Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Open Access

Quantum Spin Lenses in Atomic Arrays

A. W. Glaetzle1,2,3,4, K. Ender1,2, D. S. Wild5, S. Choi5, H. Pichler6,5, M. D. Lukin5, and P. Zoller1,2,7

  • 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
  • 2Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
  • 3Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117543
  • 4Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
  • 5Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 6ITAMP, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 7Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, 85748 Garching, Germany

Phys. Rev. X 7, 031049 – Published 20 September, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031049

Abstract

We propose and discuss quantum spin lenses, where quantum states of delocalized spin excitations in an atomic medium are focused in space in a coherent quantum process down to (essentially) single atoms. These can be employed to create controlled interactions in a quantum light-matter interface, where photonic qubits stored in an atomic ensemble are mapped to a quantum register represented by single atoms. We propose Hamiltonians for quantum spin lenses as inhomogeneous spin models on lattices, which can be realized with Rydberg atoms in 1D, 2D, and 3D, and with strings of trapped ions. We discuss both linear and nonlinear quantum spin lenses: in a nonlinear lens, repulsive spin-spin interactions lead to focusing dynamics conditional to the number of spin excitations. This allows the mapping of quantum superpositions of delocalized spin excitations to superpositions of spatial spin patterns, which can be addressed by light fields and manipulated. Finally, we propose multifocal quantum spin lenses as a way to generate and distribute entanglement between distant atoms in an atomic lattice array.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Synopsis

A Lens to Focus Spins

Published 20 September, 2017

A quantum bit stored in the spin excitation of an atomic cloud could be “focused” onto the quantum state of a single atom.

See more in Physics

Popular Summary

Article Text

References (48)

  1. T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, Quantum Computers, Nature (London) 464, 45 (2010).
  2. C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, in The Quantum World of Ultra-Cold Atoms and Light Book II: The Physics of Quantum-Optical Devices (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015) pp. 1–524.
  3. M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum Information with Rydberg Atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010).
  4. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbene, Quantum Simulations with Ultracold Quantum Gases, Nat. Phys. 8, 267 (2012).
  5. P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, J. T. Barreiro, E. Martinez, S. X. Wang, S. Quint, M. F. Brandl, V. Nebendahl, C. F. Roos et al., A Quantum Information Processor with Trapped Ions, New J. Phys. 15, 123012 (2013).
  6. S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Monroe, Demonstration of a Small Programmable Quantum Computer with Atomic Qubits, Nature (London) 536, 63 (2016).
  7. P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quasiparticle Engineering and Entanglement Propagation in a Quantum Many-Body System, Nature (London) 511, 202 (2014).
  8. P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-Local Propagation of Correlations in Quantum Systems with Long-Range Interactions, Nature (London) 511, 198 (2014).
  9. A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-Based Quantum Networks with Single Atoms and Optical Photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015).
  10. H. Jeff Kimble, The Quantum Internet, Nature (London) 453, 1023 (2008).
  11. T. E. Northup and R. Blatt, Quantum Information Transfer Using Photons, Nat. Photonics 8, 356 (2014).
  12. D. Hucul, I. V. Inlek, G. Vittorini, C. Crocker, S. Debnath, S. M. Clark, and C. Monroe, Modular Entanglement of Atomic Qubits Using Photons and Phonons, Nat. Phys. 11, 37 (2015).
  13. M. D. Lukin, Colloquium: Trapping and Manipulating Photon States in Atomic Ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 457 (2003).
  14. K. Hammerer, A. S. Sørensen, and E. S. Polzik, Quantum Interface between Light and Atomic Ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1041 (2010).
  15. M. D. Eisaman, A. André, F. Massou, M. Fleischhauer, A. S. Zibrov, and M. D. Lukin, Electromagnetically Induced Transparency with Tunable Single-Photon Pulses, Nature (London) 438, 837 (2005).
  16. L. Lamata, D. R. Leibrandt, I. L. Chuang, J. I. Cirac, M. D. Lukin, V. Vuletić, and S. F. Yelin, Ion Crystal Transducer for Strong Coupling between Single Ions and Single Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 030501 (2011).
  17. T. Peyronel, O. Firstenberg, Q.-Y. Liang, S. Hofferberth, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Pohl, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletić, Quantum Nonlinear Optics with Single Photons Enabled by Strongly Interacting Atoms, Nature (London) 488, 57 (2012).
  18. G. Heinze, C. Hubrich, and T. Halfmann, Stopped Light and Image Storage by Electromagnetically Induced Transparency Up to the Regime of One Minute, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 033601 (2013).
  19. D. Maxwell, D. J. Szwer, D. Paredes-Barato, H. Busche, J. D. Pritchard, A. Gauguet, K. J. Weatherill, M. P. A. Jones, and C. S. Adams, Storage and Control of Optical Photons Using Rydberg Polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 103001 (2013).
  20. S. Bose, Quantum Communication through Spin Chain Dynamics: An Introductory Overview, Contemp. Phys. 48, 13 (2007).
  21. K. M. Maller, M. T. Lichtman, T. Xia, Y. Sun, M. J. Piotrowicz, A. W. Carr, L. Isenhower, and M. Saffman, Rydberg-Blockade Controlled-NOT Gate and Entanglement in a Two-Dimensional Array of Neutral-Atom Qubits, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022336 (2015).
  22. H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de Léséleuc, T. Macrì, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Tunable Two-Dimensional Arrays of Single Rydberg Atoms for Realizing Quantum Ising Models, Nature (London) 534, 667 (2016).
  23. J. Zeiher, R. van Bijnen, P. Schausz, S. Hild, J.-y. Choi, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Many-Body Interferometry of a Rydberg-Dressed Spin Lattice, Nat. Phys. 12, 1095 (2016).
  24. Y.-Y. Jau, A. M. Hankin, T. Keating, I. H. Deutsch, and G. W. Biedermann, Entangling Atomic Spins with a Rydberg-Dressed Spin-Flip Blockade, Nat. Phys. 12, 71 (2016).
  25. N. Henkel, R. Nath, and T. Pohl, Three-Dimensional Roton Excitations and Supersolid Formation in Rydberg-Excited Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 195302 (2010).
  26. G. Pupillo, A. Micheli, M. Boninsegni, I. Lesanovsky, and P. Zoller, Strongly Correlated Gases of Rydberg-Dressed Atoms: Quantum and Classical Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 223002 (2010).
  27. A. W. Glaetzle, M. Dalmonte, R. Nath, C. Gross, I. Bloch, and P. Zoller, Designing Frustrated Quantum Magnets with Laser-Dressed Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 173002 (2015).
  28. R. M. W. van Bijnen and T. Pohl, Quantum Magnetism and Topological Ordering via Rydberg Dressing near Förster Resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 243002 (2015).
  29. I. Novikova, A. V. Gorshkov, D. F. Phillips, A. S. Sørensen, M. D. Lukin, and R. L. Walsworth, Optimal Control of Light Pulse Storage and Retrieval, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 243602 (2007).
  30. A. V. Gorshkov, A. André, M. Fleischhauer, A. S. Sørensen, and M. D. Lukin, Universal Approach to Optimal Photon Storage in Atomic Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 123601 (2007).
  31. Sequential mapping of qubits requires transfer of qubits stored in the excited states |e to another excited state |e to hide these qubits from the focusing dynamics of the following qubits. Note that these previously stored qubits appear as holes (defects) in the focusing dynamics of the consecutive qubits, as discussed in Sec. 5.

  32. A. W. Lohmann, Image Rotation, Wigner Rotation, and the Fractional Fourier Transform, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 2181 (1993).
  33. W. P. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space (Wiley, New York, 2015).
  34. M. V. Berry, Semi-Classical Mechanics in Phase Space: A Study of Wigner’s Function, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 287, 237 (1977).
  35. J. P. Bizarro, Weyl-Wigner Formalism for Rotation-Angle and Angular-Momentum Variables in Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3255 (1994).
  36. In contrast to focusing with quench dynamics in a HO, as described above, one could also localize the wave function in an adiabatic ramp of the harmonic oscillator, i.e., by sweeping ωωf. An initial Gaussian wave packet, which is matched to represent the HO ground state with ω with width would then be mapped to the final ground state with width f/mωf, with time required 1/ω. Quench dynamics discussed in this paper results in fast focusing tf1/ω, and does not require good knowledge of the initial wave function or control over the applied trapping potential to match the initial wave packet to the HO ground state. In contrast, an adiabatic scheme can be expected to be more robust against imperfect parameters in Hamiltonian Eq. (1).

  37. M. B. Dahan, E. Peik, J. Reichel, Y. Castin, and C. Salomon, Bloch Oscillations of Atoms in an Optical Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4508 (1996).
  38. M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Memory for Photons: Dark-State Polaritons, Phys. Rev. A 65, 022314 (2002).
  39. M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Cold Matter Assembled Atom-by-Atom, arXiv:1607.03044.
  40. D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An Atom-by-Atom Assembler of Defect-Free Arbitrary 2D Atomic Arrays, Science 354, 1021 (2016).
  41. R. M. W. van Bijnen, Quantum Engineering with Ultracold Atoms, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2011.
  42. S. Whitlock, A. W. Glaetzle, and P. Hannaford, Simulating Quantum Spin Models Using Rydberg-Excited Atomic Ensembles in Magnetic Microtrap Arrays, J. Phys. B 50, 074001 (2017).
  43. D. Barredo, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, and C. S. Adams, Coherent Excitation Transfer in a Spin Chain of Three Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 113002 (2015).
  44. I. I. Beterov, I. I. Ryabtsev, D. B. Tretyakov, and V. M. Entin, Quasiclassical Calculations of Blackbody-Radiation-Induced Depopulation Rates and Effective Lifetimes of Rydberg ns, np, and nd Alkali-Metal Atoms with n80, Phys. Rev. A 79, 052504 (2009).
  45. M. Marcuzzi, J. Minář, D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, H. Labuhn, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, E. Levi, and I. Lesanovsky, Facilitation Dynamics and Localization Phenomena in Rydberg Lattice Gases with Position Disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 063606 (2017).
  46. P. W. Anderson, Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
  47. P. Schauß, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, A. Omran, T. Pohl, C. Gross, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, Observation of Spatially Ordered Structures in a Two-Dimensional Rydberg Gas, Nature (London) 491, 87 (2012).
  48. T. Caneva, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Chopped Random-Basis Quantum Optimization, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022326 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation