Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of multi-occupancy traps on the diffusion and retention of multiple hydrogen isotopes in irradiated tungsten and vanadium

Sanjeet Kaur1,*, Daniel R. Mason1, Prashanth Srinivasan1, Stephen Dixon1, Sid Mungale1, Teresa Orr1, Mikhail Yu. Lavrentiev1, and Duc Nguyen-Manh1,2

  • 1UK Atomic Energy Authority, Culham Campus, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3DB, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: sanjeet.kaur@ukaea.uk

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 125404 – Published 24 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nbwm-bs8m

Abstract

We propose a computational scheme for the diffusion and retention of multiple hydrogen isotopes (HI) with multi-occupancy traps parametrized by first principles calculations. We show that it is often acceptable to reduce the complexity of the coupled differential equations for gas evolution by taking the dynamic steady state, a generalization of the Oriani equilibrium for multiple isotopes and multi-occupancy traps. The effective gas diffusivity varies most with mobile fraction when the total gas concentration approximates the trap density. We show HI binding to a monovacancy in vanadium produces a nonmonotonic dependence between diffusivity and gas concentration, unlike the tungsten system. We demonstrate the difference between multiple single occupancy traps and multi-occupancy traps in long-term diffusion dynamics. The applicability of the multi-occupancy, multi-isotope model in steady state is assessed by comparison to an isotope exchange experiment between hydrogen and deuterium in self-ion irradiated tungsten. The vacancy distribution is estimated with molecular dynamics, and the retention across sample depth shows good agreement with experiment using no fitting parameters.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. M. Rubel, Fusion neutrons: Tritium breeding and impact on wall materials and components of diagnostic systems, J. Fusion Energy 38, 315 (2019).
  2. M. R. Gilbert, S. L. Dudarev, S. Zheng, L. W. Packer, and J. C. Sublet, An integrated model for materials in a fusion power plant: Transmutation, gas production, and helium embrittlement under neutron irradiation, Nucl. Fusion 52, 083019 (2012).
  3. B. D. Wirth, K. Nordlund, D. G. Whyte, and D. Xu, Fusion materials modeling: Challenges and opportunities, Mater. Res. Soc. Bulletin 36, 216 (2011).
  4. C. N. Taylor, Hydrogen and its detection in fusion and fission nuclear materials–a review, J. Nucl. Mater. 558, 153396 (2022).
  5. R. A. Oriani, The physical and metallurgical aspects of hydrogen in metals, Fusion Technol. 26, 235 (1994).
  6. M. Coleman and M. Kovari, Global Supply of Tritium for Fusion R&D from Heavy Water Reactors, Technical Report IAEA-CN-258: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2018.
  7. R. J. Pearson, A. B. Antoniazzi, and W. J. Nuttall, Tritium supply and use: A key issue for the development of nuclear fusion energy, Fusion Eng. Des. 136, 1140 (2018).
  8. M. Abdou, M. Riva, A. Ying, C. Day, A. Loarte, L. R. Baylor, P. Humrickhouse, T. F. Fuerst, and S. Cho, Physics and technology considerations for the deuterium–tritium fuel cycle and conditions for tritium fuel self sufficiency, Nucl. Fusion 61, 013001 (2021).
  9. A. Ibarra, F. Arbeiter, D. Bernardi, W. Krolas, M. Cappelli, U. Fischer, R. Heidinger, F. Marin-Fuertes, G. Micciché, A. Muñoz, and F. S. Nitti, The European approach to the fusion-like neutron source: The IFMIF-DONES project, Nucl. Fusion 59, 065002 (2019).
  10. S. Markelj, O. V. Ogorodnikova, P. Pelicon, T. Schwarz-Selinger, K. Sugiyama, and I. Čadež, Study of thermal hydrogen atom interaction with undamaged and self-damaged tungsten, J. Nucl. Mater. 438, S1027 (2013).
  11. M. Wilde, S. Ohno, S. Ogura, K. Fukutani, and H. Matsuzaki, Quantification of hydrogen concentrations in surface and interface layers and bulk materials through depth profiling with nuclear reaction analysis, J. Visualized Exp. 109, 53452 (2016).
  12. C. W. M. Castleton, A. Hoglund, and S. Mirbt, Density functional theory calculations of defect energies using supercells, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17, 084003 (2009).
  13. A. McNabb and K. Foster, A new analysis of diffusion of hydrogen in iron and ferritic steels, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 227, 618 (1963).
  14. R. Delaporte-Mathurin, J. Dark, G. Ferrero, E. A. Hodille, V. Kulagin, and S. Meschini, FESTIM: An open-source code for hydrogen transport simulations, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 63, 786 (2024).
  15. P. C. A. Simon, C. T. Icenhour, G. Singh, A. D. Lindsay, C. Bhave, L. Yang, A. Riet, and Y. Che, MOOSE-based tritium migration analysis program, version 8 (TMAP8) for advanced open-source tritium transport and fuel cycle modeling, Fusion Eng. Des. 214, 114874 (2025).
  16. K. Heinola, T. Ahlgren, K. Nordlund, and J. Keinonen, Hydrogen interaction with point defects in tungsten, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094102 (2010).
  17. N. Fernandez, Y. Ferro, and D. Kato, Hydrogen diffusion and vacancies formation in tungsten: Density functional theory calculations and statistical models, Acta Mater. 94, 307 (2015).
  18. J. Hou, X. S. Kong, X. Wu, J. Song, and C. S. Liu, Predictive model of hydrogen trapping and bubbling in nanovoids in bcc metals, Nat. Mater. 18, 833 (2019).
  19. W. T. Geng, L. Wan, J. P. Du, A. Ishii, N. Ishikawa, H. Kimizuka, and S. Ogata, Hydrogen bubble nucleation in α-iron, Scr. Mater. 134, 105 (2017).
  20. M. Zibrov and K. Schmid, Reaction–diffusion simulations of hydrogen isotope trapping and release from cavities in tungsten, I: Single cavity, Nucl. Mater. Energy 30, 101121 (2022).
  21. E. A. Hodille, Y. Ferro, N. Fernandez, C. S. Becquart, T. Angot, J. M. Layet, R. Bisson, and C. Grisolia, Study of hydrogen isotopes behavior in tungsten by a multi trapping macroscopic rate equation model, Phys. Scr. T167, 014011 (2016).
  22. K. Schmid, U. von Toussaint, and T. Schwarz-Selinger, Transport of hydrogen in metals with occupancy dependent trap energies, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 116, 134901 (2014).
  23. X. Chen, Y. Zhang, L. Wei, Q. Zheng, C. Zhang, and Y. Li, Cluster dynamics modeling of hydrogen retention and desorption in tungsten with saturation and multi-trapping effect of sinks, Nucl. Fusion 64, 096037 (2024).
  24. J. Hou, X. Kong, W. Hu, H. Deng, D. Nguyen-Manh, and J. Song, Deuterium trapping and desorption by vacancy clusters in irradiated Mo from object kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, Acta Mater. 274, 120014 (2024).
  25. R. H. Ning, Y. G. Li, W. H. Zhou, and Z. Zeng, An improved cluster dynamics model for hydrogen retention in tungsten, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 23, 1250042 (2012).
  26. C. Grisolia, Plasma material interaction in tokamak: The contribution of WEST and of laboratory studies, in, EPJ Web Conf. 115, 01005 (2016).
  27. L. Harbour, G. Giudicelli, A. D. Lindsay, P. German, J. E. Hansel, C. T. Icenhour, M. Li, J. M. Miller, R. H. Stogner, and P. Behne, 3.0 - MOOSE: Enabling massively parallel multiphysics simulations, SoftwareX 26, 101690 (2024).
  28. G. H. Vineyard, Frequency factors and isotope effects in solid state rate processes, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 3, 121 (1957).
  29. G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. Jónsson, A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901 (2000).
  30. A. F. Voter, Introduction to the kinetic Monte Carlo method, in Radiation Effects in Solids, edited by K. E. Sickafus, E. A. Kotomin, and B. P. Uberuaga, NATO Science Series, Vol. 235 (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2007), pp. 1–23.
  31. K. Heinola and T. Ahlgren, Hydrogen retention to impurities in tungsten: A multi-scale study, J. Nucl. Mater. 438, S1001 (2013).
  32. E. W. Weisstein, Gershgorin circle theorem, https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GershgorinCircleTheorem.html.
  33. K. Heinola and T. Ahlgren, First-principles study of H on the reconstructed W(100) surface, Phys. Rev. B 81, 073409 (2010).
  34. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994).
  35. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  36. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  37. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  38. M. Methfessel and A. T. Paxton, High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals, Phys. Rev. B 40, 3616 (1989).
  39. K. Ohsawa, K. Eguchi, H. Watanabe, M. Yamaguchi, and M. Yagi, Configuration and binding energy of multiple hydrogen atoms trapped in monovacancy in bcc transition metals, Phys. Rev. B 85, 094102 (2012).
  40. L. J. Gui, Y. L. Liu, W. T. Wang, S. Jin, Y. Zhang, G. H. Lu, and J. E. Yao, First-principles investigation on vacancy trapping behaviors of hydrogen in vanadium, J. Nucl. Mater. 442, S688 (2013).
  41. R. A. Oriani, The diffusion and trapping of hydrogen in steel, Acta Metall. 18, 147 (1970).
  42. K. Schmid, J. Bauer, T. Schwarz-Selinger, S. Markelj, U. von Toussaint, A. Manhard, and W. Jacob, Recent progress in the understanding of H transport and trapping in W, Phys. Scr. T170, 014037 (2017).
  43. J. B. J. Chapman, M. R. Gilbert, and D. Nguyen-Manh, Ab initio investigation into the stability of hydrogen isotopes (protium, deuterium, and tritium) in α-Fe and dilute FeCr alloys, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 035401 (2025).
  44. M. Boleininger, D. R. Mason, A. E. Sand, and S. L. Dudarev, Microstructure of a heavily irradiated metal exposed to a spectrum of atomic recoils, Sci. Rep. 13, 1684 (2023).
  45. S. Markelj, A. Založnik, T. Schwarz-Selinger, O. V. Ogorodnikova, P. Vavpetič, P. Pelicon, and I. Čadež, In situ NRA study of hydrogen isotope exchange in self-ion damaged tungsten exposed to neutral atoms, J. Nucl. Mater. 469, 133 (2016).
  46. G. A. Somorjai and Y. Li, Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2010).
  47. O. V. Ogorodnikova, J. Roth, and M. Mayer, Deuterium retention in tungsten in dependence of the surface conditions, J. Nucl. Mater. 313–316, 469 (2003).
  48. S. Nagata and K. Takahiro, Effect of carbon and oxygen enriched layer on retention and release of deuterium implanted in tungsten and molybdenum, Phys. Scr. T94, 106 (2001).
  49. X. Hu, T. Koyanagi, M. Fukuda, Y. Katoh, L. L. Snead, and B. D. Wirth, Defect evolution in single crystalline tungsten following low temperature and low dose neutron irradiation, J. Nucl. Mater. 470, 278 (2016).
  50. X. Yi, M. L. Jenkins, M. A. Kirk, Z. Zhou, and S. G. Roberts, In-situ TEM studies of 150keVW+ ion irradiated W and W-alloys: Damage production and microstructural evolution, Acta Mater. 112, 105 (2016).
  51. D. R. Mason, D. Nguyen-Manh, V. W. Lindblad, F. Granberg, and M. Y. Lavrentiev, An empirical potential for simulating hydrogen isotope retention in highly irradiated tungsten, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35, 495901 (2023).
  52. A. De Backer, D. R. Mason, C. Domain, D. Nyugen-Manh, M. C. Marinica, L. Ventelon, C. S. Becquart, and S. L. Dudarev, Multiscale of the interaction of hydrogen with interstitial defects and dislocations in bcc tungsten, Nucl. Fusion 58, 016006 (2018).
  53. D. Terentyev, V. Dubinko, A. Bakaev, Y. Zayachuk, V. Van Renterghem, and P. Grigorev, Dislocations mediate hydrogen retention in tungsten, Nucl. Fusion 54, 042004 (2014).
  54. Z. Yu and H. Xu, Dislocation loop bias and void swelling in irradiated α-iron from mesoscale and atomistic simulations, Commun. Mater. 4, 29 (2023).
  55. O. V. Ogorodnikova, Yu Gasparyan, V. Efimov, Ł. Ciupiński, and J. Grzonka, Annealing of radiation-induced damage in tungsten under and after irradiation with 20 MeV self-ions, J. Nucl. Mater. 451, 379 (2014).
  56. J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, and J. P. Biersack, SRIM - the stopping and range of ions in matter, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 268, 1818 (2010).
  57. D. R. Mason, F. Granberg, M. Boleininger, T. Schwarz-Selinger, K. Nordlund, and S. L. Dudarev, Parameter-free quantitative simulation of high-dose microstructure and hydrogen retention in ion-irradiated tungsten, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 095403 (2021).
  58. J. Zavašnik, A. Šestan, T. Schwarz-Selinger, K. Hunger, E. Lu, F. Tuomisto, and K. Nordlund, Microstructural analysis of tungsten single crystals irradiated by MeV W ions: The effect of irradiation dose and temperature, Mater. Charact. 224, 115050 (2025).
  59. E. A. Hodille, N. Fernandez, Z. A. Piazza, M. Ajmalghan, and Y. Ferro, Hydrogen supersaturated layers in H/D plasma-loaded tungsten: A global model based on thermodynamics, kinetics and density functional theory data, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 093802 (2018).
  60. S. Kaur and D. R. Mason, The effect of multi-occupancy traps on the diffusion and retention of multiple hydrogen isotopes in irradiated tungsten and vanadium, Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17492671.
  61. E. Anderson and Z. Bai, LAPACK Users' Guide 3rd ed. (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1999).
  62. M. V. Pattabhiraman, The generalized Rayleigh quotient, Can. Math. Bull. 17, 251 (1974).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation