Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Transmission coefficients from phantom currents

Yuma Furuta1,*, Yuya Kusuki1,2,3,†, and Toshiki Onagi4,‡

  • *Contact author: furuta.yuma@phys.kyushu-u.ac.jp
  • Contact author: kusuki.yuya@phys.kyushu-u.ac.jp
  • Contact author: toshiki.onagi@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 113, 045008 – Published 10 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fdfb-tkz4

Abstract

A representative quantity that characterizes the dynamics of conformal interfaces is the transmission coefficient, which is defined through correlation functions of the stress tensor. Typically, this coefficient is complicated and highly dependent on its details. In this work, we introduce a new perspective based on the notion of a “phantom current”. We have shown that a spin-2 phantom current arising from the folding trick determines the transmission coefficient. As a result, our framework provides a unified explanation of known results in minimal models and the free boson, while also yielding concrete predictions for previously unexplored interfaces.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. T. Quella, I. Runkel, and G. M. T. Watts, Reflection and transmission for conformal defects, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2007) 095.
  2. I. Brunner and C. Schmidt-Colinet, Reflection and transmission of conformal perturbation defects, J. Phys. A 49, 195401 (2016).
  3. M. Meineri, J. Penedones, and A. Rousset, Colliders and conformal interfaces, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 138.
  4. C. Bachas, S. Chapman, D. Ge, and G. Policastro, Energy reflection and transmission at 2D holographic interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 231602 (2020).
  5. C. Bachas, S. Baiguera, S. Chapman, G. Policastro, and T. Schwartzman, Energy transport for thick holographic branes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 021601 (2023).
  6. A. Karch, Y. Kusuki, H. Ooguri, H.-Y. Sun, and M. Wang, Universal bound on effective central charge and its saturation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 091604 (2024).
  7. Y. Liu and C.-Y. Wang, Energy transport in holographic junctions, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 205.
  8. K. Sakai and Y. Satoh, Entanglement through conformal interfaces, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2008) 001.
  9. P. Calabrese, M. Mintchev, and E. Vicari, Entanglement entropy of quantum wire junctions, J. Phys. A 45, 105206 (2012).
  10. E. M. Brehm and I. Brunner, Entanglement entropy through conformal interfaces in the 2D Ising model, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 080.
  11. X. Wen, Y. Wang, and S. Ryu, Entanglement evolution across a conformal interface, J. Phys. A 51, 195004 (2018).
  12. A. Karch, Y. Kusuki, H. Ooguri, H.-Y. Sun, and M. Wang, Universality of effective central charge in interface CFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 126.
  13. Q. Tang, Z. Wei, Y. Tang, X. Wen, and W. Zhu, Universal entanglement signatures of interface conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. B 109, L041104 (2024).
  14. S. A. Baig, A. Karch, and M. Wang, Transmission coefficient of super-Janus solution, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 235.
  15. R. Barad, Q. Tang, and X. Wen, Dissipation meets conformal interface: How the relaxation rate is suppressed, Phys. Rev. B 112, 235143 (2025).
  16. E. Afxonidis, I. Carreño Bolla, C. Hoyos, and A. Karch, Connecting boundary entropy and effective central charge at holographic interfaces, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 011.
  17. D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 172.
  18. S.-H. Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: Tasi lectures on non-invertible symmetries, arXiv:2308.00747.
  19. T. Azeyanagi, A. Karch, T. Takayanagi, and E. G. Thompson, Holographic calculation of boundary entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2008) 054.
  20. T. Takayanagi, Holographic dual of BCFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 101602 (2011).
  21. M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi, and E. Tonni, Aspects of AdS/BCFT, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2011) 043.
  22. M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Defect lines in the Ising model and boundary states on orbifolds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2604 (1996).
  23. M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional Ising model with a defect line, Nucl. Phys. B495, 533 (1997).
  24. C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf, and H. Ooguri, Permeable conformal walls and holography, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2002) 027.
  25. M. Billò, V. Gonçalves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri, Defects in conformal field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 091.
  26. I. Affleck and Andreas W. W. Ludwig, Universal noninteger ‘ground state degeneracy’ in critical quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 161 (1991).
  27. D. Gaiotto, Domain walls for two-dimensional renormalization group flows, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2012) 103.
  28. G. Poghosyan and H. Poghosyan, RG domain wall for the n=1 minimal superconformal models, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 043.
  29. E. Wong and I. Affleck, Tunneling in quantum wires: A boundary conformal field theory approach, arXiv:cond-mat/9311040.
  30. A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, Defect conformal manifolds from phantom (non-invertible) symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 211602 (2025).
  31. A. B. Zamolodchikov, Renormalization group and perturbation theory near fixed points in two-dimensional field theory, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 46, 1090 (1987), https://inspirehep.net/literature/257015.
  32. E. P. Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2D conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B300, 360 (1988).
  33. T. Tanaka and Y. Nakayama, Infinitely many new renormalization group flows between virasoro minimal models from non-invertible symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 137.
  34. F. Ambrosino and S. Negro, Minimal models RG flows: Non-invertible symmetries and non-perturbative description, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 021602 (2025).
  35. F. K. Popov and Y. Wang, Factorizing defects from generalized pinning fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 201601 (2025).
  36. M. J. Martins, Renormalization group trajectories from resonance factorized S-matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2461 (1992).
  37. M. J. Martins, Exact resonance A-D-E S-matrices and their renormalization group trajectories, Nucl. Phys. B394, 339 (1993).
  38. C. Bachas, I. Brunner, and D. Roggenkamp, A worldsheet extension of O(d,d; Z). J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 039.
  39. C. Bachas and I. Brunner, Fusion of conformal interfaces, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 085.
  40. P. Kravchuk, A. Radcliffe, and R. Sinha, Effective theory for fusion of conformal defects, J. Phys. A 58, 465402 (2025).
  41. O. Diatlyk, H. Khanchandani, F. K. Popov, and Y. Wang, Defect fusion and Casimir energy in higher dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 006.
  42. C. Bachas, I. Brunner, and D. Roggenkamp, Fusion of critical defect lines in the 2D Ising model, J. Stat. Mech. (2013) P08008.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation