Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Massive graviton geons

Katsuki Aoki1,*, Kei-ichi Maeda1,†, Yosuke Misonoh1,‡, and Hirotada Okawa2,1,§

  • 1Department of Physics, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan
  • 2Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

  • *katsuki-a12@gravity.phys.waseda.ac.jp
  • maeda@waseda.ac.jp
  • misonoh@aoni.waseda.jp
  • §okawa@heap.phys.waseda.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 97, 044005 – Published 5 February, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.044005

Abstract

We find vacuum solutions such that massive gravitons are confined in a local spacetime region by their gravitational energy in asymptotically flat spacetimes in the context of the bigravity theory. We call such self-gravitating objects massive graviton geons. The basic equations can be reduced to the Schrödinger-Poisson equations with the tensor “wave function” in the Newtonian limit. We obtain a nonspherically symmetric solution with j=2, =0 as well as a spherically symmetric solution with j=0, =2 in this system where j is the total angular momentum quantum number and is the orbital angular momentum quantum number, respectively. The energy eigenvalue of the Schrödinger equation in the nonspherical solution is smaller than that in the spherical solution. We then study the perturbative stability of the spherical solution and find that there is an unstable mode in the quadrupole mode perturbations which may be interpreted as the transition mode to the nonspherical solution. The results suggest that the nonspherically symmetric solution is the ground state of the massive graviton geon. The massive graviton geons may decay in time due to emissions of gravitational waves but this timescale can be quite long when the massive gravitons are nonrelativistic and then the geons can be long-lived. We also argue possible prospects of the massive graviton geons: applications to the ultralight dark matter scenario, nonlinear (in)stability of the Minkowski spacetime, and a quantum transition of the spacetime.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. B. P. Abbott et al. (Virgo Collaboration, LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  2. B. P. Abbott et al. (Virgo Collaboration, LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016).
  3. B. P. Abbott et al. (Virgo Collaboration, LIGO Scientific Collaboration), GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221101 (2017).
  4. B. P. Abbott et al. (Virgo Collaboration, LIGO Scientific Collaboration), GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017).
  5. J. A. Wheeler, Geons, Phys. Rev. 97, 511 (1955).
  6. D. R. Brill and J. B. Hartle, Method of the self-consistent field in general relativity and its application to the gravitational geon, Phys. Rev. 135, B271 (1964).
  7. P. R. Anderson and D. R. Brill, Gravitational geons revisited, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4824 (1997).
  8. A. Trautman, Proof of the non-existence of periodic gravitational fields representing radiation, Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Cl. 3 5, 1115 (1957).
  9. S. L. Detweiler, Periodic solutions of the Einstein equations, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4929 (1994).
  10. G. Gibbons and J. Stewart, Absence of Asymptotically Flat Solutions of Einstein’s Equations Which Are Periodic and Empty Near Infinity, in Proceedings of the Conference on Classical (Non-Quantum) General Relativity, City University, London, 21–22 December 1983, edited by W. B. Bonnor, J. N. Islam, and M. A. H. MacCallum (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984), p. 77–94.
  11. P. Tod, On analytic asymptotically-flat vacuum and electrovac metrics, periodic in time, arXiv:0902.1061.
  12. J. Bicak, M. Scholtz, and P. Tod, On asymptotically flat solutions of Einstein’s equations periodic in time I. Vacuum and electrovacuum solutions, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 055007 (2010).
  13. J. Bicak, M. Scholtz, and P. Tod, On asymptotically flat solutions of Einstein’s equations periodic in time II. Spacetimes with scalar-field sources, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 175011 (2010).
  14. S. Alexakis and V. Schlue, Non-existence of time-periodic vacuum spacetimes, arXiv:1504.04592.
  15. R. T. Enriquez, Stationarity of asymptotically flat non-radiating electrovacuum spacetimes, arXiv:1607.04882.
  16. O. J. C. Dias, G. T. Horowitz, D. Marolf, and J. E. Santos, On the nonlinear stability of asymptotically anti-de Sitter solutions, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 235019 (2012)].
  17. G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos, Geons and the instability of anti-de Sitter spacetime, Surveys Diff. Geom. 20, 321 (2015).
  18. G. Martinon, G. Fodor, P. Grandclément, and P. Forgács, Gravitational geons in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 125012 (2017).
  19. C. de Rham, Massive gravity, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 7 (2014).
  20. A. Schmidt-May and M. von Strauss, Recent developments in bimetric theory, J. Phys. A 49, 183001 (2016).
  21. J. L. Feng, A. Rajaraman, and F. Takayama, Graviton cosmology in universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 68, 085018 (2003).
  22. S. L. Dubovsky, P. G. Tinyakov, and I. I. Tkachev, Massive Graviton as a Testable Cold Dark Matter Candidate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 181102 (2005).
  23. M. Pshirkov, A. Tuntsov, and K. A. Postnov, Constraints on the Massive Graviton Dark Matter from Pulsar Timing and Precision Astrometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 261101 (2008).
  24. K. Aoki and S. Mukohyama, Massive gravitons as dark matter and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 94, 024001 (2016).
  25. E. Babichev, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, A. Schmidt-May, F. Urban, H. Veermäe, and M. von Strauss, Bigravitational origin of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084055 (2016).
  26. E. Babichev, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, A. Schmidt-May, F. Urban, H. Veermäe, and M. von Strauss, Heavy spin-2 dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2016) 016.
  27. K. Aoki and K.-i. Maeda, Condensate of massive fraviton and dark matter, arXiv:1707.05003.
  28. K. Aoki and S. Mukohyama, Massive graviton dark matter with environment dependent mass: A natural explanation of the dark matter-baryon ratio, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104039 (2017).
  29. L. Marzola, M. Raidal, and F. R. Urban, Oscillating spin-2 dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 97, 024010 (2018).
  30. X. Chu and C. Garcia-Cely, Self-interacting spin-2 dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103519 (2017).
  31. N. L. G. Albornoz, A. Schmidt-May, and M. von Strauss, Dark matter scenarios with multiple spin-2 fields, arXiv:1709.05128.
  32. M. Garny, A. Palessandro, M. Sandora, and M. S. Sloth, Theory and phenomenology of Planckian interacting massive particles as dark matter, arXiv:1709.09688.
  33. E. Seidel and W. M. Suen, Oscillating Soliton Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1659 (1991).
  34. D. J. Kaup and K.-G. Geon, Klein-gordon geon, Phys. Rev. 172, 1331 (1968).
  35. P. Jetzer, Boson stars, Phys. Rep. 220, 163 (1992).
  36. R. Brito, V. Cardoso, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and E. Radu, Proca stars: Gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates of massive spin 1 particles, Phys. Lett. B 752, 291 (2016).
  37. F. E. Schunck and E. W. Mielke, General relativistic boson stars, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, R301 (2003).
  38. C. A. R. Herdeiro, A. M. Pombo, and E. Radu, Asymptotically flat scalar, Dirac and Proca stars: Discrete vs. continuous families of solutions, Phys. Lett. B 773, 654 (2017).
  39. S. F. Hassan and R. A. Rosen, Bimetric gravity from ghost-free massive gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 126.
  40. R. A. Isaacson, Gravitational radiation in the limit of high frequency. II. Nonlinear terms and the effective stress tensor, Phys. Rev. 166, 1272 (1968).
  41. C. de Rham and G. Gabadadze, Generalization of the Fierz-Pauli action, Phys. Rev. D 82, 044020 (2010).
  42. C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, Resummation of Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 231101 (2011).
  43. A. I. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass, Phys. Lett. 39B, 393 (1972).
  44. R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola, Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state, Phys. Rev. 187, 1767 (1969).
  45. D. H. Bernstein, E. Giladi, and K. R. Jones, Eigenstates of the gravitational schrödinger equation, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13, 2327 (1998).
  46. I. M. Moroz, R. Penrose, and P. Tod, Spherically symmetric solutions of the Schrodinger-Newton equations, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, 2733 (1998).
  47. R. Harrison, I. Moroz, and K. Tod, A numerical study of the schrödinger–newton equations, Nonlinearity 16, 101 (2003).
  48. F. S. Guzman and L. A. Urena-Lopez, Evolution of the Schrodinger-Newton system for a selfgravitating scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 69, 124033 (2004).
  49. L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043541 (2017).
  50. E. Babichev and A. Fabbri, Instability of black holes in massive gravity, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 152001 (2013).
  51. R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Massive spin-2 fields on black hole spacetimes: Instability of the Schwarzschild and Kerr solutions and bounds on the graviton mass, Phys. Rev. D 88, 023514 (2013).
  52. G. Hobbs and S. Dai, A review of pulsar timing array gravitational wave research, arXiv:1707.01615.
  53. C. de Rham, L. Heisenberg, and R. H. Ribeiro, On couplings to matter in massive (bi-)gravity, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 035022 (2015).
  54. A. Khmelnitsky and V. Rubakov, Pulsar timing signal from ultralight scalar dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2014) 019.
  55. C. M. Will, The confrontation between general relativity and experiment, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 4 (2014).
  56. J. Murata and S. Tanaka, A review of short-range gravity experiments in the LHC era, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 033001 (2015).
  57. C. de Rham, J. T. Deskins, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, Graviton mass bounds, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025004 (2017).
  58. T. Baker, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller, and I. Sawicki, Strong Constraints on Cosmological Gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251301 (2017).
  59. S. M. Merkowitz, Tests of gravity using lunar laser ranging, Living Rev. Relativity 13, 7 (2010).
  60. P. Bizon and A. Rostworowski, On Weakly Turbulent Instability of Anti–de Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 031102 (2011).
  61. K. S. Thorne, Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 299 (1980).
  62. M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments, Oxford Master Series in Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation