- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review B

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Inverse proximity effect in thin-film superconductor/magnet heterostructures with metallic and insulating magnets

V. A. Bobkov1, G. A. Bobkov1, and I. V. Bobkova1,2

PDF

Phys. Rev. B 113, 054508 – Published 10 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2hdv-4b2x

Abstract

The proximity effect in thin-film superconductor (S)/magnet heterostructures with different types of magnets including ferromagnets, antiferromagnets, and altermagnets is widely considered in the framework of an effective model, where the heterostructure is replaced by a homogeneous superconductor in the presence of a homogeneous exchange field heff of a corresponding type. Here we study the extent to which such a model is actually applicable to ballistic thin-film superconductor/magnetic heterostructures. In particular, a comparative analysis of thin-film superconductor/magnetic metal and superconductor/magnetic insulator heterostructures is performed. Metallic and insulating ferromagnets (FM, FI) and altermagnets (AM, AI) are considered. It is shown that in the S/FI and S/AI heterostructures the the proximity effect creates a well-defined spin splitting of the electronic spectra in the S layer. Thus, they are well described by the effective model. At the same time, the proximity effect in S/FM and S/AM heterostructures also creates a spin splitting of the spectra of the S layer, but it has a chaotic spectral and spatial distribution and unpredictable amplitude and, in general, cannot be detected via the spin splitting of the superconducting density of states. Thus, the effective model is not applicable to such heterostructures. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that they support well-pronounced triplet correlations and, thus, can be used for spintronics applications.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (76)

  1. A. I. Buzdin, Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 935 (2005).
  2. F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor-ferromagnet structures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1321 (2005).
  3. F. S. Bergeret, M. Silaev, P. Virtanen, and T. T. Heikkilä, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium effects in superconductors with a spin-splitting field, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 041001 (2018).
  4. T. T. Heikkilä, M. Silaev, P. Virtanen, and F. S. Bergeret, Thermal, electric and spin transport in superconductor/ferromagnetic-insulator structures, Prog. Surf. Sci. 94, 100540 (2019).
  5. J. Linder and J. W. A. Robinson, Superconducting spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11, 307 (2015).
  6. M. Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics: A review of current progress, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 104501 (2015).
  7. P. De Gennes, Coupling between ferromagnets through a superconducting layer, Phys. Lett. 23, 10 (1966).
  8. B. Li, N. Roschewsky, B. A. Assaf, M. Eich, M. Epstein-Martin, D. Heiman, M. Münzenberg, and J. S. Moodera, Superconducting spin switch with infinite magnetoresistance induced by an internal exchange field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 097001 (2013).
  9. S. Oh, D. Youm, and M. R. Beasley, A superconductive magnetoresistive memory element using controlled exchange interaction, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2376 (1997).
  10. A. A. Jara, C. Safranski, I. N. Krivorotov, C.-T. Wu, A. N. Malmi-Kakkada, O. T. Valls, and K. Halterman, Angular dependence of superconductivity in superconductor/spin-valve heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 89, 184502 (2014).
  11. A. Singh, S. Voltan, K. Lahabi, and J. Aarts, Colossal proximity effect in a superconducting triplet spin valve based on the half-metallic ferromagnet CrO2, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021019 (2015).
  12. A. A. Kamashev, N. N. Garif'yanov, A. A. Validov, J. Schumann, V. Kataev, B. Büchner, Y. V. Fominov, and I. A. Garifullin, Superconducting spin-valve effect in heterostructures with ferromagnetic Heusler alloy layers, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134511 (2019).
  13. L. R. Tagirov, Low-field superconducting spin switch based on a superconductor/erromagnet multilayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2058 (1999).
  14. Y. V. Fominov, A. A. Golubov, and M. Y. Kupriyanov, Triplet proximity effect in FSF trilayers, Jetp Lett. 77, 510 (2003).
  15. J. Zhu, I. N. Krivorotov, K. Halterman, and O. T. Valls, Angular dependence of the superconducting transition temperature in ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet trilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 207002 (2010).
  16. I. C. Moraru, W. P. Pratt, and N. O. Birge, Magnetization-dependent Tc shift in ferromagnet/superconductor/ferromagnet trilayers with a strong ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 037004 (2006).
  17. A. Singh, C. Sürgers, and H. v. Löhneysen, Superconducting spin switch with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 75, 024513 (2007).
  18. N. Banerjee, C. B. Smiet, R. G. J. Smits, A. Ozaeta, F. S. Bergeret, M. G. Blamire, and J. W. A. Robinson, Evidence for spin selectivity of triplet pairs in superconducting spin valves, Nat. Commun. 5, 3048 (2014).
  19. P. V. Leksin, N. N. Garif'yanov, I. A. Garifullin, Y. V. Fominov, J. Schumann, Y. Krupskaya, V. Kataev, O. G. Schmidt, and B. Büchner, Evidence for triplet superconductivity in a superconductor-ferromagnet spin valve, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 057005 (2012).
  20. K. Westerholt, D. Sprungmann, H. Zabel, R. Brucas, B. Hjörvarsson, D. A. Tikhonov, and I. A. Garifullin, Superconducting spin valve effect of a V layer coupled to an antiferromagnetic [Fe/V] superlattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 097003 (2005).
  21. G. Deutscher and F. Meunier, Coupling between ferromagnetic layers through a superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 395 (1969).
  22. J. Y. Gu, C.-Y. You, J. S. Jiang, J. Pearson, Y. B. Bazaliy, and S. D. Bader, Magnetization-orientation dependence of the superconducting transition temperature in the ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet system: CuNi/Nb/CuNi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 267001 (2002).
  23. Y. Gu, G. B. Halász, J. W. A. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire, Large superconducting spin valve effect and ultrasmall exchange splitting in epitaxial rare-earth-niobium trilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 067201 (2015).
  24. T. Y. Karminskaya, A. A. Golubov, and M. Y. Kupriyanov, Anomalous proximity effect in spin-valve superconductor/ferromagnetic metal/ferromagnetic metal structures, Phys. Rev. B 84, 064531 (2011).
  25. C.-T. Wu, O. T. Valls, and K. Halterman, Tunneling conductance and spin transport in clean ferromagnet/ferromagnet/superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 90, 054523 (2014).
  26. K. Halterman, O. T. Valls, and C.-T. Wu, Charge and spin currents in ferromagnetic Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 92, 174516 (2015).
  27. E. Moen and O. T. Valls, Transport in ferromagnet/superconductor spin valves, Phys. Rev. B 95, 054503 (2017).
  28. E. Moen and O. T. Valls, Spin current and spin transfer torque in ferromagnet/superconductor spin valves, Phys. Rev. B 97, 174506 (2018).
  29. E. Moen and O. T. Valls, Quasiparticle conductance in spin valve Josephson structures, Phys. Rev. B 101, 184522 (2020).
  30. O. T. Valls, Superconductor/Ferromagnet Nanostructures An Illustration of the Physics of Hybrid Nanomaterials, Lecture Notes in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2022).
  31. I. V. Bobkova and A. M. Bobkov, Thermospin effects in superconducting heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 96, 104515 (2017).
  32. I. V. Bobkova, A. M. Bobkov, and W. Belzig, Thermally induced spin-transfer torques in superconductor/ferromagnet bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 103, L020503 (2021).
  33. P. Machon, M. Eschrig, and W. Belzig, Nonlocal thermoelectric effects and nonlocal Onsager relations in a three-terminal proximity-coupled superconductor-ferromagnet device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 047002 (2013).
  34. A. Ozaeta, P. Virtanen, F. S. Bergeret, and T. T. Heikkilä, Predicted very large thermoelectric effect in ferromagnet-superconductor junctions in the presence of a spin-splitting magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 057001 (2014).
  35. P. Machon, M. Eschrig, and W. Belzig, Giant thermoelectric effects in a proximity-coupled superconductor–ferromagnet device, New J. Phys. 16, 073002 (2014).
  36. S. Kolenda, M. J. Wolf, and D. Beckmann, Observation of thermoelectric currents in high-field superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 097001 (2016).
  37. S. Kolenda, C. Sürgers, G. Fischer, and D. Beckmann, Thermoelectric effects in superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions on europium sulfide, Phys. Rev. B 95, 224505 (2017).
  38. F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Enhancement of the Josephson current by an exchange field in superconductor-ferromagnet structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3140 (2001).
  39. A. Cottet, D. Huertas-Hernando, W. Belzig, and Y. V. Nazarov, Spin-dependent boundary conditions for isotropic superconducting Green's functions, Phys. Rev. B 80, 184511 (2009).
  40. M. Eschrig, A. Cottet, W. Belzig, and J. Linder, General boundary conditions for quasiclassical theory of superconductivity in the diffusive limit: Application to strongly spin-polarized systems, New J. Phys. 17, 083037 (2015).
  41. X. Hao, J. S. Moodera, and R. Meservey, Spin-filter effect of ferromagnetic europium sulfide tunnel barriers, Phys. Rev. B 42, 8235 (1990).
  42. J. S. Moodera, X. Hao, G. A. Gibson, and R. Meservey, Electron-spin polarization in tunnel junctions in zero applied field with ferromagnetic EuS barriers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 637 (1988).
  43. P. M. Tedrow, J. E. Tkaczyk, and A. Kumar, Spin-polarized electron tunneling study of an artificially layered superconductor with internal magnetic field: EuO-Al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1746 (1986).
  44. R. Meservey and P. Tedrow, Spin-polarized electron tunneling, Phys. Rep. 238, 173 (1994).
  45. E. Strambini, V. N. Golovach, G. De Simoni, J. S. Moodera, F. S. Bergeret, and F. Giazotto, Revealing the magnetic proximity effect in EuS/Al bilayers through superconducting tunneling spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 054402 (2017).
  46. T. Mühge, N. N. Garif'yanov, Y. V. Goryunov, G. G. Khaliullin, L. R. Tagirov, K. Westerholt, I. A. Garifullin, and H. Zabel, Possible origin for oscillatory superconducting transition temperature in superconductor/ferromagnet multilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1857 (1996).
  47. J. Aarts, J. M. E. Geers, E. Brück, A. A. Golubov, and R. Coehoorn, Interface transparency of superconductor/ferromagnetic multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 56, 2779 (1997).
  48. J. S. Jiang, D. Davidović, D. H. Reich, and C. L. Chien, Oscillatory superconducting transition temperature in Nb/Gd multilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 314 (1995).
  49. L. Lazar, K. Westerholt, H. Zabel, L. R. Tagirov, Y. V. Goryunov, N. N. Garif'yanov, and I. A. Garifullin, Superconductor/ferromagnet proximity effect in Fe/Pb/Fe trilayers, Phys. Rev. B 61, 3711 (2000).
  50. V. Zdravkov, A. Sidorenko, G. Obermeier, S. Gsell, M. Schreck, C. Müller, S. Horn, R. Tidecks, and L. R. Tagirov, Reentrant superconductivity in Nb/Cu1−xNix bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 057004 (2006).
  51. V. I. Zdravkov, J. Kehrle, G. Obermeier, S. Gsell, M. Schreck, C. Müller, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, J. Lindner, J. Moosburger-Will, E. Nold, R. Morari, V. V. Ryazanov, A. S. Sidorenko, S. Horn, R. Tidecks, and L. R. Tagirov, Reentrant superconductivity in superconductor/ferromagnetic-alloy bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 82, 054517 (2010).
  52. Q. Jin, M. Yang, G. Song, N. Zhao, S. Chen, H. Hong, T. Cui, D. Rong, Q. Wang, Y. Fan, C. Ge, C. Wang, J. Bi, Y. Cao, L. Wu, S. Wang, K.-J. Jin, Z.-G. Cheng, and E.-J. Guo, Strong anisotropic order parameters at all-nitride ferromagnet/superconductor interfaces, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 027402 (2024).
  53. T. E. Golikova, F. Hübler, D. Beckmann, I. E. Batov, T. Y. Karminskaya, M. Y. Kupriyanov, A. A. Golubov, and V. V. Ryazanov, Double proximity effect in hybrid planar superconductor-(normal metal/ferromagnet)-superconductor structures, Phys. Rev. B 86, 064416 (2012).
  54. C. Sun, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Andreev reflection in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054511 (2023).
  55. S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite-momentum Cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nat. Commun. 15, 1801 (2024).
  56. S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024503 (2024).
  57. Y.-X. Li and C.-C. Liu, Majorana corner modes and tunable patterns in an altermagnet heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205410 (2023).
  58. M. Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet-superconductor interface, Phys. Rev. B 108, L060508 (2023).
  59. J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, dc Josephson effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 076003 (2023).
  60. C. W. J. Beenakker and T. Vakhtel, Phase-shifted Andreev levels in an altermagnet Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075425 (2023).
  61. S. Chourasia, A. Svetogorov, A. Kamra, and W. Belzig, Thermodynamic properties of a superconductor interfaced with an altermagnet, Phys. Rev. B 111, 224503 (2025).
  62. A. Maiani and R. S. Souto, Impurity states in altermagnetic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 111, 224506 (2025).
  63. M. M. Vasiakin and A. S. Mel'nikov, Disorder-enhanced superconductivity in altermagnet-superconductor hybrids, Phys. Rev. B 111, L100502 (2025).
  64. T. Kokkeler, I. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Quantum transport theory for unconventional magnets: Interplay of altermagnetism and p-wave magnetism with superconductivity, SciPost Phys. 18, 178 (2025).
  65. T. Tokuyasu, J. A. Sauls, and D. Rainer, Proximity effect of a ferromagnetic insulator in contact with a superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 38, 8823 (1988).
  66. A. Millis, D. Rainer, and J. A. Sauls, Quasiclassical theory of superconductivity near magnetically active interfaces, Phys. Rev. B 38, 4504 (1988).
  67. G. A. Bobkov, K. A. Bokai, M. M. Otrokov, A. M. Bobkov, and I. V. Bobkova, Gate-controlled proximity effect in superconductor/ferromagnet van der Waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 104801 (2024).
  68. A. S. Ianovskaia, G. A. Bobkov, A. M. Bobkov, and I. V. Bobkova, Magnetic proximity effect in superconductor/ferromagnet van der Waals heterostructures: Dependence on the number of superconducting monolayers, Phys. Rev. B 110, 214503 (2024).
  69. I. V. Bobkova and A. M. Bobkov, Recovering of superconductivity in S/F bilayers under spin-dependent nonequilibrium quasiparticle distribution, JETP Lett. 101, 407 (2015).
  70. M. J. Wolf, C. Sürgers, G. Fischer, and D. Beckmann, Spin-polarized quasiparticle transport in exchange-split superconducting aluminum on europium sulfide, Phys. Rev. B 90, 144509 (2014).
  71. J. A. Ouassou, A. Pal, M. Blamire, M. Eschrig, and J. Linder, Triplet Cooper pairs induced in diffusive s-wave superconductors interfaced with strongly spin-polarized magnetic insulators or half-metallic ferromagnets, Sci. Rep. 7, 1932 (2017).
  72. K. Maki, Pauli paramagnetism and superconducting state. II, Prog. Theor. Phys. 32, 29 (1964).
  73. P. Fulde and K. Maki, Theory of superconductors containing magnetic impurities, Phys. Rev. 141, 275 (1966).
  74. A. Abrikosov and L. Gor'kov, Contribution to the theory of superconducting alloys with paramagnetic impurities, Sov. Phys. JETP 12, 1243 (1961).
  75. G. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova, A. M. Bobkov, and A. Kamra, Néel proximity effect at antiferromagnet/superconductor interfaces, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144512 (2022).
  76. G. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova, and A. M. Bobkov, Proximity effect in superconductor/antiferromagnet hybrids: Néel triplets and impurity suppression of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054510 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 113, 054508– Published 10 February, 2026
  • Received 13 October 2025
  • Accepted 21 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation