Yanfu Wu, Ming-Chao Duan, Ningning Liu, Gang Yao, Dandan Guan, Shiyong Wang, Yao-Yi Li, Hao Zheng, Canhua Liu, and Jin-Feng Jia
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140506(R) (2019) - Published 18 April, 2019
How does one detect the Meissner effect in ultrathin superconducting films that are usually extremely sensitive to air? Here, the authors succeed in observing the diamagnetic response of a superconducting surface superstructure by using an two-coil mutual inductance technique embedded in a specially designed scanning tunneling microscope. The diamagnetic measurement allows for the calculation of the penetration depth, which provides invaluable information about the nature of superconductivity and the symmetry of the underlying order parameter.
L. V. Abdurakhimov, S. Khan, N. A. Panjwani, J. D. Breeze, M. Mochizuki, S. Seki, Y. Tokura, J. J. L. Morton, and H. Kurebayashi
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140401(R) (2019) - Published 3 April, 2019
In chiral magnets, nontrivial spin textures can be realized due to the relativistic spin-orbit Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions between the magnetic moments of unpaired electrons. In particular, a helical magnetic structure can be formed, in which magnetic moments spiral around the helical axis. Here, the authors demonstrate that collective spin excitations of the helical structure (helimagnons) can couple strongly to microwave cavity photons, resulting in the formation of a hybrid state – the helimagnon polariton.
M. Redies, F. R. Lux, J.-P. Hanke, P. M. Buhl, G. P. Müller, N. S. Kiselev, S. Blügel, and Y. Mokrousov
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140407(R) (2019) - Published 12 April, 2019
Based on theoretical arguments, the authors provide a clear pathway to utilizing a new chiral particle – a chiral bobber – for the purposes of future spintronics. They discover that these novel chiral states possess inherent transport traits that allow for their unambiguous electrical detection in systems comprising several types of chiral states. The unique properties of bobbers are rooted in the nontrivial spin topology of these particles, which also bear great potential for cognitive computing.
Christopher J. Winta, Martin Wolf, and Alexander Paarmann
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144308 (2019) - Published 22 April, 2019
Hyperbolic materials are attracting considerable interest in the nanophotonics community due to their ability to support highly directional, large-momentum states that can be utilized for, e.g., subdiffractional imaging or nanolithography. Here, the authors explore the infrared dielectric properties of α-quartz at low temperatures by performing infrared reflectivity measurements. The results imply remarkably high quality factors for polaritons in the pronounced hyperbolic spectral region of α-quartz as well as additional design opportunities for nanophotonic applications.
Hans Tornatzky, Roland Gillen, Hiroshi Uchiyama, and Janina Maultzsch
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144309 (2019) - Published 24 April, 2019
The phonon dispersion is one of the most fundamental properties of a crystalline material. It determines virtually all of its physical properties, including optical, electronic, mechanical, and thermal behavior. Despite its importance, the phonon dispersion of MoS – one of the most investigated two-dimensional semiconductors – has not been determined experimentally in relevant parts of the Brillouin zone. In a combined experimental and theoretical approach, the authors present comprehensively the entire phonon dispersion of a MoS crystal and determine displacement patterns, symmetries, and scattering intensities.
Peiheng Jiang, Cong Wang, Dachuan Chen, Zhicheng Zhong, Zhe Yuan, Zhong-Yi Lu, and Wei Ji
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144401 (2019) - Published 1 April, 2019
Interlayer magnetic interactions between two-dimension van der Waals layers are often thought to be weak or even negligible and their mechanism is largely unexplored. Here, the authors propose a mechanism for these interactions in a CrI bilayer, based on the concept of covalent-like quasibonding, which offers significant alteration of interlayer wave-function hybridization but small energetic difference between different stacking configurations. While a near-collinear coupling between two parallel spin-polarized I 5 orbitals prefers interlayer ferromagnetism, a noncollinear one favors antiferromagnetism, which is tunable by surmounting a tiny energy barrier between two stacking orders. This explains experimental observations and suggests a strategy for designing interlayer magnetism.
R. J. H. Wesselink, K. Gupta, Z. Yuan, and Paul J. Kelly
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144409 (2019) - Published 11 April, 2019
Experiments usually don’t measure things favored by theorists like Green’s functions or scattering matrices, rather, they measure chemical potentials and currents. Here, the authors have calculated local charge and spin currents in bulk platinum and permalloy from the results of relativistic first-principles quantum mechanical scattering calculations at finite temperatures. This makes it possible to extract spin transport parameters like the spin-flip diffusion length, spin Hall angle, and spin polarization. It opens up the exciting possibility of separating interface and bulk effects, a problem that plagues experimental studies on magnetic bilayers.
Eduardo Mendive-Tapia and Julie B. Staunton
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144424 (2019) - Published 25 April, 2019
Phase diagrams and the temperature and field dependence of complex magnetic materials are described here by an theory. Consideration of fluctuating local degrees of freedom (‘local moments’), emerging from a material’s interacting itinerant electrons, produces naturally a picture of multisite magnetic interactions. Accurate prediction of the order of transitions and the role of both electronic and magnetoelastic effects in the Gibbs free energy coefficients are demonstrated by application to the widely varying frustrated magnetism of Mn .
Torsten Karzig, Yuval Oreg, Gil Refael, and Michael H. Freedman
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144521 (2019) - Published 24 April, 2019
High-fidelity phase gates are an essential ingredient for the majority of universal quantum computation proposals. Here, the authors present a new way of implementing a gate in Majorana-based qubits that eliminates the leading noise sources, expected to limit other approaches. The scheme employs a combination of measurements and quantum evolution to optimize the fidelity of the final state when a favorable set of measurement outcomes has been achieved and, at the same time, guarantees a high-success probability for obtaining such measurement outcomes.
Jan Behrends, Sthitadhi Roy, Michael H. Kolodrubetz, Jens H. Bardarson, and Adolfo G. Grushin
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140201(R) (2019) - Published 1 April, 2019
Martin Luckabauer, Tomoki Hayashi, Hidemi Kato, and Tetsu Ichitsubo
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140202(R) (2019) - Published 19 April, 2019
Oleksandr Gamayun, Yuan Miao, and Enej Ilievski
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140301(R) (2019) - Published 1 April, 2019
Indra Yudhistira, Nilotpal Chakraborty, Gargee Sharma, Derek Y. H. Ho, Evan Laksono, Oleg P. Sushkov, Giovanni Vignale, and Shaffique Adam
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140302(R) (2019) - Published 17 April, 2019
L. V. Abdurakhimov, S. Khan, N. A. Panjwani, J. D. Breeze, M. Mochizuki, S. Seki, Y. Tokura, J. J. L. Morton, and H. Kurebayashi
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140401(R) (2019) - Published 3 April, 2019
In chiral magnets, nontrivial spin textures can be realized due to the relativistic spin-orbit Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions between the magnetic moments of unpaired electrons. In particular, a helical magnetic structure can be formed, in which magnetic moments spiral around the helical axis. Here, the authors demonstrate that collective spin excitations of the helical structure (helimagnons) can couple strongly to microwave cavity photons, resulting in the formation of a hybrid state – the helimagnon polariton.
W. T. Jin, M. Meven, A. P. Sazonov, S. Demirdis, Y. Su, Y. Xiao, Z. Bukowski, S. Nandi, and Th. Brückel
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140402(R) (2019) - Published 9 April, 2019
B. Flebus and Y. Tserkovnyak
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140403(R) (2019) - Published 10 April, 2019
Lei Chen, Dai-Wei Qu, Han Li, Bin-Bin Chen, Shou-Shu Gong, Jan von Delft, Andreas Weichselbaum, and Wei Li
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140404(R) (2019) - Published 10 April, 2019
Anne Le Cunuder, Irénée Frérot, Antonio Ortiz-Ambriz, and Pietro Tierno
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140405(R) (2019) - Published 10 April, 2019
Praveen Vir, Jacob Gayles, A. S. Sukhanov, Nitesh Kumar, Françoise Damay, Yan Sun, Jürgen Kübler, Chandra Shekhar, and Claudia Felser
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140406(R) (2019) - Published 12 April, 2019
M. Redies, F. R. Lux, J.-P. Hanke, P. M. Buhl, G. P. Müller, N. S. Kiselev, S. Blügel, and Y. Mokrousov
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140407(R) (2019) - Published 12 April, 2019
Based on theoretical arguments, the authors provide a clear pathway to utilizing a new chiral particle – a chiral bobber – for the purposes of future spintronics. They discover that these novel chiral states possess inherent transport traits that allow for their unambiguous electrical detection in systems comprising several types of chiral states. The unique properties of bobbers are rooted in the nontrivial spin topology of these particles, which also bear great potential for cognitive computing.
Shi-Zeng Lin, Jian-Xin Zhu, and Avadh Saxena
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140408(R) (2019) - Published 15 April, 2019
S. Yu. Bodnar, M. Filianina, S. P. Bommanaboyena, T. Forrest, F. Maccherozzi, A. A. Sapozhnik, Y. Skourski, M. Kläui, and M. Jourdan
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140409(R) (2019) - Published 18 April, 2019
Harald O. Jeschke, Hiroki Nakano, and Tôru Sakai
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140410(R) (2019) - Published 24 April, 2019
P. F. Bessarab, D. Yudin, D. R. Gulevich, P. Wadley, M. Titov, and Oleg A. Tretiakov
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140411(R) (2019) - Published 26 April, 2019
Akihiko Ikeda, Shunsuke Furukawa, Oleg Janson, Yasuhiro H. Matsuda, Shojiro Takeyama, Takeshi Yajima, Zenji Hiroi, and Hajime Ishikawa
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140412(R) (2019) - Published 29 April, 2019
David C. Ronquillo, Adu Vengal, and Nandini Trivedi
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140413(R) (2019) - Published 29 April, 2019
L. McKenzie-Sell, J. Xie, C.-M. Lee, J. W. A. Robinson, C. Ciccarelli, and J. A. Haigh
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140414(R) (2019) - Published 29 April, 2019
Liangliang Liu, Chongze Wang, Seho Yi, Kun Woo Kim, Jaeyong Kim, and Jun-Hyung Cho
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140501(R) (2019) - Published 4 April, 2019
Jaeho Shin and Moses H. W. Chan
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140502(R) (2019) - Published 8 April, 2019
Yu. N. Khaydukov, E. A. Kravtsov, V. D. Zhaketov, V. V. Progliado, G. Kim, Yu. V. Nikitenko, T. Keller, V. V. Ustinov, V. L. Aksenov, and B. Keimer
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140503(R) (2019) - Published 12 April, 2019
T. A. Maier, V. Mishra, G. Balduzzi, and D. J. Scalapino
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140504(R) (2019) - Published 15 April, 2019
José María Escartín, Francesco Ancilotto, Manuel Barranco, and Martí Pi
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140505(R) (2019) - Published 16 April, 2019
Yanfu Wu, Ming-Chao Duan, Ningning Liu, Gang Yao, Dandan Guan, Shiyong Wang, Yao-Yi Li, Hao Zheng, Canhua Liu, and Jin-Feng Jia
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140506(R) (2019) - Published 18 April, 2019
How does one detect the Meissner effect in ultrathin superconducting films that are usually extremely sensitive to air? Here, the authors succeed in observing the diamagnetic response of a superconducting surface superstructure by using an two-coil mutual inductance technique embedded in a specially designed scanning tunneling microscope. The diamagnetic measurement allows for the calculation of the penetration depth, which provides invaluable information about the nature of superconductivity and the symmetry of the underlying order parameter.
Rustem Khasanov, William R. Meier, Sergey L. Bud'ko, Hubertus Luetkens, Paul C. Canfield, and Alex Amato
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140507(R) (2019) - Published 19 April, 2019
Yu. S. Barash
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140508(R) (2019) - Published 22 April, 2019
A. Pustogow, Y. Saito, A. Rohwer, J. A. Schlueter, and M. Dressel
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140509(R) (2019) - Published 23 April, 2019
Hideaki Iwasawa, Pavel Dudin, Kyosuke Inui, Takahiko Masui, Timur K. Kim, Cephise Cacho, and Moritz Hoesch
Phys. Rev. B 99, 140510(R) (2019) - Published 26 April, 2019
Nikita Medvedev, Zhaoji Fang, Chenyi Xia, and Zheng Li
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144101 (2019) - Published 10 April, 2019
Tathagata Biswas and Manish Jain
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144102 (2019) - Published 11 April, 2019
Yunong Zhou, Michael Moseler, and Martin H. Müser
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144103 (2019) - Published 12 April, 2019
Adrien Girard, Vita Ilakovac, Michal Stekiel, Wolfgang Morgenroth, Helmuth Berger, Tanaka Yoshikazu, Takumi Hasegawa, Alexei Bosak, and Bjoern Winkler
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144104 (2019) - Published 23 April, 2019
Yasushi Yoneta and Akira Shimizu
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144105 (2019) - Published 29 April, 2019
Caroline S. Gorham and David E. Laughlin
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144106 (2019) - Published 30 April, 2019
Younes Javanmard, Soumya Bera, and Markus Heyl
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144201 (2019) - Published 3 April, 2019
Y. J. Lü, Q. L. Bi, and W. H. Wang
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144202 (2019) - Published 19 April, 2019
P. Rinkel, P. L. S. Lopes, and Ion Garate
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144301 (2019) - Published 2 April, 2019
Cheng-Zhen Wang, Chen-Di Han, Hong-Ya Xu, and Ying-Cheng Lai
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144302 (2019) - Published 10 April, 2019
P. Scuracchio, K. H. Michel, and F. M. Peeters
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144303 (2019) - Published 10 April, 2019
R. E. Barfknecht, S. E. Rasmussen, A. Foerster, and N. T. Zinner
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144304 (2019) - Published 11 April, 2019
Emmanuelle Jal, Mikako Makita, Benedikt Rösner, Christian David, Frithjof Nolting, Jörg Raabe, Tatiana Savchenko, Armin Kleibert, Flavio Capotondi, Emanuele Pedersoli, Lorenzo Raimondi, Michele Manfredda, Ivaylo Nikolov, Xuan Liu, Alaa el dine Merhe, Nicolas Jaouen, Jon Gorchon, Gregory Malinowski, Michel Hehn, Boris Vodungbo, and Jan Lüning
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144305 (2019) - Published 15 April, 2019
Min-Cheol Lee, Choong H. Kim, Inho Kwak, C. W. Seo, Changhee Sohn, F. Nakamura, C. Sow, Y. Maeno, E.-A. Kim, T. W. Noh, and K. W. Kim
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144306 (2019) - Published 15 April, 2019
Iacopo Torre, Luan Vieira de Castro, Ben Van Duppen, David Barcons Ruiz, François M. Peeters, Frank H. L. Koppens, and Marco Polini
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144307 (2019) - Published 18 April, 2019
Christopher J. Winta, Martin Wolf, and Alexander Paarmann
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144308 (2019) - Published 22 April, 2019
Hyperbolic materials are attracting considerable interest in the nanophotonics community due to their ability to support highly directional, large-momentum states that can be utilized for, e.g., subdiffractional imaging or nanolithography. Here, the authors explore the infrared dielectric properties of α-quartz at low temperatures by performing infrared reflectivity measurements. The results imply remarkably high quality factors for polaritons in the pronounced hyperbolic spectral region of α-quartz as well as additional design opportunities for nanophotonic applications.
Hans Tornatzky, Roland Gillen, Hiroshi Uchiyama, and Janina Maultzsch
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144309 (2019) - Published 24 April, 2019
The phonon dispersion is one of the most fundamental properties of a crystalline material. It determines virtually all of its physical properties, including optical, electronic, mechanical, and thermal behavior. Despite its importance, the phonon dispersion of MoS – one of the most investigated two-dimensional semiconductors – has not been determined experimentally in relevant parts of the Brillouin zone. In a combined experimental and theoretical approach, the authors present comprehensively the entire phonon dispersion of a MoS crystal and determine displacement patterns, symmetries, and scattering intensities.
M. Stein, F. Schäfer, and L. Gomell
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144310 (2019) - Published 25 April, 2019
Junfei Li, Chen Shen, Xiaohui Zhu, Yangbo Xie, and Steven A. Cummer
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144311 (2019) - Published 25 April, 2019
Peiheng Jiang, Cong Wang, Dachuan Chen, Zhicheng Zhong, Zhe Yuan, Zhong-Yi Lu, and Wei Ji
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144401 (2019) - Published 1 April, 2019
Interlayer magnetic interactions between two-dimension van der Waals layers are often thought to be weak or even negligible and their mechanism is largely unexplored. Here, the authors propose a mechanism for these interactions in a CrI bilayer, based on the concept of covalent-like quasibonding, which offers significant alteration of interlayer wave-function hybridization but small energetic difference between different stacking configurations. While a near-collinear coupling between two parallel spin-polarized I 5 orbitals prefers interlayer ferromagnetism, a noncollinear one favors antiferromagnetism, which is tunable by surmounting a tiny energy barrier between two stacking orders. This explains experimental observations and suggests a strategy for designing interlayer magnetism.
Boyu Zhang, Yong Xu, Weisheng Zhao, Daoqian Zhu, Huaiwen Yang, Xiaoyang Lin, Michel Hehn, Gregory Malinowski, Nicolas Vernier, Dafiné Ravelosona, and Stéphane Mangin
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144402 (2019) - Published 1 April, 2019
Neil Wilkins and Stephen Powell
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144403 (2019) - Published 2 April, 2019
Dayane de Souza Chaves, Fernando Ajejas, Viola Křižáková, Jan Vogel, and Stefania Pizzini
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144404 (2019) - Published 4 April, 2019
Quentin Arnoux, Camille Blouzon, Dongzhe Li, Yannick J. Dappe, Alexander Smogunov, Pierre Bonville, Ludovic Tortech, and Jean-Baptiste Moussy
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144405 (2019) - Published 4 April, 2019
Kazushi Aoyama and Hikaru Kawamura
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144406 (2019) - Published 5 April, 2019
Kazuhiro Seki and Sandro Sorella
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144407 (2019) - Published 8 April, 2019
V. Ukleev, Y. Yamasaki, D. Morikawa, K. Karube, K. Shibata, Y. Tokunaga, Y. Okamura, K. Amemiya, M. Valvidares, H. Nakao, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, and T. Arima
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144408 (2019) - Published 10 April, 2019
R. J. H. Wesselink, K. Gupta, Z. Yuan, and Paul J. Kelly
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144409 (2019) - Published 11 April, 2019
Experiments usually don’t measure things favored by theorists like Green’s functions or scattering matrices, rather, they measure chemical potentials and currents. Here, the authors have calculated local charge and spin currents in bulk platinum and permalloy from the results of relativistic first-principles quantum mechanical scattering calculations at finite temperatures. This makes it possible to extract spin transport parameters like the spin-flip diffusion length, spin Hall angle, and spin polarization. It opens up the exciting possibility of separating interface and bulk effects, a problem that plagues experimental studies on magnetic bilayers.
A. O. Leonov and C. Pappas
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144410 (2019) - Published 12 April, 2019
T. Kato, Y. Ohnuma, M. Matsuo, J. Rech, T. Jonckheere, and T. Martin
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144411 (2019) - Published 15 April, 2019
J. K. Dey, A. Chatterjee, S. Majumdar, A.-C. Dippel, O. Gutowski, M. v. Zimmermann, and S. Giri
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144412 (2019) - Published 15 April, 2019
M. Ye, T. Xu, G. Li, S. Qiao, Y. Takeda, Y. Saitoh, S.-Y. Zhu, M. Nurmamat, K. Sumida, Y. Ishida, S. Shin, and A. Kimura
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144413 (2019) - Published 16 April, 2019
M. Sadrzadeh, R. Haghshenas, and A. Langari
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144414 (2019) - Published 16 April, 2019
Petros Andreas Pantazopoulos and Nikolaos Stefanou
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144415 (2019) - Published 17 April, 2019
Shuang Wu, Kyotaro Abe, Takuma Nakano, Tim Mewes, Claudia Mewes, G. J. Mankey, and Takao Suzuki
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144416 (2019) - Published 19 April, 2019
Katsuhiro Morita and Takami Tohyama
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144417 (2019) - Published 19 April, 2019
Y. Pavlyukh, E. Rentschler, H. J. Elmers, W. Hübner, and G. Lefkidis
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144418 (2019) - Published 19 April, 2019
Feng Jin, Nenad Lazarević, Changle Liu, Jianting Ji, Yimeng Wang, Shuna He, Hechang Lei, Cedomir Petrovic, Rong Yu, Zoran V. Popović, and Qingming Zhang
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144419 (2019) - Published 22 April, 2019
J. Xu, Owen Benton, V. K. Anand, A. T. M. N. Islam, T. Guidi, G. Ehlers, E. Feng, Y. Su, A. Sakai, P. Gegenwart, and B. Lake
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144420 (2019) - Published 23 April, 2019
L. Pili and S. A. Grigera
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144421 (2019) - Published 23 April, 2019
Jonas Richter, Fengping Jin, Lars Knipschild, Jacek Herbrych, Hans De Raedt, Kristel Michielsen, Jochen Gemmer, and Robin Steinigeweg
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144422 (2019) - Published 23 April, 2019
Chih-Wei Chen, Weiyi Wang, Vaideesh Loganathan, Scott V. Carr, Leland W. Harriger, C. Georgen, Andriy H. Nevidomskyy, Pengcheng Dai, C.-L. Huang, and E. Morosan
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144423 (2019) - Published 24 April, 2019
Eduardo Mendive-Tapia and Julie B. Staunton
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144424 (2019) - Published 25 April, 2019
Phase diagrams and the temperature and field dependence of complex magnetic materials are described here by an theory. Consideration of fluctuating local degrees of freedom (‘local moments’), emerging from a material’s interacting itinerant electrons, produces naturally a picture of multisite magnetic interactions. Accurate prediction of the order of transitions and the role of both electronic and magnetoelastic effects in the Gibbs free energy coefficients are demonstrated by application to the widely varying frustrated magnetism of Mn .
Nazir Khan, Danil Prishchenko, Yurii Skourski, Vladimir G. Mazurenko, and Alexander A. Tsirlin
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144425 (2019) - Published 25 April, 2019
Shunsuke C. Furuya and Masaaki Nakamura
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144426 (2019) - Published 29 April, 2019
J. López-López, Juan M. Gomez-Perez, A. Álvarez, Hari Babu Vasili, A. C. Komarek, L. E. Hueso, Fèlix Casanova, and S. Blanco-Canosa
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144427 (2019) - Published 29 April, 2019
Hichem Ben Hamed, Martin Hoffmann, Waheed A. Adeagbo, Arthur Ernst, Wolfram Hergert, Teemu Hynninen, Kalevi Kokko, and Petriina Paturi
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144428 (2019) - Published 29 April, 2019
R. Kumar, Tusharkanti Dey, P. M. Ette, K. Ramesha, Atasi Chakraborty, I. Dasgupta, R. Eremina, Sándor Tóth, A. Shahee, S. Kundu, M. Prinz-Zwick, A. A. Gippius, H. A. Krug von Nidda, N. Büttgen, P. Gegenwart, and A. V. Mahajan
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144429 (2019) - Published 30 April, 2019
Zhi-Cheng Wang, Yi Liu, Si-Qi Wu, Ye-Ting Shao, Zhi Ren, and Guang-Han Cao
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144501 (2019) - Published 1 April, 2019
Oscar E. Casas, Shirley Gómez Páez, Alfredo Levy Yeyati, Pablo Burset, and William J. Herrera
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144502 (2019) - Published 3 April, 2019
Kun-Rok Jeon, Chiara Ciccarelli, Hidekazu Kurebayashi, Lesley F. Cohen, Sachio Komori, Jason W. A. Robinson, and Mark G. Blamire
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144503 (2019) - Published 4 April, 2019
Dmitry S. Golubev and Andrei D. Zaikin
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144504 (2019) - Published 4 April, 2019
Dibyendu Hazra
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144505 (2019) - Published 5 April, 2019
A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144506 (2019) - Published 8 April, 2019
Vladyslav Kozii, Hiroki Isobe, Jörn W. F. Venderbos, and Liang Fu
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144507 (2019) - Published 8 April, 2019
Li Xiang, Sergey L. Bud'ko, Jin-Ke Bao, Duck Young Chung, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis, and Paul C. Canfield
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144509 (2019) - Published 11 April, 2019
Hikaru Ueki, Ryota Tamura, and Jun Goryo
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144510 (2019) - Published 15 April, 2019
Takahiro Matsuoka, Masahiro Hishida, Keiji Kuno, Naohisa Hirao, Yasuo Ohishi, Shigeo Sasaki, Kazushi Takahama, and Katsuya Shimizu
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144511 (2019) - Published 15 April, 2019
Yi-Ming Wu, Artem Abanov, Yuxuan Wang, and Andrey V. Chubukov
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144512 (2019) - Published 15 April, 2019
Yue Yu and S. A. Kivelson
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144513 (2019) - Published 16 April, 2019
A. V. Putilov, C. Di Giorgio, V. L. Vadimov, D. J. Trainer, E. M. Lechner, J. L. Curtis, M. Abdel-Hafiez, O. S. Volkova, A. N. Vasiliev, D. A. Chareev, G. Karapetrov, A. E. Koshelev, A. Yu. Aladyshkin, A. S. Mel'nikov, and M. Iavarone
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144514 (2019) - Published 16 April, 2019
E. R. Louden, C. Rastovski, L. DeBeer-Schmitt, C. D. Dewhurst, N. D. Zhigadlo, and M. R. Eskildsen
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144515 (2019) - Published 17 April, 2019
Hasan Khan and Nandini Trivedi
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144516 (2019) - Published 17 April, 2019
S. Conti, A. Perali, F. M. Peeters, and D. Neilson
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144517 (2019) - Published 18 April, 2019
Xavier Buelna, Daniel Gonzalez, Adam Freund, and Jussi Eloranta
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144518 (2019) - Published 19 April, 2019
Darren C. Peets, Erjian Cheng, Tianping Ying, Markus Kriener, Xiaoping Shen, Shiyan Li, and Donglai Feng
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144519 (2019) - Published 22 April, 2019
Run Yang, Yaomin Dai, Jia Yu, Qiangtao Sui, Yongqing Cai, Zhian Ren, Jungseek Hwang, Hong Xiao, Xingjiang Zhou, Xianggang Qiu, and Christopher C. Homes
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144520 (2019) - Published 23 April, 2019
Torsten Karzig, Yuval Oreg, Gil Refael, and Michael H. Freedman
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144521 (2019) - Published 24 April, 2019
High-fidelity phase gates are an essential ingredient for the majority of universal quantum computation proposals. Here, the authors present a new way of implementing a gate in Majorana-based qubits that eliminates the leading noise sources, expected to limit other approaches. The scheme employs a combination of measurements and quantum evolution to optimize the fidelity of the final state when a favorable set of measurement outcomes has been achieved and, at the same time, guarantees a high-success probability for obtaining such measurement outcomes.
Elio J. König and Piers Coleman
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144522 (2019) - Published 26 April, 2019
Chandan Setty
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144523 (2019) - Published 26 April, 2019
Jennifer Gosner, Björn Kubala, and Joachim Ankerhold
Phys. Rev. B 99, 144524 (2019) - Published 29 April, 2019
