- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review X

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Open Access

Ultrafast Demagnetization Measurements Using Extreme Ultraviolet Light: Comparison of Electronic and Magnetic Contributions

Chan La-O-Vorakiat*, Emrah Turgut, Carson A. Teale, Henry C. Kapteyn, and Margaret M. Murnane

Stefan Mathias† and Martin Aeschlimann

Claus M. Schneider

Justin M. Shaw, Hans T. Nembach, and T. J. Silva

  • Department of Physics and JILA, and NSF Engineering Research Center in Extreme Ultraviolet Science and Technology, University of Colorado and NIST, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA

  • University of Kaiserslautern and Research Center OPTIMAS, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany

  • Peter Grünberg Institute, PGI-6, Research Center Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany

  • Electromagnetics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA

  • *Corresponding author. Chan.La-o-vorakiat@Colorado.EDU
  • †Corresponding author. smathias@physik.uni-kl.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. X 2, 011005 – Published 23 January, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.011005

Abstract

Ultrashort pulses of extreme ultraviolet light from high-harmonic generation are a new tool for probing coupled charge, spin, and phonon dynamics with element specificity, attosecond pump-probe synchronization, and time resolution of a few femtoseconds in a tabletop apparatus. In this paper, we address an important question in magneto-optics that has implications for understanding magnetism on the fastest time scales: Is the signal from the transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect at the M2,3 edges of a magnetic material purely magnetic or is it perturbed by nonmagnetic artifacts? Our measurements demonstrate conclusively that transverse magneto-optical Kerr measurements at the M2,3 edges sensitively probe the magnetic state, with almost negligible contributions from the transient variation of the refractive index by the nonequilibrium hot-electron distribution. In addition, we compare pump-probe demagnetization dynamics measured by both high harmonics and conventional visible-wavelength magneto-optics and find that the measured demagnetization times are in agreement.

View figure in article

Viewpoint

Spin-Sensitive Optics

Published 23 January, 2012

Advances in a magneto-optical technique will allow researchers to better understand how to control spins in a metal with short optical pulses.

See more in Physics

Popular Summary

Femtomagnetism explores how fast magnetic materials can magnetize or demagnetize—timescales that depend on the coupled motions of charges, spins, atoms, and phonons in materials. While still relatively young, this research area is vibrant, thanks in no small measure to laser-based magneto-optical techniques, which are used to induce, and probe, ultrafast (de)magnetization dynamics. Ultrafast x-ray pulses can probe element-specific dynamics, providing rich new information not accessible using visible light. However, until very recently, only large-scale synchrotron and x-ray free-electron laser facilities could view element-specific dynamics in magnetic materials, with time resolutions of about 100 femtoseconds. Is there another route to femtomagnetism that is small scale, more accessible, and capable of capturing the fastest dynamics in magnetic materials? In this work that uses broad-bandwidth ultrafast x-rays from a tabletop high-harmonic laser source to probe magnetic materials, we demonstrate unequivocally that the answer is “yes.”

In a recent paper, we showed that ultrafast high harmonics with photon energies in the range of 40 to 70 eV can probe how fast the magnetization in a ferromagnetic material can be destroyed. However, two important issues remained open. First, were the measured changes in the intensity of the reflected harmonic beams due only to a change in the magnetic alignment of the material after its interaction with a laser, or did the signal also contain contributions due to excited electrons created by the laser? Such nonmagnetic artifacts are known to influence all time-resolved magnetic probe techniques to date. Second, the time resolution was limited by the experimental geometry, so the limiting speed of demagnetization was not known. In the present work, our team addressed both questions conclusively to show that the intensity of the reflected high-harmonic light is only sensitive to the magnetic (spin) state of the material, with no contributions from excited charges or phonons. We have also been able to measure how fast the magnetization in a material can be destroyed, with a temporal resolution of less than 20 femtoseconds, and with elemental specificity.

This work paves the way to the most accurate measurements of magnetic dynamics and interactions in complex materials.

Comments & Replies

Comment on “Ultrafast Demagnetization Measurements Using Extreme Ultraviolet Light: Comparison of Electronic and Magnetic Contributions”

Boris Vodungbo, Julien Gautier, Guillaume Lambert, Philippe Zeitoun, and Jan Lüning
Phys. Rev. X 3, 038001 (2013)

Reply to “Comment on ‘Ultrafast Demagnetization Measurements Using Extreme Ultraviolet Light: Comparison of Electronic and Magnetic Contributions’ ”

Emrah Turgut, Patrik Grychtol, Chan La-O-Vorakiat, Daniel E. Adams, Henry C. Kapteyn, Margaret M. Murnane, Stefan Mathias, Martin Aeschlimann, Claus M. Schneider, Justin M. Shaw, Hans T. Nembach, and Thomas J. Silva
Phys. Rev. X 3, 038002 (2013)

Article Text

References (32)

  1. E. Beaurepaire, J. C. Merle, A. Daunois, and J. Y. Bigot, Ultrafast Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250 (1996).
  2. B. Koopmans, in Spin Dynamics in Confined Magnetic Strucures II, edited by B. Hillebrands and K. Ounadjela (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003).
  3. M. Cinchetti, M. Sanchez Albaneda, D. Hoffmann, T. Roth, J.-P Wuestenberg, M. Krauss, O. Andreyev, H. C. Schneider, M. Bauer, and M. Aeschlimann, Spin-Flip Processes and Ultrafast Magnetization Dynamics in Co: Unifying the Microscopic and Macroscopic View of Femtosecond Magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 177201 (2006).
  4. B. Koopmans, G. Malinowski, F. Dalla Longa, D. Steiauf, M. Faehnle, T. Roth, M. Cinchetti, and M. Aeschlimann, Explaining the Paradoxical Diversity of Ultrafast Laser-Induced Demagnetization, Nature Mater. 9, 259 (2010).
  5. M. Krauss, T. Roth, S. Alebrand, D. Steil, M. Cinchetti, M. Aeschlimann, and H. C. Schneider, Ultrafast Demagnetization of Ferromagnetic Transition Metals: The Role of the Coulomb Interaction, Phys. Rev. B 80, 180407 (2009).
  6. G. P. Zhang and W. Hübner, Laser-Induced Ultrafast Demagnetization in Ferromagnetic Metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3025 (2000).
  7. J. Y. Bigot, M. Vomir, and E. Beaurepaire, Coherent Ultrafast Magnetism Induced by Femtosecond Laser Pulses, Nature Phys. 5, 515 (2009).
  8. M. Battiato, K. Carva, and P. M. Oppeneer. Superdiffusive Spin Transport as a Mechanism of Ultrafast Demagnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 027203 (2010).
  9. A. B. Schmidt M. Pickel, M. Donath, P. Buczek, A. Ernst, V. P. Zhukov, P. M. Echenique, L. M. Sandratskii, E. V. Chulkov, and M. Weinelt, Ultrafast Magnon Generation in an Fe Film on Cu(100), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 197401 (2010).
  10. B. Y. Mueller, T. Roth, M. Cinchetti, M. Aeschlimann, and B. Rethfeld, Driving Force of Ultrafast Magnetization Dynamics, New J. Phys. 13, 123010 (2011).
  11. B. Koopmans, M. van Kampen, J. T. Kohlhepp, and W. J. M. de Jonge, Ultrafast Magneto-Optics in Nickel: Magnetism or Optics?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 844 (2000).
  12. L. Guidoni, E. Beaurepaire, and J. Y. Bigot, Magneto-Optics in the Ultrafast Regime: Thermalization of Spin Populations in Ferromagnetic Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 017401 (2002).
  13. J. Y. Bigot, L. Guidoni, E. Beaurepaire, and P. Saeta, Femtosecond Spectrotemporal Magneto-Optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 077401 (2004).
  14. P. M. Oppeneer and A. Liebsch, Ultrafast Demagnetization in Ni: Theory of Magneto-Optics for Non-Equilibrium Electron Distributions, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16, 5519 (2004).
  15. G. P. Zhang, W. Hübner, G. Lefkidis, Y. Bai, and T. F. George, Paradigm of the Time-Resolved Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect for Femtosecond Magnetism, Nature Phys. 5, 499 (2009).
  16. K. Carva, D. Legut, and P. M Oppeneer, Influence of Laser-Excited Electron Distributions on the X-Ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spectra: Implications for Femtosecond Demagnetization in Ni, Europhys. Lett. 86, 57002 (2009).
  17. K. Carva, M. Battiato, and P. M. Oppeneer, Is the Controversy over Femtosecond Magneto-Optics Really Solved?, Nature Phys. 7, 665 (2011).
  18. C. Stamm, T. Kachel, N. Pontius, R. Mitzner, T. Quast, K. Holldack, S. Khan, C. Lupulescu, E. F. Aziz, M. Wietstruk, H. A. Dürr, and W. Eberhardt, Femtosecond Modification of Electron Localization and Transfer of Angular Momentum in Nickel, Nature Mater. 6, 740 (2007).
  19. I. Radu, K. Vahaplar, C. Stamm, T. Kachel, N. Pontius, H. A. Dürr, T. A. Ostler, J. Barker, R. F. L. Evans, R. W. Chantrell, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, A. Kirilyuk, Th. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, Transient Ferromagnetic-Like State Mediating Ultrafast Reversal of Antiferromagnetically Coupled Spins, Nature (London) 472, 205 (2011).
  20. C. La-O-Vorakiat, M. Siemens, M. M. Murnane, H. C. Kapteyn, S. Mathias, M. Aeschlimann, P. Grychtol, R. Adam, C. M. Schneider, J. M. Shaw, H. Nembach, and T. J. Silva, Ultrafast Demagnetization Dynamics at the M Edges of Magnetic Elements Observed Using a Tabletop High-Harmonic Soft X-Ray Source, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 257402 (2009).
  21. T. Popmintchev, M.-C. Chen, P. Arpin, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, The Attosecond Nonlinear Optics of Bright Coherent X-Ray Generation, Nature Photon. 4, 822 (2010).
  22. A. Rundquist, C. G. Durfee, Z. H. Chang, C. Herne, S. Backus, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, Phase-Matched Generation of Coherent Soft X-Rays, Science 280, 1412 (1998).
  23. 3D Warehouse, http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/search?uq=0774178905215056886102796&scoring=m. Mention of commercial products is for illustration only; it does not imply National Institute of Standards and Technology recommendation or endorsement, nor does it imply that the products illustrated are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
  24. H. Hochst, D. Rioux, D. Zhao, and D. L. Huber, Magnetic Linear Dichroism Effects in Reflection Spectroscopy: A Case Study at the Fe   M2,3 Edge, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 7584 (1997).
  25. M. Hecker, P. M. Oppeneer, S. Valencia, H.-Ch. Mertins, and C. M. Schneider, Soft X-Ray Magnetic Reflection Spectroscopy at the 3p Absorption Edges of Thin Fe Films, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 144-147, 881 (2005).
  26. M. Pretorius, J. Friedrich, A. Ranck, M. Schroeder, J. Voss, V. Wedemeier, D. Spanke, D. Knabben, I. Rozhko, H. Ohldag, F. U. Hillebrecht, and E. Kisker, Transverse Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect of Fe at the Fe 3p Threshold, Phys. Rev. B 55, 14133 (1997).
  27. J. Hohlfeld, S.-S. Wellershoff, J. Güdde, U. Conrad, V. Jähnke, and E. Matthias, Electron and Lattice Dynamics Following Optical Excitation of Metals, Chem. Phys. 251, 237 (2000).
  28. E. Gullikson, X-Ray Interactions with Matter, http://henke.lbl.gov/optical_constants/.
  29. R. I. Tobey, M. E. Siemens, O. Cohen, M. M. Murnane, H. C. Kapteyn, and K. Nelson, Ultrafast Extreme Ultraviolet Holography: Dynamic Monitoring of Surface Deformation, Opt. Lett. 32, 286 (2007).
  30. R. C. Weast, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1986), 67th ed., p. E-43.
  31. N. Soga, Comparison of Measured and Predicted Bulk Moduli of Tantalum and Tungsten at High Temperatures, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 3416 (1966). The speed of the longitudinal wave (νl) is calculated from the reported elastic constant (c11, 2602 kbar), density (ρ, 16.626  g/cm3) and the relation νl=c11ρ: L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1986), Vol. 7, 3rd ed..
  32. F. Dalla Longa, J. T. Kohlhepp, W. J. M. de Jonge, and B. Koopmans, Influence of Photon Angular Momentum on Ultrafast Demagnetization in Nickel, Phys. Rev. B 75, 224431 (2007).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. X 2, 011005– Published 23 January, 2012
  • Received 26 October 2011
Article part of CHORUS
Creative Commons Logo

This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation