- Access by Xinjiang University
Second-order perturbation theory: The problem of infinite mode coupling
Phys. Rev. D 94, 104018 – Published 7 November, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104018
Abstract
Second-order self-force computations, which will be essential in modeling extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, involve two major new difficulties that were not present at first order. One is the problem of large scales, discussed in Pound [Phys. Rev. D 92, 104047 (2015)]. Here we discuss the second difficulty, which occurs instead on small scales: if we expand the field equations in spherical harmonics, then because the first-order field contains a singularity, we require an arbitrarily large number of first-order modes to accurately compute even a single second-order mode. This is a generic feature of nonlinear field equations containing singularities, allowing us to study it in the simple context of a scalar toy model in flat space. Using that model, we illustrate the problem and demonstrate a robust strategy for overcoming it.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (41)
- E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, Living Rev. Relativ. 14, 7 (2011).
- A. Pound, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 179, 399 (2015).
- A. I. Harte, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 179, 327 (2015).
- L. Barack, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 213001 (2009).
- P. Amaro-Seoane, J. R. Gair, A. Pound, S. A. Hughes, and C. F. Sopuerta, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 610, 012002 (2015).
- L. Blanchet, S. L. Detweiler, A. Le Tiec, and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D 81, 084033 (2010).
- S. Akcay, L. Barack, T. Damour, and N. Sago, Phys. Rev. D 86, 104041 (2012).
- L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D 90, 044017 (2014).
- A. Le Tiec, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23, 1430022 (2014).
- S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, T. Dietrich, and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 161103 (2015).
- T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Schäfer, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084014 (2016).
- B. Wardell, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 179, 487 (2015).
- M. Colleoni, L. Barack, A. G. Shah, and M. van de Meent, Phys. Rev. D 92, 084044 (2015).
- D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D 93, 064023 (2016).
- T. Osburn, N. Warburton, and C. R. Evans, Phys. Rev. D 93, 064024 (2016).
- S. Hopper, C. Kavanagh, and A. C. Ottewill, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044010 (2016).
- C. Kavanagh, A. C. Ottewill, and B. Wardell, Phys. Rev. D 93, 124038 (2016).
- M. van de Meent, Phys. Rev. D 94, 044034 (2016).
- S. Akcay, D. Dempsey, and S. Dolan, arXiv:1608.04811.
- T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064028 (2008).
- E. Rosenthal, Phys. Rev. D 73, 044034 (2006).
- E. Rosenthal, Phys. Rev. D 74, 084018 (2006).
- S. Detweiler, Phys. Rev. D 85, 044048 (2012).
- A. Pound, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 051101 (2012).
- S. E. Gralla, Phys. Rev. D 85, 124011 (2012).
- A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084019 (2012).
- A. Pound and J. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 89, 104020 (2014).
- A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D 92, 044021 (2015).
- A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D 92, 104047 (2015).
- A. Pound (to be published).
- N. Warburton and B. Wardell, Phys. Rev. D 89, 044046 (2014).
- B. Wardell and N. Warburton, Phys. Rev. D 92, 084019 (2015).
- L. Barack and C. O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D 72, 104026 (2005).
- L. Barack and N. Sago, Phys. Rev. D 75, 064021 (2007).
- S. L. Detweiler and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024025 (2003).
- A. Pound, GR21, Columbia University, 2016; slides are available at http://www.gr21.org/files/Adam_Pound_-_Pound_(1).pdf.gz.
- A. Heffernan, A. Ottewill, and B. Wardell, Phys. Rev. D 86, 104023 (2012).
- R. Haas and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 74, 044009 (2006).
- S. Orszag, Mon. Weather Rev. 102, 56 (1974).
- G. Lohöfer, J. Approx. Theory 95, 178 (1998).
- L. Barack, A. Ori, and N. Sago, Phys. Rev. D 78, 084021 (2008).