David Ellis, David J. E. Marsh, Benedikt Eggemeier, Jens Niemeyer, Javier Redondo, and Klaus Dolag
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103514 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Asteroid-sized clumps of a dark matter candidate known as an axion could be detectable in a gravitational-microlensing survey.
Valentin Deliyski, Galin Gyulchev, Petya Nedkova, and Stoytcho Yazadjiev
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104024 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Predictions indicate that wormholes and black holes may have nearly identical polarized light spectra, making these astrophysical objects difficult to distinguish.
Rodrigo Fernández, Sherwood Richers, Nicole Mulyk, and Steven Fahlman
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103003 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Neutron star mergers are of tremendous astrophysical interest for a variety of reasons that include their role in initiating r-process nucleosynthesis in their ejecta. In this article, the authors tackle the complex influence of extremely rapid neutrino flavor conversion (fast flavor instability - FFI) on ejecta from accretion disks around hypermassive neutron stars (HMNSs) formed in mergers. By studying a wide variety of scenarios, the authors detail the influence of FFI and show that it depends strongly on the lifetime of the HMNS.
Marek Lewicki, Ville Vaskonen, and Hardi Veermäe
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103501 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
The authors set up a new method (proof of concept) for studying bubble wall dynamics in first-order cosmological phase transitions based on N-body simulations. The technique goes beyond commonly used perfect fluid descriptions and equilibrium assumptions. This allows e.g. the computation of the terminal bubble wall velocity, a key ingredient for determining the gravitational wave signal created in the cosmological phase transition, based on particle physics properties rather than on phenomenological fluid parameters.
Mohammed Khalil, Raissa F. P. Mendes, Néstor Ortiz, and Jan Steinhoff
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104016 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
The authors provide a model for dynamical scalarization, beyond the adiabatic approximation, using effective field theory techniques, demonstrating that the inclusion of post-adiabatic corrections is crucial. The model is agnostic, i.e., independent of a specific theory of gravity and can therefore be used even for alternative gravity theories.
Tousif Islam, Scott E. Field, Scott A. Hughes, Gaurav Khanna, Vijay Varma, Matthew Giesler, Mark A. Scheel, Lawrence E. Kidder, and Harald P. Pfeiffer
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104025 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Gravitational waveforms obtained using numerical relativity (NR) are computationally expensive and slow. Surrogate models provide an alternative to full NR by extrapolating from the point-particle regime of high-mass ratio binary waveforms calibrated to NR to much smaller mass ratios. The authors show that their methods work over a remarkable range of mass ratios of 2.5 to 10000 showing good agreement with NR simulations.
Bernardo Porto Veronese and Carsten Gundlach
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104044 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
The authors numerically study the interactions between scalar fields and gravitational waves in the context of gravitational collapse at the threshold of black hole formation in dimensions. They find evidence for the existence of a co-dimension two attractor in the dynamical systems picture.
Chiung Hwang, Sara Pasquetti, and Matteo Sacchi
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105014 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
The authors develop an algorithm for a field theoretical implementation of mirror symmetry. This is based on the so-called quiver representation of certain supersymmetric theories and is a non-abelian generalization of the piecewise dualization of three-dimensional abelian theories. Extensions of this local field-theoretic operations to non-supersymmetric theories are expected.
Tyler Gorda, Juuso Österman, and Saga Säppi
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105026 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Within the framework of the imaginary time formalism applied to systems at zero temperature but finite density, the authors investigate whether the order of integration, namely the spatial momentum integration is performed before that of the temporal momentum or vice versa, matters. They show that the former yields results consistent with those for nonzero but very low values of the temperature whilst the latter does not. They attribute this to the way the limit of the Fermi-Dirac distribution is taken as the temperature goes to zero.
S. M. Apple, S. Parry Kenyon, S. Barke, M. R. Clark, A. Y. Davila, B. C. Letson, G. Mueller, T. J. Olatunde, J. Sanjuan, O. E. Sauter, J. Siu, T. J. Sumner, P. J. Wass, and J. W. Conklin
Phys. Rev. D 106, L101101 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Ligong Bian, Jing Shu, Bo Wang, Qiang Yuan, and Junchao Zong
Phys. Rev. D 106, L101301 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Gihyuk Cho, Rafael A. Porto, and Zixin Yang
Phys. Rev. D 106, L101501 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Nemanja Kaloper and Alexander Westphal
Phys. Rev. D 106, L101701 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Jaime Alvarez-Muñiz, Ruben Conceição, Pedro J. Costa, Mário Pimenta, and Bernardo Tomé
Phys. Rev. D 106, 102001 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
R. Cervantes, G. Carosi, S. Kimes, C. Hanretty, B. H. LaRoque, G. Leum, P. Mohapatra, N. S. Oblath, R. Ottens, Y. Park, G. Rybka, J. Sinnis, and J. Yang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 102002 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
Naoki Aritomi, Yuhang Zhao, Eleonora Capocasa, Matteo Leonardi, Marc Eisenmann, Michael Page, Yuefan Guo, Eleonora Polini, Akihiro Tomura, Koji Arai, Yoichi Aso, Martin van Beuzekom, Yao-Chin Huang, Ray-Kuang Lee, Harald Lück, Osamu Miyakawa, Pierre Prat, Ayaka Shoda, Matteo Tacca, Ryutaro Takahashi, Henning Vahlbruch, Marco Vardaro, Chien-Ming Wu, Matteo Barsuglia, and Raffaele Flaminio
Phys. Rev. D 106, 102003 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Xue-Hao Zhang, Shao-Dong Zhao, Soumya D. Mohanty, and Yu-Xiao Liu
Phys. Rev. D 106, 102004 (2022) - Published 16 November, 2022
Xiaoqing Han, Xiaodong Peng, Wenlin Tang, Zhen Yang, Xiaoshan Ma, Chen Gao, Li-e Qiang, Yuzhu Zhang, Mengyuan Zhao, Jiafeng Zhang, and Binbin Liu
Phys. Rev. D 106, 102005 (2022) - Published 18 November, 2022
Derek Davis, Max Trevor, Simone Mozzon, and Laura K. Nuttall
Phys. Rev. D 106, 102006 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
Jeff Steinhauer
Phys. Rev. D 106, 102007 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 106, 102008 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Michael L. Katz, Jean-Baptiste Bayle, Alvin J. K. Chua, and Michele Vallisneri
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103001 (2022) - Published 1 November, 2022
Andrew Eberhardt, Michael Kopp, and Tom Abel
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103002 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Rodrigo Fernández, Sherwood Richers, Nicole Mulyk, and Steven Fahlman
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103003 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Neutron star mergers are of tremendous astrophysical interest for a variety of reasons that include their role in initiating r-process nucleosynthesis in their ejecta. In this article, the authors tackle the complex influence of extremely rapid neutrino flavor conversion (fast flavor instability - FFI) on ejecta from accretion disks around hypermassive neutron stars (HMNSs) formed in mergers. By studying a wide variety of scenarios, the authors detail the influence of FFI and show that it depends strongly on the lifetime of the HMNS.
J. Félix Salazar and Thomas Zannias
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103004 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Hajime Sotani and Shinsuke Ota
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103005 (2022) - Published 4 November, 2022
Tatsuya Narikawa and Nami Uchikata
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103006 (2022) - Published 4 November, 2022
Tetyana Pitik, Daniel J. Heimsoth, Anna M. Suliga, and A. Baha Balantekin
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103007 (2022) - Published 4 November, 2022
L. Brouwer et al. (DMRadio Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103008 (2022) - Published 8 November, 2022
K. Y. Kraav, M. E. Gusakov, and E. M. Kantor
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103009 (2022) - Published 7 November, 2022
John Ryan Westernacher-Schneider, Jonathan Zrake, Andrew MacFadyen, and Zoltán Haiman
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103010 (2022) - Published 8 November, 2022
Jian-He Zheng, Yi-Yun Huang, Ze-Lin Zhang, Hai-Ming Zhang, Ruo-Yu Liu, and Xiang-Yu Wang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103011 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
Andrew Cheek, Lucien Heurtier, Yuber F. Perez-Gonzalez, and Jessica Turner
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103012 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Matthew Mould, Davide Gerosa, and Stephen R. Taylor
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103013 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Shin’ichiro Ando, Nagisa Hiroshima, and Koji Ishiwata
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103014 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Ottavio Fornieri and Heshou Zhang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103015 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Nicole F. Bell, James B. Dent, Bhaskar Dutta, Jason Kumar, and Jayden L. Newstead
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103016 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Alberto Mangiagli, Chiara Caprini, Marta Volonteri, Sylvain Marsat, Susanna Vergani, Nicola Tamanini, and Henri Inchauspé
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103017 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Deeksha Beniwal, Patrick Clearwater, Liam Dunn, Lucy Strang, Gavin Rowell, Andrew Melatos, and David Ottaway
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103018 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Hui Tong, Shanika Galaudage, and Eric Thrane
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103019 (2022) - Published 16 November, 2022
Lucas Tonetto and Omar Benhar
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103020 (2022) - Published 16 November, 2022
Rui Xue, Ze-Rui Wang, and Wei-Jian Li
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103021 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Nicola Tomassetti, Bruna Bertucci, and Emanuele Fiandrini
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103022 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Márcio Ferreira, Valéria Carvalho, and Constança Providência
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103023 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Guan-Wen Yuan, Zhao-Qiang Shen, Yue-Lin Sming Tsai, Qiang Yuan, and Yi-Zhong Fan
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103024 (2022) - Published 18 November, 2022
Kyu-Hyun Chae, Federico Lelli, Harry Desmond, Stacy S. McGaugh, and James M. Schombert
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103025 (2022) - Published 21 November, 2022
André de Gouvêa, Ivan Martinez-Soler, Yuber F. Perez-Gonzalez, and Manibrata Sen
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103026 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
Atul Kedia, Hee Il Kim, In-Saeng Suh, and Grant J. Mathews
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103027 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
Chandrachur Chakraborty and Sudip Bhattacharyya
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103028 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
Lucas Johns and Zewei Xiong
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103029 (2022) - Published 23 November, 2022
Enping Zhou, Kenta Kiuchi, Masaru Shibata, Antonios Tsokaros, and Kōji Uryū
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103030 (2022) - Published 23 November, 2022
Ian Padilla-Gay, Irene Tamborra, and Georg G. Raffelt
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103031 (2022) - Published 23 November, 2022
Niccoló Bucciantini, Alessandro Drago, Giuseppe Pagliara, Silvia Traversi, and Andreas Bauswein
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103032 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Huangyu Xiao, Liang Dai, and Matthew McQuinn
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103033 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Christopher Dessert and Zachary Johnson
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103034 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Rahul Dhurkunde and Alexander H. Nitz
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103035 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Yang Jiang and Qing-Guo Huang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103036 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Dixeena Lopez, Shubhanshu Tiwari, Marco Drago, David Keitel, Claudia Lazzaro, and Giovanni Andrea Prodi
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103037 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Shu Yan Lau, Kent Yagi, and Phil Arras
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103038 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Soumya Bhattacharyya and Basudeb Dasgupta
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103039 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Xian Chen and Zhongfu Zhang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103040 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Marek Lewicki, Ville Vaskonen, and Hardi Veermäe
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103501 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
The authors set up a new method (proof of concept) for studying bubble wall dynamics in first-order cosmological phase transitions based on N-body simulations. The technique goes beyond commonly used perfect fluid descriptions and equilibrium assumptions. This allows e.g. the computation of the terminal bubble wall velocity, a key ingredient for determining the gravitational wave signal created in the cosmological phase transition, based on particle physics properties rather than on phenomenological fluid parameters.
Sobhan Kazempour, Amin Rezaei Akbarieh, and Emmanuel N. Saridakis
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103502 (2022) - Published 4 November, 2022
Guido D’Amico and Nemanja Kaloper
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103503 (2022) - Published 7 November, 2022
Zihang Wang and Lijing Shao
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103504 (2022) - Published 8 November, 2022
Kazunori Nakayama and Wen Yin
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103505 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
Eleonora Di Valentino, William Giarè, Alessandro Melchiorri, and Joseph Silk
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103506 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Julien Carron, Antony Lewis, and Giulio Fabbian
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103507 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Miguel Cruz, Samuel Lepe, and Germán E. Soto
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103508 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Georgios Valogiannis and Cora Dvorkin
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103509 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Alberto Salvio
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103510 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Chia-Min Lin
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103511 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
G. Papagiannopoulos, Spyros Basilakos, and Emmanuel N. Saridakis
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103512 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Shintaro Eijima, Osamu Seto, and Takashi Shimomura
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103513 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
David Ellis, David J. E. Marsh, Benedikt Eggemeier, Jens Niemeyer, Javier Redondo, and Klaus Dolag
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103514 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Asteroid-sized clumps of a dark matter candidate known as an axion could be detectable in a gravitational-microlensing survey.
Avirup Ghosh, Sourav Gope, and Satyanarayan Mukhopadhyay
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103515 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Robert J. Scherrer
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103516 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Helena García Escudero, Jui-Lin Kuo, Ryan E. Keeley, and Kevork N. Abazajian
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103517 (2022) - Published 16 November, 2022
H. C. Das
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103518 (2022) - Published 16 November, 2022
George Alestas, Lavrentios Kazantzidis, and Savvas Nesseris
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103519 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Gabriele Franciolini, Anshuman Maharana, and Francesco Muia
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103520 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Atsuhisa Ota
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103521 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Adrià Gómez-Valent, Ziyang Zheng, Luca Amendola, Christof Wetterich, and Valeria Pettorino
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103522 (2022) - Published 18 November, 2022
Katherine Freese and Martin Wolfgang Winkler
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103523 (2022) - Published 18 November, 2022
Daniel Cutting, Essi Vilhonen, and David J. Weir
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103524 (2022) - Published 23 November, 2022
Trey Driskell, Ethan O. Nadler, Jordan Mirocha, Andrew Benson, Kimberly K. Boddy, Timothy D. Morton, Jack Lashner, Rui An, and Vera Gluscevic
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103525 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
D. J. Bartlett, A. Kostić, H. Desmond, J. Jasche, and G. Lavaux
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103526 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Zhongxu Zhai and Will J. Percival
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103527 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Gen Ye, Jun-Qian Jiang, and Yun-Song Piao
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103528 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Tomohiro Fujita, Yuto Minami, Maresuke Shiraishi, and Shuichiro Yokoyama
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103529 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
A. Porredon et al. (DES Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103530 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Lingyuan Ji, Marc Kamionkowski, and José Luis Bernal
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103531 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Atsushi Taruya and Shohei Saga
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103532 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Kelly MacDevette, Peter Dunsby, and Saikat Chakraborty
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103533 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Gabriela Sato-Polito and José Luis Bernal
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103534 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
L. N. Barboza, G. L. L. W. Levy, L. L. Graef, and Rudnei O. Ramos
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103535 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Ramkishor Sharma and Axel Brandenburg
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103536 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Taylor M. Ordines and Eric D. Carlson
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103537 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Priti Gupta, Lorenzo Speri, Beátrice Bonga, Alvin J. K. Chua, and Takahiro Tanaka
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104001 (2022) - Published 2 November, 2022
Josu C. Aurrekoetxea, Pedro G. Ferreira, Katy Clough, Eugene A. Lim, and Oliver J. Tattersall
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104002 (2022) - Published 2 November, 2022
H. Zheng and L. F. Wei
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104003 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Hoang Ky Nguyen
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104004 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Sumit Dey and Bibhas Ranjan Majhi
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104005 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Thanasis Karakasis, George Koutsoumbas, Andri Machattou, and Eleftherios Papantonopoulos
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104006 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Donato Bini, Stuart Kauffman, Sauro Succi, and Pablo G. Tello
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104007 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Tiago V. Fernandes and José P. S. Lemos
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104008 (2022) - Published 4 November, 2022
Lorenzo Pierini and Leonardo Gualtieri
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104009 (2022) - Published 4 November, 2022
Antonios Tsokaros, Milton Ruiz, Stuart L. Shapiro, and Vasileios Paschalidis
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104010 (2022) - Published 4 November, 2022
Deog Ki Hong, Wei-Chen Lin, and Dong-han Yeom
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104011 (2022) - Published 7 November, 2022
Song Li and Wen-Biao Han
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104013 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
Michael Ebersold, Shubhanshu Tiwari, Leigh Smith, Yeong-Bok Bae, Gungwon Kang, Daniel Williams, Achamveedu Gopakumar, Ik Siong Heng, and Maria Haney
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104014 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
Pankaj Saini, Sajad A. Bhat, and K. G. Arun
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104015 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
Mohammed Khalil, Raissa F. P. Mendes, Néstor Ortiz, and Jan Steinhoff
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104016 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
The authors provide a model for dynamical scalarization, beyond the adiabatic approximation, using effective field theory techniques, demonstrating that the inclusion of post-adiabatic corrections is crucial. The model is agnostic, i.e., independent of a specific theory of gravity and can therefore be used even for alternative gravity theories.
Ethan Payne, Sophie Hourihane, Jacob Golomb, Rhiannon Udall, Derek Davis, and Katerina Chatziioannou
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104017 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
Asad Hussain and Aaron Zimmerman
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104018 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
Iain Davies and Harvey S. Reall
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104019 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
B. N. Jayawiguna, I. Prasetyo, A. Sulaksono, and H. S. Ramadhan
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104020 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Cailin Plunkett, Sophie Hourihane, and Katerina Chatziioannou
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104021 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
David Kofroň and Petr Kotlařík
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104022 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Víctor Jaramillo and Darío Núñez
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104023 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Valentin Deliyski, Galin Gyulchev, Petya Nedkova, and Stoytcho Yazadjiev
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104024 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Predictions indicate that wormholes and black holes may have nearly identical polarized light spectra, making these astrophysical objects difficult to distinguish.
Tousif Islam, Scott E. Field, Scott A. Hughes, Gaurav Khanna, Vijay Varma, Matthew Giesler, Mark A. Scheel, Lawrence E. Kidder, and Harald P. Pfeiffer
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104025 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Gravitational waveforms obtained using numerical relativity (NR) are computationally expensive and slow. Surrogate models provide an alternative to full NR by extrapolating from the point-particle regime of high-mass ratio binary waveforms calibrated to NR to much smaller mass ratios. The authors show that their methods work over a remarkable range of mass ratios of 2.5 to 10000 showing good agreement with NR simulations.
M. Cvetič, C. N. Pope, B. F. Whiting, and Haoyu Zhang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104026 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Daniela D. Doneva, Lucas G. Collodel, and Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104027 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Saeedeh Sadeghian
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104028 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Lucy M. Thomas, Geraint Pratten, and Patricia Schmidt
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104029 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Kamal Hajian, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and Bayram Tekin
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104030 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Leor Barack and Oliver Long
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104031 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Samanwaya Mukherjee, Sayak Datta, Srishti Tiwari, Khun Sang Phukon, and Sukanta Bose
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104032 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
João P. B. Brito, Rafael P. Bernar, and Luís C. B. Crispino
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104033 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Alexandre Toubiana, Stanislav Babak, Sylvain Marsat, and Sergei Ossokine
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104034 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Alessandro Ciarfella, James Healy, Carlos O. Lousto, and Hiroyuki Nakano
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104035 (2022) - Published 16 November, 2022
Nils A. Nilsson
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104036 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Daniel J. Vickers and Gregory B. Cook
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104037 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Philip Beltracchi
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104038 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Ran Li and Jin Wang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104039 (2022) - Published 18 November, 2022
Barak Rom and Re’em Sari
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104040 (2022) - Published 18 November, 2022
Constantinos Skordis and Tom Zlosnik
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104041 (2022) - Published 18 November, 2022
Pan-Pan Wang, Wei-Liang Qian, Han-Zhong Wu, Yu-Jie Tan, and Cheng-Gang Shao
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104042 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
Yang Huang and Zhoujian Cao
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104043 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
Bernardo Porto Veronese and Carsten Gundlach
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104044 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
The authors numerically study the interactions between scalar fields and gravitational waves in the context of gravitational collapse at the threshold of black hole formation in dimensions. They find evidence for the existence of a co-dimension two attractor in the dynamical systems picture.
Philip Relton, Andrea Virtuoso, Sophie Bini, Vivien Raymond, Ian Harry, Marco Drago, Claudia Lazzaro, Andrea Miani, and Shubhanshu Tiwari
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104045 (2022) - Published 23 November, 2022
Yi Wang and Jie Ren
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104046 (2022) - Published 23 November, 2022
Oscar Fuentealba, Marc Henneaux, Patricio Salgado-Rebolledo, and Jakob Salzer
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104047 (2022) - Published 23 November, 2022
João C. Lobato, Isabela S. Matos, Maurício O. Calvão, and Ioav Waga
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104048 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
O. S. Stashko and V. I. Zhdanov
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104049 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Mohsen Khodadi and Gaetano Lambiase
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104050 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Alvin J. K. Chua
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104051 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Sven Zschocke
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104052 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Naresh Adhikari and Soichiro Morisaki
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104053 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Karina Calhoun, Brendan Fay, and Ben Kain
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104054 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
William E. East and Frans Pretorius
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104055 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Adam Cieślik, Patryk Mach, and Andrzej Odrzywołek
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104056 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Indranil Chakraborty, Soumya Bhattacharya, and Sumanta Chakraborty
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104057 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Yves Brihaye, Felipe Console, and Betti Hartmann
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104058 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Sean E. Li, Thomas W. Baumgarte, Kenneth A. Dennison, and H. P. de Oliveira
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104059 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Edgardo Franzin, Stefano Liberati, Jacopo Mazza, and Vania Vellucci
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104060 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Carlo Rovelli
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104062 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
B. Steltner, T. Menne, M. A. Papa, and H.-B. Eggenstein
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104063 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Kalin V. Staykov and Daniela D. Doneva
Phys. Rev. D 106, 104064 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Héctor Maeso-García, José Polo-Gómez, and Eduardo Martín-Martínez
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105001 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
M. Herrero-Valea, A. S. Koshelev, and A. Tokareva
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105002 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
M. Lencsés, G. Mussardo, and G. Takács
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105003 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Naoki Yamamoto and Ryo Yokokura
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105004 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Taegyu Kim and Sunyoung Shin
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105005 (2022) - Published 7 November, 2022
Ken-ichi Nakao, Kazumasa Okabayashi, and Tomohiro Harada
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105006 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Keiichiro Furuya, Nima Lashkari, and Mudassir Moosa
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105007 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Brando Bellazzini, Marc Riembau, and Francesco Riva
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105008 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Yurii A. Sitenko, Volodymyr M. Gorkavenko, and Maria S. Tsarenkova
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105010 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
N. P. Meshcheriakov, V. V. Shatalova, and K. V. Stepanyantz
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105011 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Joydeep Chakrabortty, Diptarka Das, Bidyut Dey, Suraj Prakash, and Shakeel Ur Rahaman
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105012 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
H. Arthur Weldon
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105013 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Chiung Hwang, Sara Pasquetti, and Matteo Sacchi
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105014 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
The authors develop an algorithm for a field theoretical implementation of mirror symmetry. This is based on the so-called quiver representation of certain supersymmetric theories and is a non-abelian generalization of the piecewise dualization of three-dimensional abelian theories. Extensions of this local field-theoretic operations to non-supersymmetric theories are expected.
Stefan Ðorđević, Aleksandra Gočanin, Dragoljub Gočanin, and Voja Radovanović
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105015 (2022) - Published 18 November, 2022
Fabrizio Canfora, Diego Hidalgo, Marcela Lagos, Enzo Meneses, and Aldo Vera
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105016 (2022) - Published 21 November, 2022
Hank Chen and Florian Girelli
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105017 (2022) - Published 21 November, 2022
Mariana Carrillo González, Claudia de Rham, Victor Pozsgay, and Andrew J. Tolley
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105018 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
L. L. Salcedo
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105019 (2022) - Published 22 November, 2022
Haocong Zheng, Yiwen Pan, and Yufan Wang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105020 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Anthony J. Brady, Ivan Agullo, and Dimitrios Kranas
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105021 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
N. Ahmadiniaz, S. A. Franchino-Viñas, L. Manzo, and F. D. Mazzitelli
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105022 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Shovon Biswas and Gordon W. Semenoff
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105023 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Fabien Buisseret and Yves Brihaye
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105024 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Ashmita Das and Bibhas Ranjan Majhi
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105025 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Tyler Gorda, Juuso Österman, and Saga Säppi
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105026 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Within the framework of the imaginary time formalism applied to systems at zero temperature but finite density, the authors investigate whether the order of integration, namely the spatial momentum integration is performed before that of the temporal momentum or vice versa, matters. They show that the former yields results consistent with those for nonzero but very low values of the temperature whilst the latter does not. They attribute this to the way the limit of the Fermi-Dirac distribution is taken as the temperature goes to zero.
C. Adam, K. Oles, T. Romanczukiewicz, and A. Wereszczynski
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105027 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Yuebing Zhou, Jiawei Hu, and Hongwei Yu
Phys. Rev. D 106, 105028 (2022) - Published 30 November, 2022
Takeshi Morita
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106001 (2022) - Published 3 November, 2022
Yidian Chen, Danning Li, and Mei Huang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106002 (2022) - Published 9 November, 2022
Mirjam Cvetič, Jonathan J. Heckman, Max Hübner, and Ethan Torres
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106003 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Yoshiyasu Ito, Daisuke Kadoh, and Yuki Sato
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106004 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Matías N. Sempé and Guillermo A. Silva
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106005 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Muhammad F. A. R. Sakti and Piyabut Burikham
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106006 (2022) - Published 10 November, 2022
Ichiro Oda and Philipp Saake
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106007 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Marina David and James T. Liu
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106008 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Przemysław Bieniek, Jan Chojnacki, Jan H. Kwapisz, and Krzysztof A. Meissner
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106009 (2022) - Published 15 November, 2022
Wenhe Cai, Sizheng Cao, Xian-Hui Ge, Masataka Matsumoto, and Sang-Jin Sin
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106010 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Erik Verlinde and Kathryn M. Zurek
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106011 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Stephon Alexander, Tatsuya Daniel, Marcell Howard, and Morgane König
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106012 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Petr Hořava and Christopher J. Mogni
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106013 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Petr Hořava and Christopher J. Mogni
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106014 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Ran Li and Jin Wang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106015 (2022) - Published 18 November, 2022
Masooma Ali and Sebastian Steinhaus
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106016 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Chanyong Park, Chi-Ok Hwang, Kyungchan Cho, and Se-Jin Kim
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106017 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Budhaditya Bhattacharjee and Chethan Krishnan
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106018 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
A. Yung
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106019 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
George Barnes, Adrian Padellaro, and Sanjaye Ramgoolam
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106020 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Monica Jinwoo Kang, Craig Lawrie, Ki-Hong Lee, Matteo Sacchi, and Jaewon Song
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106021 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
Yannick Kluth and Daniel F. Litim
Phys. Rev. D 106, 106022 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022
João Paulo M. Pitelli, Ricardo A. Mosna, Christyan C. de Oliveira, and Mauricio Richartz
Phys. Rev. D 106, 108501 (2022) - Published 14 November, 2022
Zheng-Liang Liang, Chongjie Mo, Fawei Zheng, and Ping Zhang
Phys. Rev. D 106, 109901 (2022) - Published 7 November, 2022
Mario Pitschmann
Phys. Rev. D 106, 109902 (2022) - Published 17 November, 2022
Michael E. Tobar, Ben T. McAllister, and Maxim Goryachev
Phys. Rev. D 106, 109903 (2022) - Published 29 November, 2022
Jackson Olsen and Yong-Zhong Qian
Phys. Rev. D 106, 109904 (2022) - Published 28 November, 2022