- Access by Xinjiang University
Nodal Structure, Nodal Flux Fields, and Flux Quantization in Stationary Quantum States
Phys. Rev. D 2, 647 – Published 15 August, 1970
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.647
Abstract
The nodal structure of the Schrödinger wave function is used to describe an -particle system in a stationary quantum state. In terms of nodal lines (quantized flux lines) together with their circulation numbers, two fields are defined: the microscopic, singular nodal flux field n (r) and the macroscopic, regular nodal flux density field N (r). Their definition arises in a natural way from a quantum-mechanical vector potential defined by the gradient of the multivalued phase function associated with the pattern of quantized flux lines. The flux of the fields n (r) and N (r) is quantized and shown to be proportional to the circulation of the velocity in the system. The unit circulation for a system of bosons with a particle spin and mass is equal to . In the case of charged particles, the field resembles Jehle's formulation of the magnetic field of a lepton as a superposition of quantized flux lines. In our case, however, the presence of quantized flux lines, forming closed loops follows from the mere existence of a current density and does not have to be assumed. By a simple argument, using permutation symmetry, it is shown that a flux quantum of the size is possible.
References (18)
- J. Riess, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 57, 301 (1970)
- P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A133, 60 (1931) Phys. Rev. 74, 817 (1948) F. A. Kaempffer, in Concepts in Quantum Mechanics (Academic, New York, 1965), Sec. 20
- H. Jehle, Int. J. Quantum Chem. IIS, 373 (1968)
- H. Jehle, Int. J. Quantum Chem. III, 269 (1969)
- ([1], Sec. I)
Omitted endnote
- Sec. 5.7 of [8] (Sec. V)
- J. Riess, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Thesis No. 4048 (Verlag, Zürich, 1968)
Omitted endnote
- M. Hamermesh, in Group Theory and its Application to Physical Problems (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1962), Chap. 7
- W. F. Vinen, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A260, 218 (1961)
- G. W. Rayfield and F. Reif, Phys. Rev. 136, A1194 (1964)
- B. S. Deaver, Jr., and W. M. Fairbank, Phys. Rev. Letters 7, 43 (1961) R. Doll and M. Nabauer, ibid. 7, 51 (1961) W. A. Little and R. D. Parks, ibid. 9, 9 (1962)
- Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)
- R. G. Chambers, Phys. Rev. Letters 5, 3 (1960)
- W. H. Furry and N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 118, 623 (1960)
- V. F. Weisskopf, in Boulder Lectures (Interscience, New York, 1960), Vol. III, p. 54
- F. Rohrlich and F. Strocchi, Phys. Rev. 139, B476 (1965)