Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Consistent probabilities in perfect fluid quantum universes

C. R. Bom, N. Pinto-Neto, and G. B. Santos

  • ICRA-Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas – CBPF, Rua Xavier Sigaud, 150, Urca, CEP22290-180 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Phys. Rev. D 89, 023514 – Published 21 January, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.023514

Abstract

Recently it has been claimed that the Wheeler–DeWitt quantization of gravity is unable to avoid cosmological singularities. However, in order to make this assertion, one must specify the underlying interpretation of quantum mechanics which has been adopted. For instance, several nonsingular models were obtained in Wheeler–DeWitt quantum cosmology in the framework of the de Broglie–Bohm quantum theory. Conversely, there are specific situations where the singularity cannot be avoided in the framework of the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics. In these specific situations, the matter content is described by a scalar field, and the Wheeler–DeWitt equation looks like a Klein–Gordon equation. The aim of this work is to study a possible singular behavior of quantum cosmological models in which the matter content is described by a hydrodynamical perfect fluid, where the resulting wave equation is a genuine Schrödinger equation. In this case, it is shown that the conclusions of the consistent histories and the de Broglie–Bohm approaches coincide in the quantum cosmological models where the curvature of the spatial sections is not positive definite, namely, that the cosmological singularities are eliminated. In the case of positive spatial curvature, the family of histories is no longer consistent, and no conclusion can be given in this framework.

Article Text

References (29)

  1. B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. 160, 1113 (1967); J. A. Wheeler, in Battelle Rencontres: 1967 Lectures in Mathematical Physics, edited by B. DeWitt and J. A. Wheeler (Benjamin, New York, 1968).
  2. A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 213001 (2011).
  3. D. A. Craig and P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 82, 123526 (2010).
  4. A. Ashtekar, A. Corichi, and P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024046 (2008).
  5. A. Ashtekar, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 41, 707, (2009).
  6. A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh; Phys. Rev. D 73, 124038 (2006).
  7. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952); 85, 180 (1952); D. Bohm, B. J. Hiley, and P. N. Kaloyerou, Phys. Rep. 144, 321 (1987).
  8. H. Everett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957); B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Today 23, 30 (1970).
  9. R. B. Griffiths, J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984).
  10. R. Omnès, J. Stat. Phys. 53, 893 (1988); 53, 933 (1988); 53, 957 (1988); 57, 357 (1989); R. Omnès, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1994).
  11. N. Pinto-Neto, F. T. Falciano, R. Pereira, and E. S. Santini, Phys. Rev. D 86, 063504 (2012).
  12. R. Colistete, Jr., J. C. Fabris, and N. Pinto-Neto, Phys. Rev. D 62, 083507 (2000).
  13. N. Pinto-Neto, Found. Phys. 35, 577 (2005).
  14. N. Pinto-Neto, E. Sergio Santini, and F. T. Falciano, Phys. Lett. A 344, 131 (2005).
  15. N. Pinto-Neto, A. F. Velasco, and R. Colistete, Jr., Phys. Lett. A 277, 194 (2000).
  16. M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology: Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd., Kokubunji, Tokyo, Japan, 1989, edited by S. Kobayashi, H. Ezawa, M. Murayama, and S. Nomura (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 1990).
  17. J. B. Hartle, in Proceedings of the 1992 Les Houches Summer School, edited by B. Julia and J. Zinn-Justin, (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1995).
  18. J. J. Halliwell, in Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes, edited by S. Coleman, J. B. Hartle, T. Piran, and S. Weinberg (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
  19. J. J. Halliwell, Phys. Rev. D 60, 105031 (1999).
  20. J. J. Halliwell and J. Thorwart, Phys. Rev. D 64, 124018 (2001).
  21. N. A. Lemos, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 37, 1449 (1996).
  22. J. A. de Barros, N. Pinto-Neto, and M. A. Sagioro-Leal, Phys. Lett. A 241, 229 (1998).
  23. F. G. Alvarenga, J. C. Fabris, N. A. Lemos, and G. A. Monerat, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 34, 651 (2002).
  24. P. Peter, E. J. C. Pinho, and N. Pinto-Neto, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104017 (2006).
  25. B. F. Schutz, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2762 (1970); 4, 3559 (1971).
  26. V. G. Lapchinskii and V. A. Rubakov, Theor. Math. Phys. 33, 1076 (1977).
  27. F. Tipler, Phys. Rep. 137, 231 (1986).
  28. R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, edited by D. Styer (Dover, New York, 2010).
  29. N. Pinto-Neto, E. Sergio Santini, and F. T. Falciano, Phys. Lett. A 344, 131 (2005).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation