Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Two-Body Weak Reactions of Hadrons at Very High Energies

Mark Dubovoy, Paul Langacker*, and Mahiko Suzuki

  • Department of Physics and Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

  • *National Science Foundation Predoctoral Fellow.

Phys. Rev. D 4, 1474 – Published 1 September, 1971

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.4.1474

Abstract

Two-body hadronic scattering through weak interactions is investigated theoretically in the energy region accessible at the National Accelerator Laboratory. In the ordinary current ×current form of weak interactions, the following quantities are calculated for charge-exchange weak hadronic reactions: (i) the differential cross section, the polarization of a final baryon, and the asymmetry in the angular distribution of scattering from a polarized target for strangeness-changing processes, and (ii) the interference of weak-interaction amplitudes with strong-interaction amplitudes for processes to which both weak and strong interactions contribute. The interference with strong amplitudes is discussed by means of a straight ex-trapolation of existing Regge analysis at lower energies (less than 30 GeV). Differential cross sections near the forward direction are typically of the order of 1038 cm2 in dσdcosθ in the center-of-mass frame. The interference between weak and strong amplitudes is unfortunately only one part in 104-105 for the πN charge-exchange scattering in spite of the different high-energy behavior. All calculations are supposed to be valid at high energies up to absorption corrections due to a Regge cut generated by the Pomeranchukon and a fixed pole at J=1 from the weak amplitude. Inelastic scattering is also briefly mentioned. Charge-nonexchange processes are discussed in connection with a test for the existence of neutral weak currents.

References (22)

  1. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Letters 10, 531 (1963)
  2. B. L. Ioffe and E. P. Shabalin, Yadern. Fiz. 6, 828 (1967) [Soviet J. Nucl. Phys. 6, 328 (1967)]
  3. R. N. Mohapatra, J. Subba Rao, and R. E. Marshak, Phys. Rev. 171, 1502 (1968)
  4. M. Gell-Mann, M. L. Goldberger, N. Kroll, and F. E. Low, Phys. Rev. 179, 1518 (1969)
  5. A. Pais, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Expectations for Particle Reactions at the New Accelerators (Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis., 1970)
  6. Omitted endnote

  7. V. M. De Laney, D. J. Gross, I. J. Muzinich, and V. L. Teplitz, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 149 (1967)
  8. M. M. Block et al., Phys. Letters 12, 281 (1964)
  9. G. Bernardini et al., Phys. Letters 13, 86 (1964)
  10. R. Burns et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 15, 42 (1965)
  11. N. Brene, L. Veje, M. Roos, and C. Cronström, Phys. Rev. 149, 1288 (1966)
  12. B. Sakita and K. C. Wali, Phys. Rev. 139, B1355 (1965)
  13. P. S. J. McNamee and F. Chilton, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 1005 (1964)
  14. Omitted endnote

  15. Omitted endnote

  16. Y. Nambu and M. Yoshimura, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 25 (1970) Brene et al. in [14]
  17. Omitted endnote

  18. Omitted endnote

  19. V. Singh, Phys. Rev. 129, 1889 (1963)
  20. W. Rarita et al., Phys. Rev. 165, 1615 (1968)
  21. Omitted endnote

  22. Omitted endnote

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation