Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Enhancing li3lj with the Z0-penguin

M. Hirsch1,*, F. Staub2,†, and A. Vicente3,‡

  • 1AHEP Group, Instituto de Física Corpuscular–C.S.I.C./Universitat de València Edificio de Institutos de Paterna, Apartado 22085, E–46071 València, Spain
  • 2Physikalisches Institut der Universität Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany
  • 3Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, CNRS–UMR 8627, Université de Paris-Sud 11 F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France

  • *mahirsch@ific.uv.es
  • fnstaub@physik.uni-bonn.de
  • avelino.vicente@th.u-psud.fr

Phys. Rev. D 85, 113013 – Published 26 June, 2012Erratum Phys. Rev. D 91, 059902 (2015)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.113013

Abstract

Lepton flavor violation has been observed in neutrino oscillations. For charged lepton flavor violation decays only upper limits are known, but sizable branching ratios are expected in many neutrino mass models. High-scale models, such as the classical supersymmetric seesaw, usually predict that decays li3lj are roughly a factor α smaller than the corresponding decays liljγ. Here we demonstrate that the Z0-penguin diagram can give an enhancement for decays li3lj in many extensions of the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). We first discuss why the Z0-penguin is not dominant in the MSSM with seesaw and show that much larger contributions from the Z0-penguin are expected in general. We then demonstrate the effect numerically in two example models, namely, the supersymmetric inverse seesaw and R-parity violating supersymmetry.

Erratum

Erratum: Enhancing li3lj with the Z0-penguin [Phys. Rev. D 85, 113013 (2012)]

M. Hirsch, F. Staub, and A. Vicente
Phys. Rev. D 91, 059902 (2015)

Article Text

References (27)

  1. Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
  2. Q. R. Ahmad et al. (SNO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).
  3. S. Abe et al. (KamLAND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 221803 (2008).
  4. Y. Ashie et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 101801 (2004).
  5. T. Schwetz, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, New J. Phys. 13, 109401 (2011).
  6. J. Adam et al. (MEG Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 171801 (2011).
  7. K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010).
  8. Y. Kuno and Y. Okada, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 151 (2001).
  9. F. Borzumati and A. Masiero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 961 (1986).
  10. K. S. Babu and C. Kolda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 241802 (2002).
  11. E. Arganda and M. J. Herrero, Phys. Rev. D 73, 055003 (2006).
  12. A. Faessler, T. S. Kosmas, S. Kovalenko, and J. D. Vergados, Nucl. Phys. B587, 25 (2000).
  13. T. Goto, Y. Okada, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D 83, 053011 (2011).
  14. J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2442 (1996).
  15. E. Lunghi, A. Masiero, I. Scimemi, and L. Silvestrini, Nucl. Phys. B568, 120 (2000).
  16. W. Porod, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 275 (2003).
  17. W. Porod and F. Staub, arXiv:1104.1573.
  18. F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 808 (2011).
  19. F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1077 (2010).
  20. F. Staub, T. Ohl, W. Porod, and C. Speckner, arXiv:1109.5147.
  21. R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1642 (1986).
  22. V. De Romeri, M. Hirsch, and M. Malinsky, Phys. Rev. D 84, 053012 (2011).
  23. A. Abada, D. Das, and C. Weiland, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 100.
  24. B. C. Allanach, A. Dedes, and H. K. Dreiner, Phys. Rev. D 69, 115002 (2004) 72, 079902 (2005).
  25. M. Hirsch, M. A. Diaz, W. Porod, J. C. Romao, and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 62, 113008 (2000); 65, 119901 (2002).
  26. H. K. Dreiner, M. Hanussek, and S. Grab, Phys. Rev. D 82, 055027 (2010).
  27. R. Barbier, C. Bérat, M. Besançon, M. Chemtob, A. Deandrea, E. Dudas, P. Fayet, S. Lavignac G. Moreau, E. Perez, and Y. Sirois, Phys. Rep. 420, 1 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation