- Access by Xinjiang University
Evidence for a Nuclear Tensor Force from Mass-14 Beta- and Gamma-Ray Data
Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 591 – Published 1 July, 1968
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.40.591
Abstract
The role of beta- and gamma-ray matrix elements in the determination of wave functions for the states of mass 14 is examined. The data considered include the Gamow-Teller (beta) matrix elements of and and the and matrix elements connecting the lowest four states of . The magnetic moment of is also discussed. The shell-model wave functions considered arise mainly from the configuration but include admixtures of the () configuration. It is found that the data, considered as a whole, cannot be explained if the components of the wave functions are derived from a central plus spin-orbit interaction only, but that quite satisfactory agreement is obtained if the nuclear force includes a tensor part. The bulk of the cancellation of the beta decay matrix element takes place within the configuration. In general, configuration mixing is of secondary importance; its most noticeable effect is on the decay of the first-excited state of .
References (46)
- B. Jancovici and I. Talmi, Phys. Rev. 95, 289 (1954)
- J. P. Elliott, Phil. Mag. 1, 503 (1956)
- W. M. Visscher and R. A. Ferrell, Phys. Rev. 107, 781 (1957)
- D. R. Inglis, Rev. Mod. Phys. 25, 390 (1953)
- E. Baranger and S. Meshkov, Phys. Rev. Letters 1, 30 (1958)
- W. E. Moore, J. N. McGruer, and A. I. Hamburger, Phys. Rev. Letters 1, 29 (1958)
- L. Zamick, Phys. Letters 21, 194 (1966)
- I. Unna and I. Talmi, Phys. Rev. 112, 452 (1958)
- W. W. True, Phys. Rev. 130, 1530 (1963)
- E. K. Warburton, H. J. Rose, and E. N. Hatch, Phys. Rev. 114, 214 (1959)
- E. K. Warburton and W. T. Pinkston, Phys. Rev. 118, 733 (1960)
- J. C. Legg, Phys. Rev. 129, 272 (1963)
- K. G. Standing, Phys. Rev. 101, 152 (1956) E. F. Bennett, 122, 595 (1961)
- R. N. Glover and A. D. W. Jones, Nucl. Phys. 84, 673 (1966)
- G. H. Holbrow, R. Middleton, and B. Rosner, Phys. Rev. 152, 970 (1966)
- M. H. MacFarlane and J. B. French, Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 567 (1960)
- H. J. Rose and D. M. Brink, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 306 (1967)
- T. Hamada and I. D. Johnston, Nucl. Phys. 34, 382 (1962)
- S. Cohen and D. Kurath, Nucl. Phys. 73, 1 (1965)
- H. Weidenmüller, Nucl. Phys. 36, 151. (1962)
- R. L. Becker and A. D. MacKellar, Phys. Letters 21, 201 (1966)
- J. S. Bell, Nucl. Phys. 12, 117 (1959)
- W. W. True (private communication)
- H. J. Rose, F. Riess, and W. Trost, Nucl. Phys. 52, 48 (1964)
- E. C. Halbert and J. B. French, Phys. Rev. 105, 1563 (1957)
- T. Engeland, Nucl. Phys. 72, 68 (1965)
- W. Trost, H. J. Rose, and F. Riess, Phys. Letters 10, 83 (1964)
- O. Häusser, J. S. Lopes, H. J. Rose, and R. D. Gill, Oxford Nucl. Phys. Lab. Rept. 1966 (unpublished)
- C. P. Swann, K. K. Rasmussen, and F. P. Metzger, Phys. Rev. 121, 242 (1961)
- E. C. Booth, B. Chasan, and K. A. Wright, Nucl. Phys. 57, 403 (1964)
- J. A. Lonergan and D. J. Donahue, Nucl. Phys. 74, 318 (1965)
- K. P. Lieb, Nucl. Phys. 85, 461 (1966)
- J. P. Elliott and B. H. Flowers, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A229, 536 (1955)
- M. G. Redlich, Phys. Rev. 110, 468 (1958)
- B. H. Flowers and D. Wilmore, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 83, 683 (1964)
- J. M. Soper (private communication)
- G. S. Sidhu and J. B. Gerhart, Phys. Rev. 148, 1024 (1966)
- J. W. Olness, A. R. Poletti, and E. K. Warburton, Phys. Rev. 154, 971 (1967)
- D. H. Wilkinson, in Nuclear Spectroscopy, F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Ed. (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1960), Part B, pp. 852-889
- D. H. Wilkinson, Nucl. Phys. 85, 114 (1966)
- A. R. Poletti, E. K. Warburton, and D. Kurath, Phys. Rev. 155, 1096 (1967)
- T. T. S. Kuo and G. E. Brown, Phys. Letters 18, 54 (1965)
- A. Kallio and K. Kolltviet, Nucl. Phys. 53, 87 (1964)
- H. J. Rose and J. S. Lopes, Phys. Letters 22, 601 (1966)
- E. K. Warburton, Phys. Rev. Letters 1, 68 (1958)
- O. Häusser, H. J. Rose, J. S. Lopes, and R. D. Gill, Phys. Letters 22, 604 (1966)