Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Gravitating binaries at the fifth post-Newtonian order in the post-Minkowskian approximation

Stefano Foffa*

  • Département de Physique Théorique and Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Université de Genève, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

  • *stefano.foffa@unige.ch

Phys. Rev. D 89, 024019 – Published 14 January, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.024019

Abstract

The Lagrangian governing the dynamics of a compact binary system is explicitly computed in the post-Minkowskian approximation, and at any post-Newtonian order, by means of the effective field theory approach. This result is then specialized to the fifth post-Newtonian order and allows us to determine one formerly unknown coefficient of the energy expression for binary point masses on the circular orbit as a function of the orbital angular frequency.

Article Text

References (31)

  1. L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Relativity 9, 4 (2006).
  2. T. Futamase and Y. Itoh, Living Rev. Relativity 10, 2 (2007).
  3. A. Abramovici et al., Science 256, 325 (1992); A. Giazotto, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 289, 518 (1990).
  4. v is the relative speed of the stars in units c=1, and is related through the virial theorem to the curvature generated by the whole binary system of total mass M.

  5. W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104029 (2006).
  6. W. D. Goldberger, in Les Houches lectures on effective field theories and gravitational radiation, Proceedings of Les Houches Summer School, Session LXXXVI: Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime, [arXiv:hep-ph/0701129].
  7. S. Foffa and R. Sturani, arXiv:1309.3474.
  8. R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 021101 (2006); R. A. Porto, arXiv:gr-qc/0701106; R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D 78, 044012 (2008); 81, 029904(E) (2010); 78, 044013 (2008); 81, 029905(E) (2010); J. Steinhoff, G. Schaefer, and S. Hergt, 77, 104018 (2008); J. Steinhoff, S. Hergt, and G. Schaefer, 78, 101503 (2008); J. Hartung and J. Steinhoff, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 523, 919 (2011); M. Levi, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064043 (2012); S. Foffa and R. Sturani, 87, 044056 (2013); A. Bohe, S. Marsat, G. Faye, and L. Blanchet, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 075017 (2013); D. Bini and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 87, 121501 (2013).
  9. S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D 87, 064011 (2013).
  10. P. Jaranowski and G. Schafer, Phys. Rev. D 86, 061503 (2012).
  11. P. Jaranowski and G. Schfer, Phys. Rev. D 87, 081503 (2013).
  12. W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104030 (2006); R. A. Porto, 77, 064026 (2008); W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross, 81, 124015 (2010); R. A. Porto, A. Ross, and I. Z. Rothstein, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2011) 009; 09 (2012) 028; W. D. Goldberger, A. Ross, and I. Z. Rothstein, arXiv:1211.6095; S. Marsat, A. Bohe, L. Blanchet, and A. Buonanno, arXiv:1307.6793; A. Boh, S. Marsat, and L. Blanchet, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 135009 (2013).
  13. T. Damour, PRINT-82-0836 (MEUDON); L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 320, 379 (1986).
  14. T. Ledvinka, G. Schaefer, and J. Bicak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 251101 (2008).
  15. S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D 84, 044031 (2011).
  16. We adopt the “mostly plus” convention ημνdiag(,+,+,+), and the Riemann and Ricci tensors are defined as Rνρσμ=ρΓνσμ+ΓαρμΓνσαρσ, RμνRμανα.

  17. J. B. Gilmore and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D 78, 124021 (2008).
  18. B. Kol and M. Smolkin, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 145011 (2008).
  19. B. Kol and M. Smolkin, Phys. Rev. D 85, 044029 (2012).
  20. L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, A 50, 377 (1989).
  21. B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connel, Phys. Lett. 78A, 231 (1980).
  22. To be more precise, accelerations are traded for their equations of motion, which for the PM point of view means eliminating them as they will give rise to O(G2) terms.

  23. T. Damour and G. Schaefer, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 32, 127 (1991).
  24. J. Martin and J. L. Sanz, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 20, 25 (1979).
  25. L. Blanchet and G. Faye, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 4391 (2001); V. C. de Andrade, L. Blanchet, and G. Faye, Classical Quantum Gravity 18, 753 (2001).
  26. The 4PN order in the center-of-mass position is sufficient for the purposes of the present work; however, the derivation at 5PN in the PM limit is a very useful test of Lorentz invariance, and thus of the correctness of the calculation.

  27. A. Le Tiec, L. Blanchet, and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064039 (2012).
  28. L. Blanchet, S. L. Detweiler, A. Le Tiec, and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 084033.
  29. M. Favata, arXiv:1310.8288.
  30. K. Yagi and N. Yunes, arXiv:1310.8358.
  31. The use of either of the two equivalent operators for some n brings us to different expressions for VPM*.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation