- Access by Xinjiang University
Two- and three-body contributions to cosmological monopole annihilation
Phys. Rev. D 26, 1306 – Published 15 September, 1982
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1306
Abstract
We show (1) that the two-body cross section for monopole-antimonopole annihilation is smaller when photon discreteness effects are included than previously believed; (2) that the three-body annihilation process should dominate the two-body process; but (3) that, even when monopole clumping and monopole dilution by entropy production is taken into account, these processes do not appear to provide a solution to the cosmological monopole problem in that either the monopoles do not annihilate or they annihilate so late that an unacceptable amount of entropy is produced.
References (21)
- J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1240 (1973) H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974) H. Georgi, H. Quinn, and S. Weinberg, ibid. 33, 451 (1974) F. Gursey and P. Sikivie, ibid. 36, 775 (1976) A. Buras, J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Nucl. Phys. B135, 66 (1978) H. Georgi and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett 82B, 392 (1979)
- M. Yoshimura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 281 (1978) ibid.42, 746 (1979) S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 18, 4500 (1978) D. Toussaint, S. B. Treiman, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, ibid. 19, 1036 (1979) S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 850 (1979) J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. 80B, 360 (1979) ibid.82B, 464 (1979) E. W. Kolb and S. Wolfram, ibid. 91B, 217 (1980) Nucl. Phys. B712, 224 (1980) J. N. Fry, K. A. Olive, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2953 (1980) ibid.22, 2977 (1980)
- Ya. B. Zeldovich and M. Yu. Khlopov, Phys. Lett. 79B, 239 (1978)
- J. P. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1365 (1979)
- A. Guth and S.-H. H. Tye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 631 (1980) A. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981)
- A. Albrecht et al., Enrico Fermi Report No. 82-09 (unpublished)
- M. B. Einhorn, D. L. Stein, and D. Toussaint, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3295 (1980) P. Langacker and S.-Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1 (1980) F. A. Bais and S. Rudoz, CERN Report No. TH. 2885 (unpublished) A. Kennedy, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi, CERN Report No. TH. 2944 (unpublished)
- T. Goldman, E. W. Kolb, and D. Toussaint, Phys. Rev. D 23, 867 (1981)
- J. N. Fry, Astrophys. J. 246, L93 (1981)
- G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B79, 276 (1974) ibid.B105, 538 (1976) A. Polyakov, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 430 (1974) [JETP Lett. 20, 194 (1974)]
- D. N. Page and M. R. McKee, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1458 (1981)
- D. N. Page and M. R. McKee, Nature 291, 44 (1981)
- J. J. Thomson, Philos. Mag. 23, 449 (1912) I. C. Percival and D. Richards, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 11, 1 (1975)
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 3rd revised English edition (Pergamon, Oxford, 1971), Sec. 75
- J. Jeans, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 199A, 49 (1902)
- [8]
- D. Lynden-Bell, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 136, 101 (1967)
Omitted endnote
- J. Bjorken and S. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Fields (McGraw Hill, New York, 1965), Sec. 17.10
- [14], Sec. 70
- H. A. Kramers, Philos. Mag. 46, 836 (1923)