Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Environment dependence of the growth of the most massive objects in the Universe

Krzysztof Bolejko*

Jan J. Ostrowski

  • School of Natural Sciences, College of Sciences and Engineering, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 37, Hobart TAS 7001 and Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, A28, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

  • National Centre for Nuclear Research, 00-681 Warszawa, Poland and Université de Lyon, Ens de Lyon, Université Lyon1, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon UMR 5574, 69007, Lyon, France

  • *krzysztof.bolejko@utas.edu.au

Phys. Rev. D 99, 124036 – Published 25 June, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.124036

Abstract

This paper investigates the growth of the most massive cosmological objects. We utilize the Simsilun simulation, which is based on the approximation of the silent universe. In the limit of spatial homogeneity and isotropy, the silent universes reduce to the standard Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker models. We show that within the approximation of the silent universe the formation of the most massive cosmological objects differs from the standard background-dependent approaches. For objects with masses above 1015M, the effect of spatial curvature (overdense regions are characterized by positive spatial curvature) leads to measurable effects. The effect is analogous to the effect that the background cosmological model has on the formation of these objects (i.e., the higher the matter density and spatial curvature, the faster the growth of cosmic structures). We measure this by means of the mass function and show that the mass function obtained from the Simsilun simulation has a higher amplitude at the high-mass end compared to a standard mass function such as the Press-Schechter or the Tinker mass function. For comparison, we find that the expected mass of most massive objects using the Tinker mass function is 4.40.6+0.8×1015M, whereas for the Simsilun simulation it is 6.30.8+1.0×1015M.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. S. Matarrese, O. Pantano, and D. Saez, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1311 (1993).
  2. S. Matarrese, O. Pantano, and D. Saez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 320 (1994).
  3. M. Bruni, S. Matarrese, and O. Pantano, Astrophys. J. 445, 958 (1995).
  4. H. van Elst, C. Uggla, W. M. Lesame, G. F. R. Ellis, and R. Maartens, Classical Quantum Gravity 14, 1151 (1997).
  5. K. Bolejko, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 024003 (2018).
  6. G. F. R. Ellis, Relativistic cosmology, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course 47: General relativity and cosmology, edited by R. K. Sachs (Academic Press, New York and London, 1971), pp. 104–182.
  7. G. F. R. Ellis, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 41, 581 (2009).
  8. R. Maartens, W. M. Lesame, and G. F. R. Ellis, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5219 (1997).
  9. R. A. Sussman and K. Bolejko, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 065018 (2012).
  10. W. H. Press and P. Schechter, Astrophys. J. 187, 425 (1974).
  11. R. K. Sheth and G. Tormen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 329, 61 (2002).
  12. O. Lahav and Y. Suto, Living Rev. Relativity 7, 8 (2004).
  13. W. A. Watson, I. T. Iliev, A. D’Aloisio, A. Knebe, P. R. Shapiro, and G. Yepes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 433, 1230 (2013).
  14. S. G. Murray, C. Power, and A. S. G. Robotham, Astron. Comput. 3, 23 (2013).
  15. J. Tinker, A. V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, K. Abazajian, M. Warren, G. Yepes, S. Gottlöber, and D. E. Holz, Astrophys. J. 688, 709 (2008).
  16. D. J. Eisenstein and W. Hu, Astrophys. J. 496, 605 (1998).
  17. P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016).
  18. D. E. Holz and S. Perlmutter, Astrophys. J. 755, L36 (2012).
  19. V. Desjacques, D. Jeong, and F. Schmidt, Phys. Rep. 733, 1 (2018).
  20. G. F. R. Ellis and W. R. Stoeger, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1527 (2009).
  21. C. Sifón, F. Menanteau, M. Hasselfield, T. A. Marriage, J. P. Hughes, L. F. Barrientos, J. González, L. Infante, G. E. Addison, A. J. Baker et al., Astrophys. J. 772, 25 (2013).
  22. S. Bardelli, E. Zucca, G. Zamorani, L. Moscardini, and R. Scaramella, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 312, 540 (2000).
  23. C. J. Ragone, H. Muriel, D. Proust, A. Reisenegger, and H. Quintana, Astron. Astrophys. 445, 819 (2006).
  24. D. Proust, H. Quintana, E. R. Carrasco, A. Reisenegger, E. Slezak, H. Muriel, R. Dünner, L. Sodré, Jr., M. J. Drinkwater, Q. A. Parker et al., Astron. Astrophys. 447, 133 (2006).
  25. R. K. Sheth and A. Diaferio, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 417, 2938 (2011).
  26. K. Bolejko and C. Hellaby, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 1771 (2008).
  27. T. Buchert and M. Ostermann, Phys. Rev. D 86, 023520 (2012).
  28. T. Buchert, C. Nayet, and A. Wiegand, Phys. Rev. D 87, 123503 (2013).
  29. A. Alles, T. Buchert, F. Al Roumi, and A. Wiegand, Phys. Rev. D 92, 023512 (2015).
  30. F. Al Roumi, T. Buchert, and A. Wiegand, Phys. Rev. D 96, 123538 (2017).
  31. B. F. Roukema, Astron. Astrophys. 610, A51 (2018).
  32. L. Amendola, S. Appleby, D. Bacon, T. Baker, M. Baldi, N. Bartolo, A. Blanchard, C. Bonvin, S. Borgani, E. Branchini et al., Living Rev. Relativity 16, 6 (2013).
  33. A. Merloni, P. Predehl, W. Becker, H. Böhringer, T. Boller, H. Brunner, M. Brusa, K. Dennerl, M. Freyberg, P. Friedrich et al., arXiv:1209.3114.
  34. D. Foreman-Mackey, J. Open Source Software, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.45906 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation