- Featured in Physics
- Open Access
Quantum Spin Lenses in Atomic Arrays
Phys. Rev. X 7, 031049 – Published 20 September, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031049
Abstract
We propose and discuss quantum spin lenses, where quantum states of delocalized spin excitations in an atomic medium are focused in space in a coherent quantum process down to (essentially) single atoms. These can be employed to create controlled interactions in a quantum light-matter interface, where photonic qubits stored in an atomic ensemble are mapped to a quantum register represented by single atoms. We propose Hamiltonians for quantum spin lenses as inhomogeneous spin models on lattices, which can be realized with Rydberg atoms in 1D, 2D, and 3D, and with strings of trapped ions. We discuss both linear and nonlinear quantum spin lenses: in a nonlinear lens, repulsive spin-spin interactions lead to focusing dynamics conditional to the number of spin excitations. This allows the mapping of quantum superpositions of delocalized spin excitations to superpositions of spatial spin patterns, which can be addressed by light fields and manipulated. Finally, we propose multifocal quantum spin lenses as a way to generate and distribute entanglement between distant atoms in an atomic lattice array.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Synopsis
A Lens to Focus Spins
A quantum bit stored in the spin excitation of an atomic cloud could be “focused” onto the quantum state of a single atom.
See more in Physics
Popular Summary
A formidable challenge in quantum computing is how to interface photons, which transmit information, with stationary qubits, used for storage and manipulation. To convert a photon into a stationary qubit, the photon may be sent into a cloud of atoms, where it is absorbed. This triggers a collective behavior among the atomic spins (known as a spin excitation) that is spread out over many atoms and cannot be manipulated easily. If the spin excitation could be “focused” onto a single atom, the spin (which acts as a qubit) could then be operated on using the well-developed tools of atomic quantum computing. We introduce the concept of a “quantum spin lens” that does just that. It not only focuses the spin excitation of an atomic cloud but also extracts information stored in one atom and sends it elsewhere in the form of photons.
Our description of the spin lens is guided by a close analogy with optical lenses, which focus light and form the essential building blocks of complex imaging systems. We show how the spin lens can be implemented in lattices of atoms by modifying the coupling between atoms with laser light. We study the focusing dynamics of one or more excitations, and even of quantum superpositions of different types of excitations, taking into account interactions between the excitations. By mapping different excitations into different spatial regions, it is possible to address and manipulate them separately, which could be exploited to create highly entangled states of light.
Viewed from a different perspective, quantum spin lenses can be used in coherent quantum spintronics to design and exploit coherent spin transport to achieve spatial focusing of delocalized spin excitations.
Article Text
References (48)
- T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, Quantum Computers, Nature (London) 464, 45 (2010).
- C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, in The Quantum World of Ultra-Cold Atoms and Light Book II: The Physics of Quantum-Optical Devices (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015) pp. 1–524.
- M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum Information with Rydberg Atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010).
- I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbene, Quantum Simulations with Ultracold Quantum Gases, Nat. Phys. 8, 267 (2012).
- P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, J. T. Barreiro, E. Martinez, S. X. Wang, S. Quint, M. F. Brandl, V. Nebendahl, C. F. Roos et al., A Quantum Information Processor with Trapped Ions, New J. Phys. 15, 123012 (2013).
- S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Monroe, Demonstration of a Small Programmable Quantum Computer with Atomic Qubits, Nature (London) 536, 63 (2016).
- P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quasiparticle Engineering and Entanglement Propagation in a Quantum Many-Body System, Nature (London) 511, 202 (2014).
- P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-Local Propagation of Correlations in Quantum Systems with Long-Range Interactions, Nature (London) 511, 198 (2014).
- A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-Based Quantum Networks with Single Atoms and Optical Photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015).
- H. Jeff Kimble, The Quantum Internet, Nature (London) 453, 1023 (2008).
- T. E. Northup and R. Blatt, Quantum Information Transfer Using Photons, Nat. Photonics 8, 356 (2014).
- D. Hucul, I. V. Inlek, G. Vittorini, C. Crocker, S. Debnath, S. M. Clark, and C. Monroe, Modular Entanglement of Atomic Qubits Using Photons and Phonons, Nat. Phys. 11, 37 (2015).
- M. D. Lukin, Colloquium: Trapping and Manipulating Photon States in Atomic Ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 457 (2003).
- K. Hammerer, A. S. Sørensen, and E. S. Polzik, Quantum Interface between Light and Atomic Ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1041 (2010).
- M. D. Eisaman, A. André, F. Massou, M. Fleischhauer, A. S. Zibrov, and M. D. Lukin, Electromagnetically Induced Transparency with Tunable Single-Photon Pulses, Nature (London) 438, 837 (2005).
- L. Lamata, D. R. Leibrandt, I. L. Chuang, J. I. Cirac, M. D. Lukin, V. Vuletić, and S. F. Yelin, Ion Crystal Transducer for Strong Coupling between Single Ions and Single Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 030501 (2011).
- T. Peyronel, O. Firstenberg, Q.-Y. Liang, S. Hofferberth, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Pohl, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletić, Quantum Nonlinear Optics with Single Photons Enabled by Strongly Interacting Atoms, Nature (London) 488, 57 (2012).
- G. Heinze, C. Hubrich, and T. Halfmann, Stopped Light and Image Storage by Electromagnetically Induced Transparency Up to the Regime of One Minute, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 033601 (2013).
- D. Maxwell, D. J. Szwer, D. Paredes-Barato, H. Busche, J. D. Pritchard, A. Gauguet, K. J. Weatherill, M. P. A. Jones, and C. S. Adams, Storage and Control of Optical Photons Using Rydberg Polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 103001 (2013).
- S. Bose, Quantum Communication through Spin Chain Dynamics: An Introductory Overview, Contemp. Phys. 48, 13 (2007).
- K. M. Maller, M. T. Lichtman, T. Xia, Y. Sun, M. J. Piotrowicz, A. W. Carr, L. Isenhower, and M. Saffman, Rydberg-Blockade Controlled-NOT Gate and Entanglement in a Two-Dimensional Array of Neutral-Atom Qubits, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022336 (2015).
- H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de Léséleuc, T. Macrì, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Tunable Two-Dimensional Arrays of Single Rydberg Atoms for Realizing Quantum Ising Models, Nature (London) 534, 667 (2016).
- J. Zeiher, R. van Bijnen, P. Schausz, S. Hild, J.-y. Choi, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Many-Body Interferometry of a Rydberg-Dressed Spin Lattice, Nat. Phys. 12, 1095 (2016).
- Y.-Y. Jau, A. M. Hankin, T. Keating, I. H. Deutsch, and G. W. Biedermann, Entangling Atomic Spins with a Rydberg-Dressed Spin-Flip Blockade, Nat. Phys. 12, 71 (2016).
- N. Henkel, R. Nath, and T. Pohl, Three-Dimensional Roton Excitations and Supersolid Formation in Rydberg-Excited Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 195302 (2010).
- G. Pupillo, A. Micheli, M. Boninsegni, I. Lesanovsky, and P. Zoller, Strongly Correlated Gases of Rydberg-Dressed Atoms: Quantum and Classical Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 223002 (2010).
- A. W. Glaetzle, M. Dalmonte, R. Nath, C. Gross, I. Bloch, and P. Zoller, Designing Frustrated Quantum Magnets with Laser-Dressed Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 173002 (2015).
- R. M. W. van Bijnen and T. Pohl, Quantum Magnetism and Topological Ordering via Rydberg Dressing near Förster Resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 243002 (2015).
- I. Novikova, A. V. Gorshkov, D. F. Phillips, A. S. Sørensen, M. D. Lukin, and R. L. Walsworth, Optimal Control of Light Pulse Storage and Retrieval, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 243602 (2007).
- A. V. Gorshkov, A. André, M. Fleischhauer, A. S. Sørensen, and M. D. Lukin, Universal Approach to Optimal Photon Storage in Atomic Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 123601 (2007).
Sequential mapping of qubits requires transfer of qubits stored in the excited states to another excited state to hide these qubits from the focusing dynamics of the following qubits. Note that these previously stored qubits appear as holes (defects) in the focusing dynamics of the consecutive qubits, as discussed in Sec. 5.
- A. W. Lohmann, Image Rotation, Wigner Rotation, and the Fractional Fourier Transform, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 2181 (1993).
- W. P. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space (Wiley, New York, 2015).
- M. V. Berry, Semi-Classical Mechanics in Phase Space: A Study of Wigner’s Function, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 287, 237 (1977).
- J. P. Bizarro, Weyl-Wigner Formalism for Rotation-Angle and Angular-Momentum Variables in Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3255 (1994).
In contrast to focusing with quench dynamics in a HO, as described above, one could also localize the wave function in an adiabatic ramp of the harmonic oscillator, i.e., by sweeping . An initial Gaussian wave packet, which is matched to represent the HO ground state with with width would then be mapped to the final ground state with width , with time required . Quench dynamics discussed in this paper results in fast focusing , and does not require good knowledge of the initial wave function or control over the applied trapping potential to match the initial wave packet to the HO ground state. In contrast, an adiabatic scheme can be expected to be more robust against imperfect parameters in Hamiltonian Eq. (1).
- M. B. Dahan, E. Peik, J. Reichel, Y. Castin, and C. Salomon, Bloch Oscillations of Atoms in an Optical Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4508 (1996).
- M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Memory for Photons: Dark-State Polaritons, Phys. Rev. A 65, 022314 (2002).
- M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Cold Matter Assembled Atom-by-Atom, arXiv:1607.03044.
- D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An Atom-by-Atom Assembler of Defect-Free Arbitrary 2D Atomic Arrays, Science 354, 1021 (2016).
- R. M. W. van Bijnen, Quantum Engineering with Ultracold Atoms, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2011.
- S. Whitlock, A. W. Glaetzle, and P. Hannaford, Simulating Quantum Spin Models Using Rydberg-Excited Atomic Ensembles in Magnetic Microtrap Arrays, J. Phys. B 50, 074001 (2017).
- D. Barredo, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, and C. S. Adams, Coherent Excitation Transfer in a Spin Chain of Three Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 113002 (2015).
- I. I. Beterov, I. I. Ryabtsev, D. B. Tretyakov, and V. M. Entin, Quasiclassical Calculations of Blackbody-Radiation-Induced Depopulation Rates and Effective Lifetimes of Rydberg , , and Alkali-Metal Atoms with , Phys. Rev. A 79, 052504 (2009).
- M. Marcuzzi, J. Minář, D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, H. Labuhn, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, E. Levi, and I. Lesanovsky, Facilitation Dynamics and Localization Phenomena in Rydberg Lattice Gases with Position Disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 063606 (2017).
- P. W. Anderson, Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
- P. Schauß, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, A. Omran, T. Pohl, C. Gross, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, Observation of Spatially Ordered Structures in a Two-Dimensional Rydberg Gas, Nature (London) 491, 87 (2012).
- T. Caneva, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Chopped Random-Basis Quantum Optimization, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022326 (2011).
