- Open Access
Student reasoning in hydrodynamics: Bernoulli’s principle versus the continuity equation
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 010147 – Published 29 June, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010147
Abstract
We report on an investigation of student thinking about steady-state pipe flow of an incompressible fluid. About 250 undergraduate engineering students were given a test consisting of two hydrodynamics questions, combining multiple-choice format with subsequent open-ended explanations. There is substantial evidence that students have difficulty applying and prioritizing the two basic principles of mass conservation (expressed in the continuity equation) and energy conservation (i.e., Bernoulli’s equation). When faced with questions that involve gravity, dissipative effects (“friction”), or a visible pressure drop, a considerable number of students did not invoke the continuity equation in situations where applying it is a necessary step for arriving at the correct answer. Instead, even after lecture instruction on this topic, many of the first-year students based their answers on ill-supported assumptions about local pressures. Some of them used formal arguments from a simplified Bernoulli equation (“lower pressure means higher velocity”), while others based their answer on intuitive arguments (“higher pressure leads to higher velocity”). We also found reasoning based on analogies to single-particle motion (“flow velocity decreases when flowing upwards or friction is present”). Contrary to other researchers, we did not see any evidence for the hypothesis that students think of water as a compressible fluid. Instead, students’ answers often indicate a lack of understanding of the conservation of mass or its implications for incompressible fluids or of the role that this principle plays in the context of fluid flow. In addition, our data indicate that some students have more general difficulties in describing and reasoning about technical situations, such as applying equations containing multiple variables, distinguishing spatial differences in a quantity from its changes with respect to time, or realizing the meaning of idealizations. We also present some evidence that different levels of activation of students during instruction influence the prevalence of these difficulties and discuss some implications for instruction.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (32)
- B. E. Faulkner and F. M. Ytreberg, Understanding Bernoulli’s principle through simulations, Am. J. Phys. 79, 214 (2011).
- A. Rahman, A blended learning approach to teach fluid mechanics in engineering, Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 42, 252 (2017).
- A. Samsudin, N. Fratiwi, N. Amin, Wiendartun, Supriyatman, F. Wibowo, M. Faizin, and B. Costu, Improving students’ conceptions on fluid dynamics through peer teaching model with PDEODE (PTM-PDEODE), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1013, 012040 (2018).
- J. Martin, J. Mitchell, and T. Newell, Development of a concept inventory for fluid mechanics, in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference 2003, T3D–23 Westminster Colorado (IEEE, Stipes Publishing L.L.C, Champaign, 2003).
- J. K. Martin, J. Mitchell, and T. Newell, Work in progress: Analysis of reliability of the fluid mechanics concept inventory, in Proceedings of the 34th Annual Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference 2004, F1F–3 Savannah (IEEE, Bellingham, WA, 2004).
- B. M. Olds, R. A. Streveler, R. L. Miller, and M. A. Nelson, Preliminary results from the development of a concept inventory in thermal and transport science, in Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 9.1003.1 Salt Lake City (ASEE, Washington D.C., 2004).
- M. Watson, A. Mills, K. Bower, K. Brannan, M. Woo, and R. Welch, Refinement of a concept inventory to assess conceptual understanding in civil engineering fluid mechanics, in Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 26.1322.1 Seattle (ASEE, Washington D.C., 2015).
- S. A. Brown, K. Beddoes, D. Montfort, and A. Baghdanov, Engineering students fluid mechanics misconceptions: A description and theoretical explanation, Int. J. Eng. Educ. 33, 1149 (2017).
- A. Suarez, S. Kahan, G. Zavala, and A. C. Marti, Students conceptual difficulties in hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020132 (2017).
- L. C. McDermott and P. S. Shaffer, Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part i: Investigation of student understanding, Am. J. Phys. 60, 994 (1992).
- C. Schäfle and C. Kautz, Students’ reasoning in fluid dynamics: Bernoulli’s principle vs the continuity equation, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Physics Teaching in Engineering Education, Delft, The Netherlands 2019 (The Hague University of Applied Sciences, Delft) (to be published).
- C. Schäfle and C. Kautz, Students’ reasoning in fluid dynamics: Bernoulli’s principle vs the continuity equation, contributed poster, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Washington D.C. (AIP, New York, 2018).
- H. Pfundt and R. Duit, Students’ alternative frameworks and science education: Bibliography, available at https://archiv.ipn.uni-kiel.de/stcse, Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel, Germany (1994).
- D. Hammer, Student resources for learning introductory physics, Am. J. Phys. 68, S52 (2000).
- A. A. DiSessa, Towards an epistemology of physics, Cognit. Instr. 10, 105 (1993).
- J. Minstrell, Facets of students’ knowledge and relevant instruction, in Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies, in Proceedings of an International Workshop, edited by R. Duit, F. Goldberg, and H. Niedderer (Institute for Science Education, Germany, 1992).
- P. R. Heron, Empirical investigations of learning and teaching, Part I: Examining and interpreting student thinking, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi Vol. 156 (IOS Press, Amsterdam, NL, 2004), p. 341.
- L. C. McDermott, Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: Physics education research: The key to student learning, Am. J. Phys. 69, 1127 (2001).
- P. A. Tipler and G. Mosca, Physics for Scientists and Engineers (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 2008), p. 443.
- D. Hestenes, M. Wells, and G. Swackhammer, Force Concept Inventory, Phys. Teach. 30, 141 (1992).
- G. M. Novak, E. T. Patterson, A. D. Gavrin, and W. Christian, Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1999).
- E. Mazur, Peer instruction: A user’s manual (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997).
- M. Loverude, P. Heron, and C. Kautz, Identifying and addressing student difficulties with hydrostatic pressure, Am. J. Phys. 78, 75 (2010).
- M. T. Chi, J. D. Slotta, and N. De Leeuw, From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts, Learn. Instr. 4, 27 (1994).
- C. H. Kautz, P. R. Heron, M. E. Loverude, and L. C. McDermott, Student understanding of the ideal gas law, Part i: A macroscopic perspective, Am. J. Phys. 73, 1055 (2005).
- A. A. DiSessa, Why conceptual ecology is a good idea, in Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in Theory and Practice (Springer, New York, 2002), p. 28.
- C. H. Kautz and G. Schmitz, Probing student understanding of basic concepts and principles in introductory engineering thermodynamics, in ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, New York, 2008), p. 473.
- P. S. Shaffer and L. C. McDermott, A research-based approach to improving student understanding of the vector nature of kinematical concepts, Am. J. Phys. 73, 921 (2005).
- R. R. Hake, Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, Am. J. Phys. 66, 64 (1998).
- S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 8410 (2014).
- L. C. McDermott, Millikan lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned: Closing the gap, Am. J. Phys. 59, 301 (1991).
- L. C. McDermott, P. S. Shaffer, and Physics Education Group, Tutorials in Introductory Physics, prelim. ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997).
