- Access by Xinjiang University
Dynamics of perfect fluids in nonminimally coupled gravity
Phys. Rev. D 85, 024012 – Published 11 January, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024012
Abstract
In this work we explore the consequences that a nonminimal coupling between geometry and matter can have on the dynamics of perfect fluids. It is argued that the presence of a static, axially symmetric pressureless fluid does not imply a Minkowski space-time like as is in general relativity. This feature can be attributed to a pressure mimicking mechanism related to the nonminimal coupling. The case of a spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by fluid matter is analyzed, and it is shown that under equilibrium conditions the total fluid mass is about twice that of the black hole. Finally, a generalization of the Newtonian potential for a fluid element is proposed and its implications are briefly discussed.
Article Text
References (19)
- T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010).
- O. Bertolami, C. G. Boehmer, T. Harko, and F. S. N. Lobo, Phys. Rev. D 75, 104016 (2007).
- O. Bertolami, T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, and J. Páramos, arXiv:0811.2876.
- O. Bertolami and J. Páramos, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 245017 (2008).
- O. Bertolami, F. S. N. Lobo, and J. Páramos, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064036 (2008).
- S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (Wiley, New York, 1972).
In fact, the same relation holds even for the axially symmetric case. See below.
There is a minor issue we have been ignoring so far: as pointed out earlier, must depend on , so that one recovers when . Making the substitution is one way to deal with this problem. However, if , it can be absorbed into , which is the same as taking , so that no problem arises whatsoever. We will assume that throughout the rest of this paper.
Take, for example, the ratio
- P. Salucci and M. Persic, ASP Conf. Series 117, 1 (1997).
- D. Merritt, J. F. Navarro, A. Ludlow, and A. Jenkins, Astrophys. J. 624, L85 (2005).
- A. Graham, D. Merritt, B. Moore, J. Diemand, and B. Terzic, Astron. J. 132, 2701 (2006).
- G. van de Ven, R. Mandelbaum, and C. R. Keeton, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 607 (2009).
In fact, the result was proven only for . However, its generalization to the case is straightforward.
- S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone, and A. Troisi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 375, 1423 (2007).
- C. G. Boehmer, T. Harko, and F. S. N. Lobo, Astropart. Phys. 29, 386 (2008).
- O. Bertolami and J. Páramos, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2010) 009.
- O. Bertolami, P. Frazão, and J. Páramos, Phys. Rev. D 81, 104046 (2010).
- O. Bertolami and J. Páramos, Phys. Rev. D 84, 064022 (2011).