- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Materials

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

First-principles theory of direct-gap optical emission in hexagonal Ge and its enhancement via strain engineering

Christopher A. Broderick1,2,3,*, Xie Zhang4, Mark E. Turiansky1, and Chris G. Van de Walle1

  • *Contact author: christopher.broderick@ucc.ie
PDF

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 044603 – Published 21 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4m4m-84p3

Abstract

The emergence of hexagonal Ge (2H-Ge) as a candidate direct-gap group-IV semiconductor for Si photonics mandates a rigorous understanding of its optoelectronic properties. Theoretical predictions of a “pseudodirect” band gap, characterized by weak oscillator strength, contrast with a claimed high radiative recombination coefficient B comparable to conventional (cubic) InAs. We compute B in 2H-Ge from first principles and quantify its dependence on temperature, carrier density, and strain. For unstrained 2H-Ge, our calculated spontaneous emission spectra corroborate that measured photoluminescence corresponds to direct-gap emission, but with B being approximately three orders of magnitude lower than in InAs. We confirm a pseudodirect-to-direct-gap transition under ∼2% [0001] uniaxial tension, which can enhance B by up to 3 orders of magnitude, making it comparable to that of InAs. Beyond quantifying the strong enhancement of B via strain engineering, our analysis suggests the dominance of additional, as-yet unquantified recombination mechanisms in this nascent material.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (35)

  1. Z. Zhou, X. Ou, Y. Fang, E. Alkhazraji, R. Xu, Y. Wan, and J. E. Bowers, Prospects and applications of on-chip lasers, eLight 3, 1 (2023).
  2. R. Geiger, T. Zabel, and H. Sigg, Group IV direct band gap photonics: methods, challenges, and opportunities, Front. Mater. 2, 52 (2015).
  3. H. I. T. Hauge, S. Conesa-Boj, M. A. Verheijen, S. Koelling, and E. P. A. M. Bakkers, Single-crystalline hexagonal silicon–germanium, Nano Lett. 17, 85 (2017).
  4. A. De and C. E. Pryor, Electronic structure and optical properties of Si, Ge and diamond in the lonsdaleite phase, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 045801 (2014).
  5. C. Rödl, J. Furthmüller, J. R. Suckert, V. Armuzza, F. Bechstedt, and S. Botti, Accurate electronic and optical properties of hexagonal germanium for optoelectronic applications, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 034602 (2019).
  6. E. M. T. Fadaly, A. Dijkstra, J. R. Suckert, D. Ziss, M. A. J. van Tilburg, C. Mao, Y. Ren, V. T. van Lange, K. Korzun, S. Kölling, et al., Direct-bandgap emission from hexagonal Ge and SiGe alloys, Nature (London) 580, 205 (2020).
  7. M. A. J. van Tilburg, R. Farina, V. T. van Lange, W. H. J. Peeters, S. Meder, M. M. Jansen, M. A. Verheijen, M. Vettori, J. J. Finley, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, et al., Stimulated emission from hexagonal silicon-germanium nanowires, Commun. Phys. 7, 328 (2024).
  8. J. R. Suckert, C. Rödl, J. Furthmüller, F. Bechstedt, and S. Botti, Efficient strain-induced light emission in lonsdaleite germanium, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 024602 (2021).
  9. C. D. Thurmond, The standard thermodynamic functions for the formation of electrons and holes in Ge, Si, GaAs, and GaP, J. Electrochem. Soc. 122, 1133 (1975).
  10. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  11. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  12. F. Tran and P. Blaha, Accurate band gaps of semiconductors and insulators with a semilocal exchange-correlation potential Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 226401 (2009).
  13. J.-X. Shen, D. Steiauf, A. McAllister, G. Shi, E. Kioupakis, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van de Walle, Impact of phonons and spin-orbit coupling on Auger recombination in InAs, Phys. Rev. B 100, 155202 (2019).
  14. I. Vurgaftman and J. R. Meyer, Band parameters for III–V compound semiconductors and their alloys, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5815 (2001).
  15. P. T. Landsberg, Recombination in Semiconductors (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).
  16. L. H. G. Tizei, M. R. Fiorentin, T. Dursap, T. M. van den Berg, M. Túnica, M. Palummo, M. Kociak, L. Vincent, and M. Amato, Optical absorption in hexagonal-diamond Si and Ge nanowires: Insights from STEM-EELS experiments and ab initio theory, Nano Lett. 25, 8604 (2025).
  17. M. Gajdoš, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, and F. Bechstedt, Linear optical properties in the projector-augmented wave methodology, Phys. Rev. B 73, 045112 (2006).
  18. C.-S. Chang, S. L. Chuang, J. R. Minch, W.-C. W. Fang, Y. K. Chen, and T. Tanbun-Ek, Amplified spontaneous emission spectroscopy in strained quantum-well lasers, IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 1, 1100 (1995).
  19. I. P. Marko, C. A. Broderick, S.-R. Jin, P. Ludewig, W. Stolz, K. Volz, J. M. Rorison, E. P. O'Reilly, and S. J. Sweeney, Optical gain in GaAsBi/GaAs quantum well diode lasers, Sci. Rep. 6, 28863 (2016).
  20. C. Murphy, E. P. O'Reilly, and C. A. Broderick, Theory and optimisation of radiative recombination in broken-gap InAs/GaSb superlattices, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 57, 035103 (2024).
  21. X. Zhang, J.-X. Shen, W. Wang, and C. G. Van de Walle, First-principles analysis of radiative recombination in lead-halide perovskites, ACS Energy Lett. 3, 2329 (2018).
  22. J. Hader, S. C. Liebscher, J. V. Moloney, and S. W. Koch, Intrinsic carrier losses in tellurium due to radiative and Auger recombinations, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 192103 (2022).
  23. M. A. J. van Tilburg, W. H. J. Peeters, M. Vettori, V. T. van Lange, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and J. E. M. Haverkort, Polarized emission from hexagonal-silicon–germanium nanowires, J. Appl. Phys. 133, 065702 (2023).
  24. J. Hader, J. V. Moloney, and S. W. Koch, Supression of carrier recombination in semiconductor lasers by phase-space filling, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 201112 (2005).
  25. J. Hader, J. V. Moloney, and S. W. Koch, Beyond the ABC: Carrier recombination in semiconductor lasers, Proc. SPIE 6115, 61151T (2006).
  26. C. H. Grein, M. E. Flatté, J. T. Olesberg, S. A. Anson, L. Zhang, and T. F. Boggess, Auger recombination in narrow-gap semiconductor superlattices incorporating antimony, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 7311 (2002).
  27. V. T. van Lange, A. Dijkstra, E. M. T. Fadaly, W. H. J. Peeters, M. A. J. van Tilburg, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, F. Bechstedt, J. J. Finley, and J. E. M. Haverkort, Nanosecond carrier lifetime of hexagonal Ge, ACS Photonics 11, 4258 (2024).
  28. W. J. H. Willem-Jan Berghuis, M. A. J. van Tilburg, W. H. J. Peeters, V. T. van Lange, R. Farina, E. M. T. Fadaly, E. C. M. Renirie, R. J. Theeuwes, M. A. Verheijen, B. Macco, et al., Low surface recombination in hexagonal SiGe alloy nanowires: Implications for SiGe-based nanolasers, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 7, 2343 (2024).
  29. E. M. T. Fadaly, A. Marzegalli, Y. Ren, L. Sun, A. Dijkstra, D. de Matteis, E. Scalise, A. Sarikov, M. De Luca, R. Rurali, et al., Unveiling planar defects in hexagonal group IV materials, Nano Lett. 21, 3619 (2021).
  30. S. Imhof, A. Thränhardt, A. Chernikov, M. Koch, N. S. Köster, K. Kolata, S. Chatterjee, S. W. Koch, X. Lu, S. R. Johnson, et al., Clustering effects in Ga(AsBi), Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 131115 (2010).
  31. A. K. Ramdas and S. Rodriguez, Spectroscopy of the solid-state analogues of the hydrogen atom: Donors and acceptors in semiconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 44, 1297 (1981).
  32. M. Keller, A. Belabbes, J. Furthmüller, F. Bechstedt, and S. Botti, First-principles insight in structure-property relationships of hexagonal Si and Ge polytypes, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 064601 (2023).
  33. M. Túnica, A. Zobelli, and M. Amato, Acceptor and donor impurity levels in hexagonal-diamond silicon, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 114601 (2024).
  34. F. Zhang, V. H. Crespi, and P. Zhang, Prediction that uniaxial tension along 〈111〉 produces a direct band gap in germanium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 156401 (2009).
  35. P. Martín, A. Cano, I. García, and I. Rey-Stolle, Review of intrinsic vs extrinsic recombination in germanium thermophotovoltaic converters, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 291, 113741 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 044603– Published 21 April, 2026
  • Received 24 September 2025
  • Accepted 12 March 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation