- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Reviews of Modern Physics

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Tensor lattice field theory for renormalization and quantum computing

Yannick Meurice, Ryo Sakai, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey

Yannick Meurice

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA

Ryo Sakai

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA and Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA

Judah Unmuth-Yockey

  • Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA and Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA

PDF

Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 025005 – Published 26 May, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.025005

Abstract

The successes and limitations of statistical sampling for a sequence of models studied in the context of lattice QCD are discussed and the need for new methods to deal with finite-density and real-time evolution is emphasized. It is shown that these lattice models can be reformulated using tensorial methods where the field integrations in the path-integral formalism are replaced by discrete sums. These formulations involve various types of duality and provide exact coarse-graining formulas that can be combined with truncations to obtain practical implementations of the Wilson renormalization group program. Tensor reformulations are naturally discrete and provide manageable transfer matrices. Truncations with the time continuum limit are combined, and Hamiltonians suitable for performing quantum simulation experiments, for instance, using cold atoms, or to be programmed on existing quantum computers, are derived. Recent progress concerning the tensor field theory treatment of noncompact scalar models, supersymmetric models, economical four-dimensional algorithms, noise-robust enforcement of Gauss’s law, symmetry preserving truncations, and topological considerations are reviewed. Connections with other tensor network approaches are also discussed.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (348)

  1. Abramowitz, Milton, and Irene A. Stegun, 1965, Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Vol. 55 (Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA).
  2. Adachi, Daiki, Tsuyoshi Okubo, and Synge Todo, 2020, “Anisotropic tensor renormalization group,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 054432.
  3. Akerlund, Oscar, and Philippe de Forcrand, 2015, “U(1) lattice gauge theory with a topological action,” J. High Energy Phys. 06, 183.
  4. Akiyama, Shinichiro, Daisuke Kadoh, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Takumi Yamashita, and Yusuke Yoshimura, 2020, “Tensor renormalization group approach to four-dimensional complex ϕ4 theory at finite density,” J. High Energy Phys. 09, 177.
  5. Akiyama, Shinichiro, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Takumi Yamashita, and Yusuke Yoshimura, 2020, “Phase transition of four-dimensional Ising model with tensor network scheme,” Proc. Sci. LATTICE2019, 138 [arXiv:1911.12954].
  6. Akiyama, Shinichiro, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Takumi Yamashita, and Yusuke Yoshimura, 2021, “Restoration of chiral symmetry in cold and dense Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model with tensor renormalization group,” J. High Energy Phys. 01, 121.
  7. Alexandru, Andrei, Paulo F. Bedaque, Siddhartha Harmalkar, Henry Lamm, Scott Lawrence, and Neill C. Warrington (NuQS Collaboration), 2019, “Gluon field digitization for quantum computers,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 114501.
  8. Alexandru, Andrei, Paulo F. Bedaque, Henry Lamm, and Scott Lawrence (NuQS Collaboration), 2019, “σ Models on Quantum Computers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 090501.
  9. Anderson, P. W., 1973, “Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?,” Mater. Res. Bull. 8, 153–160.
  10. Aoki, Ken-Ichi, Tamao Kobayashi, and Hiroshi Tomita, 2009, “Domain wall renormalization group analysis of two-dimensional Ising model,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 23, 3739–3751.
  11. Aoki, S., et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group), 2020, “FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG),” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 113.
  12. Asaduzzaman, Muhammad, Simon Catterall, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey, 2020, “Tensor network formulation of two-dimensional gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 054510.
  13. Atiyah, M. F., 2007, “Duality in mathematics and physics” (unpublished), https://fme.upc.edu/ca/arxius/butlleti-digital/riemann/071218_conferencia_atiyah-d_article.pdf.
  14. Bailey, Jon A., et al. (Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations), 2015, “|Vub| from b→πℓν decays and (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 014024.
  15. Baker, George A., 1972, “Ising model with a scaling interaction,” Phys. Rev. B 5, 2622–2633.
  16. Bal, M., M. Mariën, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, 2017, “Renormalization Group Flows of Hamiltonians Using Tensor Networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 250602.
  17. Balian, R., J. M. Drouffe, and C. Itzykson, 1975, “Gauge fields on a lattice. III. Strong-coupling expansions and transition points,” Phys. Rev. D 11, 2104–2119.
  18. Banerjee, D., M. Bögli, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, 2013, “Atomic Quantum Simulation of U(N) and SU(N) Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 125303.
  19. Banerjee, D., M. Dalmonte, M. Muller, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U. J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, 2012, “Atomic Quantum Simulation of Dynamical Gauge Fields Coupled to Fermionic Matter: From String Breaking to Evolution after a Quench,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 175302.
  20. Banerjee, Debasish, and Shailesh Chandrasekharan, 2010, “Finite size effects in the presence of a chemical potential: A study in the classical nonlinear O(2) sigma model,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 125007.
  21. Banks, Tom, R. Myerson, and John B. Kogut, 1977, “Phase Transitions in Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B129, 493–510.
  22. Bañuls, M. C., K. Cichy, K. Jansen, and J. I. Cirac, 2013, “The mass spectrum of the Schwinger model with matrix product states,” J. High Energy Phys. 11, 158.
  23. Bañuls, Mari Carmen, and Krzysztof Cichy, 2020, “Review on novel methods for lattice gauge theories,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 024401.
  24. Bañuls, Mari Carmen, Krzysztof Cichy, J. Ignacio Cirac, Karl Jansen, and Stefan Kühn, 2017a, “Density Induced Phase Transitions in the Schwinger Model: A Study with Matrix Product States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 071601.
  25. Bañuls, Mari Carmen, Krzysztof Cichy, J. Ignacio Cirac, Karl Jansen, and Stefan Kühn, 2017b, “Efficient Basis Formulation for (1+1)-Dimensional SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory: Spectral Calculations with Matrix Product States,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 041046.
  26. Bañuls, Mari Carmen, Krzysztof Cichy, J. Ignacio Cirac, Karl Jansen, and Stefan Kühn, 2018, “Tensor networks and their use for lattice gauge theories,” Proc. Sci. LATTICE2018, 022 [arXiv:1810.12838].
  27. Bañuls, Mari Carmen, et al., 2020, “Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologies,” Eur. Phys. J. D 74, 165.
  28. Barthel, Thomas, Carlos Pineda, and Jens Eisert, 2009, “Contraction of fermionic operator circuits and the simulation of strongly correlated fermions,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 042333.
  29. Baxter, R. J., 1968, “Dimers on a rectangular lattice,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 9, 650–654.
  30. Bazavov, Alexei, Simon Catterall, Raghav G. Jha, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey, 2019, “Tensor renormalization group study of the non-Abelian Higgs model in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 114507.
  31. Bazavov, Alexei, Yannick Meurice, Shan-Wen Tsai, Judah Unmuth-Yockey, and Jin Zhang, 2015, “Gauge-invariant implementation of the Abelian Higgs model on optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 076003.
  32. Bender, Julian, and Erez Zohar, 2020, “Gauge redundancy-free formulation of compact QED with dynamical matter for quantum and classical computations,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 114517.
  33. Berges, Juergen, Nikolaos Tetradis, and Christof Wetterich, 2002, “Nonperturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics,” Phys. Rep. 363, 223–386.
  34. Bernien, Hannes, et al., 2017, “Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator,” Nature (London) 551, 579–584.
  35. Bervillier, C., 2013, “Revisiting the local potential approximation of the exact renormalization group equation,” Nucl. Phys. B876, 587–604.
  36. Bervillier, Claude, Andreas Juttner, and Daniel F. Litim, 2007, “High-accuracy scaling exponents in the local potential approximation,” Nucl. Phys. B783, 213–226.
  37. Bhattacharya, Tanmoy, Alexander J. Buser, Shailesh Chandrasekharan, Rajan Gupta, and Hersh Singh, 2021, “Qubit Regularization of Asymptotic Freedom,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172001.
  38. Bloch, Immanuel, Jean Dalibard, and Wilhelm Zwerger, 2008, “Many-body physics with ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885–964.
  39. Bloch, Jacques, Raghav G. Jha, Robert Lohmayer, and Maximilian Meister, 2021, “Tensor renormalization group study of the 3D O(2) model,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 094517.
  40. Bonnes, Lars, Daniel Charrier, and Andreas M. Läuchli, 2014, “Dynamical and steady-state properties of a Bose-Hubbard chain with bond dissipation: A study based on matrix product operators,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 033612.
  41. Bosetti, Paolo, Barbara De Palma, and Marco Guagnelli, 2015, “Monte Carlo determination of the critical coupling in ϕ24 theory,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 034509.
  42. Bowers, R. G., and G. S. Joyce, 1967, “Lattice Model for the λ Transition in a Bose Fluid,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 630–632.
  43. Bronzin, Simone, Barbara De Palma, and Marco Guagnelli, 2019, “New Monte Carlo determination of the critical coupling in ϕ24 theory,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 034508.
  44. Browaeys, Antoine, and Thierry Lahaye, 2020, “Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms,” Nat. Phys. 16, 132–142.
  45. Brower, R., S. Chandrasekharan, and U.-J. Wiese, 1999, “QCD as a quantum link model,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 094502.
  46. Bruckmann, Falk, Christof Gattringer, Thomas Kloiber, and Tin Sulejmanpasic, 2016, “Two-dimensional O(3) model at nonzero density: From dual lattice simulations to repulsive bosons,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 114503.
  47. Bruckmann, Falk, Christof Gattringer, Thomas Kloiber, and Tin Sulejmanpašić, 2015, “Dual lattice representations for O(N) and CP(N−1) models with a chemical potential,” Phys. Lett. B 749, 495–501.
  48. Bruckmann, Falk, Karl Jansen, and Stefan Kühn, 2019, “O(3) nonlinear sigma model in 1+1 dimensions with matrix product states,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 074501.
  49. Butt, Nouman, Simon Catterall, Yannick Meurice, Ryo Sakai, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey, 2020, “Tensor network formulation of the massless Schwinger model with staggered fermions,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 094509.
  50. Buyens, Boye, Jutho Haegeman, Karel Van Acoleyen, Henri Verschelde, and Frank Verstraete, 2014, “Matrix Product States for Gauge Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 091601.
  51. Buyens, Boye, Jutho Haegeman, Henri Verschelde, Frank Verstraete, and Karel Van Acoleyen, 2016, “Confinement and String Breaking for QED2 in the Hamiltonian Picture,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 041040.
  52. Byrnes, T. M. R., P. Sriganesh, R. J. Bursill, and C. J. Hamer, 2002, “Density matrix renormalization group approach to the massive Schwinger model,” Phys. Rev. D 66, 013002.
  53. Byrnes, Tim, and Yoshihisa Yamamoto, 2006, “Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 022328.
  54. Campos, Manuel, Germán Sierra, and Esperanza López, 2019, “Tensor renormalization group in bosonic field theory,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 195106.
  55. Campostrini, Massimo, Paolo Rossi, and Ettore Vicari, 1995, “Strong-coupling expansion of chiral models,” Phys. Rev. D 52, 358–385.
  56. Cardy, J., 1996, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
  57. Castro Neto, A. H., F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, 2009, “The electronic properties of graphene,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162.
  58. Catterall, Simon, David B. Kaplan, and Mithat Unsal, 2009, “Exact lattice supersymmetry,” Phys. Rep. 484, 71–130.
  59. Celi, A., B. Vermersch, O. Viyuela, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and P. Zoller, 2020, “Emerging Two-Dimensional Gauge Theories in Rydberg Configurable Arrays,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 021057.
  60. Cervera-Lierta, Alba, 2018, “Exact Ising model simulation on a quantum computer,” Quantum 2, 114.
  61. Chang, Shau-Jin, 1976, “The existence of a second-order phase transition in the two-dimensional ϕ4 field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 13, 2778.
  62. Chen, Bin-Bin, Yuan Gao, Yi-Bin Guo, Yuzhi Liu, Hui-Hai Zhao, Hai-Jun Liao, Lei Wang, Tao Xiang, Wei Li, and Z. Y. Xie, 2020, “Automatic differentiation for second renormalization of tensor networks,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 220409.
  63. Chen, Jing, Hai-Jun Liao, Hai-Dong Xie, Xing-Jie Han, Rui-Zhen Huang, Song Cheng, Zhong-Chao Wei, Zhi-Yuan Xie, and Tao Xiang, 2017, “Phase transition of the q-state clock model: Duality and tensor renormalization,” Chin. Phys. Lett. 34, 050503.
  64. Chen, Ming-Cheng, et al., 2020, “Demonstration of Adiabatic Variational Quantum Computing with a Superconducting Quantum Coprocessor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180501.
  65. Chen, Yong, Zhi-Yuan Xie, and Ji-Feng Yu, 2018, “Phase transitions of the five-state clock model on the square lattice,” Chin. Phys. B27, 080503.
  66. Chung, S. G., 1999, “Essential finite-size effect in the two-dimensional XY model,” Phys. Rev. B 60, 11761–11764.
  67. Ciavarella, Anthony, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage, 2021, “Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 094501.
  68. Cirac, Ignacio, David Perez-Garcia, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete, 2021, “Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003.
  69. Cirac, J. Ignacio, and Frank Verstraete, 2009, “Renormalization and tensor product states in spin chains and lattices,” J. Phys. A 42, 504004.
  70. Clark, Logan W., Brandon M. Anderson, Lei Feng, Anita Gaj, K. Levin, and Cheng Chin, 2018, “Observation of Density-Dependent Gauge Fields in a Bose-Einstein Condensate Based on Micromotion Control in a Shaken Two-Dimensional Lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 030402.
  71. Cohen, Thomas D., 2003, “Functional Integrals for QCD at Nonzero Chemical Potential and Zero Density,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 222001.
  72. Coleman, Sidney, R. Jackiw, and H. D. Politzer, 1974, “Spontaneous symmetry breaking in the O(N) model for large N,” Phys. Rev. D 10, 2491–2499.
  73. Coleman, Sidney R., 1975, “The quantum Sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model,” Phys. Rev. D 11, 2088.
  74. Corboz, Philippe, Glen Evenbly, Frank Verstraete, and Guifré Vidal, 2010, “Simulation of interacting fermions with entanglement renormalization,” Phys. Rev. A 81, 010303.
  75. Creutz, Michael, 1977, “Gauge fixing, the transfer matrix, and confinement on a lattice,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 1128–1136.
  76. Creutz, Michael, 2001, “Lattice gauge theory: A retrospective,” Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 94, 219–226.
  77. Creutz, Michael, Laurence Jacobs, and Claudio Rebbi, 1979, “Monte Carlo study of Abelian lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 20, 1915.
  78. Dasgupta, Raka, and Indrakshi Raychowdhury, 2022, “Cold-atom quantum simulator for string and hadron dynamics in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. A 105, 023322.
  79. Davoudi, Zohreh, Mohammad Hafezi, Christopher Monroe, Guido Pagano, Alireza Seif, and Andrew Shaw, 2020, “Towards analog quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories with trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023015.
  80. Davoudi, Zohreh, Indrakshi Raychowdhury, and Andrew Shaw, 2021, “Search for efficient formulations for Hamiltonian simulation of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 074505.
  81. Debnath, S., N. M. Linke, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Monroe, 2016, “Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits,” Nature (London) 536, 63–66.
  82. de Forcrand, Philippe, 2010, “Simulating QCD at finite density,” Proc. Sci. LATTICE2009, 010 [arXiv:1005.0539].
  83. Delcamp, Clement, and Antoine Tilloy, 2020, “Computing the renormalization group flow of two-dimensional ϕ4 theory with tensor networks,” Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033278.
  84. Denbleyker, Alan, Yuzhi Liu, Y. Meurice, M. P. Qin, T. Xiang, Z. Y. Xie, J. F. Yu, and Haiyuan Zou, 2014, “Controlling sign problems in spin models using tensor renormalization,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 016008.
  85. Detmold, William, and Kostas Orginos, 2013, “Nuclear correlation functions in lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 87, 114512.
  86. Devoret, M. H., and R. J. Schoelkopf, 2013, “Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook,” Science 339, 1169–1174.
  87. Dittrich, Bianca, Sebastian Mizera, and Sebastian Steinhaus, 2016, “Decorated tensor network renormalization for lattice gauge theories and spin foam models,” New J. Phys. 18, 053009.
  88. Dyson, Freeman J., 1969, “Existence of a phase transition in a one-dimensional Ising ferromagnet,” Commun. Math. Phys. 12, 91–107.
  89. Edwards, E. E., S. Korenblit, K. Kim, R. Islam, M.-S. Chang, J. K. Freericks, G.-D. Lin, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, 2010, “Quantum simulation and phase diagram of the transverse-field Ising model with three atomic spins,” Phys. Rev. B 82, 060412.
  90. Efrati, Efi, Zhe Wang, Amy Kolan, and Leo P. Kadanoff, 2014, “Real-space renormalization in statistical mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 647–667.
  91. Einhorn, Martin B., and Robert Savit, 1978, “Topological excitations in the Abelian Higgs model,” Phys. Rev. D 17, 2583.
  92. Einhorn, Martin B., and Robert Savit, 1979, “Phase transitions in the Abelian Higgs model,” Phys. Rev. D 19, 1198.
  93. Emonts, Patrick, Mari Carmen Bañuls, Ignacio Cirac, and Erez Zohar, 2020, “Variational Monte Carlo simulation with tensor networks of a pure Z3 gauge theory in (2+1)D,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 074501.
  94. Evenbly, G., 2018, “Gauge fixing, canonical forms, and optimal truncations in tensor networks with closed loops,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 085155.
  95. Evenbly, G., and G. Vidal, 2015, “Tensor Network Renormalization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180405.
  96. Fannes, Mark, Bruno Nachtergaele, and Reinhard F. Werner, 1992, “Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains,” Commun. Math. Phys. 144, 443–490.
  97. Felser, Timo, Pietro Silvi, Mario Collura, and Simone Montangero, 2020, “Two-Dimensional Quantum-Link Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics at Finite Density,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 041040.
  98. Fetter, A. L., and J. D. Walecka, 2003, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, New York).
  99. Feynman, R. P, 1982, “Simulating physics with computers,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467–488.
  100. Fishman, M. T., L. Vanderstraeten, V. Zauner-Stauber, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, 2018, “Faster methods for contracting infinite two-dimensional tensor networks,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 235148.
  101. Fradkin, Eduardo H., and Leonard Susskind, 1978, “Order and disorder in gauge systems and magnets,” Phys. Rev. D 17, 2637.
  102. Friedenauer, A., H. Schmitz, J. T. Glueckert, D. Porras, and T. Schaetz, 2008, “Simulating a quantum magnet with trapped ions,” Nat. Phys. 4, 757–761.
  103. Friedenauer, Axel, 2010, “Simulation of the quantum Ising model in an ion trap,” Ph.D. thesis (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).
  104. Funcke, Lena, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Manuel Schneider, Paolo Stornati, and Xiaoyang Wang, 2022, “Towards quantum simulations in particle physics and beyond on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 380, 20210062.
  105. Funcke, Lena, Karl Jansen, and Stefan Kühn, 2020, “Topological vacuum structure of the Schwinger model with matrix product states,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 054507.
  106. Gattringer, Christof, Daniel Goschl, and Carlotta Marchis, 2018, “Kramers-Wannier duality and worldline representation for the SU(2) principal chiral model,” Phys. Lett. B 778, 435–441.
  107. Gattringer, Christof, Daniel Göschl, and Tin Sulejmanpašić, 2018, “Dual simulation of the 2D U(1) gauge Higgs model at topological angle θ=π: Critical endpoint behavior,” Nucl. Phys. B935, 344–364.
  108. Gattringer, Christof, Thomas Kloiber, and Michael Müller-Preussker, 2015, “Dual simulation of the two-dimensional lattice U(1) Gauge-Higgs model with a topological term,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 114508.
  109. Gattringer, Christof, Thomas Kloiber, and Vasily Sazonov, 2015, “Solving the sign problems of the massless lattice Schwinger model with a dual formulation,” Nucl. Phys. B897, 732–748.
  110. Georgescu, I. M., S. Ashhab, and Franco Nori, 2014, “Quantum simulation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153–185.
  111. Goldstone, J., 1961, “Field theories with ‘superconductor’ solutions,” Nuovo Cimento 19, 154–164.
  112. Goldstone, Jeffrey, Abdus Salam, and Steven Weinberg, 1962, “Broken symmetries,” Phys. Rev. 127, 965–970.
  113. Golterman, Maarten F. L., and Donald N. Petcher, 1989, “A local interactive lattice model with supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B319, 307–341.
  114. González-Cuadra, Daniel, Erez Zohar, and J Ignacio Cirac, 2017, “Quantum simulation of the Abelian-Higgs lattice gauge theory with ultracold atoms,” New J. Phys. 19, 063038.
  115. Göschl, Daniel, Christof Gattringer, Alexander Lehmann, and Christoph Weis, 2017, “Simulation strategies for the massless lattice Schwinger model in the dual formulation,” Nucl. Phys. B924, 63–85.
  116. Green, Frederic, and Stuart Samuel, 1981, “The large-N phase transition in the U(N) chiral models,” Phys. Lett. 103B, 110–112.
  117. Gross, David J., and Frank Wilczek, 1973, “Ultraviolet Behavior of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343–1346.
  118. Gu, Z.-C, M. Levin, and X.-G. Wen, 2008, “Tensor-entanglement renormalization group approach as a unified method for symmetry breaking and topological phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 205116.
  119. Gu, Zheng-Cheng, 2013, “Efficient simulation of Grassmann tensor product states,” Phys. Rev. B 88, 115139.
  120. Gu, Zheng-Cheng, Frank Verstraete, and Xiao-Gang Wen, 2010, “Grassmann tensor network states and its renormalization for strongly correlated fermionic and bosonic states,” arXiv:1004.2563.
  121. Gu, Zheng-Cheng, and Xiao-Gang Wen, 2009, “Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry protected topological order,” Phys. Rev. B 80, 155131.
  122. Guardado-Sanchez, Elmer, Peter T. Brown, Debayan Mitra, Trithep Devakul, David A. Huse, Peter Schauß, and Waseem S. Bakr, 2018, “Probing the Quench Dynamics of Antiferromagnetic Correlations in a 2D Quantum Ising Spin System,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 021069.
  123. Gürsey, F., 1960, “On the symmetries of strong and weak interactions,” Nuovo Cimento 16, 230–240.
  124. Gustafson, Erik, 2020, “Projective cooling for the transverse Ising model,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 071504.
  125. Gustafson, Erik, Patrick Dreher, Zheyue Hang, and Yannick Meurice, 2021, “Indexed improvements for real-time Trotter evolution of a (1+1) field theory using NISQ quantum computers,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 045020.
  126. Gustafson, Erik, Yannick Meurice, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey, 2019, “Quantum simulation of scattering in the quantum Ising model,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 094503.
  127. Gustafson, Erik, Yingyue Zhu, Patrick Dreher, Norbert M. Linke, and Yannick Meurice, 2021, “Real-time quantum calculations of phase shifts using wave packet time delays,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 054507.
  128. Gustafson, Erik, et al., 2021, “Large scale multi-node simulations of Z2 gauge theory quantum circuits using Google Cloud Platform,” arXiv:2110.07482.
  129. Gustafson, Erik J., and Henry Lamm, 2021, “Toward quantum simulations of Z2 gauge theory without state preparation,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 054507.
  130. Hackett, Daniel, C., Kiel Howe, Ciaran Hughes, William Jay, Ethan T. Neil, and James N. Simone, 2019, “Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 062341.
  131. Haegeman, Jutho, Karel Van Acoleyen, Norbert Schuch, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Frank Verstraete, 2015, “Gauging Quantum States: From Global to Local Symmetries in Many-Body Systems,” Phys. Rev. X 5, 011024.
  132. Haegeman, Jutho, J. Ignacio Cirac, Tobias J. Osborne, and Frank Verstraete, 2013, “Calculus of continuous matrix product states,” Phys. Rev. B 88, 085118.
  133. Haegeman, Jutho, and Frank Verstraete, 2017, “Diagonalizing transfer matrices and matrix product operators: A medley of exact and computational methods,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 355–406.
  134. Hasenfratz, P., M. Maggiore, and F. Niedermayer, 1990, “The exact mass gap of the O(3) and O(4) non-linear σ-models in d=2,” Phys. Lett. B 245, 522–528.
  135. Hauru, Markus, Clement Delcamp, and Sebastian Mizera, 2018, “Renormalization of tensor networks using graph independent local truncations,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 045111.
  136. Hebenstreit, M., D. Alsina, J. I. Latorre, and B. Kraus, 2017, “Compressed quantum computation using a remote five-qubit quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 052339.
  137. Herbut, I., 2007, A Modern Approach to Critical Phenomena (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
  138. Honda, Masazumi, Etsuko Itou, Yuta Kikuchi, Lento Nagano, and Takuya Okuda, 2022, “Classically emulated digital quantum simulation for screening and confinement in the Schwinger model with a topological term,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 014504.
  139. Horn, D., 1981, “Finite matrix models with continuous local gauge invariance,” Phys. Lett. 100B, 149–151.
  140. Hostetler, Leon, Jin Zhang, Ryo Sakai, Judah Unmuth-Yockey, Alexei Bazavov, and Yannick Meurice, 2021, “Clock model interpolation and symmetry breaking in O(2) models,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 054505.
  141. Iblisdir, S., R. Orus, and J. I. Latorre, 2007, “Matrix product states algorithms and continuous systems,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 104305.
  142. Ising, Ernst, 1925, “Contribution to the theory of ferromagnetism,” Z. Phys. 31, 253–258.
  143. Islam, R., et al., 2011, “Onset of a quantum phase transition with a trapped ion quantum simulator,” Nat. Commun. 2, 377.
  144. Islam, Rajibul, Ruichao Ma, Philipp M. Preiss, M. Eric Tai, Alexander Lukin, Matthew Rispoli, and Markus Greiner, 2015, “Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system,” Nature (London) 528, 77–83.
  145. Itzykson, C., and J. M. Drouffe, 1991, Statistical Field Theory: Volume 1—From Brownian Motion to Renormalization and Lattice Gauge Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
  146. Jaksch, D., C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, 1998, “Cold Bosonic Atoms in Optical Lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108–3111.
  147. Johri, Sonika, Damian S. Steiger, and Matthias Troyer, 2017, “Entanglement spectroscopy on a quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 195136.
  148. Jordan, Stephen P., Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill, 2014, “Quantum computation of scattering in scalar quantum field theories,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 14, 1014–1080.
  149. Kadanoff, L. P., 1976, “Notes on Migdal’s recursion formulas,” Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 100, 359–394.
  150. Kadanoff, Leo P., 1966, “Scaling laws for Ising models near Tc,” Phys. Phys. Fiz. 2, 263–272.
  151. Kadanoff, Leo P., 1975, “Variational Principles and Approximate Renormalization Group Calculations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1005–1008.
  152. Kadanoff, Leo P., and Anthony Houghton, 1975, “Numerical evaluations of the critical properties of the two-dimensional Ising model,” Phys. Rev. B 11, 377–386.
  153. Kadoh, Daisuke, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Yoshifumi Nakamura, Ryo Sakai, Shinji Takeda, and Yusuke Yoshimura, 2018, “Tensor network formulation for two-dimensional lattice N=1 Wess-Zumino model,” J. High Energy Phys. 03, 141.
  154. Kadoh, Daisuke, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Yoshifumi Nakamura, Ryo Sakai, Shinji Takeda, and Yusuke Yoshimura, 2019, “Tensor network analysis of critical coupling in two dimensional ϕ4 theory,” J. High Energy Phys. 05, 184.
  155. Kadoh, Daisuke, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Yoshifumi Nakamura, Ryo Sakai, Shinji Takeda, and Yusuke Yoshimura, 2020, “Investigation of complex ϕ4 theory at finite density in two dimensions using TRG,” J. High Energy Phys. 02, 161.
  156. Kadoh, Daisuke, and Katsumasa Nakayama, 2019, “Renormalization group on a triad network,” arXiv:1912.02414.
  157. Kandala, Abhinav, Kristan Temme, Antonio D. Corcoles, Antonio Mezzacapo, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, 2019, “Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor,” Nature (London) 567, 491–495.
  158. Kaplan, David B., and Jesse R. Stryker, 2020, “Gauss’s law, duality, and the Hamiltonian formulation of U(1) lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 094515.
  159. Kasper, V., F. Hebenstreit, F. Jendrzejewski, M. K. Oberthaler, and J. Berges, 2017, “Implementing quantum electrodynamics with ultracold atomic systems,” New J. Phys. 19, 023030.
  160. Kaufman, Bruria, 1949, “Crystal statistics. II. Partition function evaluated by spinor analysis,” Phys. Rev. 76, 1232–1243.
  161. Kawauchi, Hikaru, and Takeda Shinji, 2018, “Loop-TNR analysis of CP(1) model with theta term,” EPJ Web Conf. 175, 11015.
  162. Keesling, Alexander, et al., 2019, “Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator,” Nature (London) 568, 207–211.
  163. Keldysh, L. V, 1965, “Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave,” Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307–1314.
  164. Kharzeev, Dmitri E., and Yuta Kikuchi, 2020, “Real-time chiral dynamics from a digital quantum simulation,” Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023342.
  165. Kim, Hyosub, Kyungtae Kim, Woojun Lee, and Jaewook Ahn, 2017, “Quantum simulation with N=19 Rydberg atoms for quantum Ising dynamics,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), San Jose, 2017 (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC), p. JTh5C.1.
  166. Kim, K., M.-S. Chang, S. Korenblit, R. Islam, E. E. Edwards, J. K. Freericks, G.-D. Lin, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, 2010, “Quantum simulation of frustrated Ising spins with trapped ions,” Nature (London) 465, 590–593.
  167. Kim, K., et al., 2011, “Quantum simulation of the transverse Ising model with trapped ions,” New J. Phys. 13, 105003.
  168. Klco, N., E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Morris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, 2018, “Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 032331.
  169. Klco, Natalie, and Martin J. Savage, 2019, “Digitization of scalar fields for quantum computing,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 052335.
  170. Knolle, J., and R. Moessner, 2019, “A field guide to spin liquids,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 451–472.
  171. Kogut, John B., 1979, “An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659–713.
  172. Kogut, John B., 1983, “The lattice gauge theory approach to quantum chromodynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 775–836.
  173. Kogut, John B., and Leonard Susskind, 1975, “Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 11, 395–408.
  174. Korenblit, Simcha, 2013, “Quantum simulations of the Ising model with trapped ions: Devil’s staircase and arbitrary lattice proposal,” Ph.D. thesis (University of Maryland, College Park).
  175. Kramers, H. A., and G. H. Wannier, 1941, “Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. Part I,” Phys. Rev. 60, 252–262.
  176. Kühn, Stefan, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Mari Carmen Bañuls, 2015, “Non-Abelian string breaking phenomena with matrix product states,” J. High Energy Phys. 07, 130.
  177. Kuramashi, Yoshinobu, and Yusuke Yoshimura, 2019, “Three-dimensional finite temperature Z2 gauge theory with tensor network scheme,” J. High Energy Phys. 08, 023.
  178. Lamm, Henry, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi (NuQS Collaboration), 2019, “General methods for digital quantum simulation of gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 034518.
  179. Lamm, Henry, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi (NuQS Collaboration), 2020, “Parton physics on a quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013272.
  180. Lay, William, and Joseph Rudnick, 2002, “Analysis of a Continuous Field Theory in Two Dimensions with Use of the Density Matrix Renormalization Group,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057203.
  181. Leibfried, D., R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, 2003, “Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281–324.
  182. Levin, Michael, and Cody P. Nave, 2007, “Tensor Renormalization Group Approach to 2D Classical Lattice Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 120601.
  183. Li, Tracy, Lucia Duca, Martin Reitter, Fabian Grusdt, Eugene Demler, Manuel Endres, Monika Schleier-Smith, Immanuel Bloch, and Ulrich Schneider, 2016, “Bloch state tomography using Wilson lines,” Science 352, 1094–1097.
  184. Li, Ying, and Simon C. Benjamin, 2017, “Efficient Variational Quantum Simulator Incorporating Active Error Minimization,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 021050.
  185. Li, Zi-Qian, Li-Ping Yang, Z. Y. Xie, Hong-Hao Tu, Hai-Jun Liao, and T. Xiang, 2020, “Critical properties of the two-dimensional q-state clock model,” Phys. Rev. E 101, 060105.
  186. Lidar, Daniel A., and Ofer Biham, 1997, “Simulating Ising spin glasses on a quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. E 56, 3661–3681.
  187. Linke, N. M., S. Johri, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, A. Y. Matsuura, and C. Monroe, 2018, “Measuring the Rényi entropy of a two-site Fermi-Hubbard model on a trapped ion quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 052334.
  188. Liu, Yuzhi, Y. Meurice, M. P. Qin, J. Unmuth-Yockey, T. Xiang, Z. Y. Xie, J. F. Yu, and Haiyuan Zou, 2013, “Exact blocking formulas for spin and gauge models,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 056005.
  189. Lloyd, Seth, 1996, “Universal quantum simulators,” Science 273, 1073–1078.
  190. Lüscher, M., 1990, “Selected topics in lattice field theory,” in Champs, Cordes, Et Phénomènes Critiques, Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School 1988, Session 49, edited by E. Brezin and J. Zinn-Justin (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
  191. Magnifico, Giuseppe, Marcello Dalmonte, Paolo Facchi, Saverio Pascazio, Francesco V. Pepe, and Elisa Ercolessi, 2020, “Real time dynamics and confinement in the Zn Schwinger-Weyl lattice model for 1+1 QED,” Quantum 4, 281.
  192. Magnifico, Giuseppe, Timo Felser, Pietro Silvi, and Simone Montangero, 2021, “Lattice quantum electrodynamics in (3+1)-dimensions at finite density with tensor networks,” Nat. Commun. 12, 3600.
  193. Marchis, Carlotta, and Christof Gattringer, 2018, “Dual representation of lattice QCD with worldlines and worldsheets of Abelian color fluxes,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 034508.
  194. Martinez, Esteban A., et al., 2016, “Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer,” Nature (London) 534, 516–519.
  195. Meurice, Y., 2007, “Nonlinear aspects of the renormalization group flows of Dyson’s hierarchical model,” J. Phys. A 40, R39.
  196. Meurice, Y., 2013, “Accurate exponents from approximate tensor renormalizations,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 064422.
  197. Meurice, Yannick, 1994, “Duality in long-range Ising ferromagnets,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 35, 769–779.
  198. Meurice, Yannick, 2019, “Examples of symmetry-preserving truncations in tensor field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 014506.
  199. Meurice, Yannick, 2020a, “Discrete aspects of continuous symmetries in the tensorial formulation of Abelian gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 014506.
  200. Meurice, Yannick, 2020b, Quantum Field Theory: A Quantum Computation Approach (Institute of Physics, London).
  201. Meurice, Yannick, 2021, “Theoretical methods to design and test quantum simulators for the compact Abelian Higgs model,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 094513.
  202. Migdal, Alexander A., 1975, “Gauge transitions in gauge and spin lattice systems,” Sov. Phys. JETP 42, 743.
  203. Mishra, Chinmay, Shane Thompson, Raphael Pooser, and George Siopsis, 2020, “Quantum computation of an interacting fermionic model,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 035010.
  204. Molnar, Andras, José Garre-Rubio, David Pérez-García, Norbert Schuch, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2018, “Normal projected entangled pair states generating the same state,” New J. Phys. 20, 113017.
  205. Montangero, S., 2018, Introduction to Tensor Network Methods: Numerical Simulations of Low-Dimensional Many-Body Quantum Systems (Springer, New York).
  206. Montvay, Istvan, and Gernot Münster, 1994, Quantum Fields on a Lattice, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
  207. Morita, Satoshi, and Naoki Kawashima, 2019, “Calculation of higher-order moments by higher-order tensor renormalization group,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 236, 65–71.
  208. Morita, Satoshi, and Naoki Kawashima, 2021, “Global optimization of tensor renormalization group using the corner transfer matrix,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 045131.
  209. Mostame, Sarah, and Ralf Schützhold, 2008, “Quantum Simulator for the Ising Model with Electrons Floating on a Helium Film,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 220501.
  210. Mueller, Niklas, Andrey Tarasov, and Raju Venugopalan, 2020, “Deeply inelastic scattering structure functions on a hybrid quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 016007.
  211. Nachman, Benjamin, Davide Provasoli, Wibe A. De Jong, and Christian W. Bauer, 2021, “Quantum Algorithm for High Energy Physics Simulations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 062001.
  212. Nakamoto, Norihiro, and Shinji Takeda, 2016, “Computation of correlation functions by tensor renormalization group method,” Sci. Rep. Kanazawa Univ. 60, 11–25.
  213. Nakamura, Yoshifumi, Hideaki Oba, and Shinji Takeda, 2019, “Tensor renormalization group algorithms with a projective truncation method,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 155101.
  214. Nambu, Yoichiro, 1960, “Quasi-particles and gauge invariance in the theory of superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. 117, 648–663.
  215. Nielsen, M. A., and I. L. Chuang, 2000, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge Series on Information and the Natural Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
  216. Niemeijer, Th., and J. van Leeuwen, 1976, “Renormalization: Ising-like spin systems,” in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 6, edited by C. Domb and M. Green (Academic Press, New York).
  217. Nishino, Tomotoshi, 1995, “Density matrix renormalization group method for 2D classical models,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 3598.
  218. Nishino, Tomotoshi, and Kouichi Okunishi, 1996, “Corner transfer matrix renormalization group method,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 891.
  219. Nishiyama, Yoshihiro, 2001a, “Quantum-fluctuation-induced repulsive interaction of a quantum string between walls,” Phys. Rev. B 64, 064510.
  220. Nishiyama, Yoshihiro, 2001b, “Strong-coupling-expansion analysis of the false-vacuum decay rate of the lattice ϕ4 model in 1+1 dimensions,” J. Phys. A 34, 11215–11223.
  221. Orland, Peter, and Daniel Rohrlich, 1990, “Lattice gauge magnets: Local isospin from spin,” Nucl. Phys. B338, 647–672.
  222. Orus, Roman, 2014, “A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,” Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 349, 117–158.
  223. Paeckel, Sebastian, Thomas Köhler, Andreas Swoboda, Salvatore R. Manmana, Ulrich Schollwöck, and Claudius Hubig, 2019, “Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states,” Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 411, 167998.
  224. Parisi, G., 1998, Statistical Field Theory (Avalon Publishing, New York).
  225. Perez, Alejandro, 2013, “The spin-foam approach to quantum gravity,” Living Rev. Relativity 16, 3.
  226. Perez-Garcia, D., F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. I. Cirac, 2007, “Matrix product state representations,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 401–430.
  227. Peskin, Michael E., and Daniel V. Schroeder, 1995, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
  228. Peter, F., and H. Weyl, 1927, “The completeness of the primitive representations of a closed continuous group,” Math. Ann. 97, 737–755.
  229. Pichler, T., M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller, and S. Montangero, 2016, “Real-Time Dynamics in U(1) Lattice Gauge Theories with Tensor Networks,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 011023.
  230. Pirvu, B., G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, and L. Tagliacozzo, 2012, “Matrix product states for critical spin chains: Finite-size versus finite-entanglement scaling,” Phys. Rev. B 86, 075117.
  231. Plenio, M. B., J. Eisert, J. Dreißig, and M. Cramer, 2005, “Entropy, Entanglement, and Area: Analytical Results for Harmonic Lattice Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 060503.
  232. Politzer, H. David, 1973, “Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346–1349.
  233. Pollmann, Frank, Subroto Mukerjee, Ari M. Turner, and Joel E. Moore, 2009, “Theory of Finite-Entanglement Scaling at One-Dimensional Quantum Critical Points,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 255701.
  234. Polyakov, A. M., 1987, Gauge Fields and Strings, Contemporary Concepts in Physics (Taylor & Francis, London).
  235. Polyakov, Alexander M., 1978, “Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,” Phys. Lett. 72B, 477–480.
  236. Pontryagin, L., 1939, Topological Groups (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
  237. Potts, R. B., 1952, “Some generalized order-disorder transformations,” Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 48, 106–109.
  238. Poulin, David, Angie Qarry, Rolando Somma, and Frank Verstraete, 2011, “Quantum Simulation of Time-Dependent Hamiltonians and the Convenient Illusion of Hilbert Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 170501.
  239. Preskill, John, 2018, “Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond,” Quantum 2, 79.
  240. Prokof’ev, Nikolay, and Boris Svistunov, 2001, “Worm Algorithms for Classical Statistical Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 160601.
  241. Rahman, Sarmed A., Randy Lewis, Emanuele Mendicelli, and Sarah Powell, 2021, “SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum annealer,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 034501.
  242. Ran, Shi-Ju, Emanuele Tirrito, Cheng Peng, Xi Chen, Luca Tagliacozzo, Gang Su, and Maciej Lewenstein, 2020, “Tensor Network Contractions,” Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 964 (Springer, New York).
  243. Raychowdhury, Indrakshi, and Jesse R. Stryker, 2020a, “Loop, string, and hadron dynamics in SU(2) Hamiltonian lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 114502.
  244. Raychowdhury, Indrakshi, and Jesse R. Stryker, 2020b, “Solving Gauss’s law on digital quantum computers with loop-string-hadron digitization,” Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033039.
  245. Rebbi, C., 1983, Lattice Gauge Theories and Monte Carlo Simulations (World Scientific, Singapore).
  246. Reed, M., and B. Simon, 1980, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. 1: Functional Analysis (Academic Press, New York).
  247. Rico, E., T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, P. Zoller, and S. Montangero, 2014, “Tensor Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories and Atomic Quantum Simulation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 201601.
  248. Robaina, Daniel, Mari Carmen Bañuls, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2021, “Simulating 2+1D Z3 Lattice Gauge Theory with an Infinite Projected Entangled-Pair State,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 050401.
  249. Sachdev, S., 2001, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
  250. Sakai, Ryo, 2019, “Renormalization of tensor networks and applications to particle physics,” Ph.D. thesis (Kanazawa University).
  251. Sakai, Ryo, Shinji Takeda, and Yusuke Yoshimura, 2017, “Higher order tensor renormalization group for relativistic fermion systems,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 063B07.
  252. Samuel, Stuart, and Fu-Goul Yee, 1985, “A theoretical and numerical analysis of disorder operators in the chiral models,” Nucl. Phys. B257, 85–122.
  253. Savit, Robert, 1977, “Topological Excitations in U(1)-Invariant Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 55–58.
  254. Savit, Robert, 1980, “Duality in field theory and statistical systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 453–487.
  255. Schaich, David, and Will Loinaz, 2009, “Improved lattice measurement of the critical coupling in ϕ24 theory,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 056008.
  256. Schauss, Peter, 2018, “Quantum simulation of transverse Ising models with Rydberg atoms,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 023001.
  257. Schollwöck, U., 2005, “The density-matrix renormalization group,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259–315.
  258. Schollwöck, Ulrich, 2011a, “The density-matrix renormalization group: A short introduction,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 2643–2661.
  259. Schollwöck, Ulrich, 2011b, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,” Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 326, 96–192.
  260. Schumacher, Benjamin, 1995, “Quantum coding,” Phys. Rev. A 51, 2738–2747.
  261. Schützhold, R., and S. Mostame, 2005, “Quantum simulator for the O(3) nonlinear sigma model,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 82, 248–252.
  262. Schweizer, Christian, Fabian Grusdt, Moritz Berngruber, Luca Barbiero, Eugene Demler, Nathan Goldman, Immanuel Bloch, and Monika Aidelsburger, 2019, “Floquet approach to Z2 lattice gauge theories with ultracold atoms in optical lattices,” Nat. Phys. 15, 1168–1173.
  263. Serre, J. P., 1973, A Course in Arithmetic, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, New York).
  264. Sewell, Troy J., and Stephen P. Jordan, 2021, “Preparing renormalization group fixed points on NISQ hardware,” arXiv:2109.09787.
  265. Shi, Y. Y., L. M. Duan, and G. Vidal, 2006, “Classical simulation of quantum many-body systems with a tree tensor network,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 022320.
  266. Shimizu, Yuya, 2012, “Analysis of the (1+1)-dimensional lattice ϕ4 model using the tensor renormalization group,” Chin. J. Phys. 50, 749.
  267. Shimizu, Yuya, and Yoshinobu Kuramashi, 2014a, “Critical behavior of the lattice Schwinger model with a topological term at θ=π using the Grassmann tensor renormalization group,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 074503.
  268. Shimizu, Yuya, and Yoshinobu Kuramashi, 2014b, “Grassmann tensor renormalization group approach to one-flavor lattice Schwinger model,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 014508.
  269. Shimizu, Yuya, and Yoshinobu Kuramashi, 2018, “Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in lattice Schwinger model with one flavor of Wilson fermion,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 034502.
  270. Silvi, Pietro, Enrique Rico, Marcello Dalmonte, Ferdinand Tschirsich, and Simone Montangero, 2017, “Finite-density phase diagram of a (1+1)-d non-Abelian lattice gauge theory with tensor networks,” Quantum 1, 9.
  271. Silvi, Pietro, Yannick Sauer, Ferdinand Tschirsich, and Simone Montangero, 2019, “Tensor network simulation of an SU(3) lattice gauge theory in 1D,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 074512.
  272. Silvi, Pietro, Ferdinand Tschirsich, Matthias Gerster, Johannes Jünemann, Daniel Jaschke, Matteo Rizzi, and Simone Montangero, 2019, “The Tensor Networks Anthology: Simulation techniques for many-body quantum lattice systems,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 8.
  273. Simon, Jonathan, Waseem S. Bakr, Ruichao Ma, M. Eric Tai, Philipp M. Preiss, and Markus Greiner, 2011, “Quantum simulation of antiferromagnetic spin chains in an optical lattice,” Nature (London) 472, 307–312.
  274. Sjostrand, Torbjorn, Stefan Ask, Jesper R. Christiansen, Richard Corke, Nishita Desai, Philip Ilten, Stephen Mrenna, Stefan Prestel, Christine O. Rasmussen, and Peter Z. Skands, 2015, “An introduction to pythia 8.2,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159–177.
  275. Smith, Adam, M. S. Kim, Frank Pollmann, and Johannes Knolle, 2019, “Simulating quantum many-body dynamics on a current digital quantum computer,” npj Quantum Inf. 5, 106.
  276. Sulejmanpasic, Tin, and Christof Gattringer, 2019, “Abelian gauge theories on the lattice: θ-terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles,” Nucl. Phys. B943, 114616.
  277. Surace, Federica M., Paolo P. Mazza, Giuliano Giudici, Alessio Lerose, Andrea Gambassi, and Marcello Dalmonte, 2020, “Lattice Gauge Theories and String Dynamics in Rydberg Atom Quantum Simulators,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041.
  278. Suzuki, Masuo, 1976, “Generalized Trotter’s formula and systematic approximants of exponential operators and inner derivations with applications to many-body problems,” Commun. Math. Phys. 51, 183–190.
  279. Tagliacozzo, L., A. Celi, and M. Lewenstein, 2014, “Tensor Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories with Continuous Groups,” Phys. Rev. X 4, 041024.
  280. Tagliacozzo, L., A. Celi, P. Orland, and M. Lewenstein, 2013, “Simulations of non-Abelian gauge theories with optical lattices,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2615.
  281. Tagliacozzo, L., A. Celi, A. Zamora, and M. Lewenstein, 2013, “Optical Abelian lattice gauge theories,” Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 330, 160–191.
  282. Tagliacozzo, L., Thiago. R. de Oliveira, S. Iblisdir, and J. I. Latorre, 2008, “Scaling of entanglement support for matrix product states,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 024410.
  283. Tagliacozzo, L., and G. Vidal, 2011, “Entanglement renormalization and gauge symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 115127.
  284. Takeda, Shinji, and Yusuke Yoshimura, 2015, “Grassmann tensor renormalization group for the one-flavor lattice Gross-Neveu model with finite chemical potential,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 043B01.
  285. Temme, Kristan, Sergey Bravyi, and Jay M. Gambetta, 2017, “Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509.
  286. Thirring, Walter E., 1958, “A soluble relativistic field theory,” Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 3, 91–112.
  287. Trotter, H., 1959, “On the product of semi-groups of operators,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 10, 545–551.
  288. Ueda, Hiroshi, Kouichi Okunishi, and Tomotoshi Nishino, 2014, “Doubling of entanglement spectrum in tensor renormalization group,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 075116.
  289. Unmuth-Yockey, J., Jin Zhang, P. M. Preiss, Li-Ping Yang, S. W. Tsai, and Y. Meurice, 2017, “Probing the conformal Calabrese-Cardy scaling with cold atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 023603.
  290. Unmuth-Yockey, Judah, Jin Zhang, Alexei Bazavov, Yannick Meurice, and Shan-Wen Tsai, 2018, “Universal features of the Abelian Polyakov loop in 1+1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 094511.
  291. Unmuth-Yockey, Judah F., 2019, “Gauge-invariant rotor Hamiltonian from dual variables of 3D U(1) gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 074502.
  292. Unmuth-Yockey, Judah F., 2020, “Four-dimensional U(1) gauge theory as a rotor gauge theory” (to be published).
  293. Unmuth-Yockey, Judah Francis, 2017, “Duality methods and the tensor renormalization group: Applications to quantum simulation,” Ph.D. thesis (University of Iowa).
  294. Unmuth-Yockey, Judah Francis, Yannick Meurice, James Osborn, and Haiyuan Zou, 2015, “Tensor renormalization group study of the 2D O(3) model,” Proc. Sci. LATTICE2014, 325 [arXiv:1411.4213].
  295. Vaks, V. G., and A. I. Larkin, 1965, “On phase transitions of second order,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 49, 975 [Sov. Phys. JETP 22, 678 (1966)].
  296. Vanhecke, Bram, Jutho Haegeman, Karel Van Acoleyen, Laurens Vanderstraeten, and Frank Verstraete, 2019, “Scaling Hypothesis for Matrix Product States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 250604.
  297. Verstraete, F., and J. I. Cirac, 2004a, “Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions,” arXiv:cond-mat/0407066.
  298. Verstraete, F., and J. I. Cirac, 2004b, “Valence-bond states for quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 060302.
  299. Verstraete, F., V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac, 2008, “Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems,” Adv. Phys. 57, 143–224.
  300. Verstraete, F., M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and J. I. Cirac, 2006, “Criticality, the Area Law, and the Computational Power of Projected Entangled Pair States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220601.
  301. Verstraete, Frank, J. Ignacio Cirac, and José I. Latorre, 2009, “Quantum circuits for strongly correlated quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 032316.
  302. Vidal, G., 2007, “Entanglement Renormalization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 220405.
  303. Vidal, Guifré, 2003, “Efficient Classical Simulation of Slightly Entangled Quantum Computations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902.
  304. Vidal, Guifré, 2004, “Efficient Simulation of One-Dimensional Quantum Many-Body Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502.
  305. Villani, C., 2012, Théorème Vivant, Littérature Franćaise (Grasset, Paris).
  306. Wang, Jianwei, Fabio Sciarrino, Anthony Laing, and Mark G. Thompson, 2020, “Integrated photonic quantum technologies,” Nat. Photonics 14, 273–284.
  307. Wang, Xiaoqun, and Tao Xiang, 1997, “Transfer matrix DMRG for thermodynamics of one-dimensional quantum systems,” arXiv:cond-mat/9705301.
  308. Wegner, F. J., 1971, “Duality in generalized Ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 12, 2259–2272.
  309. Wen, X. G., 2004, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Systems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
  310. Wen, Xiao-Gang, 2017, “Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041004.
  311. White, Steven R., 1992, “Density Matrix Formulation for Quantum Renormalization Groups,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863–2866.
  312. White, Steven R., 1993, “Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups,” Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345–10356.
  313. Wiese, Uwe-Jens, 2013, “Ultracold quantum gases and lattice systems: Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories,” Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 525, 777–796.
  314. Wilson, K. G., and John B. Kogut, 1974, “The renormalization group and the epsilon expansion,” Phys. Rep. 12, 75–199.
  315. Wilson, Kenneth G., 1974, “Confinement of quarks,” Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445–2459.
  316. Wilson, Kenneth G., 1975, “The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773.
  317. Witten, Edward, 1982, “Constraints on supersymmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B202, 253.
  318. Wolff, Ulli, 1990, “Asymptotic freedom and mass generation in the O(3) nonlinear σ-model,” Nucl. Phys. B334, 581–610.
  319. Wolff, Ulli, 2008, “Cluster simulation of relativistic fermions in two space-time dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B789, 258–276.
  320. Wolff, Ulli, 2010, “Simulating the all-order strong coupling expansion III: O(N) sigma/loop models,” Nucl. Phys. B824, 254–272.
  321. Wozar, Christian, and Andreas Wipf, 2012, “Supersymmetry breaking in low dimensional models,” Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 327, 774–807.
  322. Wu, Xiaoling, Xinhui Liang, Yaoqi Tian, Fan Yang, Cheng Chen, Yong-Chun Liu, Meng Khoon Tey, and Li You, 2021, “A concise review of Rydberg atom based quantum computation and quantum simulation,” Chin. Phys. B 30, 020305.
  323. Xie, Z. Y., J. Chen, M. P. Qin, J. W. Zhu, L. P. Yang, and T. Xiang, 2012, “Coarse-graining renormalization by higher-order singular value decomposition,” Phys. Rev. B 86, 045139.
  324. Xie, Z. Y., H. C. Jiang, Q. N. Chen, Z. Y. Weng, and T. Xiang, 2009, “Second Renormalization of Tensor-Network States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160601.
  325. Yang, Li-Ping, Yuzhi Liu, Haiyuan Zou, Z. Y. Xie, and Y. Meurice, 2016, “Fine structure of the entanglement entropy in the O(2) model,” Phys. Rev. E 93, 012138.
  326. Yang, Shuo, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen, 2017, “Loop Optimization for Tensor Network Renormalization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 110504.
  327. Yoshimura, Yusuke, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Yoshifumi Nakamura, Shinji Takeda, and Ryo Sakai, 2018, “Calculation of fermionic Green functions with Grassmann higher-order tensor renormalization group,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 054511.
  328. You, Hao, Michael R. Geller, and P. C. Stancil, 2013, “Simulating the transverse Ising model on a quantum computer: Error correction with the surface code,” Phys. Rev. A 87, 032341.
  329. Yu, J. F., Z. Y. Xie, Y. Meurice, Yuzhi Liu, A. Denbleyker, Haiyuan Zou, M. P. Qin, and J. Chen, 2014, “Tensor renormalization group study of classical XY model on the square lattice,” Phys. Rev. E 89, 013308.
  330. Zhang, J., G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, H. Kaplan, A. V. Gorshkov, Z.-X. Gong, and C. Monroe, 2017, “Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator,” Nature (London) 551, 601–604.
  331. Zhang, Jin, J. Unmuth-Yockey, J. Zeiher, A. Bazavov, S. W. Tsai, and Y. Meurice, 2018, “Quantum Simulation of the Universal Features of the Polyakov Loop,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 223201.
  332. Zhao, H. H., Z. Y. Xie, Q. N. Chen, Z. C. Wei, J. W. Cai, and T. Xiang, 2010, “Renormalization of tensor-network states,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 174411.
  333. Zhou, Yi, Kazushi Kanoda, and Tai-Kai Ng, 2017, “Quantum spin liquid states,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025003.
  334. Zohar, Erez, and Michele Burrello, 2015, “Formulation of lattice gauge theories for quantum simulations,” Phys. Rev. D 91, 054506.
  335. Zohar, Erez, and Michele Burrello, 2016, “Building projected entangled pair states with a local gauge symmetry,” New J. Phys. 18, 043008.
  336. Zohar, Erez, Michele Burrello, Thorsten Wahl, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2015, “Fermionic projected entangled pair states and local U(1) gauge theories,” Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 363, 385–439.
  337. Zohar, Erez, Alessandro Farace, Benni Reznik, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2017a, “Digital lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 023604.
  338. Zohar, Erez, Alessandro Farace, Benni Reznik, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2017b, “Digital Quantum Simulation of Z2 Lattice Gauge Theories with Dynamical Fermionic Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 070501.
  339. Zohar, Erez, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2018a, “Combining tensor networks with Monte Carlo methods for lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 034510.
  340. Zohar, Erez, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2018b, “Eliminating fermionic matter fields in lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 075119.
  341. Zohar, Erez, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2019, “Removing staggered fermionic matter in U(N) and SU(N) lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 114511.
  342. Zohar, Erez, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik, 2012, “Simulating Compact Quantum Electrodynamics with Ultracold Atoms: Probing Confinement and Nonperturbative Effects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 125302.
  343. Zohar, Erez, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik, 2013a, “Cold-Atom Quantum Simulator for SU(2) Yang-Mills Lattice Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 125304.
  344. Zohar, Erez, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik, 2013b, “Quantum simulations of gauge theories with ultracold atoms: Local gauge invariance from angular momentum conservation,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 023617.
  345. Zohar, Erez, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik, 2016, “Quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in optical lattices,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 014401.
  346. Zohar, Erez, and Benni Reznik, 2011, “Confinement and Lattice QED Electric Flux-Tubes Simulated with Ultracold Atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 275301.
  347. Zohar, Erez, Thorsten B. Wahl, Michele Burrello, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2016, “Projected entangled pair states with non-Abelian gauge symmetries: An SU(2) study,” Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 374, 84–137.
  348. Zou, Haiyuan, Yuzhi Liu, Chen-Yen Lai, J. Unmuth-Yockey, A. Bazavov, Z. Y. Xie, T. Xiang, S. Chandrasekharan, S. W. Tsai, and Y. Meurice, 2014, “Progress towards quantum simulating the classical O(2) model,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 063603.

Outline

Information

Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 025005– Published 26 May, 2022
  • Received 16 October 2020
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2022 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation