Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Rigorous Bound on Kl3 Decay Amplitudes

Ling-Fong Li and Heinz Pagels

  • Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

Phys. Rev. D 3, 2191 – Published 1 May, 1971

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2191

Abstract

We derive a rigorous bound on the Kl3 decay form factors f±(t). With ξf(0)f+(0) and λ+mπ2f+(0)f+(0), our bound is |ξ+(mK2mπ2)λ+mπ2|<~8Δ12(0)I123mK2|f+(0)|, where I=0.584 and Δ(0) is the propagator of the divergence of the strangeness-changing current at zero momentum. If one further assumes for the Hamiltonian density H(x)=H0(x)+ε0S0(x)+ε8S8(x), with H0(x) SU(3)×SU(3) invariant and S0,8 transforming like members of the (3¯,3)+(3,3¯) representation, then one can prove that Δ(0)=3ε8S804, so Δ(0) is proportional to the product of SU(3) violations in the Hamiltonian times those in the vacuum, and is hence expected to be very small. We estimate Δ12mπfπ, and our bound implies |ξ+12.3λ+|<~0.29. With λ+=0.06 as indicated by recent data, we have 1.03<ξ<0.45, which serves to restrict the ξ value considerably. We also remark on the relation of this bound to the perturbative theorem of Dashen and Weinstein.

Comments & Replies

Test of Kl3 Soft-Pion Theorem and Chiral SW(3) Model

I-Fu Shih and Susumu Okubo
Phys. Rev. D 4, 3519 (1971)

Comment on a Rigorous Bound for the f+(0) Form Factor of Kl3 Decay

Ling-Fong Li and Heinz Pagels
Phys. Rev. D 4, 255 (1971)

Lower Bound on λ+ in Kl3 Decay

R. Acharya
Phys. Rev. D 5, 768 (1972)

References (17)

  1. M. Gaillard, Nuovo Cimento 61A, 499 (1969)
  2. L. M. Chounet and M. K. Gaillard, Phys. Letters 32B, 505 (1970) M. K. Gaillard and L. M. Chounet, CERN Report No. 70-14, 1970 (unpublished)
  3. M. Bég, Comments Nucl. Particle Phys. 4, 182 (1970)
  4. C. Callan and S. Treiman, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 153 (1966)
  5. V. Mathur, S. Okubo, and L. Pandit, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 371 (1966)
  6. R. A. Brandt and G. Preparata, Nuovo Cimento Letters 4, 80 (1970)
  7. R. Dashen and M. Weinstein, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 1337 (1969) C. P. Korthals Altes, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1181 (1970) S. P. de Alwis, ibid. 2, 1346 (1970)
  8. S. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 224 (1968)
  9. M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes, and B. Renner, Phys. Rev. 175, 2196 (1968)
  10. V. S. Mathur and S. Okubo, Phys. Rev. D 1, 3468 (1970)
  11. X2 Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 3, 10 (1971)
  12. H. Pagels, University of N. Carolina report, 1967 (unpublished)
  13. D. J. Gross and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. 163, 1688 (1967)
  14. F. von Hippel and J. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 1, 151 (1970)
  15. P. Federbush and K. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 120, 1926 (1960)
  16. M. Ademollo and R. Gatto, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 264 (1965)
  17. R. E. Berhends and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 186 (1960)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation