Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Unitarized Veneziano Model with Satellites for ππ Scattering

David M. Scott, K. Tanaka, and R. Torgerson

  • Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210

Phys. Rev. D 2, 1301 – Published 1 October, 1970

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1301

Abstract

We impose single-channel unitarity on a five-term Veneziano ππ amplitude using the K-matrix approach. The violation of crossing symmetry as measured by the s- and p-wave crossing-symmetry sum rules is found to be negligible for wide ranges in the satellite coefficients. We study the conditions imposed by the non-negativity of the widths of the ρ, f, and g mesons as well as all their daughters. Although these conditions still permit a continuous infinity of solutions, a limiting case is of some interest where the widths of the ε, ε, and f are made to vanish. For this special model we calculate widths, scattering lengths, and the phase shifts δ00, δ02, and δ11. Since the daughters are no longer degenerate with the parents, masses are also calculated.

References (26)

  1. G. Veneziano, Nuovo Cimento 57A, 190 (1968)
  2. C. Lovelace, Phys. Letters 28B, 265 (1968)
  3. C. Lovelace, Conference on ππ and πK Interaction, Argonne, 1969, p. 562 (unpublished)
  4. H. M. Lipinski, University of Wisconsin report (unpublished)
  5. G. F. Chew and S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. 119, 467 (1960)
  6. R. E. Kreps and M. S. Milgram, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2271 (1970)
  7. C. Schmid, Phys. Letters 28B, 348 (1968) N. N. Khuri, Phys. Rev. 185, 1875 (1969) G. B. West, ibid. 185, 1927 (1969)
  8. S. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. 185, 1811 (1969) C. Tiktopoulos, Phys. Letters 31B, 138 (1970)
  9. M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, (Dover, New York, 1964), p. 445
  10. J. Shapiro and J. Yellin, LRL Report No. UCRL-18500 (unpublished) J. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. 179, 1345 (1969)
  11. N. G. Antoniou, A. Bartl, and F. Widder, Universität Tübingen report (unpublished)
  12. L. S. Brown and R. L. Goble, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 346 (1968) D. G. Ravenhall and R. L. Schult, University of Illinois report (unpublished)
  13. G. J. Gounaris and J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 244 (1968)
  14. Omitted endnote

  15. J. L. Basdevant, G. Cohen-Tannoudji, and A. Morel, Nuovo Cimento 64A, 585 (1969) R. Z. Roskies, ibid. 65A 467 (1970) A. P. Balachandran and J. Nuyts, Phys. Rev. 172, 1821 (9168)
  16. N. Barash-Schmidt, A. Barbaro-Galtieri, C. Bricman, S. E. Derenzo, L. R. Price, A. Rittenberg, M. Roos, A. H. Rosenfeld, P. Söding, and C. G. Wohl, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 87 (1970)
  17. J. H. Scharenguivel, L. J. Gutay, D. H. Miller, L. D. Jacobs, R. Keyser, D. Huwe, E. Marquit, F. Oppenheimer, W. Schultz, S. Marateck, J. D. Prentice, and E. West, Phys. Rev. 186, 1387 (1969)
  18. J. P. Baton, G. Laurens, and J. Reignier, Phys. Letters 25B, 419 (1967) W. D. Walker, J. Carroll, A. Garfinkel, and B. Y. Oh, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 603 (1967) N. N. Biswas, N. M. Cason, P. B. Johnson, V. P. Kenney, J. A. Poirier, and R. Torgerson, Phys. Letters 27B, 513 (1968) J. H. Scharenguivel, Conference on ππ and πK Interaction, Argonne, 1969, p. 306 (unpublished)
  19. Omitted endnote

  20. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 616 (1966)
  21. M. G. Olsson and L. Turner, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1127 (1968)
  22. J. Schwinger, Phys. Letters 24B, 473 (1967)
  23. M. G. Olsson, University of Wisconsin report (unpublished)
  24. [10]
  25. R. Z. Roskies, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 1851 (1968)
  26. Omitted endnote

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation