- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Reviews of Modern Physics

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Final-focus systems in linear colliders

T. O. Raubenheimer and F. Zimmermann

T. O. Raubenheimer and F. Zimmermann

  • Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, P.O. Box 4349, Stanford, California 94309

PDF

Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 95 – Published 1 January, 2000

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.72.95

Abstract

In colliding-beam facilities, the “final-focus system” must demagnify the beams to attain the very small spot sizes required at the interaction points. The first final-focus system with local chromatic correction was developed for the Stanford Linear Collider, where very large demagnifications were desired. This same conceptual design has been adopted by all of the future linear collider designs as well as the Superconducting Super Collider, the Stanford and KEK B Factories, and the proposed Muon Collider. In this paper, the overall layout, physics constraints, and optimization techniques relevant to the design of final-focus systems for high-energy electron-positron linear colliders are reviewed. Finally, advanced concepts to avoid some of the limitations of these systems are discussed.

View figure in article

References (61)

  1. Akasaka, M., et al., 1997, “JLC [Japanese Linear Collider] Design Study,” KEK-REPORT 97-1.
  2. Balakin, V., 1992, in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Final Focus and Interaction Regions of Next Generation Linear Colliders, SLAC-405 (SLAC, Stanford, CA), p. 178.
  3. Balakin, V. E., and N. A. Solyak, 1986, in Proceedings of the XIII International Conference on High Energy Accelerators, Novosibirsk, USSR (Nauka, Novosibirsk, USSR), p. 146.
  4. Berndt, M., et al., 1991, “Final Focus Test Beam: Project Desion Report,” SLAC-376 (SLAC, Stanford, CA).
  5. Bethe, H., and J. Ashkin, 1953, in Experimental Nuclear Physics, Vol. 1, edited by E. Segre (Wiley, New York), p. 166.
  6. Brinkmann, R., 1990, “Optimization of a Final Focus System for Large Momentum Bandwidth,” DESY-M-90/14.
  7. Brinkmann, R., 1993, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Next-Generation Linear Colliders, Stanford, CA, SLAC-436 (SLAC, Stanford, CA), p. 363.
  8. Brinkmann, R., G. Materlik, J. Rossbach, and A. Wagner, 1997, Eds., “Conceptual Design of a 500 GeV e+e− Linear Collider with Integrated X-ray Laser Facility,” DESY 1997-048.
  9. Brown, K. L., 1968, Adv. Part. Phys. 1, 71.
  10. Brown, K. L., and F. C. Iselin, 1974, “DECAY TURTLE (Trace Unlimited Rays Through Lumped Elements): A Computer Program for Simulating Charged Particle Beam Transport Systems, Including Decay Calculations,” CERN-74-2.
  11. Brown, K. L., and J. Spencer, 1981, in Proceedings of the 1981 Particle Accelerator Conference, Washington, D.C. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), p. 2568.
  12. Cai, Y., et al., “LEGO: A Modular Accelerator Design Code,” in Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, Canada (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), p. 2583.
  13. Chen, P., 1993, “Disruption Effects from the Collision of Quasi-Flat Beams,” in 1993 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Washington, D.C. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), p. 617.
  14. Chen, P., C. K. Ng, and S. Rajagopalan, 1993, Phys. Rev. E 48, 3022.
  15. Chen, P., K. Oide, A. M. Sessler, and S. Yu, 1990, Part. Accel. 31, 7.
  16. Chen, P., S. Rajagopalan, and J. Rosenzweig, 1989, Phys. Rev. D 40, 923.
  17. Chen, P., A. Spitkovsky, and A. Weidemann, 1996, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11, 1687.
  18. Chen, P., and K. Yokoya, 1988a, Phys. Rev. D 38, 987.
  19. Chen, P., and K. Yokoya, 1988b, “Multibunch Crossing Instability,” SLAC-PUB-4653.
  20. Chen, P., and K. Yokoya, 1992, in Frontiers of Particle Beams: Intensity Limitations, Lecture Notes in Physics 400 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), p. 415.
  21. Dunham, B., and O. Napoly, 1994, “FFADA, Final Focus Automatic Design and Analysis,” DAPNIA/SEA 94-06.
  22. Emma, P., et al., 1997, “Limitations of Interaction-point Spot-size Tuning at the SLC,” in Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, Canada (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), p. 452.
  23. Forest, E., 1997, unpublished.
  24. Hendrickson, L., et al., 1997, “Luminosity Optimization Feedback in the SLC,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems (Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China).
  25. Hertzbach, S. S., T. W. Markiewicz, T. Maruyama, and R. Messner, 1996, “Backgrounds at the Next Linear Collider,” in Snowmass 1996: New Directions for High-Energy Physics, Snowmass, Colorado (SLAC, Stanford, CA), p. 178.
  26. Hirata, K., B. Zotter, and K. Oide, 1989, Phys. Lett. B 224, 437.
  27. Hollebeek, R., 1981, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 184, 333.
  28. Irwin, J., 1990, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 298, 460.
  29. Irwin, J., et al., 1996, “Ground Motion: Theory and Measurement,” in Zeroth Order Design Report for the Next Linear Collider, edited by T. Raubenheimer et al., LBNL-PUB-5424, SLAC-474, UCRL-ID-124161, p. 1044.
  30. Irwin, J., 1997, “Dynamic Focusing Schemes for Linear Colliders,” in Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, Canada (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), p. 512.
  31. Juravlev, V. M., et al., 1993, “Investigations of Power and Spatial Correlation Characteristics of Seismic Vibrations in the CERN LEP Tunnel for Linear Collider Studies,” CERN-SL-93-53.
  32. Loew, G. A., 1995, Ed., “International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee Report,” SLAC-R-95-471, with updates available at: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/ilc-trc/ilc-trchome.html.
  33. Murray, J. J., K. L. Brown, and T. Fieguth, 1987, in Proceedings of the 1987 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Washington, D.C. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), p. 1331.
  34. Myers, S., 1995, in Proceedings of the IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Dallas, Texas (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), p. 476.
  35. Oide, K., 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1713.
  36. Oide, K., 1992, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on High Energy Accelerators, Hamburg, Germany (World Scientific, River Edge, NJ), p. 861.
  37. Palmer, R., 1988, in Snowmass DPF Summer Study 1988: High Energy Physics in the 1990’s, Snowmass, Colorado (World Scientific, NJ), p. 613.
  38. Raubenheimer, T., and F. Zimmermann, 1996, SLAC internal report, NLC-Note-23, unpublished.
  39. Raubenheimer, T., et al., 1996, Eds., Zeroth Order Design Report for the Next Linear Collider, 1996, LBNL-PUB-5424, SLAC-474, UCRL-ID-124161.
  40. Reichel, I., et al., 1998, in Proceedings of the 1998 International Computational Accelerator Physics Conference (ICAP’98), Monterey, California (forthcoming).
  41. Rosenzweig, J. B., B. Autin, and P. Chen, 1989, in Proceedings of the 1989 Lake Arrowhead Workshop on Advanced Accelerator Concepts (AIP, New York), p. 324.
  42. Rosenzweig, J. B., and P. Chen, 1991, in Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, San Francisco (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), p. 3225.
  43. Roy, G., 1990, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 298, 128.
  44. Roy, G., 1992, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, SLAC-397.
  45. Sands, M., 1979, “The Physics of Electron Storage Rings,” SLAC-121.
  46. Sands, M., 1985, “Emittance Growth from Radiation Fluctuations,” SLAC AP-47, unpublished.
  47. Seeman, J., 1990, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 41, 389.
  48. Servranckx, R., et al., 1990, “User’s Guide to the Program DIMAD,” SLAC-0285.
  49. Telnov, V., 1987, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 260, 304.
  50. Walker, N., 1997, “MERLIN,” presented at Linear Collider 97 workshop, Dubna, Russia, unpublished.
  51. Walker, N., et al., 1993, “Global Tuning Knobs for the SLC Final Focus,” in Proceedings of the 1993 Particle Accelerator Conference, Washington, D.C. (IEEE, NJ), p. 95.
  52. Whittum, D. H., A. M. Sessler, J. J. Stewart, and S. S. Yu, 1990, Part. Accel. 34, 89.
  53. Woodley, M., 1994, private communication.
  54. Yokoya, K., 1988, “Impedance of Slowly Tapered Structures,” CERN SL/90-88.
  55. Yokoya, K., 1997, private communication.
  56. Zhuravlev, V. M., et al., 1995, “Seismic Conditions in Finland and Stability Requirements for the Future Linear Collider,” e-print HU-SEFT-R-1995-01.
  57. Zimmermann F., 1998, in Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Advanced Accelerator Concepts, Baltimore, Maryland (AIP, New York), p. 103.
  58. Zimmermann, F., R. Helm, and J. Irwin, 1995, “Optimization of the Next Linear Collider Final Focus System,” in Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference, Dallas, Texas (IEEE, New York), p. 710.
  59. Zimmermann F., and D. H. Whittum, 1997, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Electron-Electron Interactions at TeV Energies, Santa Cruz, California, 1997; Published in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 13, 2525.
  60. Zimmermann, F., et al., 1996, “Collimator Wake Fields in the SLC Final Focus,” in Proceedings of the Fifth European Particle Accelerator Conference, Sitges, Spain (Inst. Physics, Bristol, UK), p. 504.
  61. Zimmermann, F., et al., 1997, “Performance Issues, Downtime Recovery and Tuning in the Next Linear Collider (NLC),” in Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, Canada (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), p. 608.

Outline

Information

Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 95– Published 1 January, 2000

    © 2000 American Physical Society

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation