Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Two- and three-body contributions to cosmological monopole annihilation

Duane A. Dicus and Don N. Page*

Vigdor L. Teplitz

  • Center for Particle Theory and Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712

  • Strategic Affairs Division, U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Washington, D. C. 20451 and Physics Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland

  • *Permanent address: Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.

Phys. Rev. D 26, 1306 – Published 15 September, 1982

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1306

Abstract

We show (1) that the two-body cross section for monopole-antimonopole annihilation is smaller when photon discreteness effects are included than previously believed; (2) that the three-body annihilation process should dominate the two-body process; but (3) that, even when monopole clumping and monopole dilution by entropy production is taken into account, these processes do not appear to provide a solution to the cosmological monopole problem in that either the monopoles do not annihilate or they annihilate so late that an unacceptable amount of entropy is produced.

References (21)

  1. J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1240 (1973) H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974) H. Georgi, H. Quinn, and S. Weinberg, ibid. 33, 451 (1974) F. Gursey and P. Sikivie, ibid. 36, 775 (1976) A. Buras, J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Nucl. Phys. B135, 66 (1978) H. Georgi and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett 82B, 392 (1979)
  2. M. Yoshimura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 281 (1978) ibid.42, 746 (1979) S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 18, 4500 (1978) D. Toussaint, S. B. Treiman, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, ibid. 19, 1036 (1979) S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 850 (1979) J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. 80B, 360 (1979) ibid.82B, 464 (1979) E. W. Kolb and S. Wolfram, ibid. 91B, 217 (1980) Nucl. Phys. B712, 224 (1980) J. N. Fry, K. A. Olive, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2953 (1980) ibid.22, 2977 (1980)
  3. Ya. B. Zeldovich and M. Yu. Khlopov, Phys. Lett. 79B, 239 (1978)
  4. J. P. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1365 (1979)
  5. A. Guth and S.-H. H. Tye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 631 (1980) A. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981)
  6. A. Albrecht et al., Enrico Fermi Report No. 82-09 (unpublished)
  7. M. B. Einhorn, D. L. Stein, and D. Toussaint, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3295 (1980) P. Langacker and S.-Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1 (1980) F. A. Bais and S. Rudoz, CERN Report No. TH. 2885 (unpublished) A. Kennedy, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi, CERN Report No. TH. 2944 (unpublished)
  8. T. Goldman, E. W. Kolb, and D. Toussaint, Phys. Rev. D 23, 867 (1981)
  9. J. N. Fry, Astrophys. J. 246, L93 (1981)
  10. G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B79, 276 (1974) ibid.B105, 538 (1976) A. Polyakov, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 430 (1974) [JETP Lett. 20, 194 (1974)]
  11. D. N. Page and M. R. McKee, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1458 (1981)
  12. D. N. Page and M. R. McKee, Nature 291, 44 (1981)
  13. J. J. Thomson, Philos. Mag. 23, 449 (1912) I. C. Percival and D. Richards, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 11, 1 (1975)
  14. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 3rd revised English edition (Pergamon, Oxford, 1971), Sec. 75
  15. J. Jeans, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 199A, 49 (1902)
  16. [8]
  17. D. Lynden-Bell, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 136, 101 (1967)
  18. Omitted endnote

  19. J. Bjorken and S. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Fields (McGraw Hill, New York, 1965), Sec. 17.10
  20. [14], Sec. 70
  21. H. A. Kramers, Philos. Mag. 46, 836 (1923)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation