- Access by Xinjiang University
Sensitivity limits of space-based interferometric gravitational wave observatories from the solar wind
Phys. Rev. D 104, 062003 – Published 3 September, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.062003
Abstract
Space-based interferometric gravitational wave instruments such as the ESA/NASA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) observe gravitational waves by measuring changes in the light travel time between widely separated spacecraft. One potential noise source for these instruments is interaction with the solar wind, in particular the free electrons in the interplanetary plasma. Variations in the integrated column density of free electrons along the laser links will lead to time-of-flight delays which directly compete with signals produced by gravitational waves. In this paper we present a simplified model of the solar plasma relevant for this problem, anchor key parameters of our model using data from the NASA Wind/solar wind experiment instrument, and derive estimates for the effect in the LISA measurement. We find that under normal solar conditions, the gravitational wave sensitivity limit from the free-electron effect is smaller than other noise sources that are expected to limit LISA’s sensitivity.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (21)
- eLISA Consortium, P. Amaro Seoane, S. Aoudia, H. Audley, G. Auger, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, S. Barke, M. Bassan et al., arXiv:1305.5720.
- P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi et al., arXiv:1702.00786.
- K. Danzmann and LISA Science Team, Adv. Space Res. 32, 1233 (2003).
- R. Woo and J. W. Armstrong, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 7288 (1979).
- M. Tinto and J. W. Armstrong, Phys. Rev. D 58, 042002 (1998).
- K. S. Thorne and R. D. Blandford, Modern Classical Physics: Optics, Fluids, Plasmas, Elasticity, Relativity, and Statistical Physics (Princeton University Press, 2017).
- K. W. Ogilvie, D. J. Chornay, R. J. Fritzenreiter, F. Hunsaker, J. Keller, J. Lobell, G. Miller, J. D. Scudder, E. C. Sittler, R. B. Torbert et al., Space Sci. Rev. 71, 55 (1995).
- C. H. K. Chen, J. Plasma Phys. 82, 535820602 (2016).
- I. Wilson, Lynn B., A. L. Brosius, N. Gopalswamy, T. Nieves-Chinchilla, A. Szabo, K. Hurley, T. Phan, J. C. Kasper, N. Lugaz, I. G. Richardson et al., Rev. Geophys. 59, e2020RG000714 (2021).
- A Jupyter notebook used to produce the analysis in this paper is available at https://github.com/ithorpe/solarWindLISA
- A. Savitzky and M. J. E. Golay, Anal. Chem. 36, 1627 (1964).
- Ises Solar Cycle Sunspot Number Progression, https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/solar-cycle-progression.
- K. Issautier, C. Perche, S. Hoang, C. Lacombe, M. Maksimovic, J.-L. Bougeret, and C. Salem, Adv. Space Res. 35, 2141 (2005).
- D. Olmos, LISA Mission Requirement Document.
- M. Tinto and S. V. Dhurandhar, Living Rev. Relativity 24, 1 (2021).
- W. Su, Y. Wang, C. Zhou, L. Lu, Z.-B. Zhou, T. Li, T. Shi, X.-C. Hu, M.-Y. Zhou, M. Wang et al., Astrophys. J. 914, 139 (2021).
- Y. Lithwick, P. Goldreich, and S. Sridhar, Astrophys. J. 655, 269 (2007).
- C. H. K. Chen, J. Plasma Phys. 82, 535820602 (2016).
- P. Goldreich, Astrophys. Space Sci. 278, 17 (2001).
- J. Maron and P. Goldreich, Astrophys. J. 554, 1175 (2001).
- A. Smetana, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.: Lett. 499, L77 (2020).
