- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Optical and orbital characterization of spherically symmetric static black holes of self-gravitating new nonlinear electrodynamics model

İlim İrfan Çimdiker1,2,*, Ali Övgün3,†, and Yosef Verbin2,‡

  • *Contact author: ilim.cimdiker@phd.usz.edu.pl
  • †Contact author: ali.ovgun@emu.edu.tr
  • ‡Contact author: verbin@openu.ac.il
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 024032 – Published 13 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p6lp-rktr

Abstract

Horizon-scale imaging and precision lensing have turned black holes into quantitative laboratories for strong gravity and for nonstandard electromagnetic physics. We study the optical appearance and orbital dynamics of a new class of static spherically symmetric black holes sourced by a Palatini-inspired nonlinear electrodynamics model, minimally coupled to Einstein-Hilbert gravity. Using a unified geodesic analysis, we identify the key radii that organize the strong-field phenomenology. For photons we determine the unstable photon sphere, the associated critical capture threshold, and the resulting shadow size for a distant observer, and we map how these observables respond to the charge and to the nonlinearity index n. For massive probes we compute circular orbits and the innermost stable circular orbit, clarifying the departure from the Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström cases. We then connect to classical tests by evaluating the light deflection angle and periastron advance, providing additional diagnostics that complement the shadow. Our results furnish a practical reference model for confronting first-order nonlinear electrodynamics black holes with current and forthcoming imaging and lensing data.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (76)

  1. R. Abuter et al. (GRAVITY Collaboration), Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole, Astron. Astrophys. 636, L5 (2020).
  2. K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019).
  3. K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022).
  4. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, Testing the no-hair theorem with observations in the electromagnetic spectrum: II. Black-hole images, Astrophys. J. 718, 446 (2010).
  5. A. E. Broderick, T. Johannsen, A. Loeb, and D. Psaltis, Testing the no-hair theorem with Event Horizon Telescope observations of Sagittarius A*, Astrophys. J. 784, 7 (2014).
  6. T. Johannsen, A. E. Broderick, P. M. Plewa, S. Chatzopoulos, S. S. Doeleman, F. Eisenhauer, V. L. Fish, R. Genzel, O. Gerhard, and M. D. Johnson, Testing general relativity with the shadow size of Sgr A*, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 031101 (2016).
  7. C. Bambi, Testing black hole candidates with electromagnetic radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025001 (2017).
  8. Z. Younsi, A. Zhidenko, L. Rezzolla, R. Konoplya, and Y. Mizuno, New method for shadow calculations: Application to parametrized axisymmetric black holes, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084025 (2016).
  9. A. Grenzebach, V. Perlick, and C. Lämmerzahl, Photon regions and shadows of Kerr-Newman-NUT black holes with a cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D 89, 124004 (2014).
  10. R. A. Hennigar, M. B. J. Poshteh, and R. B. Mann, Shadows, signals, and stability in Einsteinian cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 97, 064041 (2018).
  11. X.-M. Kuang, Z.-Y. Tang, B. Wang, and A. Wang, Constraining a modified gravity theory in strong gravitational lensing and black hole shadow observations, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064012 (2022).
  12. T. Bronzwaer and H. Falcke, The nature of black hole shadows, Astrophys. J. 920, 155 (2021).
  13. S. Vagnozzi, C. Bambi, and L. Visinelli, Concerns regarding the use of black hole shadows as standard rulers, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 087001 (2020).
  14. Y. Chen, R. Roy, S. Vagnozzi, and L. Visinelli, Superradiant evolution of the shadow and photon ring of Sgr A*, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043021 (2022).
  15. R. C. Pantig and A. Övgün, Gravitational black hole shadow spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 112, 124072 (2025).
  16. H. C. D. Lima, Junior., L. C. B. Crispino, P. V. P. Cunha, and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Can different black holes cast the same shadow?, Phys. Rev. D 103, 084040 (2021).
  17. S. Boyeneni, J. Wu, and E. R. Most, Unveiling the electrodynamic nature of spacetime collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101401 (2025).
  18. J. L. Synge, The escape of photons from gravitationally intense stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 131, 463 (1966).
  19. V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies, Phys. Rep. 947, 1 (2022).
  20. P. V. P. Cunha and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: A brief review, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 50, 42 (2018).
  21. V. Bozza, Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103001 (2002).
  22. K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, Schwarzschild black hole lensing, Phys. Rev. D 62, 084003 (2000).
  23. C.-M. Claudel, K. S. Virbhadra, and G. F. R. Ellis, The geometry of photon surfaces, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 818 (2001).
  24. K. S. Virbhadra, Relativistic images of Schwarzschild black hole lensing, Phys. Rev. D 79, 083004 (2009).
  25. S. Capozziello, E. Battista, and S. De Bianchi, Null geodesics, causal structure, and matter accretion in Lorentzian-Euclidean black holes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044009 (2025).
  26. S. E. Gralla, D. E. Holz, and R. M. Wald, Black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings, Phys. Rev. D 100, 024018 (2019).
  27. G. Lambiase, D. J. Gogoi, R. C. Pantig, and A. Övgün, Shadow and quasinormal modes of the rotating Einstein–Euler–Heisenberg black holes, Phys. Dark Universe 48, 101886 (2025).
  28. A. Uniyal, S. Chakrabarti, R. C. Pantig, and A. Övgün, Nonlinearly charged black holes: Shadow and thin-accretion disk, New Astron. 111, 102249 (2024).
  29. M. Born and L. Infeld, Foundations of the new field theory, Proc. R. Soc. A 144, 425 (1934).
  30. H. Euler and B. Kockel, The scattering of light by light in Dirac’s theory, Naturwiss 23, 246 (1933).
  31. W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons, Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936).
  32. D. P. Sorokin, Introductory Notes on non-linear electrodynamics and its applications, Fortschr. Phys. 70, 2200092 (2022).
  33. M. Novello, S. E. Perez Bergliaffa, and J. M. Salim, Singularities in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 3821 (2000).
  34. G. W. Gibbons and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Born-Infeld theory and stringy causality, Phys. Rev. D 63, 064006 (2001).
  35. H. A. Gonzalez, M. Hassaine, and C. Martinez, Thermodynamics of charged black holes with a nonlinear electrodynamics source, Phys. Rev. D 80, 104008 (2009).
  36. B. Toshmatov, Z. Stuchlík, J. Schee, and B. Ahmedov, Electromagnetic perturbations of black holes in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 97, 084058 (2018).
  37. J. Bardeen, Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity (Pub. House of Tbilisi University, Tbilisi, Georgia, 1968), p. 87.
  38. S. Hayward, Formation and evaporation of regular black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 031103 (2006).
  39. E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5056 (1998).
  40. E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole, Phys. Lett. B 493, 149 (2000).
  41. E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, New regular black hole solution from nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 464, 25 (1999).
  42. K. A. Bronnikov, Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 63, 044005 (2001).
  43. I. Dymnikova, Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 4417 (2004).
  44. L. Balart and E. C. Vagenas, Regular black holes with a nonlinear electrodynamics source, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124045 (2014).
  45. Z.-Y. Fan and X. Wang, Construction of regular black holes in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 94, 124027 (2016).
  46. K. A. Bronnikov, Comment on, “Construction of regular black holes in general relativity”, Phys. Rev. D 96, 128501 (2017).
  47. B. Toshmatov, Z. Stuchlík, and B. Ahmedov, Comment on “Construction of regular black holes in general relativity”, Phys. Rev. D 98, 028501 (2018).
  48. M. Hassaine and C. Martinez, Higher-dimensional charged black holes solutions with a nonlinear electrodynamics source, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 195023 (2008).
  49. H. Maeda, M. Hassaine, and C. Martinez, Lovelock black holes with a nonlinear Maxwell field, Phys. Rev. D 79, 044012 (2009).
  50. M. Cataldo and A. Garcia, Three dimensional black hole coupled to the Born-Infeld electrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 456, 28 (1999).
  51. M. Cataldo and A. Garcia, Regular (2+1)-dimensional black holes within nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 61, 084003 (2000).
  52. G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, Electric—magnetic duality rotations in nonlinear electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B454, 185 (1995).
  53. G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, Sl(2,R) invariance of nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to an axion and a dilaton, Phys. Lett. B 365, 46 (1996).
  54. M. Novello, V. A. De Lorenci, J. M. Salim, and R. Klippert, Geometrical aspects of light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 61, 045001 (2000).
  55. V. A. De Lorenci, R. Klippert, M. Novello, and J. M. Salim, Light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 482, 134 (2000).
  56. E. F. Eiroa, Gravitational lensing by Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes, Phys. Rev. D 73, 043002 (2006).
  57. V. Perlick, O. Y. Tsupko, and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole, Phys. Rev. D 92, 104031 (2015).
  58. S. G. Ghosh, A nonsingular rotating black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 532 (2015).
  59. B. Toshmatov, Z. Stuchlík, and B. Ahmedov, Generic rotating regular black holes in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084037 (2017).
  60. I. Dymnikova and E. Galaktionov, Regular rotating electrically charged black holes and solitons in non-linear electrodynamics minimally coupled to gravity, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 165015 (2015).
  61. R. Kumar, A. Kumar, and S. G. Ghosh, Testing rotating regular metrics as candidates for astrophysical black holes, Astrophys. J. 896, 89 (2020).
  62. B. Toshmatov, B. Ahmedov, and D. Malafarina, Can a light ray distinguish charge of a black hole in nonlinear electrodynamics?, Phys. Rev. D 103, 024026 (2021).
  63. K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. VI. The shadow and mass of the central black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L6 (2019).
  64. P. Kocherlakota et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Constraints on black-hole charges with the 2017 EHT observations of M87*, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104047 (2021).
  65. S. Vagnozzi et al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 165007 (2023).
  66. A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi, and D. F. Mota, Magnetically charged black holes from non-linear electrodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2020) 003.
  67. M. Okyay and A. Övgün, Nonlinear electrodynamics effects on the black hole shadow, deflection angle, quasinormal modes and greybody factors, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2022) 009.
  68. A. Uniyal, R. C. Pantig, and A. Övgün, Probing a non-linear electrodynamics black hole with thin accretion disk, shadow, and deflection angle with M87* and Sgr A* from EHT, Phys. Dark Universe 40, 101178 (2023).
  69. G. J. Olmo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Palatini f(R) black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 84, 124059 (2011).
  70. M. E. Rodrigues, E. L. B. Junior, G. T. Marques, and V. T. Zanchin, Regular black holes in f(R) gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 94, 024062 (2016); 94, 049904(A) (2016).
  71. M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de Sousa Silva, Bardeen regular black hole with an electric source, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2018) 025.
  72. W. Berej, J. Matyjasek, D. Tryniecki, and M. Woronowicz, Regular black holes in quadratic gravity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38, 885 (2006).
  73. S. Capozziello, S. De Bianchi, and E. Battista, Avoiding singularities in Lorentzian-Euclidean black holes: The role of atemporality, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104060 (2024).
  74. S. Rasanen and Y. Verbin, Palatini formulation for gauge theory: Implications for slow-roll inflation, Open J. Astrophys. 6 (2023).
  75. Y. Verbin, B. Pulice, A. Övgün, and H. Huang, New black hole solutions of second and first order formulations of nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084061 (2025).
  76. J. Plebanski, Lectures on Non-Linear Electrodynamics (Nordita, Copenhagen, 1970).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 024032– Published 13 July, 2026
  • Received 17 March 2026
  • Accepted 18 June 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation