Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

SUSY implications from WIMP annihilation into scalars at the Galactic Center

Tony Gherghetta1,*, Benedict von Harling2,†, Anibal D. Medina3,‡, Michael A. Schmidt4,§, and Timothy Trott3,∥

  • 1School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
  • 2SISSA and INFN, Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy
  • 3ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale, School of Physics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • 4ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

  • *tgher@umn.edu
  • bharling@sissa.it
  • anibal.medina@unimelb.edu.au
  • §m.schmidt@physics.usyd.edu.au
  • t.trott@student.unimelb.edu.au

Phys. Rev. D 91, 105004 – Published 5 May, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.105004

Abstract

An excess in γ rays emanating from the Galactic Center has recently been observed in the Fermi-LAT data. This signal can be interpreted as resulting from weakly interacting massive particle annihilation, with the spectrum well fit by dark matter annihilating dominantly into either bottom-quark or Higgs pairs. Supersymmetric models provide a well-motivated framework to study the implications of this signal in these channels. With a neutralino dark matter candidate, the γ-ray excess cannot be easily accommodated in the minimal supersymmetric model, which in any case requires tuning below the percent level to explain the observed Higgs mass. Instead we are naturally led to consider the next-to-minimal model with a singlet superfield. This not only allows for the annihilation channel into bottom-quark pairs to be implemented but also provides new possibilities for annihilation into Higgs-pseudoscalar pairs. We show that the fit to the γ-ray excess for the Higgs-pseudoscalar channel can be just as good as for annihilation into bottom-quark pairs. Moreover, in the parameter range of interest, the next-to-minimal supersymmetric model solves the μ problem and can explain the 125 GeV Higgs mass with improved naturalness. We also consider an extension by adding a right-handed neutrino superfield with the right-handed sneutrino acting as a dark matter candidate. Interestingly, this allows for the annihilation into pseudoscalar pairs which also provide a good fit to the γ-ray excess. Furthermore, in the case of a neutralino lightest supersymmetric particle, the late decay of a sneutrino next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle can nonthermally produce the observed relic abundance. Finally, the weakly interacting massive particle annihilation into scalar pairs allows for the possibility of detecting the Higgs or pseudoscalar decay into two photons, providing a smoking-gun signal of the model.

Article Text

References (110)

  1. L. Goodenough and D. Hooper, arXiv:0910.2998.
  2. D. Hooper and L. Goodenough, Phys. Lett. B 697, 412 (2011).
  3. D. Hooper and T. Linden, Phys. Rev. D 84, 123005 (2011).
  4. K. N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, Phys. Rev. D 86, 083511 (2012).
  5. D. Hooper and T. R. Slatyer, Phys. Dark Univ. 2, 118 (2013).
  6. W.-C. Huang, A. Urbano, and W. Xue, arXiv:1307.6862.
  7. C. Gordon and O. Macias, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083521 (2013).
  8. K. N. Abazajian, N. Canac, S. Horiuchi, and M. Kaplinghat, Phys. Rev. D 90, 023526 (2014).
  9. T. Daylan et al., arXiv:1402.6703.
  10. F. Calore, I. Cholis, and C. Weniger, arXiv:1409.0042.
  11. F. Calore, I. Cholis, C. McCabe, and C. Weniger, Phys. Rev. D 91, 063003 (2015).
  12. P. Agrawal, B. Batell, P. J. Fox, and R. Harnik, arXiv:1411.2592.
  13. S. Murgia, http://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/mtgs/symposia/2014/program/08_Murgia.pdf.
  14. W.-C. Huang, A. Urbano, and W. Xue, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2014) 020.
  15. A. Alves, S. Profumo, F. S. Queiroz, and W. Shepherd, Phys. Rev. D 90, 115003 (2014).
  16. C. Cheung, M. Papucci, D. Sanford, N. R. Shah, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 90, 075011 (2014).
  17. M. Cahill-Rowley, J. Gainer, J. Hewett, and T. Rizzo, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 057.
  18. K. Ghorbani, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2015) 015.
  19. K. P. Modak, D. Majumdar, and S. Rakshit, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1503, 011 (2015).
  20. J. Huang, T. Liu, L.-T. Wang, and F. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 90, 115006 (2014).
  21. K. P. Modak and D. Majumdar, arXiv:1502.05682.
  22. K. Griest, M. Kamionkowski, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 41, 3565 (1990).
  23. A. Berlin, P. Gratia, D. Hooper, and S. D. McDermott, Phys. Rev. D 90, 015032 (2014).
  24. T. Han, Z. Liu, and S. Su, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 093.
  25. A. Berlin, S. Gori, T. Lin, and L.-T. Wang, arXiv:1502.06000.
  26. S. Caron, A. Achterberg, L. Hendriks, R. R. de Austri, and C. Weniger, arXiv:1502.05703.
  27. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 160.
  28. A. Djouadi, L. Maiani, A. Polosa, J. Quevillon, and V. Riquer, arXiv:1502.05653.
  29. T. Gherghetta, B. von Harling, A. D. Medina, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 180.
  30. M. Carena, H. E. Haber, I. Low, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 91, 035003 (2015).
  31. D. Eriksson, F. Mahmoudi, and O. Stal, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2008) 035.
  32. U. Ellwanger, J. F. Gunion, and C. Hugonie, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2005) 066.
  33. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, Comput. Phys. Commun. 175, 290 (2006).
  34. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, C. Hugonie, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2005) 001.
  35. D. G. Cerdeno and O. Seto, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2009) 032.
  36. D. Cerdeno, M. Peiro, and S. Robles, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2014) 005.
  37. D. Cerdeno, M. Peiro, and S. Robles, arXiv:1501.01296.
  38. Q. Yuan and B. Zhang, JHEAp 3–4, 1 (2014).
  39. D. Hooper, I. Cholis, T. Linden, J. Siegal-Gaskins, and T. Slatyer, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083009 (2013).
  40. I. Cholis, D. Hooper, and T. Linden, arXiv:1407.5625.
  41. E. Carlson and S. Profumo, Phys. Rev. D 90, 023015 (2014).
  42. J. Petrovic, P. D. Serpico, and G. Zaharijas, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2014) 052.
  43. N. Rodd, https://indico.cern.ch/event/278032/session/9/contribution/144.
  44. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. White, Astrophys. J. 462, 563 (1996).
  45. A. Klypin, H. Zhao, and R. S. Somerville, Astrophys. J. 573, 597 (2002).
  46. T. Sjostrand et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  47. M. Cirelli, G. Corcella, A. Hektor, G. Hütsi, M. Kadastik, P. Panci, M. Raidal, F. Sala, and A. Strumia, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2011) 051.
  48. P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli, A. Riotto, F. Sala, A. Strumia, and A. Urbano, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2011) 019.
  49. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 082002 (2013).
  50. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 89, 042001 (2014).
  51. B. Anderson, http://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/mtgs/symposia/2014/program/17_Anderson.pdf.
  52. T. Bringmann, M. Vollmann, and C. Weniger, Phys. Rev. D 90, 123001 (2014).
  53. M. Cirelli, D. Gaggero, G. Giesen, M. Taoso, and A. Urbano, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2014) 045.
  54. I. Cholis, D. Hooper, and T. Linden, Phys. Rev. D 91, 083507 (2015).
  55. G. Aad et al., Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  56. S. Chatrchyan et al., Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  57. A. Arvanitaki and G. Villadoro, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 144.
  58. N. Craig, C. Englert, and M. McCullough, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 121803 (2013).
  59. M. Farina, M. Perelstein, and N. Rey-LeLorier, Phys. Rev. D 90, 015014 (2014).
  60. M. Farina, M. Perelstein, and B. Shakya, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 108.
  61. J. Fan and M. Reece, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 031.
  62. M. W. Cahill-Rowley, J. L. Hewett, A. Ismail, and T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 86, 075015 (2012).
  63. P. Fayet, Nucl. Phys. B90, 104 (1975).
  64. P. Fayet, Phys. Lett. B 69, 489 (1977).
  65. P. Fayet and S. Ferrara, Phys. Rep. 32, 249 (1977).
  66. L. J. Hall, D. Pinner, and J. T. Ruderman, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 131.
  67. T. Gherghetta, B. von Harling, A. D. Medina, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2013) 032.
  68. K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014).
  69. M. Perelstein and B. Shakya, Phys. Rev. D 88, 075003 (2013).
  70. C. Cheung, L. J. Hall, D. Pinner, and J. T. Ruderman, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 100.
  71. T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, A. Pierce, and T. R. Slatyer, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 061.
  72. J. Fan and M. Reece, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 124.
  73. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, Phys. Rep. 496, 1 (2010).
  74. D. Akerib et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 091303 (2014).
  75. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996).
  76. G. Belanger, B. Dumont, U. Ellwanger, J. Gunion, and S. Kraml, Phys. Rev. D 88, 075008 (2013).
  77. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 039.
  78. V. Barger, M. Ishida, and W.-Y. Keung, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 261801 (2012).
  79. J. Kozaczuk and T. A. W. Martin, arXiv:1501.07275.
  80. P. Ade et al., Astron. Astrophys. 571, A16 (2014).
  81. G.-C. Cho and K. Hagiwara, Nucl. Phys. B574, 623 (2000).
  82. K. Hagiwara, S. Matsumoto, D. Haidt, and C. Kim, Z. Phys. C 64, 559 (1994).
  83. S. P. Martin, K. Tobe, and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 71, 073014 (2005).
  84. R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall, Y. Nomura, and V. S. Rychkov, Phys. Rev. D 75, 035007 (2007).
  85. R. Franceschini and S. Gori, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 084.
  86. M. Baak, J. Cúth, J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. Mönig, M. Schott, and J. Stelzer (Gfitter Group), Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3046 (2014).
  87. D. McKinsey and R. Gaitskell, http://luxdarkmatter.org/talks/20131030_LUX_First_Results.pdf.
  88. K. Arisaka, http://www.snowmass2013.org/tiki-index.php?page=XENON.
  89. T. Shutt, http://www.snowmass2013.org/tiki-index.php?page=lux.
  90. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3191 (1991).
  91. J. Guo, J. Li, T. Li, and A. G. Williams, arXiv:1409.7864.
  92. J. Cao, L. Shang, P. Wu, J. M. Yang, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 91, 055005 (2015).
  93. CMS Collaboration, arXiv:1307.7135.
  94. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B 67, 421 (1977).
  95. T. Yanagida, Proceedings of the Workshop on The Unified Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe, Tsukuba, Japan, 1979, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto (KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, 1979), p. 95.
  96. S. L. Glashow, Proceedings of the 1979 Cargese Summer Institute on Quarks and Leptons, edited by M. Levy, J.-L. Basdevant, D. Speiser, J. Weyers, R. Gastmans, and M. Jacob (Plenum, New York, 1980), p. 687.
  97. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Supergravity, edited by P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Z. Freedman (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), p. 315.
  98. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  99. D. G. Cerdeno, V. Martin-Lozano, and O. Seto, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 035.
  100. S. Andreas, T. Hambye, and M. H. Tytgat, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2008) 034.
  101. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Nucl. Phys. B360, 145 (1991).
  102. A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen, and A. Pukhov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1729 (2013).
  103. A. Semenov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 431 (2009).
  104. M. Fairbairn and J. Zupan, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2009) 001.
  105. C. Cheung, G. Elor, L. J. Hall, and P. Kumar, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 042.
  106. A. D. Medina, arXiv:1409.2560.
  107. J. D. Hunter, Computing in Science & Engineering 9, 90 (2007).
  108. F. Pérez and B. E. Granger, Computing in Science & Engineering 9, 21 (2007).
  109. J. Bezanson, S. Karpinski, V. B. Shah, and A. Edelman, arXiv:1209.5145.
  110. J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, arXiv:1411.1607.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation