Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Magnon-Fluxon Interaction in Coupled Superconductor/Ferromagnet Hybrid Periodic Structures

B. Niedzielski1, C.L. Jia2, and J. Berakdar1,*

  • 1Institut für Physik, Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale 06099, Germany
  • 2Key Laboratory for Magnetism and Magnetic Materials of the Ministry of Education and Lanzhou Center for Theoretical Physics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 73000, China

  • *jamal.berakdar@physik.uni-halle.de

Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024073 – Published 28 February, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.024073

Abstract

We study the magnon propagation in a micrometer-size ferromagnetic waveguide affected by the proximity to a superconductor that hosts a vortex formation. By solving the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations of superconductivity, we obtain the equilibrium state of the vortex configuration and the associated stray fields that act on the magnetic dynamics. Spin wave dynamics in the presence of the superconductors are inferred from the Landau-Lifschitz equation. For a quantitative comparison, the simulations are performed under the experimental conditions as reported by Dobrovolskiy et al. (Nature Physics, 15, 477 (2019)). We found that the presence of the vortex lattice leads to the formation of a Bloch-like band structure in the magnon spectrum. The width and the number of allowed bands are found to depend mainly on the in-plane component of the vortex field along the waveguide. A shift to lower energies of the lowest-order-allowed bands occurs due to the confinement of the magnonic modes above the locations of the superconductor vortices. We also studied the role of the films thickness. At least two GHz-frequency backward-volume magnetostatic spin waves modes are observed at the top and bottom surfaces (in addition to these magnetostatic surface modes, the vertical confinement can also give rise to longer-wavelength and low-frequency perpendicular standing spin waves). Effects of the vortex fields are found to depend strongly on the type of the magnon modes. It is found that the effect of the superconducting vortices of the spin waves can be emulated well by the stray fields of air-separated magnetic nanocubes of appropriate dimensions.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (71)

  1. M. Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity. Dover Publications, Mineola/New York., Dover, 2. Edition (2004).
  2. R. D. Parks, Superconductivity, (M. Dekker, New York, 1969).
  3. P. Seidel, Applied Superconductivity: Handbook on Devices and Applications (Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2015).
  4. G. R. Stewart, Superconductivity in iron compounds, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1589 (2011).
  5. A. I. Buzdin, Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 935 (2005).
  6. R. Fazio and C. Lucheroni, Local density of states in superconductor-ferromagnetic hybrid systems, Europhys. Lett. 45, 707 (1999).
  7. K. Halterman and O. T. Valls, Proximity effects and characteristic lengths in ferromagnet-superconductor structures, Phys. Rev. B 66, 224516 (2002).
  8. V. N. Krivoruchko and E. A. Koshina, Inhomogeneous magnetism induced in a superconductor at a superconductor-ferromagnet interface, Phys. Rev. B 66, 014521 (2002).
  9. F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Induced ferromagnetism due to superconductivity in superconductor-ferromagnet structures, Phys. Rev. B 69, 174504 (2004).
  10. R. Grein, T. Löfwander, and M. Eschrig, Inverse proximity effect and influence of disorder on triplet supercurrents in strongly spin-polarized ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 88, 054502 (2013).
  11. I. A. Garifullin, D. A. Tikhonov, N. N. Garif’yanov, M.Z. Fattakhov, K. Theis-Bröhl, K. Westerholt, and H. Zabel, Possible reconstruction of the ferromagnetic state under the influence of superconductivity in epitaxial V/Pd1xFex bilayers, Appl. Magn. Reson. 22, 439 (2002).
  12. J. Stahn, J. Chakhalian, Ch. Niedermayer, J. Hoppler, T. Gutberlet, J. Voigt, F. Treubel, H. U. Habermeier, G. Cristiani, B. Keimer, and C. Bernhard, Magnetic proximity effect in perovskite superconductor/ferromagnet multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 71, 140509(R) (2005).
  13. J. Chakhalian, J. W. Freeland, G. Srajer, J. Strempfer, G. Khaliullin, J.C. Cezar, T. Charlton, R. Dalgliesh, C. Bernhard, G. Cristiani, and H.U. Habermeier, Magnetism at the interface between ferromagnetic and superconducting oxides, Nat. Phys. 2, 244 (2006).
  14. J. Chakhalian, J. W. Freeland, H.-U. Habermeier, G. Cristiani, G. Khaliullin, M. Van Veenendaal, and B. Keimer, Orbital reconstruction and covalent bonding at an oxide interface, Science 318, 1114 (2007).
  15. J. Xia, V. Shelukhin, M. Karpovski, A. Kapitulnik, and A. Palevski, Inverse Proximity Effect in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Bilayer Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 087004 (2009).
  16. D. K. Satapathy, M. A. Uribe-Laverde, I. Marozau, V. K. Malik, S. Das, Th. Wagner, C. Marcelot, J. Stahn, S. Brück, A. Rühm, S. Macke, T. Tietze, E. Goering, A. Frañó, J.-H. Kim, M. Wu, E. Benckiser, B. Keimer, A. Devishvili, B. P. Toperverg, M. Merz, P. Nagel, S. Schuppler, and C. Bernhard, Magnetic Proximity Effect in YBa Cu O/La Ca MnO and YBa Cu O7/LaMnO3+δ Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 197201 (2012).
  17. M. G. Flokstra, S. J. Ray, S. J. Lister, J. Aarts, H. Luetkens, T. Prokscha, A. Suter, E. Morenzoni, and S.L. Lee, Measurement of the spatial extent of inverse proximity in a Py/Nb/Py superconducting trilayer using low-energy muon-spin rotation, Phys. Rev. B. 89, 054510 (2014).
  18. J. Salafranca and S. Okamoto, Unconventional Proximity Effect and Inverse Spin-Switch Behavior in a Model Manganite-Cuprate-Manganite Trilayer System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256804 (2010).
  19. K. Rogdakis, A. Sud, M. Amado, C. M. Lee, L. McKenzie-Sell, K. R. Jeon, M. Cubukcu, M. G. Blamire, J. W. A. Robinson, L. F. Cohen, and H. Kurebayashi, Spin transport parameters of NbN thin films characterized by spin pumping experiments, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 014406 (2019).
  20. S. Kosen, R. G. E. Morris, A. F. van Loo, and A. D. Karenowska, Measurement of a magnonic crystal at millikelvin temperatures, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 012402 (2018).
  21. M. Vaňatka, K. Szulc, On. Wojewoda, C. Dubs, A. V. Chumak, M. Krawczyk, O. V. Dobrovolskiy, J. W. Kłos, and M. Urbánek, Spin-wave Dispersion Measurement by Variable-gap Propagating Spin-wave Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 054033 (2021).
  22. I. A. Golovchanskiy, N. N. Abramov, V. S. Stolyarov, V. I. Chichkov, M. Silaev, I. V. Shchetinin, A. A. Golubov, V. V. Ryazanov, A. V. Ustinov, and M. Yu. Kupriyanov, Magnetization Dynamics in Proximity-coupled Superconductor-Ferromagnet-Superconductor Multilayers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024086 (2020).
  23. A. Paschoa, J. L. Gonzalez, V. P. Nascimento, and E. C. Passamani, The role of the stray field on superconducting properties of hybrid ferromagnetic/superconducting heterostructures, J. Appl. Phys. 128, 043902 (2020).
  24. A. Paschoa, J. L. Gonzalez, V. P. Nascimento, and E. C. Passamani, The role of the stray field on superconducting properties of hybrid ferromagnetic/superconducting heterostructures, J. Appl. Phys. 128, 043902 (2020).
  25. Jeon, Chiara Ciccarelli, Hidekazu Kurebayashi, Lesley F. Cohen, Sachio Komori, Jason W. A. Robinson, and Mark G. Blamire, Abrikosov vortex nucleation and its detrimental effect on superconducting spin pumping in Pt/Nb/Ni Fe/Nb/Pt proximity structures, Phys. Rev. B 99, 144503 (2019).
  26. O. V. Dobrovolskiy, R. Sachser, T. Brächer, T. Böttcher, V. Kruglyak, R. V. Vovk, V. A. Shklovskij, M. Huth, B. Hillebrands, and A. V. Chumak, Magnon–fluxon interaction in a ferromagnet/superconductor heterostructure, Nat. Phys. 15, 477 (2019).
  27. R. Cai, I. Žutić, and W. Han, Superconductor/Ferromagnet Heterostructures: A Platform for Superconducting Spintronics and Quantum Computation. Adv. Quantum Technol., 2200080 (2022)..
  28. B. Niedzielski and J. Berakdar, Controlled vortex formation at nanostructured superconductor/ferromagnetic junctions, Phys. Status Solidi 257, 1900709 (2020).
  29. B. Niedzielski, C. L. Jia, and J. Berakdar, Supercurrent induced by chiral coupling in multiferroic/superconductor nanostructures, Nanomaterials 11, 184 (2021).
  30. C. L. Jermain, S. V. Aradhya, N. D. Reynolds, R. A. Buhrman, J. T. Brangham, M. R. Page, P. C. Hammel, F. Y. Yang, and D. C. Ralph, Increased low-temperature damping in yttrium iron garnet thin films, Phys. Rev. B 95, 174411 (2017).
  31. Yunyan Yao, Qi Song, Yota Takamura, Juan Pedro Cascales, Wei Yuan, Yang Ma, Yu Yun, X. C. Xie, Jagadeesh S. Moodera, and Wei Han, Probe of spin dynamics in superconducting NbN thin films via spin pumping, Phys. Rev. B 97, 224414 (2018).
  32. Se Kwon Kim, Roberto Myers, and Yaroslav Tserkovnyak, Nonlocal Spin Transport Mediated by a Vortex Liquid in Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 187203 (2018).
  33. V. V. Kruglyak, S. O. Demokritov, and D. Grundler, Magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 264001 (2010).
  34. A. A. Serga, A. V. Chumak, and B. Hillebrands, YIG magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 264002 (2010).
  35. A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11, 453 (2015).
  36. A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon transistor for all-magnon data processing, Nat. Commun. 5, 4700 (2014).
  37. B. Lenk, H. Ulrichs, F. Garbs, and M. Münzenberg, The building blocks of magnonics, Phys. Rep. 507, 107 (2011).
  38. X.-g. Wang, L. Chotorlishvili, G.-h. Guo, and J. Berakdar, Electric field controlled spin waveguide phase shifter in YIG, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 073903 (2018).
  39. Q. Wang, P. Pirro, R. Verba, A. Slavin, B. Hillebrands, and A. V. Chumak, Reconfigurable nanoscale spin-wave directional coupler, Sci. Adv. 4, e1701517 (2018).
  40. Q. Wang, M. Kewenig, M. Schneider, R. Verba, F. Kohl, B. Heinz, M. Geilen, M. Mohseni, B. Lägel, F. Ciubotaru, C. Adelmann, C. Dubs, S. D. Cotofana, O. V. Dobrovolskiy, T. Brächer, P. Pirro, and A. V. Chumak, A magnonic directional coupler for integrated magnonic half-adders, Nat. Electron. 3, 765 (2020).
  41. X.-g. Wang, G.-h. Guo, and J. Berakdar, Steering magnonic dynamics and permeability at exceptional points in a parity–time symmetric waveguide, Nat. Commun. 11, 5663 (2020).
  42. X.-G. Wang, G.-H. Guo, and J. Berakdar, Electric steering of spin excitation in nanostructured synthetic antiferromagnet, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 242406 (2020).
  43. A. Ikushima and T. Mizusaki, Superconductivity in Niobium and Niobium-Tantalum alloys, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 30, 873 (1969).
  44. L. P. Gorkov and G. M. Éliashberg, Generalization of the Ginzburg-Landau Equations for Non-Stationary Problems in the Case of Alloys with Paramagnetic Impurities. JETP, 27 (1968).
  45. O. V. Dobrovolskiy, Q. Wang, D. Yu. Vodolazov, B. Budinska, R. Sachser, A. V. Chumak, M. Huth, and A. I. Buzdin, Cherenkov radiation of spin waves by ultra-fast moving magnetic flux quanta ArXiv:2103.10156.
  46. H. Kaper and J. Fleckinger-Pellé, Gauges for the Ginzburg-landau equations of superconductivity, ZAMM - J. Appl. Math. Mech. / Z. für Angew. Math. Mechanik 76, 305 (1996).
  47. G. Carneiro and E. H. Brandt, Vortex lines in films: fields and interactions, Phys. Rev. B 61, 6370 (2000).
  48. S. J. Chapman, M. D. Gunzburger, and J. S. Peterson, Simplified Ginzburg-Landau type models of superconductivity in the high kappa, high field limit, Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. 5, 193 (1995).
  49. N. Niedzielski, B. Schulz, and J. Berakdar, Spatio-temporal superconducting dynamics driven by THz fields from topological spintronic terahertz emitters, Sci. Rep. 12, 15610 (2022).
  50. V. K. Vlasko-Vlasov, A. A. Buzdin, D. Carmo, A. M. H. Andrade, A. A. M. Oliveira, W. A. Ortiz, D. Rosenmann, and W.-K. Kwok, Crossing fields in thin films of isotropic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 94, 184502 (2016).
  51. A. A. Abrikosov, On the magnetic properties of superconductors of the second group, Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 1174 (1957).
  52. R. Engel-Herbert and T. Hesjedal, Calculation of the magnetic stray field of a uniaxial magnetic domain, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 074504 (2005).
  53. V. A. Ansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014).
  54. D. Kumar, O. Dmytriiev, S. Ponraj, and A. Barman, Numerical calculation of spin wave dispersions in magnetic nanostructures, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45, 015001 (2012).
  55. M. Krawczyk and D. Grundler, Review and prospects of magnonic crystals and devices with reprogrammable band structure, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 123202 (2014).
  56. H. Puszkarski and M. Krawczyk, Magnonic crystals – the magnetic counterpart of photonic crystals, Solid State Phenom. 94, 125 (2000).
  57. G. Venkat, D. Kumar, M. Franchin, O. Dmytriiev, M. Mruczkiewicz, H. Fangohr, A. Barman, M. Krawczyk, and A. Prabhakar, Proposal for a standard micromagnetic problem: spin wave dispersion in a magnonic waveguide, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 524 (2013).
  58. F. R. Morgenthaler, An overview of electromagnetic and spin angular momentum mechanical waves in ferrite media, Proc. IEEE 76, 138 (1988).
  59. K. Y. Guslienko, B. Hillebrands, S. O. Demokritov, and A. N. Slavin, Effective dipolar boundary conditions for dynamic magnetization in thin magnetic stripes, Phys. Rev. B 66, 132402 (2002).
  60. K. Y. Guslienko, R. W. Chantrell, and A. N. Slavin, Dipolar localization of quantized spin-wave modes in thin rectangular magnetic elements, Phys. Rev. B 68, 024422 (2003).
  61. J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light, 2nd ed.; Dover Publications: 2008 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  62. K.-S. Lee, D.-S. Han, and S.-K. Kim, Physical Origin and Generic Control of Magnonic Band Gaps of Dipole-exchange Spin Waves in Width-modulated Nanostrip Waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 127202 (2009).
  63. S.-K. Kim, K.-S. Lee, and D.-S. Han, A gigahertz-range spin-wave filter composed of width-modulated nanostrip magnonic-crystal waveguides, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 082507 (2009).
  64. V. N. Gladilin, J. Gutierrez, M. Timmermans, V. Vondel, J. Tempere, J. T. Devreese, and V. V. Moshchalkov, Vortices in a wedge made of a type-I superconductor, New J. Phys. 17, 063032 (2015).
  65. A. I. Gubin, K. S. Il’in, S. A. Vitusevich, M. Siegel, and N. Klein, Dependence of magnetic penetration depth on the thickness of superconducting Nb thin films, Phys. Rev. B 72, 064503 (2005).
  66. R. A. Gallardo, T. Schneider, A. Roldán-Molina, M. Langer, J. Fassbender, K. Lenz, J. Lindner, and P. Landeros, Dipolar interaction induced band gaps and flat modes in surface-modulated magnonic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 97, 144405 (2018).
  67. R. A. Gallardo, D. Cort’es-Ortuño, T. Schneider, A. Roldán-Molina, F. Ma, R. E. Troncoso, K. Lenz, H. Fangohr, J. Lindner, and P. Landeros, Flat Bands, Indirect Gaps, and Unconventional Spin-wave Behavior Induced by a Periodic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 067204 (2019).
  68. I. A. Golovchanskiy, N. N. Abramov, V. S. Stolyarov, V. V. Ryazanov, A. A. Golubov, and A. V. Ustinov, Modified dispersion law for spin waves coupled to a superconductor, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 233903 (2018).
  69. I. A. Golovchanskiy, N. N. Abramov, V. S. Stolyarov, V. V. Bolginov, V. V. Ryazanov, A. A. Gobulov, and A. V. Ustinov, Ferromagnet/Superconductor hybridization for magnonic applications, Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1802375 (2018).
  70. R. Rezaev, E. Posenitskiy, E. Smirnova, E. Levchenko, O. G. Schmidt, and V. M. Fomin, Voltage induced by superconducting vortices in open nanostructured microtubes, Phys. Stat. Sol RRL 13, 1800251 (2019).
  71. A. I. Gubin, K. S. Il’in, S. A. Vitusevich, M. Siegel, and N. Klein, Dependence of magnetic penetration depth on the thickness of superconducting Nb thin films, Phys. Rev. B 72, 064503 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation