Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Eikonal fit to pp and p¯p scattering and the edge in the scattering amplitude

Martin M. Block*

Loyal Durand

Phuoc Ha

Francis Halzen§

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA

  • Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

  • Department of Physics, Astronomy and Geosciences, Towson University, Towson, Maryland 21252, USA

  • Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center and Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

  • *mblock@northwestern.edu
  • Present address: 415 Pearl Court, Aspen, Colorado 81611, USA. ldurand@hep.wisc.edu
  • pdha@towson.edu
  • §francis.halzen@icecube.wisc.edu

Phys. Rev. D 92, 014030 – Published 27 July, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.014030

Abstract

We make a detailed eikonal fit to current data on the total and elastic scattering cross sections, the ratios ρ of the real to the imaginary parts of the forward elastic scattering amplitudes, and the logarithmic slopes B of the differential cross sections dσ/dt at t=0, for proton-proton and antiproton-proton scattering at center-of-mass energies W from 5 GeV to 57 TeV. The fit allows us to investigate the structure of the eikonal amplitudes in detail, including the impact-parameter structure of the energy-independent edge in the scattering amplitude shown to exist by Block et al., [Phys. Rev. D 91, 011501(R) (2015)]. We show that the edge region has an essentially fixed shape with a peak at approximately the “black disk” radius Rtot=σtot/2π of the scattering amplitude, a constant width tedge1fm, and migrates to larger impact parameters with increasing energy proportionally to Rtot. We comment on possible physical mechanisms which could lead to the edge. We show that the eikonal results for the cross sections and ρ values are described to high accuracy by analytic expressions of the forms used in earlier analyses by Block and Halzen, and extend the result to the elastic-scattering slope parameter B. These expressions provide simple extrapolations of the results to much higher energies where the cross sections approach the black disk limit with σelas, σinelσtot/2 and Bσtot/8π. Finally, we calculate the survival probabilities for large rapidity gaps in the scattering.

Article Text

References (33)

  1. M. M. Block, L. Durand, F. Halzen, L. Stodolsky, and T. Weiler, Phys. Rev. D 91, 011501(R) (2015).
  2. M. M. Block and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. D 72, 036006 (2005).
  3. M. M. Block and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 212002 (2011).
  4. M. M. Block and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. D 86, 051504 (2012).
  5. D. A. Fagundes, A. Grau, G. Pancheri, Y. N. Srivastava, and O. Shekhovtsova, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114011 (2015).
  6. V. A. Khoze, A. D. Martin, and M. G. Ryskin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1542004 (2015).
  7. E. Gotsman, E. Levin, and U. Maor, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1542005 (2015).
  8. J. Pumplin, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2899 (1973).
  9. M. M. Block, Phys. Rep. 436, 71 (2006).
  10. M. M. Block, E. M. Gregores, F. Halzen, and G. Pancheri, Phys. Rev. D 60, 054024 (1999).
  11. M. M. Block and R. N. Cahn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 563 (1985).
  12. ATLAS Collaboration, Nat. Commun. 2, 463 (2011).
  13. G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM Collaboration), Europhys. Lett. 96, 21002 (2011).
  14. CMS Collaboration, CERN Document Server, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1373466?ln=en, 2011.
  15. G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM Collaboration), Europhys. Lett. 101, 21002 (2013).
  16. G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM Collaboration), Europhys. Lett. 101, 21004 (2013).
  17. P. Abreu et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 062002 (2012).
  18. R. Abbasi et al. (HiRes Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 684, 790 (2008).
  19. M. M. Block, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 556, 308 (2006).
  20. N. Amos et al. (E710 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 525 (1988).
  21. N. Amos et al. (E710 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2784 (1989).
  22. G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM Collaboration), Europhys. Lett. 95, 41001 (2011).
  23. V. A. Schegelsky and M. G. Ryskin, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094024 (2012).
  24. K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014), Sec. 50.
  25. M. Froissart, Phys. Rev. 123, 1053 (1961).
  26. A. Martin, Phys. Rev. 129, 1432 (1963).
  27. The Froissart bound is just that, a bound on the growth of σtot with s. The energy scale in the rigorous bound is set by the lightest mass scale in the scattering. This is not relevant at high energies where we expect the mass scale to be that of the confinement volume, here μgg, outside of which the hadrons interact only rarely. Since 1/μgg1/mπ, the rigorous bound is far from being saturated.

  28. J. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 90, 117902 (2014).
  29. T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 137, 708 (1965).
  30. E. Gotsman, E. M. Levin, and U. Maor, Phys. Rev. D 49, R4321 (1994).
  31. F. Abe et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 50, 5535 (1994).
  32. The Bessel function J0(qb) results from the conversion of the partial-wave series for the scattering amplitude to an integral over impact parameters using the approximate relation Pj(cosθ)J0(j2(1cosθ)), valid for small angles and large angular momenta j, the relation q2=2pp(1cosθ), and the definition b=j/pp for the impact parameter. This is the geometrical mean of the initial and final impact parameters.

  33. M. M. Block and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114004 (2001).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation