- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Applied

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Decoherence-protected holonomic gates with reduced requirements for physical resources

Chunfeng Wu1,*, Chunfang Sun2,3, Jiangang Ma2,4, Ding Huang5,6, Xun-Li Feng1, and L.C. Kwek7,8

  • *Contact author: chunfeng_wu@sutd.edu.sg
PDF

Phys. Rev. Applied 23, 044016 – Published 7 April, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.044016

Abstract

We study the implementation of holonomic quantum gates preserved from arbitrary single-qubit and two-qubit decoherence or errors using a dynamical decoupling approach. To integrate the holonomic feature with the dynamical decoupling technique, we require only one auxiliary qubit for single-qubit gates and no auxiliary qubit for two-qubit gates. Our scheme uses far fewer physical qubits to achieve this integration compared to existing proposals in the literature. Moreover, the scheme is based on system interactions that can be experimentally realized with superconducting qubits. These advantages suggest that our scheme is a promising step toward developing noise-resistant quantum devices.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes, Proc. R. Soc. A 392, 45 (1984).
  2. Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1593 (1987).
  3. X. B. Wang and M. Keiji, Nonadiabatic conditional geometric phase shift with NMR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 097901 (2001).
  4. L. M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Geometric manipulation of trapped ions for quantum computation, Science 292, 1695 (2001).
  5. S. L. Zhu and Z. D. Wang, Implementation of universal quantum gates based on nonadiabatic geometric phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097902 (2002).
  6. J. Zhang, T. H. Kyaw, S. Filipp, L.-C. Kwek, E. Sjöqvist, and D. Tong, Geometric and holonomic quantum computation, Phys. Rep. 1027, 1 (2023).
  7. E. Sjöqvist, D. M. Tong, L. M. Andersson, B. Hessmo, M. Johansson, and K. Singh, Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation, New J. Phys. 14, 103035 (2012).
  8. J. Zhang, S. J. Devitt, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Holonomic surface codes for fault-tolerant quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 97, 022335 (2018).
  9. L. Viola, E. Knill, and S. Lloyd, Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2417 (1999).
  10. L. Viola, S. Lloyd, and E. Knill, Universal control of decoupled quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4888 (1999).
  11. P. Zanardi, Stabilizing quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012301 (2000).
  12. J. R. West, D. A. Lidar, B. H. Fong, and M. F. Gyure, High fidelity quantum gates via dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230503 (2010).
  13. T. v. d. Sar, Z. H. Wang, M. S. Blok, H. Bernien, T. H. Taminiau, D. M. Toyli, D. A. Lidar, D. D. Awschalom, R. Hanson, and V. V. Dobrovitski, Decoherence-protected quantum gates for a hybrid solid-state spin register, Nature 484, 82 (2012).
  14. C. Piltz, B. Scharfenberger, A. Khromova, A. F. Varón, and C. Wunderlich, Protecting conditional quantum gates by robust dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 200501 (2013).
  15. G.-Q. Liu, H. C. Po, J. Du, R.-B. Liu, and X.-Y. Pan, Noise-resilient quantum evolution steered by dynamical decoupling, Nat. Commun. 4, 2254 (2013).
  16. Z.-Y. Wang and R.-B. Liu, Protection of quantum systems by nested dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. A 83, 022306 (2011).
  17. C. Wu, G. Wang, and X.-L. Feng, Protecting quantum gates from arbitrary single- and two-qubit errors, arXiv:2405.04090 [quant-ph].
  18. G. F. Xu and G. L. Long, Protecting geometric gates by dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. A 90, 022323 (2014).
  19. X. Wu and P. Z. Zhao, Universal nonadiabatic geometric gates protected by dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. A 102, 032627 (2020).
  20. P. Z. Zhao, X. Wu, and D. M. Tong, Dynamical-decoupling-protected nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 103, 012205 (2021).
  21. X. Wu and P. Z. Zhao, Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation protected by dynamical decoupling via the XXZ Hamiltonian, Front. Phys. 17, 31502 (2022).
  22. C. Wu, C. Sun, G. Wang, X.-L. Feng, and X. X. Yi, Implementation of hybridly protected quantum gates, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034003 (2022).
  23. C. Wu, Y. Wang, X.-L. Feng, and J.-L. Chen, Holonomic quantum computation in surface codes, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 014055 (2020).
  24. G. F. Xu, J. Zhang, D. M. Tong, Erik Sjöqvist, and L. C. Kwek, Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 170501 (2012).
  25. A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021).
  26. M. A. Rol, L. Ciorciaro, F. K. Malinowski, B. M. Tarasinski, R. E. Sagastizabal, C. C. Bultink, Y. Salathe, N. Haandbaek, J. Sedivy, and L. DiCarlo, Time-domain characterization and correction of on-chip distortion of control pulses in a quantum processor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 054001 (2020).
  27. B. K. Mitchell, R. K. Naik, A. Morvan, A. Hashim, J. M. Kreikebaum, B. Marinelli, W. Lavrijsen, K. Nowrouzi, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, Hardware-efficient microwave-activated tunable coupling between superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 200502 (2021).
  28. F. Marxer, A. Vepsäläinen, S. W. Jolin, J. Tuorila, A. Landra, C. Ockeloen-Korppi, W. Liu, O. Ahonen, A. Auer, and L. Belzane et al., Long-distance transmon coupler with cz-gate fidelity above 99.8%, PRX Quantum 4, 010314 (2023).
  29. K. Mølmer and A. Sørensen, Multiparticle entanglement of hot trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1835 (1999).
  30. A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Quantum computation with ions in thermal motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1971 (1999).
  31. C. Fang, Y. Wang, S. Huang, K. R. Brown, and J. Kim, Crosstalk suppression in individually addressed two-qubit gates in a trapped-ion quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 240504 (2022).
  32. Y.-Y. Huang, Y.-K. Wu, F. Wang, P.-Y. Hou, W.-B. Wang, W.-G. Zhang, W.-Q. Lian, Y.-Q. Liu, H.-Y. Wang, and H.-Y. Zhang et al., Experimental realization of robust geometric quantum gates with solid-state spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 010503 (2019).
  33. P. Scholl, H. J. Williams, G. Bornet, F. Wallner, D. Barredo, L. Henriet, A. Signoles, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, and S. Geier et al., Microwave engineering of programmable XXZ Hamiltonians in arrays of Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum 3, 020303 (2022).
  34. T. Chen and Z.-Y. Xue, Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation with parametrically tunable coupling, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054051 (2018).
  35. E. A. Sete, N. Didier, A. Q. Chen, S. Kulshreshtha, R. Manenti, and S. Poletto, Parametric-resonance entangling gates with a tunable coupler, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 024050 (2021).
  36. J. Stehlik, D. M. Zajac, D. L. Underwood, T. Phung, J. Blair, S. Carnevale, D. Klaus, G. A. Keefe, A. Carniol, and M. Kumph et al., Tunable coupling architecture for fixed-frequency transmon superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 080505 (2021).
  37. A. Kandala, K. X. Wei, S. Srinivasan, E. Magesan, S. Carnevale, G. A. Keefe, D. Klaus, O. Dial, and D. C. McKay, Demonstration of a high-fidelity cnot gate for fixed-frequency transmons with engineered ZZ suppression, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 130501 (2021).
  38. A. Kou, W. C. Smith, U. Vool, R. T. Brierley, H. Meier, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, Fluxonium-based artificial molecule with a tunable magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031037 (2017).
  39. I. N. Moskalenko, I. A. Simakov, N. N. Abramov, A. A. Grigorev, D. O. Moskalev, A. A. Pishchimova, N. S. Smirnov, E. V. Zikiy, I. A. Rodionov, and I. S. Besedin, High fidelity two-qubit gates on fluxoniums using a tunable coupler, Npj Quantum Inf. 8, 130 (2022).
  40. L. B. Nguyen, Y.-H. Lin, A. Somoroff, R. Mencia, N. Grabon, and V. E. Manucharyan, High-coherence fluxonium qubit, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041041 (2019).
  41. M. Lenander, H. Wang, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Mariantoni, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, M. Weides, and J. Wenner et al., Measurement of energy decay in superconducting qubits from nonequilibrium quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. B 84, 024501 (2011).
  42. R. McDermott, Materials origins of decoherence in superconducting qubits, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 19, 1 (2009).
  43. C. Addis, F. Ciccarello, M. Cascio, G. M. Palma, and S. Maniscalco, Dynamical decoupling efficiency versus quantum non-Markovianity, New J. Phys. 17, 123004 (2015).
  44. N. A. da C. Morazotti, A. H. da Silva, G. Audi, F. F. Fanchini, and R. de J. Napolitano, Optimized continuous dynamical decoupling via differential geometry and machine learning, Phys. Rev. A 110, 042601 (2024).
  45. D. Risté, C. C. Bultink, M. J. Tiggelman, R. N. Schouten, K. W. Lehnert, and L. DiCarlo, Millisecond charge-parity fluctuations and induced decoherence in a superconducting transmon qubit, Nat. Commun. 4, 1913 (2013).
  46. N. P. de Leon, K. M. Itoh, D. Kim, K. K. Mehta, T. E. Northup, H. Paik, B. S. Palmer, N. Samarth, S. Sangtawesin, and D. W. Steuerman, Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware, Science 372, abb2823 (2021).
  47. J. J. Burnett, A. Bengtsson, M. Scigliuzzo, D. Niepce, M. Kudra, P. Delsing, and J. Bylander, Decoherence benchmarking of superconducting qubits, Npj Quantum Inf. 5, 54 (2019).
  48. C. Wang, X. Li, H. Xu, Z. Li, J. Wang, Z. Yang, Z. Mi, X. Liang, T. Su, and C. Yang et al., Towards practical quantum computers: Transmon qubit with a lifetime approaching 0.5 milliseconds, Npj Quantum Inf. 8, 3 (2022).
  49. A. P. M. Place, L. V. H. Rodgers, P. Mundada, B. M. Smitham, M. Fitzpatrick, Z. Leng, A. Premkumar, J. Bryon, A. Vrajitoarea, and S. Sussman et al., New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds, Nat. Commun. 12, 1779 (2021).
  50. M. Bal, A. A. Murthy, S. Zhu, F. Crisa, X. You, Z. Huang, T. Roy, J. Lee, D. van Zanten, and R. Pilipenko et al., Systematic improvements in transmon qubit coherence enabled by niobium surface encapsulation, Npj Quantum Inf. 10, 43 (2024).
  51. R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, A. Veitia, D. Sank, E. Jeffrey, T. C. White, J. Mutus, A. G. Fowler, and B. Campbell et al., Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance, Nature 508, 500 (2014).
  52. P. Zhao, K. Linghu, Z. Li, P. Xu, R. Wang, G. Xue, Y. Jin, and H. Yu, Quantum crosstalk analysis for simultaneous gate operations on superconducting qubits, PRX Quantum 3, 020301 (2022).
  53. T.-Q. Cai, X.-Y. Han, Y.-K. Wu, Y.-L. Ma, J.-H. Wang, Z.-L. Wang, H.-Y. Zhang, H.-Y. Wang, Y.-P. Song, and L.-M. Duan, Impact of spectators on a two-qubit gate in a tunable coupling superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060505 (2021).
  54. A. Sah, S. Kundu, H. Suominen, Q. Chen, and M. Möttönen, Decay-protected superconducting qubit with fast control enabled by integrated on-chip filters, Commun. Phys. 7, 227 (2024).
  55. C. Wu, C. Sun, J. Ma, D. Huang, X.-L. Feng, and L. C. Kwek, Data - “Decoherence-protected holonomic gates with reduced requirements for physical resources”. figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28622405.v2, (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Applied 23, 044016– Published 7 April, 2025
  • Received 22 August 2024
  • Revised 6 November 2024
  • Accepted 10 March 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2025 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation