Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Geometrically engineering the standard model: Locally unfolding three families out of E8

Jacob L. Bourjaily*

  • Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

  • *jbourjai@princeton.edu

Phys. Rev. D 76, 046004 – Published 9 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.046004

Abstract

This paper extends and builds upon the results of [J. L. Bourjaily, arXiv:0704.0444.], in which we described how to use the tools of geometrical engineering to deform geometrically engineered grand unified models into ones with lower symmetry. This top-down unfolding has the advantage that the relative positions of singularities giving rise to the many “low-energy” matter fields are related by only a few parameters which deform the geometry of the unified model. And because the relative positions of singularities are necessary to compute the superpotential, for example, this is a framework in which the arbitrariness of geometrically engineered models can be greatly reduced. In [J. L. Bourjaily, arXiv:0704.0444.], this picture was made concrete for the case of deforming the representations of an SU5 model into their standard model content. In this paper we continue that discussion to show how a geometrically engineered 16 of SO10 can be unfolded into the standard model, and how the three families of the standard model uniquely emerge from the unfolding of a single, isolated E8 singularity.

Article Text

References (18)

  1. S. Katz and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B497, 146 (1997).
  2. A. Klemm, W. Lerche, and P. Mayr, Phys. Lett. B 357, 313 (1995).
  3. B. S. Acharya and S. Gukov, Phys. Rep. 392, 121 (2004).
  4. E. Witten, arXiv:hep-ph/0201018.
  5. T. Friedmann and E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7, 577 (2003).
  6. J. L. Bourjaily, arXiv:0704.0444.
  7. S. Katz and D. Morrison, J. Algebraic Geometry 1, 449 (1992).
  8. B. Acharya, K. Bobkov, G. Kane, P. Kumar, and D. Vaman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 191601 (2006).
  9. B. S. Acharya, K. Bobkov, G. L. Kane, P. Kumar, and J. Shao, arXiv:hep-th/0701034.
  10. P. Berglund and A. Brandhuber, Nucl. Phys. B641, 351 (2002).
  11. F. Klein, Vorlesungen über das Ikosaeder und die Auflösung der Gleichungen vom funften Grade (Teubner, Leipzig, 1884).
  12. C. C. Bramble, Am. J. Math. 40, 351 (1918).
  13. R. Slansky, Phys. Rep. 79, 1 (1981).
  14. M. Atiyah and E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1 (2003).
  15. B. Acharya and E. Witten, arXiv:hep-th/0109152.
  16. J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rep. 183, 193 (1989).
  17. This was pointed out by Paul Langacker in a private correspondance.
  18. H. Verlinde and M. Wijnholt, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 106.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation