Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Measurement of B(Ds+l+ν) and the decay constant fDS+

T. K. Pedlar1, D. Cronin-Hennessy2, K. Y. Gao2, J. Hietala2, Y. Kubota2, T. Klein2, B. W. Lang2, R. Poling2, A. W. Scott2 et al. (CLEO Collaboration)

A. W. Scott2, A. Smith2, P. Zweber2, S. Dobbs3, Z. Metreveli3, K. K. Seth3, A. Tomaradze3, J. Ernst4, K. M. Ecklund5, H. Severini6, W. Love7, V. Savinov7, O. Aquines8, A. Lopez8, S. Mehrabyan8, H. Mendez8, J. Ramirez8, G. S. Huang9, D. H. Miller9, V. Pavlunin9, B. Sanghi9, I. P. J. Shipsey9, B. Xin9, G. S. Adams10, M. Anderson10, J. P. Cummings10, I. Danko10, D. Hu10, B. Moziak10, J. Napolitano10, Q. He11, J. Insler11, H. Muramatsu11, C. S. Park11, E. H. Thorndike11, F. Yang11, M. Artuso12, S. Blusk12, J. Butt12, S. Khalil12, J. Li12, N. Menaa12, R. Mountain12, S. Nisar12, K. Randrianarivony12, R. Sia12, T. Skwarnicki12, S. Stone12, J. C. Wang12, G. Bonvicini13, D. Cinabro13, M. Dubrovin13, A. Lincoln13, D. M. Asner14, K. W. Edwards14, P. Naik14, R. A. Briere15, T. Ferguson15, G. Tatishvili15, H. Vogel15, M. E. Watkins15, J. L. Rosner16, N. E. Adam17, J. P. Alexander17, D. G. Cassel17, J. E. Duboscq17, R. Ehrlich17, L. Fields17, L. Gibbons17, R. Gray17, S. W. Gray17, D. L. Hartill17, B. K. Heltsley17, D. Hertz17, C. D. Jones17, J. Kandaswamy17, D. L. Kreinick17, V. E. Kuznetsov17, H. Mahlke-Krüger17, D. Mohapatra17, P. U. E. Onyisi17, J. R. Patterson17, D. Peterson17, J. Pivarski17, D. Riley17, A. Ryd17, A. J. Sadoff17, H. Schwarthoff17, X. Shi17, S. Stroiney17, W. M. Sun17, T. Wilksen17, S. B. Athar18, R. Patel18, J. Yelton18, P. Rubin19, C. Cawlfield20, B. I. Eisenstein20, I. Karliner20, D. Kim20, N. Lowrey20, M. Selen20, E. J. White20, J. Wiss20, R. E. Mitchell21, M. R. Shepherd21, and D. Besson22 (CLEO Collaboration)

  • 1Luther College, Decorah, Iowa 52101, USA
  • 2University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
  • 3Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
  • 4State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York 12222, USA
  • 5State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA
  • 6University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA
  • 7University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
  • 8University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 00681
  • 9Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
  • 10Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, USA
  • 11University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
  • 12Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA
  • 13Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA
  • 14Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
  • 15Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
  • 16Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 17Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
  • 18University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
  • 19George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA
  • 20University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 61801, USA
  • 21Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
  • 22University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA

Phys. Rev. D 76, 072002 – Published 8 October, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.072002

Abstract

We examine e+eDsDs*+ and Ds*Ds+ interactions at 4170 MeV using the CLEO-c detector in order to measure the decay constant fDs+. We use the Ds++ν channel, where the + designates either a μ+ or a τ+, when the τ+π+ν¯. Analyzing both modes independently, we determine B(Ds+μ+ν)=(0.594±0.066±0.031)%, and B(Ds+τ+ν)=(8.0±1.3±0.4)%. We also analyze them simultaneously to find an effective value of Beff(Ds+μ+ν)=(0.638±0.059±0.033)% and extract fDs+=274±13±7MeV. Combining with our previous determination of B(D+μ+ν), we also find the ratio fDs+/fD+=1.23±0.11±0.04. We compare to current theoretical estimates. Finally, we find B(Ds+e+ν)<1.3×104 at 90% confidence level.

Article Text

References (43)

  1. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  2. A. Abulencia et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 242003 (2006); see also V. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), 97, 021802 (2006).
  3. W.-M. Yao et al., J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006).
  4. A recent observation of the decay rate for Bτν¯ measures the product of fBd·|Vub|, but does not provide an accurate value of fBd, because of its inherent imprecision and also because of the relative large error on |Vub|. See K. Ikado et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 251802 (2006).
  5. C. Davies et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 022001 (2004).
  6. M. Artuso et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 251801 (2005).
  7. G. Bonvicini et al. (CLEO Collaboration) Phys. Rev. D 70, 112004 (2004).
  8. D. Silverman and H. Yao, Phys. Rev. D 38, 214 (1988).
  9. A. G. Akeroyd, Prog. Theor. Phys. 111, 295 (2004); A. G. Akeroyd and C. H. Chen Phys. Rev. D 75, 075004 (2007).
  10. J. Hewett, Report No. SLAC-PUB-95-6821, 2005; W.-S. Hou, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2342 (1993).
  11. M. Chadha et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 58, 032002 (1998).
  12. Y. Alexandrov et al. (BEATRICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 478, 31 (2000).
  13. A. Heister et al. (ALEPH Collaboration) Phys. Lett. B 528, 1 (2002).
  14. M. Acciarri et al. (L3 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 396, 327 (1997).
  15. G. Abbiendi et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 516, 236 (2001).
  16. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 141801 (2007).
  17. S. Stone, in Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference, Vancouver, 2006, eConf C060409 (2006).
  18. D. Peterson et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 478, 142 (2002); Y. Kubota et al. (CLEO Collaboration), 320, 66 (1992).
  19. M. Artuso et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 554, 147 (2005).
  20. R. Poling, in Flavor Physics and CP Violation, Vancouver, 2006, eConf C060409 (2006).
  21. T. Skwarnicki, Ph.D. thesis, Cracow Institute of Nuclear Physics [Report No. DESY F31-86-02, 1986 (unpublished)].
  22. P. Rubin et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73, 112005 (2006).
  23. S. Malvezzi (FOCUS Collaboration), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 9, 165 (2005).
  24. P. Rubin et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73, 112005 (2006).
  25. E. Barberio, B. van Eijk, Z. Was, Comput. Phys. Commun. 66, 115 (1991); E. Barberio and Z. Wa̧s, 79, 291 (1994).
  26. N. E. Adam et al. (CLEO Collaboration), arXiv:hep-ex/0607079.
  27. E. Follana et al. (HPQCD and UKQCD collaborations), arXiv:0706.172.
  28. C. Aubin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 122002 (2005).
  29. A. Ali Khan et al. (QCDSF Collaboration), arXiv:hep-lat/0701015.
  30. T. W. Chiu et al., Phys. Lett. B 624, 31 (2005).
  31. L. Lellouch and C.-J. Lin (UKQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 64, 094501 (2001).
  32. D. Becirevic et al., Phys. Rev. D 60, 074501 (1999).
  33. J. Bordes, J. Peñarrocha, and K. Schilcher, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2005) 014.
  34. S. Narison, arXiv:hep-ph/0202200.
  35. A. M. Badalian et al., Phys. Rev. D 75, 116001 (2007); see also A. M. Badalian and B. L. G. Bakker, arXiv:hep-ph/0702229.
  36. D. Ebert et al., Phys. Lett. B 635, 93 (2006).
  37. G. Cvetič et al., Phys. Lett. B 596, 84 (2004).
  38. H.-M. Choi, Phys. Rev. D 75, 073016 (2007).
  39. L. Salcedo et al., Braz. J. Phys. 34, 297 (2004).
  40. Z. G. Wang et al., Nucl. Phys. A 744, 156 (2004).
  41. J. Amundson et al., Phys. Rev. D 47, 3059 (1993).
  42. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL collaborations, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 378, 101 (1996).
  43. S. Stone, in Proceedings of XXXIII International Conference on High Energy Physics, Moscow, Russia, 2006 (to be published).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation