Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Interference between independent photons

H. Paul

H. Paul

  • Zentralinstitut für Optik und Spektroskopie, Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, DDR-1199 Berlin, German Democratic Republic

Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 209 – Published 1 January, 1986

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.58.209

Abstract

A comprehensive review is given of investigations, both theoretical and experimental, that demonstrate interference to take place even when the fields involved are produced by independent sources. The physical situation is rather different for coherent and incoherent fields. In the first case, where the sources are lasers, a conventional interference pattern can be observed which is adequately described by the classical theory. In the present paper, special attention is paid to the question of whether this interference persists when the two laser beams become strongly attenuated. In the second case, the sources are individual atoms excited by a pumping mechanism, that emit spontaneously and, hence, independently from each other. In those circumstances, no interference pattern can show up. However, it becomes evident from both the classical and the quantum-mechanical theory that interference effects can still be established by observing intensity correlations rather than the intensity itself. This point is discussed in greater detail. The pioneering experiments of Forrester, Gudmundson and Johnson, and Brown and Twiss are reviewed in this context. Especially interesting from the theoretical point of view is the case of two emitting atoms, since then the classical and the quantum-mechanical description differ significantly, the quantum theory predicting the intensity correlations to be distinctly stronger than those following from classical considerations. This specific quantum-mechanical feature is shown to be intimately connected with the corpuscular aspect of light.

References (50)

  1. Brown, R. Hanbury, and R. Q. Twiss, 1956a, Nature 177, 27
  2. Brown, R. Hanbury, and R. Q. Twiss, 1956b, Nature 178, 1046
  3. Brunner, W., H. Paul, and G. Richter, 1964, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 14, 384
  4. Brunner, W., H. Paul, and G. Richter, 1965, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 15, 17
  5. Dicke, R. H., 1954, Phys. Rev. 93, 99
  6. Dicke, R. H., 1964, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Quantum Electronics, edited by P. Grivet and N. Bloembergen (Dunod, Paris, and Columbia University Press, New York), p. 35
  7. Dirac, P. A. M., 1927, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 114, 243
  8. Dirac, P. A. M., 1930, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Clarendon, Oxford; 4th ed. published 1958 by Oxford University, London), 4th ed., p. 9
  9. Einstein, A., B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, 1935, Phys. Rev. 47, 777
  10. Ernst, V., and P. Stehle, 1968, Phys. Rev. 176, 1456
  11. Fano, U., 1961, Am. J. Phys. 29, 539
  12. Forrester, A. T., R. A. Gudmundsen, and P. O. Johnson, 1955, Phys. Rev. 99, 1691
  13. Glauber, R. J., 1963, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766
  14. Glauber, R. J., 1965, in Quantum Optics and Electronics, edited by C. DeWitt, A. Blandin, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji (Gordon and Breach, New York), p. 65
  15. Haken, H., 1970, in Handbuch der Physik, edited by S. Flügge (Springer, Berlin), Vol. XXV/2c, p. 1
  16. Heitler, W., 1954, The Quantum Theory of Radiation, 3rd ed. (Oxford University, London)
  17. Hull, G. F., 1949, Am. J. Phys. 17, 559
  18. Jánossy, L., and Zs. Náray, 1957, Acta Phys. Acad. Sci. Hung. 7, 403
  19. Jánossy, L., and Zs. Náray, 1958, Nuovo Cimento, Suppl. 9, 588
  20. Javan, A., E. A. Ballik, and W. L. Bond, 1962, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 96
  21. Kimble, H. J., and L. Mandel, 1976, Phys. Rev. A 13, 2123
  22. Lax, M., 1968, Phys. Rev. 172, 350
  23. Lehmberg, R. H., 1970, Phys. Rev. A 2, 883 and 889
  24. Magyar, G., and L. Mandel, 1963, Nature 198, No. 4877, 255
  25. Mandel, L., 1983, Phys. Rev. A 28, 929
  26. Michelson, A. A., 1890, Philos. Mag. 30, 1
  27. Michelson, A. A., 1920, Astrophys. J. 51, 257
  28. Middleton, D., 1960, An Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York)
  29. Mollow, B. R., 1969, Phys. Rev. 188, 1969
  30. Mollow, B. R., and M. M. Miller, 1969, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 52, 464
  31. Paul, H., 1966, Fortschr. Phys. 14, 141
  32. Paul, H., 1969, Lasertheorie II (Akademie, Berlin)
  33. Paul, H., W. Brunner, and G. Richter, 1963, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 12, 325
  34. Paul H., W. Brunner, and G. Richter, 1965, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 16, 93
  35. Paul, H., W. Brunner, and G. Richter, 1966, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 17, 262
  36. Pfleegor, R. L., and L. Mandel, 1967, Phys. Rev. 159, 1084
  37. Pfleegor, R. L., and L. Mandel, 1968, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 946
  38. Radloff, W., 1971, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 26, 178
  39. Rebka, G. A., and R. V. Pound, 1957, Nature 180, 1035
  40. Richter, G., 1977, in 75 Jahre Quantentheorie, edited by W. Brauer, H.-W. Streitwolf, and K. Werner (Akademie, Berlin), p. 245
  41. Richter, Th., 1979, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 36, 266
  42. Schrödinger, E., 1926, Naturwissenschaften 14, 664
  43. Senitzky, I. R., 1954, Phys. Rev. 95, 904
  44. Senitzky, I. R., 1958, Phys. Rev. 111, 3
  45. Steudel, H., 1971, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 27, 57
  46. Steudel, H., and Th. Richter, 1978, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 35, 122
  47. Taylor. G. I., 1909, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 15, 114
  48. Titulaer, U. M., and R. J. Glauber, 1966, Phys. Rev. 145, 1041
  49. Weisskopf, V., and E. Wigner, 1930a, Z. Phys. 63, 54
  50. Weisskopf, V., and E. Wigner, 1930b, Z. Phys. 65, 18

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation