- Access by Xinjiang University
Enhancing with the -penguin
Phys. Rev. D 85, 113013 – Published 26 June, 2012Erratum Phys. Rev. D 91, 059902 (2015)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.113013
Abstract
Lepton flavor violation has been observed in neutrino oscillations. For charged lepton flavor violation decays only upper limits are known, but sizable branching ratios are expected in many neutrino mass models. High-scale models, such as the classical supersymmetric seesaw, usually predict that decays are roughly a factor smaller than the corresponding decays . Here we demonstrate that the -penguin diagram can give an enhancement for decays in many extensions of the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). We first discuss why the -penguin is not dominant in the MSSM with seesaw and show that much larger contributions from the -penguin are expected in general. We then demonstrate the effect numerically in two example models, namely, the supersymmetric inverse seesaw and -parity violating supersymmetry.
Erratum
Erratum: Enhancing with the -penguin [Phys. Rev. D 85, 113013 (2012)]
Article Text
References (27)
- Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
- Q. R. Ahmad et al. (SNO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).
- S. Abe et al. (KamLAND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 221803 (2008).
- Y. Ashie et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 101801 (2004).
- T. Schwetz, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, New J. Phys. 13, 109401 (2011).
- J. Adam et al. (MEG Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 171801 (2011).
- K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010).
- Y. Kuno and Y. Okada, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 151 (2001).
- F. Borzumati and A. Masiero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 961 (1986).
- K. S. Babu and C. Kolda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 241802 (2002).
- E. Arganda and M. J. Herrero, Phys. Rev. D 73, 055003 (2006).
- A. Faessler, T. S. Kosmas, S. Kovalenko, and J. D. Vergados, Nucl. Phys. B587, 25 (2000).
- T. Goto, Y. Okada, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D 83, 053011 (2011).
- J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2442 (1996).
- E. Lunghi, A. Masiero, I. Scimemi, and L. Silvestrini, Nucl. Phys. B568, 120 (2000).
- W. Porod, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 275 (2003).
- W. Porod and F. Staub, arXiv:1104.1573.
- F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 808 (2011).
- F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1077 (2010).
- F. Staub, T. Ohl, W. Porod, and C. Speckner, arXiv:1109.5147.
- R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1642 (1986).
- V. De Romeri, M. Hirsch, and M. Malinsky, Phys. Rev. D 84, 053012 (2011).
- A. Abada, D. Das, and C. Weiland, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 100.
- B. C. Allanach, A. Dedes, and H. K. Dreiner, Phys. Rev. D 69, 115002 (2004) 72, 079902 (2005).
- M. Hirsch, M. A. Diaz, W. Porod, J. C. Romao, and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 62, 113008 (2000); 65, 119901 (2002).
- H. K. Dreiner, M. Hanussek, and S. Grab, Phys. Rev. D 82, 055027 (2010).
- R. Barbier, C. Bérat, M. Besançon, M. Chemtob, A. Deandrea, E. Dudas, P. Fayet, S. Lavignac G. Moreau, E. Perez, and Y. Sirois, Phys. Rep. 420, 1 (2005).