Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Local compensation of quantum numbers and the phase of many-particle production amplitudes

Don Weingarten

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627

Phys. Rev. D 13, 1474 – Published 1 March, 1976

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.13.1474

Abstract

We assume that two-body scattering processes occur only as the shadow of a class of many-particle production events and that the probability distribution of this class of events obeys the requirement of local compensation of quantum numbers. The first of these assumptions implies that a certain functional integral yields the strongest bound on the energy dependence of two-body quantum-number exchange which can be obtained from inelastic production probabilities. Using the second assumption we evaluate this bound and show that recent data imply that the result for charge exchange is probably much weaker than the energy dependence actually observed. We therefore conclude the energy dependence of charge exchange should be generated mainly by the phase of many-particle production. Then we reformulate local compensation of quantum numbers as a condition on many-particle production amplitudes, including their phases. We show that this assumption implies the leading energy dependence of two-body quantum-number exchange is given by Regge poles with factorizable residues. The Regge trajectories we obtain are expected to be analytic functions of both charge and momentum transfer and can be extrapolated to provide a number of semiquantitative conclusions concerning exotic meson trajectories.

References (21)

  1. A. Krzywicki and D. Weingarten, Phys. Lett. 50B, 265 (1974)
  2. P. Grassberger, C. Michael, and H. Miettinen, Phys. Lett. 52B, 60 (1974)
  3. D. Weingarten, Phys. Rev. D 11, 1924 (1975)
  4. A. Krzywicki, Nucl. Phys. B86, 296 (1975)
  5. A. Krzywicki, in Proceedings of the X Rencontre de Moriond, edited by J. Tran Thanh Van (Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay, 1975), Vol. I., p. 309
  6. P. Grassberger and H. Miettinen, Nucl. Phys. B92, 309 (1975)
  7. P. Pirilä, G. H. Thomas, and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D 12, 92 (1975)
  8. R. Peccei, Phys. Lett. 51B, 274 (1974)
  9. J. Derre et al., Saclay report, 1974 (unpublished)
  10. C. Bromberg et al., Phys. Rev. D 12, 1224 (1975)
  11. P. Hoyer, R. G. Roberts, and D. P. Roy, Phys. Lett. 44B, 258 (1973)
  12. H. M. Chan, J. E. Paton, and S. T. Tsou, Nucl. Phys. B86, 479 (1975)
  13. D. Weingarten, Nucl. Phys. B70, 501 (1974)
  14. C. M. Bromberg et al., Phys. Rev. D 9, 1864 (1974)
  15. Z. Koba, lectures given at the CERN-JINR Summer School of Physics, Ebeltoft, Denmark (1973)
  16. R. B. Griffiths, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic, New York, 1972), Vol. 1
  17. H. Araki, Commun. Math. Phys. 14, 120 (1969)
  18. E. Abers and B. W. Lee, Phys. Rep. 9C, 1 (1973)
  19. Hoyer, Roberts, and Roy, [11]
  20. L. Michejda, Nucl. Phys. B4, 113 (1968) Fortschr. Phys. 16, 707 (1968)
  21. L. Michejda, J. Turnau, and A. Białas, Nuovo Cimento A56, 241 (1968)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation