Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Remarks on the Standard Model predictions for R(D) and R(D*)

C. S. Kim*

G. Lopez-Castro and S. L. Tostado

A. Vicente§

  • Department of Physics and IPAP, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea

  • Departamento de Física, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Apartado Postal 14-740, 07000 México D.F., México

  • Instituto de Física Corpuscular (CSIC-Universitat de València), Apartado 22085, E-46071 Valencia, Spain

  • *cskim@yonsei.ac.kr
  • glopez@fis.cinvestav.mx
  • stostado@fis.cinvestav.mx
  • §avelino.vicente@ific.uv.es

Phys. Rev. D 95, 013003 – Published 26 January, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.013003

Abstract

Semileptonic bc transitions, and in particular the ratios R(D(*))=Γ(BD(*)τν)Γ(BD(*)ν), can be used to test the universality of the weak interactions. In light of the recent discrepancies between the experimental measurements of these observables by the BABAR, Belle, and LHCb collaborations and the Standard Model predicted values, we study the robustness of the latter. Our analysis reveals that R(D) might be enhanced by lepton mass effects associated to the mostly unknown scalar form factor. In contrast, the Standard Model prediction for R(D*) is found to be more robust, because possible pollutions from B* contributions turn out to be negligibly small; this indicates that R(D*) is a promising observable for searches of new physics.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (60)

  1. N. Cabibbo, Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963).
  2. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
  3. H. Na, C. M. Bouchard, G. P. Lepage, C. Monahan, and J. Shigemitsu (HPQCD Collaboration), BDν form factors at nonzero recoil and extraction of |Vcb|, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054510 (2015); Erratum, 93, 119906(E) (2016).
  4. S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and I. Nišandžić, On the BD*τν¯τ sensitivity to new physics, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094025 (2012).
  5. D. Bigi and P. Gambino, Revisiting BDν, Phys. Rev. D 94, 094008 (2016).
  6. D. Bečirević, N. Košnik, and A. Tayduganov, B¯Dτν¯τ vs. B¯Dμν¯μ, Phys. Lett. B 716, 208 (2012).
  7. M. Huschle et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the branching ratio of B¯D(*)τν¯τ relative to B¯D(*)ν¯ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 92, 072014 (2015),
  8. A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the branching ratio of B¯0D*+τν¯τ relative to B¯0D*+ν¯ decays with a semileptonic tagging method, arXiv:1603.06711.
  9. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the Ratio of Branching Fractions B(B¯0D*+τν¯τ)/B(B¯0D*+μν¯μ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 111803 (2015); Publisher’s Note, 115, 159901 (2015).
  10. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Evidence for an Excess of B¯D(*)τν¯τ Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101802 (2012).
  11. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/semi/winter16/winter16_dtaunu.html.
  12. S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, I. Nišandžić, and J. Zupan, Implications of Lepton Flavor Universality Violations in B Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 161801 (2012).
  13. A. Crivellin, C. Greub, and A. Kokulu, Explaining BDτν, BD*τν and Bτν in a 2HDM of type III, Phys. Rev. D 86, 054014 (2012).
  14. A. Celis, M. Jung, X.-Q. Li, and A. Pich, Sensitivity to charged scalars in BD(*)τντ and Bτντ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 054.
  15. J. A. Bailey et al., Refining New-Physics Searches in BDτν Decay with Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 071802 (2012).
  16. M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe, New physics in the weak interaction of B¯D(*)τν¯, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034028 (2013).
  17. P. Ko, Y. Omura, and C. Yu, BD(*)τν and Bτν in chiral U(1)’ models with flavored multi Higgs doublets, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2013) 151.
  18. M. Freytsis, Z. Ligeti, and J. T. Ruderman, Flavor models for B¯D(*)τν¯, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054018 (2015).
  19. A. Crivellin, J. Heeck, and P. Stoffer, A Perturbed Lepton-Specific Two-Higgs-Doublet Model Facing Experimental Hints for Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 081801 (2016).
  20. N. G. Deshpande and A. Menon, Hints of R-parity violation in B decays into τν, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 025.
  21. Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov, and R. Watanabe, Testing leptoquark models in B¯D(*)τν¯, Phys. Rev. D 88, 094012 (2013).
  22. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, and I. Nišandžić, Minimally flavored colored scalar in B¯D(*)τν¯ and the mass matrices constraints, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 084.
  23. R. Alonso, B. Grinstein, and J. Martin Camalich, Lepton universality violation and lepton flavor conservation in B-meson decays, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 184.
  24. M. Bauer and M. Neubert, Minimal Leptoquark Explanation for the RD(*), RK, and (g2)g Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 141802 (2016).
  25. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, A. Pattori, and F. Senia, Anomalies in B-decays and U(2) flavour symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 67 (2016).
  26. S. Fajfer and N. Košnik, Vector leptoquark resolution of RK and RD(*) puzzles, Phys. Lett. B 755, 270 (2016).
  27. L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, and T. Ota, Effective Field Theory Approach to bs(), BK(*)νν¯ and BD(*)τν with Third-Generation Couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 181801 (2015).
  28. C. Hati, G. Kumar, and N. Mahajan, B¯D(*)τν¯ excesses in ALRSM constrained from B, D decays and D0D¯0 mixing, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 117.
  29. C. Hati, Explaining the diphoton excess in alternative left-right symmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 93, 075002 (2016).
  30. F. F. Deppisch, S. Kulkarni, H. Päs, and E. Schumacher, Leptoquark patterns unifying neutrino masses, flavor anomalies and the diphoton excess, Phys. Rev. D 94, 013003 (2016).
  31. J. Zhu, H.-M. Gan, R.-M. Wang, Y.-Y. Fan, Q. Chang, and Y.-G. Xu, Probing the R-parity violating supersymmetric effects in the exclusive bcν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094023 (2016).
  32. N. G. Deshpande and X.-G. He, Consequences of R-parity violating interactions for anomalies in B¯D(*)τν¯ and bsμ+μ, arXiv:1608.04817.
  33. D. Bečirević, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, and O. Sumensari, Leptoquark model to explain the B-physics anomalies, RK and RD, Phys. Rev. D 94, 115021 (2016).
  34. S. Sahoo, R. Mohanta, and A. K. Giri, Explaining RK and RD(*) anomalies with vector leptoquark, arXiv:1609.04367.
  35. G. Hiller, D. Loose, and K. Schönwald, Leptoquark flavor patterns and B decay anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 027.
  36. B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, J.-P. Guévin, D. London, and R. Watanabe, Simultaneous explanation of the RK and RD(*) puzzles: A model analysis, arXiv:1609.09078.
  37. D. Das, C. Hati, G. Kumar, and N. Mahajan, Towards a unified explanation of RD(*), RK and (g2)μ anomalies in a left-right model with leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 94, 055034 (2016).
  38. D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori, and D. Marzocca, Toward a coherent solution of diphoton and flavor anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 035.
  39. X.-G. He and G. Valencia, B decays with τ leptons in nonuniversal left-right models, Phys. Rev. D 87, 014014 (2013).
  40. A. Greljo, G. Isidori, and D. Marzocca, On the breaking of lepton flavor universality in B decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2015) 142.
  41. S. M. Boucenna, A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martín, A. Vicente, and J. Virto, Non-Abelian gauge extensions for B-decay anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 760, 214 (2016).
  42. S. M. Boucenna, A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martín, A. Vicente, and J. Virto, Phenomenology of an SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1) model with lepton-flavour non-universality, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 059.
  43. A. Abada, A. M. Teixeira, A. Vicente, and C. Weiland, Sterile neutrinos in leptonic and semileptonic decays, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 091.
  44. G. Cvetič and C. S. Kim, Rare decays of B mesons via on-shell sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 94, 053001 (2016).
  45. P. Biancofiore, P. Colangelo, and F. De Fazio, On the anomalous enhancement observed in BD(*)τν¯τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074010 (2013).
  46. S. Bhattacharya, S. Nandi, and S. K. Patra, Optimal-observable analysis of possible new physics in BD(*)τντ, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034011 (2016).
  47. R. Alonso, A. Kobach, and J. Martin Camalich, New physics in the kinematic distributions of B¯D(*)τ(ν¯ντ)ν¯τ, Phys. Rev. D 94, 094021 (2016).
  48. A. K. Alok, D. Kumar, S. Kumbhakar, and S. U. Sankar, D* polarization as a probe to discriminate new physics in BD*τν¯, arXiv:1606.03164.
  49. D. Bardhan, P. Byakti, and D. Ghosh, A closer look at the RD and RD* anomalies, arXiv:1610.03038.
  50. Y.-Y. Fan, Z.-J. Xiao, R.-M. Wang, and B.-Z. Li, The BD(*)lνl decays in the pQCD approach with the lattice QCD input, Science bulletin 60, 2009 (2015).
  51. N. Košnik, D. Bečirević, and A. Tayduganov, Testing the Standard Model in BDτν¯ decay with minimal theory input, Proc. Sci., ConfinementX2012 (2012) 244 [arXiv:1301.4037].
  52. K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014).
  53. M. Bordone, G. Isidori, and D. van Dyk, Impact of leptonic τ decays on the distribution of BPμν¯ decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 360 (2016).
  54. Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci, and D. J. Robinson, New physics in the visible final states of BD(*)τν, arXiv:1610.02045.
  55. Q. Chang, J. Zhu, X.-L. Wang, J.-F. Sun, and Y.-L. Yang, Study of semileptonic BP decays, Nucl. Phys. B909, 921 (2016).
  56. F. Bernardoni, J. Bulava, M. Donnellan, and R. Sommer (ALPHA Collaboration), Precision lattice QCD computation of the B*Bπ coupling, Phys. Lett. B 740, 278 (2015).
  57. J. M. Flynn, P. Fritzsch, T. Kawanai, C. Lehner, B. Samways, C. T. Sachrajda, R. S. Van de Water, and O. Witzel (RBC and UKQCD Collaborations), The B*Bπ coupling using relativistic heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. D 93, 014510 (2016).
  58. B. El-Bennich, M. A. Ivanov, and C. D. Roberts, Strong D*Dπ and B*Bπ couplings, Phys. Rev. C 83, 025205 (2011).
  59. A. Flores-Tlalpa, G. López Castro, and G. Sanchez Toledo, Radiative two-pion decay of the tau lepton, Phys. Rev. D 72, 113003 (2005).
  60. W. Dungel et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the form factors of the decay B0D*+ν and determination of the CKM matrix element |Vcb|, Phys. Rev. D 82, 112007 (2010).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation