Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Golden ratio prediction for solar neutrino mixing

Yuji Kajiyama1, Martti Raidal1, and Alessandro Strumia2

  • 1National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Ravala 10, Tallinn 10143, Estonia
  • 2Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universit`a di Pisa and INFN, Pisa, Italy

Phys. Rev. D 76, 117301 – Published 6 December, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.117301

Abstract

We present a simple texture that predicts the cotangent of the solar neutrino mixing angle to be equal to the golden ratio. This prediction is 1.4σ below the present best-fit value and final SNO and KamLAND data could discriminate it from tri-bimaximal mixing. The neutrino mass matrix is invariant under a Z2Z2 symmetry: that geometrically is a reflection along the diagonal of the golden rectangle. Assuming an analogous structure in the quark sector suggests a golden prediction for the Cabibbo angle, θC=π/4θ1213.3°, up to the uncertainties comparable to Vub.

Article Text

References (12)

  1. For reviews and references see A. Strumia and F. Vissani, arXiv:hep-ph/0606054; M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, arXiv:0704.1800.
  2. P. F. Harrison, D. H. Perkins, and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett. B 530, 167 (2002).
  3. For a summary and references see E. Ma, arXiv:0705.0327; G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Nucl. Phys. B741, 215 (2006).
  4. Euclid of Alexandria, Elements, Book 6, Definition 3.—A straight line is said to have been cut in extreme and mean ratio when, as the whole line is to the greater segment, so is the greater to the less.
  5. The golden prediction |θ1245°|=14° was mentioned in a footnote of A. Datta, F. Ling, and P. Ramond, Nucl. Phys. B671, 383 (2003); a numerically equivalent result is contained in Q. Duret and B. Machet, arXiv:0705.1237 who follow a completely different logic: mixing angles are constrained such that violations of unitarity satisfy some arbitrary properties.
  6. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B 67, 421 (1977); M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Proceedings of the Supergravity Stony Brook Workshop, New York, 1979, edited by P. Van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Freedman (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979); T. Yanagida, Proceedings of the Workshop on Unified Theories and Baryon Number in the Universe, Tsukuba, Japan 1979, edited by A. Sawada and A. Sugamoto [KEK Report No. 79-18, Tsukuba]; R. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  7. F. Feruglio, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 143, 184 (2005).
  8. A. Y. Smirnov, arXiv:hep-ph/0402264; see also the talk by P. Ramond at the neutrino.kek.jp/seesaw Fujihara seminar in Feb. 2004.
  9. M. Raidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 161801 (2004).
  10. The Particle Data Group, pdg.lbl.gov.; the most recent result, sinθC=0.2264±0.0009 was presented by M. Palutan at the Kaon 2007 conference, www.lnf.infn.it/conference/kaon07.
  11. For recent works and references, see: S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, M. Ratz, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 024; J. R. Ellis, A. Hektor, M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, and M. Raidal, Phys. Lett. B 631, 32 (2005).
  12. A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Choubey, S. Goswami, and S. T. Petcov, Phys. Rev. D 72, 033013 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation