Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Monochromatic dark neutrinos and boosted dark matter in noble liquid direct detection

David McKeen and Nirmal Raj

  • TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2A3, Canada

Phys. Rev. D 99, 103003 – Published 13 May, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.103003

Abstract

If dark matter self-annihilates into neutrinos or a second component of (“boosted”) dark matter that is nucleophilic, the annihilation products may be detected with high rates via coherent nuclear scattering. A future multi-ten-tonne liquid xenon detector such as DARWIN, and a multi-hundred-tonne liquid argon detector, argo, would be sensitive to the flux of these particles in complementary ranges of 10–1000 MeV dark matter masses. We derive these sensitivities after accounting for atmospheric and diffuse supernova neutrino backgrounds, and realistic nuclear recoil acceptances. We find that their constraints on the dark neutrino flux may surpass neutrino detectors such as Super-Kamiokande, and that they would extensively probe parametric regions that explain the missing satellites problem in neutrino portal models. The XENON1T and Borexino experiments currently restrict the effective baryonic coupling of thermal boosted dark matter to 10100× the weak interaction, but darwin and argo would probe down to couplings 10 times smaller. Detection of boosted dark matter with baryonic couplings 103102× the weak coupling could indicate that the dark matter density profile in the centers of galactic halos become cored, rather than cuspy, through annihilations. This work demonstrates that, alongside liquid xenon, liquid argon direct detection technology would emerge a major player in dark matter searches within and beyond the wimp paradigm.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (89)

  1. J. F. Beacom, N. F. Bell, and G. D. Mack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 231301 (2007).
  2. H. Yuksel, S. Horiuchi, J. F. Beacom, and S. Ando, Phys. Rev. D 76, 123506 (2007).
  3. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2016) 027.
  4. D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), arXiv:1509.02910.
  5. J. Aalbers et al. (DARWIN Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2016) 017.
  6. C. E. Aalseth et al., Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 131 (2018).
  7. https://indico.in2p3.fr/event/17777/, http://deap3600.ca/deap-50t-detector/, https://goo.gl/re849A.
  8. J. Bramante, B. Broerman, R. F. Lang, and N. Raj, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083516 (2018).
  9. A. Olivares-Del Campo, C. Boehm, S. Palomares-Ruiz, and S. Pascoli, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075039 (2018).
  10. K. Abe et al. (XMASS Collaboration), Astropart. Phys. 89, 51 (2017).
  11. R. F. Lang, C. McCabe, S. Reichard, M. Selvi, and I. Tamborra, Phys. Rev. D 94, 103009 (2016).
  12. M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. D 98, 034025 (2018).
  13. T. Kozynets, S. Fallows, and C. B. Krauss, Astropart. Phys. 105, 25 (2019).
  14. M. Schumann, L. Baudis, L. Bütikofer, A. Kish, and M. Selvi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2015) 016.
  15. D. Franco et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2016) 017.
  16. D. G. Cerdeo, M. Fairbairn, T. Jubb, P. A. N. Machado, A. C. Vincent, and C. Bhm, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 118; 09 (2016) 48.
  17. J. L. Newstead, L. E. Strigari, and R. F. Lang, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043006 (2019).
  18. G. B. Gelmini, V. Takhistov, and S. J. Witte, arXiv:1812.05550.
  19. Y. Cui, M. Pospelov, and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. D 97, 103004 (2018).
  20. J. F. Cherry, M. T. Frandsen, and I. M. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 231303 (2015).
  21. B. Bertoni, S. Ipek, D. McKeen, and A. E. Nelson, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 170.
  22. B. Batell, T. Han, and B. Shams Es Haghi, Phys. Rev. D 97, 095020 (2018).
  23. B. Batell, T. Han, D. McKeen, and B. S. E. Haghi, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075016 (2018).
  24. G. Belanger and J. C. Park, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2012) 038.
  25. J. Huang and Y. Zhao, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 077.
  26. K. Agashe, Y. Cui, L. Necib, and J. Thaler, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2014) 062.
  27. J. Berger, Y. Cui, and Y. Zhao, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2015) 005.
  28. K. Kong, G. Mohlabeng, and J. C. Park, Phys. Lett. B 743, 256 (2015).
  29. J. Kopp, J. Liu, and X. P. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 105.
  30. L. Necib, J. Moon, T. Wongjirad, and J. M. Conrad, Phys. Rev. D 95, 075018 (2017).
  31. H. Alhazmi, K. Kong, G. Mohlabeng, and J. C. Park, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 158.
  32. A. Bhattacharya, R. Gandhi, A. Gupta, and S. Mukhopadhyay, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2017) 002.
  33. D. Kim, J. C. Park, and S. Shin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161801 (2017).
  34. C. Kachulis et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 221301 (2018).
  35. G. F. Giudice, D. Kim, J. C. Park, and S. Shin, Phys. Lett. B 780, 543 (2018).
  36. A. Chatterjee, A. De Roeck, D. Kim, Z. G. Moghaddam, J. C. Park, S. Shin, L. H. Whitehead, and J. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 98, 075027 (2018).
  37. D. Kim, K. Kong, J. C. Park, and S. Shin, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 155.
  38. M. Aoki and T. Toma, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2018) 020.
  39. C. Ha et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 131802 (2019).
  40. J. Berger, arXiv:1812.05616.
  41. R. Catena and P. Ullio, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2010) 004.
  42. M. Cirelli, G. Corcella, A. Hektor, G. Hütsi, M. Kadastik, P. Panci, M. Raidal, F. Sala, and A. Strumia, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2011) 051; M. Cirelli et al.10 (2012) E01.
  43. F. Nesti and P. Salucci, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2013) 016.
  44. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J. 462, 563 (1996).
  45. G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 86, 023506 (2012).
  46. A. Moline, J. A. Schewtschenko, S. Palomares-Ruiz, C. Bhm, and C. M. Baugh, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2016) 069.
  47. N. Klop and S. Ando, Phys. Rev. D 98, 103004 (2018).
  48. G. Bertone, A. R. Zentner, and J. Silk, Phys. Rev. D 72, 103517 (2005).
  49. G. Bertone, Phys. Rev. D 73, 103519 (2006).
  50. S. Horiuchi and S. Ando, Phys. Rev. D 74, 103504 (2006).
  51. P. Brun, G. Bertone, J. Lavalle, P. Salati, and R. Taillet, Phys. Rev. D 76, 083506 (2007).
  52. C. Arina, S. Kulkarni, and J. Silk, Phys. Rev. D 92, 083519 (2015).
  53. D. Z. Freedman, D. N. Schramm, and D. L. Tubbs, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 27, 167 (1977).
  54. J. Erler and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D 72, 073003 (2005).
  55. M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 84, 085008 (2011).
  56. R. H. Helm, Phys. Rev. 104, 1466 (1956).
  57. P. Giampa, Private communication.
  58. L. E. Strigari, New J. Phys. 11, 105011 (2009).
  59. J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023524 (2014).
  60. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  61. G. Bellini et al. (Borexino Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 81, 034317 (2010).
  62. A. Gando et al. (KamLAND Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 745, 193 (2012).
  63. R. Essig, M. Sholapurkar, and T. T. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 095029 (2018).
  64. K. Bays et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 85, 052007 (2012).
  65. C. Garcia-Cely and J. Heeck, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 102.
  66. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008).
  67. L. G. van den Aarssen, T. Bringmann, and C. Pfrommer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 231301 (2012).
  68. I. M. Shoemaker, Phys. Dark Universe 2, 157 (2013).
  69. P. Ko and Y. Tang, Phys. Lett. B 739, 62 (2014).
  70. M. Archidiacono, S. Hannestad, R. S. Hansen, and T. Tram, Phys. Rev. D 91, 065021 (2015).
  71. J. F. Cherry, A. Friedland, and I. M. Shoemaker, arXiv:1411.1071.
  72. A. Falkowski, J. Juknevich, and J. Shelton, arXiv:0908.1790.
  73. M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. D 89, 055012 (2014).
  74. M. Kaplinghat, L. Knox, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3335 (2000).
  75. V. D. Barger, W. Y. Keung, and G. Shaughnessy, Phys. Lett. B 664, 190 (2008).
  76. C. Rott, J. Siegal-Gaskins, and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 88, 055005 (2013).
  77. N. Bernal, J. Martn-Albo, and S. Palomares-Ruiz, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2013) 011.
  78. C. Rott, S. In, J. Kumar, and D. Yaylali, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2015) 039.
  79. C. Rott, S. In, J. Kumar, and D. Yaylali, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2017) 016.
  80. N. F. Bell, S. Horiuchi, and I. M. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. D 91, 023505 (2015).
  81. M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 31, 3059 (1985).
  82. A. Drukier and L. Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2295 (1984).
  83. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Hernandez-Cabezudo, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, arXiv:1811.05487.
  84. http://www.nu-fit.org/.
  85. J. F. Beacom, W. M. Farr, and P. Vogel, Phys. Rev. D 66, 033001 (2002).
  86. B. Dasgupta and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 83, 113006 (2011).
  87. T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov, arXiv:1810.10543.
  88. G. Bellini et al. (Borexino Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 89, 112007 (2014).
  89. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/PSTAR.html.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation